Protective activity of Ticagrelor against bacterial infection in acute myocardial infarction patients

Propensity-matched analysis of the protective effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on the risk of developing Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

OBJECTIVE

Recent data indicate that ticagrelor, used in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has antibacterial effects against Staphylococcus sp. and other effects that may help management of infection. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of ticagrelor in patients who have had an ACS event and the risk of developing Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) compared to a propensity-matched cohort receiving clopidogrel.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, nationwide analysis of all patients presenting to any percutaneous coronary intervention-performing Veterans Affairs Medical Center with an ACS episode and resultant prescription for clopidogrel or ticagrelor. The primary outcome was the comparative rate of SAB in patients receiving ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel.

RESULTS

Analysis involved 24 456 patients on ticagrelor and 277 277 patients on clopidogrel. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients developing SAB between the propensity-matched groups (32 [0.13%] of 24 456 for ticagrelor vs. 71 [0.29%] of 24 456 for clopidogrel; odds ratio (OR), 0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.28-0.65; P<0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that receipt of clopidogrel, comorbid dermatologic condition, comorbid hematologic condition, and baseline anemia were independently associated with the development of SAB.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings align with recent reports that ticagrelor may have a beneficial role in the prevention of SAB.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia treatment outcomes in patients receiving ticagrelor vs a propensity-matched cohort receiving clopidogrel

OBJECTIVES

Ticagrelor may improve the outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). However, treatment outcome data for these patients remain limited. The primary objective of this study was to characterize the outcomes of patients with SAB who received ticagrelor compared with a cohort who received clopidogrel.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, nationwide propensity-matched analysis of patients with SAB who were prescribed ticagrelor or clopidogrel concomitantly with antistaphylococcal therapy. The primary outcome was the comparative all-cause 30-day mortality rate between propensity-matched groups.

RESULTS

In total, 1509 patients were prescribed concomitantly with ticagrelor or clopidogrel during treatment of S. aureus bacteraemia; of these, 194 patients were excluded from this study due to an inadequate number of antiplatelet doses within the first week of therapy (n=171) or non-admission to hospital (n=23). Of the remaining 1315 patients, 74 patients received ticagrelor and 1241 patients received clopidogrel. There was no significant difference in all-cause 30-day mortality between the groups [6/74 (8.1%) in the ticagrelor group vs 10/74 (13.5%) in the clopidogrel group; P=0.29]. Multi-variate logistic regression demonstrated that elevated aspartate aminotransferase, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, elevated serum creatinine and neurological comorbidity were independently associated with all-cause 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no difference in all-cause 30-day mortality between the two groups, although overall mortality appeared to be lower compared with other reports. Randomized controlled trials of P2Y12 inhibitors as adjunctive agents to antibiotic therapy for the treatment of serious S. aureus infections are warranted.