In silico studies and fluorescence binding assays of potential anti-prion compounds reveal an important binding site for prion inhibition from PrP(C) to PrP(Sc)

Small Molecules with Anti-Prion Activity

Prion pathologies are fatal neurodegenerative diseases caused by the misfolding of the physiological Prion Protein (PrP^C) into a β-structure-rich isoform called PrP^Sc. To date, there is no available cure for prion diseases and just a few clinical trials have been carried out. The initial approach in the search of anti-prion agents had PrP^Sc as a target, but the existence of different prion strains arising from alternative conformations of PrP^Sc, limited the efficacy of the ligands to a straindependent ability. That has shifted research to PrP^C ligands, which either act as chaperones, by stabilizing the native conformation, or inhibit its interaction with PrP^Sc. The role of transition-metal mediated oxidation processes in prion misfolding has also been investigated. Another promising approach is the indirect action via other cellular targets, like membrane domains or the Protein- Folding Activity of Ribosomes (PFAR). Also, new prion-specific high throughput screening techniques have been developed. However, so far no substance has been found to be able to extend satisfactorily survival time in animal models of prion diseases. This review describes the main features of the Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) of the various chemical classes of anti-prion agents.

BMD42-2910, a Novel Benzoxazole Derivative, Shows a Potent Anti-prion Activity and Prolongs the Mean Survival in an Animal Model of Prion Disease

Prion diseases are a group of neurodegenerative and fatal central nervous system disorders. The pathogenic mechanism involves the conversion of cellular prion protein (PrP^C) to an altered scrapie isoform (PrP^Sc), which accumulates in amyloid deposits in the brain. However, no therapeutic drugs have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials. We previously reported that BMD42-29, a synthetic compound discovered in silico, is a novel anti-prion compound that inhibits the conversion of PrP^C to protease K (PK)-resistant PrP^Sc fragments (PrP^res). In the present study, 14 derivatives of BMD42-29 were obtained from BMD42-29 by modifying in the side chain by in silico feedback, with the aim to determine whether they improve anti-prion activity. These derivatives were assessed in a PrP^Sc-infected cell model and some derivatives were further tested using real time-quaking induced conversion (RT-QuIC). Among them, BMD42-2910 showed high anti-prion activity at low concentrations in vitro and also no toxic effects in a mouse model. Interestingly, abundant PrP^res was reduced in brains of mice infected with prion strain when treated with BMD42-2910, and the mice survived longer than control mice and even that treated with BMD42-29. Finally, high binding affinity was predicted in the virtual binding sites (Asn159, Gln 160, Lys194, and Glu196) when PrP^C was combined with BMD-42-2910. Our findings showed that BMD42-2910 sufficiently reduces PrP^res generation in vitro and in vivo and may be a promising novel anti-prion compound.

Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study on the Binding and Stabilization Mechanism of Antiprion Compounds to the "Hot Spot" Region of PrPC

Structural transitions in the prion protein from the cellular form, PrP^C, into the pathological isoform, PrP^Sc, are regarded as the main cause of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, also known as prion diseases. Hence, discovering and designing effective antiprion drugs that can inhibit PrP^C to PrP^Sc conversion is regarded as a promising way to cure prion disease. Among several strategies to inhibit PrP^C to PrP^Sc conversion, stabilizing the native PrP^C via specific binding is believed to be one of the valuable approaches and many antiprion compounds have been reported based on this strategy. However, the detailed mechanism to stabilize the native PrP^C is still unknown. As such, to unravel the stabilizing mechanism of these compounds to PrP^C is valuable for the further design and discovery of antiprion compounds. In this study, by molecular dynamics simulation method, we investigated the stabilizing mechanism of several antiprion compounds on PrP^C that were previously reported to have specific binding to the "hot spot" region of PrP^C. Our simulation results reveal that the stabilization mechanism of specific binding compounds can be summarized as (I) to stabilize both the flexible C-terminal of α2 and the hydrophobic core, such as BMD42-29 and GN8; (II) to stabilize the hydrophobic core, such as J1 and GJP49; (III) to stabilize the overall structure of PrP^C by high binding affinity, as NPR-056. In addition, as indicated by the H-bond analysis and decomposition analysis of binding free energy, the residues N159 and Q160 play an important role in the specific binding of the studied compounds and all these compounds interact with PrP^C in a similar way with the key interacting residues L130 in the β1 strand, P158, N159, Q160, etc. in the α1-β2 loop, and H187, T190, T191, etc. in the α2 C-terminus although the compounds have large structural difference. As a whole, our obtained results can provide some insights into the specific binding mechanism of main antiprion compounds to the "hot spot" region of PrP^C at the molecular level and also provide guidance for effective antiprion drug design in the future.

The compound (3-{5-[(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)amino]-1,3,4-thiadiazolidin-2-yl}-5,8-methoxy-2H-chromen-2-one) inhibits the prion protein conversion from PrPC to PrPSc with lower IC50 in ScN2a cells

Prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative disorders of the central nervous system characterized by the accumulation of a protease resistant form (PrP^Sc) of the cellular prion protein (PrP^C) in the brain. Two types of cellular prion (PrP^C) compounds have been identified that appear to affect prion conversion are known as Effective Binders (EBs) and Accelerators (ACCs). Effective binders shift the balance in favour of PrP^C, whereas Accelerators favour the formation of PrP^Sc. Molecular docking indicates EBs and ACCs both bind to pocket-D of the SHaPrP^C molecule. However, EBs and ACCs may have opposing effects on the stability of the salt bridge between Arg¹⁵⁶ and Glu¹⁹⁶/Glu²⁰⁰. Computational docking data indicate that the hydrophobic benzamide group of the EB, GFP23 and the 1-(3,3-dimethylcyclohexylidene)piperidinium group of the ACC, GFP22 play an important role in inhibition and conversion from SHaPrP^C to SHaPrP^Sc, respectively. Experimentally, NMR confirmed the amide chemical shift perturbations observed upon the binding of GFP23 to pocket-D of SHaPrP^C. Consistent with its role as an ACC, titration of GFP22 resulted in widespread chemical shift changes and signal intensity loss due to protein unfolding. Virtual screening of a ligand database using the molecular scaffold developed from the set of EBs identified six of our compounds (previously studied using fluorescence quenching) as being among the top 100 best binders. Among them, compounds 5 and 6 were found to be particularly potent in decreasing the accumulation SHaPrP^Sc in ScN2a cells with an IC₅₀ of ∼35µM and 20µM.

Prion disease: experimental models and reality

The understanding of the pathogenesis and mechanisms of diseases requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving clinical observation, correlation to pathological processes, and modelling of disease mechanisms. It is an inherent challenge, and arguably impossible to generate model systems that can faithfully recapitulate all aspects of human disease. It is, therefore, important to be aware of the potentials and also the limitations of specific model systems. Model systems are usually designed to recapitulate only specific aspects of the disease, such as a pathological phenotype, a pathomechanism, or to test a hypothesis. Here, we evaluate and discuss model systems that were generated to understand clinical, pathological, genetic, biochemical, and epidemiological aspects of prion diseases. Whilst clinical research and studies on human tissue are an essential component of prion research, much of the understanding of the mechanisms governing transmission, replication, and toxicity comes from in vitro and in vivo studies. As with other neurodegenerative diseases caused by protein misfolding, the pathogenesis of prion disease is complex, full of conundra and contradictions. We will give here a historical overview of the use of models of prion disease, how they have evolved alongside the scientific questions, and how advancements in technologies have pushed the boundaries of our understanding of prion biology.