Design of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligands using the (het)Aryl-1,2,3-triazole core: Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and SAR studies

Discovery of triazole-bridged aryl adamantane analogs as an intriguing class of multifunctional agents for treatment of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive brain disorder associated with slow loss of brain functions leading to memory failure and modest changes in behavior. The multifactorial neuropathological condition is due to a depletion of cholinergic neurons and accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques. Recently, a multi-target-directed ligand (MTDL) strategy has emerged as a robust drug discovery tool to overcome current challenges. In this research work, we aimed to design and develop a library of triazole-bridged aryl adamantane analogs for the treatment of AD. All synthesized analogs were characterized and evaluated through various in vitro and in vivo biological studies. The optimal compounds 32 and 33 exhibited potent inhibitory activities against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (32 - IC50 = 0.086 μM; 33 - 0.135 μM), and significant Aβ aggregation inhibition (20 μM). N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (GluN1-1b/GluN2B subunit combination) antagonistic activity of compounds 32 and 33 measured upon heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes showed IC50 values of 3.00 μM and 2.86 μM, respectively. The compounds possessed good blood-brain barrier permeability in the PAMPA assay and were safe for SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma (10 μM) and HEK-293 cell lines (30 μM). Furthermore, in vivo behavioral studies in rats demonstrated that both compounds improved cognitive and spatial memory impairment at a dose of 10 mg/kg oral administration. Together, our findings suggest triazole-bridged aryl adamantane as a promising new scaffold for the development of anti-Alzheimer's drugs.

An Overview of 1,2,3-triazole-Containing Hybrids and Their Potential Anticholinesterase Activities

Acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmitter of the cholinergic system in the brain is involved in learning, memory, stress responses, and cognitive functioning. It is hydrolyzed into choline and acetic acid by two key cholinesterase enzymes, viz., acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). A loss or degeneration of cholinergic neurons that leads to a reduction in ACh levels is considered a significant contributing factor in the development of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Numerous studies have shown that cholinesterase inhibitors can raise the level of ACh and, therefore, enhance people's quality of life, and, at the very least, it can temporarily lessen the symptoms of NDs. 1,2,3-triazole, a five-membered heterocyclic ring, is a privileged moiety, that is, a central scaffold, and is capable of interacting with a variety of receptors and enzymes to exhibit a broad range of important biological activities. Recently, it has been clubbed with other pharmacophoric fragments/molecules in hope of obtaining potent and selective AChE and/or BuChE inhibitors. The present updated review succinctly summarizes the different synthetic strategies used to synthesize the 1,2,3-triazole moiety. It also highlights the anticholinesterase potential of various 1,2,3-triazole di/trihybrids reported in the past seven years (2015-2022), including a rationale for hybridization and with an emphasis on their structural features for the development and optimization of cholinesterase inhibitors to treat NDs.

Exploring the Chemistry and Therapeutic Potential of Triazoles: A Comprehensive Literature Review

:

Triazole is a valuable platform in medicinal chemistry, possessing assorted pharmacological properties, which could play a major role in the common mechanisms associated with various disorders like cancer, infections, inflammation, convulsions, oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. Structural modification of this scaffold could be helpful in the generation of new therapeutically useful agents. Although research endeavors are moving towards the growth of synthetic analogs of triazole, there is still a lot of scope to achieve drug discovery break-through in this area. Upcoming therapeutic prospective of this moiety has captured the attention of medicinal chemists to synthesize novel triazole derivatives. The authors amalgamated the chemistry, synthetic strategies and detailed pharmacological activities of the triazole nucleus in the present review. Information regarding the marketed triazole derivatives has also been incorporated. The objective of the review is to provide insights to designing and synthesizing novel triazole derivatives with advanced and unexplored pharmacological implications.

Synthesis of Novel Antiproliferative 1,2,3-triazole Hybrids Using the Molecular Hybridisation Approach

A series of nine novel 1,2,3-triazole-chalcone derivatives were designed using the molecular hybridisation approach and synthesised by click chemistry. Most of the synthesised compounds exhibited moderate to good antiproliferative activity against oesophagus, gastric and neuroendocrine cancer cell lines, but a compound containing a p-bromo group in the A ring and a [(4,5-dihydrothiazol-2-yl)thio]methyl group attached at the 4-position of a p-[3-(1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propyloxy] group in the B ring showed the highest activity with an IC50 value of 8.16 μM against neuroendocrine cancer cells. The structure activity relationships of all nine compounds were discussed.

Varying Chirality Across Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes: Selective Binding of Quinuclidine Triazole Compounds

The novel quinuclidine anti-1,2,3-triazole derivatives T1-T6 were designed based on the structure of QND8. The binding studies revealed that the stereochemistry at the C3 position of the quinuclidine scaffold plays an important role in the nAChR subtype selectivity. Whereas the (R)-enantiomers are selective to α7 over α4β2 (by factors of 44-225) and to a smaller degree over α3β4 (3-33), their (S)-counterparts prefer α3β4 over α4β2 (62-237) as well as over α7 (5-294). The (R)-derivatives were highly selective to α7 over α3β4 subtypes compared to (RS)- and (R)-QND8. The (S)-enantiomers are 5-10 times more selective to α4β2 than their (R) forms. The overall strongest affinity is observed for the (S)-enantiomer binding to α3β4 (K_i, 2.25-19.5 nM) followed by their (R)-counterpart binding to α7 (K_i, 22.5-117 nM), with a significantly weaker (S)-enantiomer binding to α4β2 (K_i, 414-1980 nM) still above the very weak respective (R)-analogue affinity (K_i, 5059-10436 nM).