Unexpected identification of two interstitial deletions in a patient with a pericentric inversion of a chromosome 4 and an abnormal phenotype

Familial 4p Interstitial Deletion Provides New Insights and Candidate Genes Underlying This Rare Condition

Chromosome 4p deletions can lead to two distinct phenotypic outcomes: Wolf-–Hirschhorn syndrome (a terminal deletion at 4p16.3) and less frequently reported proximal interstitial deletions (4p11-p16). Proximal 4p interstitial deletions can result in mild to moderate intellectual disability, facial dysmorphisms, and a tall thin body habitus. To date, only 35 cases of proximal 4p interstitial deletions have been reported, and only two of these cases have been familial. The critical region for this syndrome has been narrowed down to 4p15.33-15.2, but the underlying causative genes remain unclear. In this study, we report the case of a 3-year-old female with failure to thrive, developmental and motor delays, and morphological features. The mother also had a 4p15.2-p14 deletion, and the proband was found to have a 13.4-Mb 4p15.2-p14 deletion by chromosome microarray analysis. The deleted region encompasses 16 genes, five of which have a high likelihood of contributing to the phenotype: PPARGC1A, DHX15, RBPJ, STIM2, and PCDH7. These findings suggest that multiple genes are involved in this rare proximal 4p interstitial deletion syndrome. This case highlights the need for healthcare providers to be aware of proximal 4p interstitial deletions and the potential phenotypic manifestations.

A boy with 13.34-Mb interstitial deletion of chromosome 4p15: A new case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

To date, >40 cases have been described with interstitial deletions involving the 4p15 region.

PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS

We report a case of a 3-year-old boy with an interstitial de novo deletion of approximately 13.34 Mb in 4p15.1-15.31 having mild developmental delay and multiple minor congenital abnormalities.

LESSONS

This case presents a clinical manifestation that is similar but not identical to other reported cases. In this report, we have provided a detailed description of a 3-year-old patient with an interstitial 4p deletion and mildly affected phenotype. We discuss the possible involvement of SLIT2, KCNIP4, and LGI2 in cortical development and RBPJ in skeletal abnormalities.

SNP array and FISH analysis of a proband with a 22q13.2- 22qter duplication shed light on the molecular origin of the rearrangement

Background

In about one third of healthy subjects, the microscopic analysis of chromosomes reveals heteromorphisms with no clinical implications: for example changes in size of the short arm of acrocentric chromosomes. In patients with a pathological phenotype, however, a large acrocentric short arm can mask a genomic imbalance and should be investigated in more detail. We report the first case of a chromosome 22 with a large acrocentric short arm masking a partial trisomy of the distal long arm, characterized by SNP array. We suggest a possible molecular mechanism underlying the rearrangement.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 15-year-old dysmorphic girl with low grade psychomotor retardation characterized by a karyotype with a large acrocentric short arm of one chromosome 22.

Cytogenetic analysis revealed a normal karyotype with a very intense Q-fluorescent and large satellite on the chromosome 22 short arm. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis showed a de novo partial trisomy of the 22q13.2-qter chromosome region attached to the short arm of chromosome 22. SNP-array analysis showed that the duplication was 8.5 Mb long and originated from the paternal chromosome. Haplotype analysis revealed that the two paternal copies of the distal part of chromosome 22 have the same haplotype and, therefore, both originated from the same paternal chromosome 22. A possible molecular mechanism that could explain this scenario is a break-induced replication (BIR) which is involved in non-reciprocal translocation events.

Conclusion

The combined use of FISH and SNP arrays was crucial for a better understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying this rearrangement. This strategy could be applied for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying cryptic chromosomal rearrangements.

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo proximal interstitial deletion of chromosome 4p (4p15.2→p14)

We present prenatal diagnosis of de novo proximal interstitial deletion of chromosome 4p (4p15.2→p14) and molecular cytogenetic characterization of the deletion using uncultured amniocytes. We review the phenotypic abnormalities of previously reported patients with similar proximal interstitial 4p deletions, and we discuss the functions of the genes of RBPJ, CCKAR, STIM2, PCDH7 and ARAP2 that are deleted within this region.

Interstitial deletions of the short arm of chromosome 4 in a patient with mental retardation and focal seizure

Interstitial deletion of the proximal short arm of chromosome 4 has rarely been described. This defect is associated with variable clinical manifestations, including mental retardation, unusual facial appearance, and minor limb abnormalities. We describe a girl diagnosed with moderate mental retardation and seizures with an interstitial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 4 [46, XX, del(4)(p12p15.2)].

A 2.1 Mb deletion adjacent but distal to a 14q21q23 paracentric inversion in a family with spherocytosis and severe learning difficulties

A familial q21.1q23.2-inversion on chromosome 14 that co-segregated with spherocytosis and learning difficulties or mild mental retardation was extensively investigated by bacterial artificial chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridization and array-comparative genomic hybridization. As expected, a deletion of the beta-spectrin gene SPTB, a known cause of spherocytosis, was found. More unexpectedly, this deletion was approximately 1.6 Mb distal to the 14q23.2-inversion breakpoint. The deletion spanned approximately 2.1 Mb and contained 15 annotated genes in addition to SPTB, among them PLEKHG3, a guanide nucleotide exchange factor for Rho GTPases. This gene is highly expressed in the brain and our best candidate for causing the mild mental retardation. The case illustrates that inversions can be associated with microdeletions close to but not including one of the inversion breakpoints.

Is gene discovery research or diagnosis?

The criteria that distinguish human genetic research from clinical molecular diagnosis are frequently practical rather than theoretical. They are driven by the availability and costs of the relevant technologies and the systemic level of scientific fluency in interpreting laboratory results. The guiding principle in the practice of medicine is the primacy of patient care. In the service of this overarching goal the defining characteristic of clinical diagnosis is the definition of the disease entity, even when no immediate treatment is possible. For heritable disorders caused by single-gene defects, identifying the putative causal variant is the goal of molecular diagnostics. Current technologies, costs, and standards of institutional infrastructure have not typically permitted novel gene discovery to be performed within the realm of the clinical laboratory. Discovery is usually funded by self-defined research organizations and carried out by self-defined research personnel with the primary intent of publishing findings in research journals. However, exponential improvements in technological capabilities and the concurrent decline in associated costs seem poised to recast this landscape, bringing to clinical medicine some activities now considered research. Even whole genome resequencing of individual patient DNA is within clinical reach in the foreseeable future.