Neuropathy in Wolfram syndrome

A Pair of Siblings With Wolfram Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and Treatment Options

Wolfram syndrome (WS) is a rare genetic disorder typically characterized by juvenile onset diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, hearing loss, diabetes insipidus, and neurodegeneration. There would be a high index of clinical suspicion for WS when clinical manifestations of type 1 diabetes and optic atrophy present together. Genetic analysis is often required to confirm the diagnosis. We describe a pair of Chinese siblings diagnosed with WS at ages 20 and 24 years, respectively. DNA sequencing of the WFS1 gene which encodes for Wolframin ER Transmembrane Glycoprotein identified a heterozygous nonsense variant NM_006005.3: c.1999C>T p.(Gln667*) and a heterozygous missense variant c.2170C>T p.(Pro724Ser) in exon 8 of the gene for both siblings. There is no curative treatment for WS and management of this debilitating disease is aimed at treating individual clinical manifestations, slowing disease progression, and improving quality of life. Treatment with liraglutide, a glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonist, and tauroursodeoxycholic acid was started for the younger sibling, the proband. There was reduction in insulin requirements and improvement in glycemic control. The other sibling was not offered liraglutide due to her complex treatment regimen for end-organ failure. Genetic testing is a valuable tool to detect WS early to allow precise and prompt diagnosis, thereby facilitating the coordinated care from a multidisciplinary team of clinicians.

Different clinical entities of the same mutation: a case report of three sisters with Wolfram syndrome and efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy

OBJECTIVES

Wolfram syndrome (WS) is a rarely seen autosomal recessive multisystem neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the WFS1 gene.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three sisters with WS had diabetes mellitus (DM) at 4 years of age and optic atrophy. In addition, the first case had hearing impairment, and the second case had diabetes insipidus and urinary incontinence. Linagliptin was administered to the first case as add-on therapy to intensive insulin treatment 15 years after the onset of DM, and her insulin need showed a dramatic decrease. The third case had a remission phase one month after the onset of DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in cases with the same mutation, symptoms and findings may widely vary in WS. Remission of diabetes has rarely been reported in WS. Also, this report describes the first trial of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in a patient with WS which provided a decrease in exogenous insulin need.

Bladder dysfunction in Wolfram syndrome is highly prevalent and progresses to megacystis

AIM

Wolfram syndrome is a rare genetic defect in WFS1 or WSF2(CISD2). It includes diabetes mellitus and insipidis, sensorineural deafness, optic atrophy, but not bladder dysfunction. However, this has appeared a common finding in our national referral clinic, and we sought to quantify this problem.

METHODS

Data were collected from a multidisciplinary team managing all Wolfram patients in the UK. The following was analyzed: age, date of non-invasive urodynamics (NIU), symptoms, bladder capacity, voided volume, post-void residual and uroflow pattern. Bladder capacity was given as percentage predicted bladder capacity (PBC). Bladders were divided into normal, overactive (OAB), and underactive (UAB). Symptoms, bladder behavior, and genotyping were correlated. Data were expressed as median (interquartile range).

MAIN RESULTS

Forty patients with Wolfram syndrome were identified, and 38 underwent NIU. This showed normal bladder function (n=4), OAB (n=9), UAB (n=25). Symptoms were present in only 11 children. The different patterns of bladder behavior (OAB vs. normal vs. UAB) were significantly associated with different %PBC (36 (29-59)% vs. 105 (93-233)% vs. 100 (77.5-337)%; p<0.001), and percentage emptying (100 (80-100)% vs. 100 (87-100)% vs. 69 (48-93)%; p<0.05). There was no association of genotype, symptoms and bladder behavior. Patients with megacystis were older: [13.4 (9.7-16.1) vs. 15.4 (13.9-18.7) years; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Bladder dysfunction is very common in Wolfram syndrome (~90%), but most children cope (symptoms ~30%). With time there is a significant progression to megacystis, which may represent an underlying neuropathic myogenic failure and is likely to require intervention in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II (National cohort study of prognosis).

WFS1 variants in Finnish patients with diabetes mellitus, sensorineural hearing impairment or optic atrophy, and in suicide victims

Mutations in the wolframin gene, WFS1, cause Wolfram syndrome, a rare recessive neurodegenerative disorder. The clinical features include early-onset bilateral optic atrophy (OA), diabetes mellitus (DM), diabetes insipidus, hearing impairment, urinary tract abnormalities and psychiatric illness, and, furthermore, WFS1 variants appear to be associated with non-syndromic DM and hearing impairment. Variation of WFS1 was investigated in Finnish subjects consisting 182 patients with DM, 117 patients with sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI) and 44 patients with OA, and in 95 suicide victims. Twenty-two variants were found in the coding region of WFS1, including three novel nonsynonymous variants. The frequency of the p.[His456] allele was significantly higher in the patients with SNHI (11.5%; corrected P=0.00008), DM (6.6%; corrected P=0.036) or OA (9.1%; corrected P=0.043) than that in the 285 controls (3.3%). The frequency of the p.[His611] allele was 55.8% in the patients with DM being higher than that in the controls (47%; corrected P=0.039). The frequencies of p.[His456] and p.[His611] were similarly increased in an independent group of patients with DM (N=299). The results support previous findings that genetic variation of WFS1 contributes to the risk of DM and SNHI.

Reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS)

Background

Wolfram syndrome (WFS) is a rare, neurodegenerative disease that typically presents with childhood onset insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, followed by optic atrophy, diabetes insipidus, deafness, and neurological and psychiatric dysfunction. There is no cure for the disease, but recent advances in research have improved understanding of the disease course. Measuring disease severity and progression with reliable and validated tools is a prerequisite for clinical trials of any new intervention for neurodegenerative conditions. To this end, we developed the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS) to measure the severity and individual variability of WFS symptoms. The aim of this study is to develop and test the reliability and validity of the Wolfram Unified Rating Scale (WURS).

Methods

A rating scale of disease severity in WFS was developed by modifying a standardized assessment for another neurodegenerative condition (Batten disease). WFS experts scored the representativeness of WURS items for the disease. The WURS was administered to 13 individuals with WFS (6-25 years of age). Motor, balance, mood and quality of life were also evaluated with standard instruments. Inter-rater reliability, internal consistency reliability, concurrent, predictive and content validity of the WURS were calculated.

Results

The WURS had high inter-rater reliability (ICCs>.93), moderate to high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.78-0.91) and demonstrated good concurrent and predictive validity. There were significant correlations between the WURS Physical Assessment and motor and balance tests (r_s>.67, p<.03), between the WURS Behavioral Scale and reports of mood and behavior (r_s>.76, p<.04) and between WURS Total scores and quality of life (r_s=-.86, p=.001). The WURS demonstrated acceptable content validity (Scale-Content Validity Index=0.83).

Conclusions

These preliminary findings demonstrate that the WURS has acceptable reliability and validity and captures individual differences in disease severity in children and young adults with WFS.