Molecular characterization of temple syndrome families with 14q32 epimutations

Novel 14q32.2 paternal deletion encompassing the whole DLK1 gene associated with Temple syndrome

BACKGROUND

Temple syndrome (TS14) is a rare imprinting disorder caused by maternal UPD14, imprinting defects or paternal microdeletions which lead to an increase in the maternal expressed genes and a silencing the paternally expressed genes in the 14q32 imprinted domain. Classical TS14 phenotypic features include pre- and postnatal short stature, small hands and feet, muscular hypotonia, motor delay, feeding difficulties, weight gain, premature puberty along and precocious puberty.

METHODS

An exon array comparative genomic hybridization was performed on a patient affected by psychomotor and language delay, muscular hypotonia, relative macrocephaly, and small hand and feet at two years old. At 6 years of age, the proband presented with precocious thelarche. Genes dosage and methylation within the 14q32 region were analyzed by MS-MLPA. Bisulfite PCR and pyrosequencing were employed to quantification methylation at the four known imprinted differentially methylated regions (DMR) within the 14q32 domain: DLK1 DMR, IG-DMR, MEG3 DMR and MEG8 DMR.

RESULTS

The patient had inherited a 69 Kb deletion, encompassing the entire DLK1 gene, on the paternal allele. Relative hypermethylation of the two maternally methylated intervals, DLK1 and MEG8 DMRs, was observed along with normal methylation level at IG-DMR and MEG3 DMR, resulting in a phenotype consistent with TS14. Additional family members with the deletion showed modest methylation changes at both the DLK1 and MEG8 DMRs consistent with parental transmission.

CONCLUSION

We describe a girl with clinical presentation suggestive of Temple syndrome resulting from a small paternal 14q32 deletion that led to DLK1 whole-gene deletion, as well as hypermethylation of the maternally methylated DLK1-DMR.

First step towards a consensus strategy for multi-locus diagnostic testing of imprinting disorders

Background

Imprinting disorders, which affect growth, development, metabolism and neoplasia risk, are caused by genetic or epigenetic changes to genes that are expressed from only one parental allele. Disease may result from changes in coding sequences, copy number changes, uniparental disomy or imprinting defects. Some imprinting disorders are clinically heterogeneous, some are associated with more than one imprinted locus, and some patients have alterations affecting multiple loci. Most imprinting disorders are diagnosed by stepwise analysis of gene dosage and methylation of single loci, but some laboratories assay a panel of loci associated with different imprinting disorders. We looked into the experience of several laboratories using single-locus and/or multi-locus diagnostic testing to explore how different testing strategies affect diagnostic outcomes and whether multi-locus testing has the potential to increase the diagnostic efficiency or reveal unforeseen diagnoses.

Results

We collected data from 11 laboratories in seven countries, involving 16,364 individuals and eight imprinting disorders. Among the 4721 individuals tested for the growth restriction disorder Silver–Russell syndrome, 731 had changes on chromosomes 7 and 11 classically associated with the disorder, but 115 had unexpected diagnoses that involved atypical molecular changes, imprinted loci on chromosomes other than 7 or 11 or multi-locus imprinting disorder. In a similar way, the molecular changes detected in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and other imprinting disorders depended on the testing strategies employed by the different laboratories.

Conclusions

Based on our findings, we discuss how multi-locus testing might optimise diagnosis for patients with classical and less familiar clinical imprinting disorders. Additionally, our compiled data reflect the daily life experiences of diagnostic laboratories, with a lower diagnostic yield than in clinically well-characterised cohorts, and illustrate the need for systematising clinical and molecular data.

Prenatal Detection of Uniparental Disomies (UPD): Intended and Incidental Finding in the Era of Next Generation Genomics

Prenatal detection of uniparental disomy (UPD) is a methodological challenge, and a positive testing result requires comprehensive considerations on the clinical consequences as well as ethical issues. Whereas prenatal testing for UPD in families which are prone to UPD formation (e.g., in case of chromosomal variants, imprinting disorders) is often embedded in genetic counselling, the incidental identification of UPD is often more difficult to manage. With the increasing application of high-resolution test systems enabling the identification of UPD, an increase in pregnancies with incidental detection of UPD can be expected. This paper will cover the current knowledge on uniparental disomies, their clinical consequences with focus on prenatal testing, genetic aspects and predispositions, genetic counselling, as well as methods (conventional tests and high-throughput assays).