Treatment planning systems dosimetry auditing project in Portugal

2-Dimensional IMRT dose audit: An Indonesian multicenter study

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an advanced technique in radiation therapy delivery. IMRT depends on the accuracy of the multileaf collimator during treatment. Hence, the actual dose distribution can deviate from the treatment planning system's calculation. This study aimed to perform a multicentre planar dosimetry audit of radiotherapy centres in Indonesia, using the structure sets from AAPM TG-119. The gamma index used to evaluate the dose distribution was 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm. We observed 100% gamma index passing rates mostly in the 3%/3 mm evaluations. The gamma index passing rates dropped in the 3%/2 mm analysis. Most of the radiotherapy centres participating in this audit satisfied each criterion's tolerance limit of the action level. This study may become a first result for the next multicenter IMRT audit by using a standardized protocol.

Accuracy Evaluation of EPL and ETAR Algorithms in the Treatment Planning Systems using CIRS Thorax Phantom

Background:

It is recommended for each set of radiation data and algorithm that subtle deliberation is done regarding dose calculation accuracy. Knowing the errors in dose calculation for each treatment plan will result in an accurate estimate of the actual dose achieved by the tumor.

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the equivalent path length (EPL) and equivalent tissue air ratio (ETAR) algorithms in radiation dose calculation.

Material and Methods:

In this experimental study, the TEC-DOC 1583 guideline was used. Measurements and calculations were obtained for each algorithm at specific points in thorax CIRS phantom for 6 and 18 MVs and results were compared.

Results:

In the EPL, calculations were in agreement with measurements for 27 points and differences between them ranged from 0.1% to 10.4% at 6 MV. The calculations were in agreement with measurements for 21 points and differences between them ranged from 0.4% to 13% at 18 MV. In ETAR, calculations were also in consistent with measurements for 21 points, and differences between them ranged from 0.1% to 9% at 6 MV. Moreover, for 18 MV, the calculations were in agreement with measurements for 17 points and differences between them ranged from 0% to 11%.

Conclusion:

For the EPL algorithm, more dose points were in consistent with acceptance criteria. The errors in the ETAR were 1% to 2% less than the EPL. The greatest calculation error occurs in low-density lung tissue with inhomogeneities or in high-density bone. Errors were larger in shallow depths. The error in higher energy was more than low energy beam.

Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification

Background

The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the use of different characteristic points as indicators of the field size for commissioning and QA purposes. This work aimed to search for the beam profile's characteristic points and use them for the TPS commissioning purposes.

Materials and methods

The proposal is to use profile inflection points as the beam profile characteristic points. The usage of dedicated software allowed for comparing distances between inflection points and between points of 50% intensity. For the off-axis, wedged, and FFF fields, comparisons were made to the nominal field sizes.

Results

Distances between inflection points proved to be different by less than 1 mm from nominal field sizes for all kinds of investigated beams.

Conclusions

Inflection points are convenient for comparing the off-axis, wedged, and FFF field sizes because of their independence from profile normalization. With finite accuracy, the inflection points could be used for the above kind of beam sizes designation.

The influence of basic plan parameters on calculated small field output factors - A multicenter study

PURPOSE

The influence of basic plan parameters such as slice thickness, grid resolution, algorithm type and field size on calculated small field output factors (OFs) was evaluated in a multicentric study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three computational homogeneous water phantoms with slice thicknesses (ST) 1, 2 and 3 mm were shared among twenty-one centers to calculate OFs for 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3 cm² field sizes (FSs) (normalized to 10x10 cm² FS), with their own treatment planning system (TPS) and the energy clinically used for stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery. OFs were calculated for each combination of grid resolution (GR) (1, 2 and 3 mm) and ST and finally compared with the OFs measured for the TPS commissioning. A multivariate analysis was performed to test the effect of basic plan parameters on calculated OFs.

RESULTS

A total of 509 data points were collected. Calculated OFs are slightly higher than measured ones. The multivariate analysis showed that Center, GR, algorithm type, and FS are predictive variables of the difference between calculated and measured OFs (p < 0.001). As FS decreases, the spread in the difference between calculated and measured OFs became larger when increasing the GR. Monte Carlo and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithms, presented a dependence on GR (p < 0.01), while Collapsed Cone Convolution and Acuros did not. The effect of the ST was found to be negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern TPSs slightly overestimate the calculated small field OFs compared with measured ones. Grid resolution, algorithm, center number and field size influence the calculation of small field OFs.

IAEA methodology for on-site end-to-end IMRT/VMAT audits: an international pilot study

Background: The IAEA has developed and tested an on-site, end-to-end IMRT/VMAT dosimetry audit methodology for head and neck cases using an anthropomorphic phantom. The audit methodology is described, and the results of the international pilot testing are presented.Material and methods: The audit utilizes a specially designed, commercially available anthropomorphic phantom capable of accommodating a small volume ion chamber (IC) in four locations (three in planning target volumes (PTVs) and one in an organ at risk (OAR)) and a Gafchromic film in a coronal plane for the absorbed dose to water and two-dimensional dose distribution measurements, respectively. The audit consists of a pre-visit and on-site phases. The pre-visit phase is carried out remotely and includes a treatment planning task and a set of computational exercises. The on-site phase aims at comparing the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations with measurements in the anthropomorphic phantom following an end-to-end approach. Two main aspects were tested in the pilot study: feasibility of the planning constraints and the accuracy of IC and film results in comparison with TPS calculations. Treatment plan quality was scored from 0 to 100.Results: Forty-two treatment plans were submitted by 14 institutions from 10 countries, with 79% of them having a plan quality score over 90. Seventeen sets of IC measurement results were collected, and the average measured to calculated dose ratio was 0.988 ± 0.016 for PTVs and 1.020 ± 0.029 for OAR. For 13 film measurement results, the average gamma passing rate was 94.1% using criteria of 3%/3 mm, 20% threshold and global gamma.Conclusions: The audit methodology was proved to be feasible and ready to be adopted by national dosimetry audit networks for local implementation.

IMRT national audit in Portugal

PURPOSE

The IAEA newly developed "end-to-end" audit methodology for on-site verification of IMRT dose delivery has been carried out in Portugal in 2018. The main goal was to evaluate the physical aspects of the head and neck (H&N) cancer IMRT treatments. This paper presents the national results.

METHODS

All institutions performing IMRT treatments in Portugal, 20 out of 24, have voluntarily participated in this audit. Following the adopted methodology, a Shoulder, Head and Neck End-to-End phantom (SHANE) - that mimics an H&N region, underwent all steps of an IMRT treatment, according to the local practices. The measurements using an ionization chamber placed inside the SHANE phantom at four reference locations (three in PTVs and one in the spinal cord) and an EBT3 film positioned in a coronal plane were compared with calculated doses. FilmQA Pro software was used for film analysis.

RESULTS

For ionization chamber measurements, the percent difference was within the specified tolerances of ±5% for PTVs and ±7% for the spinal cord in all participating institutions. Considering film analysis, gamma passing rates were on average 96.9%±2.9% for a criterion of 3%/3 mm, 20% threshold, all above the acceptance limit of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The national results of the H&N IMRT audit showed a compliance between the planned and the delivered doses within the specified tolerances, confirming no major reasons for concern. At the same time the audit identified factors that contributed to increased uncertainties in the IMRT dose delivery in some institutions resulting in recommendations for quality improvement.

A multi-centre analytical study of small field output factor calculations in radiotherapy

An audit methodology was developed and applied for output factor (OF) calculations in radiotherapy. The auditees were asked to calculate OFs for field sizes from 10 × 10 cm² to 2 × 2 cm². Sixty five beams were audited; missing reference OFs were interpolated. The calculated OFs were in 73% of cases higher than the reference data. The smaller the field size, the higher the overestimations which were observed in the higher fraction of cases. Treatment planning systems generally overestimated OFs for small fields. The reference dataset helped radiotherapy centres to identify discrepancies which were higher than typical.

Clinical Implications of TiGRT Algorithm for External Audit in Radiation Oncology

Background:

Performing audits play an important role in quality assurance program in radiation oncology. Among different algorithms, TiGRT is one of the common application software for dose calculation. This study aimed to clinical implications of TiGRT algorithm to measure dose and compared to calculated dose delivered to the patients for a variety of cases, with and without the presence of inhomogeneities and beam modifiers.

Materials and Methods:

Nonhomogeneous phantom as quality dose verification phantom, Farmer ionization chambers, and PC-electrometer (Sun Nuclear, USA) as a reference class electrometer was employed throughout the audit in linear accelerators 6 and 18 MV energies (Siemens ONCOR Impression Plus, Germany). Seven test cases were performed using semi CIRS phantom.

Results:

In homogeneous regions and simple plans for both energies, there was a good agreement between measured and treatment planning system calculated dose. Their relative error was found to be between 0.8% and 3% which is acceptable for audit, but in nonhomogeneous organs, such as lung, a few errors were observed. In complex treatment plans, when wedge or shield in the way of energy is used, the error was in the accepted criteria. In complex beam plans, the difference between measured and calculated dose was found to be 2%–3%. All differences were obtained between 0.4% and 1%.

Conclusions:

A good consistency was observed for the same type of energy in the homogeneous and nonhomogeneous phantom for the three-dimensional conformal field with a wedge, shield, asymmetric using the TiGRT treatment planning software in studied center. The results revealed that the national status of TPS calculations and dose delivery for 3D conformal radiotherapy was globally within acceptable standards with no major causes for concern.

Determination of boundaries between ranges of high and low gradient of beam profile

AIM

This work addresses the problem of treatment planning system commissioning by introducing a new method of determination of boundaries between high and low gradient in beam profile.

BACKGROUND

The commissioning of a treatment planning system is a very important task in the radiation therapy. One of the main goals of this task is to compare two field profiles: measured and calculated. Applying points of 80% and 120% of nominal field size can lead to the incorrect determination of boundaries, especially for small field sizes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The method that is based on the beam profile gradient allows for proper assignment of boundaries between high and low gradient regions even for small fields. TRS 430 recommendations for commissioning were used.

RESULTS

The described method allows a separation between high and low gradient, because it directly uses the value of the gradient of a profile. For small fields, the boundaries determined by the new method allow a commissioning of a treatment planning system according to the TRS 430, while the point of 80% of nominal field size is already in the high gradient region.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of determining the boundaries by using the beam profile gradient can be extremely helpful during the commissioning of the treatment planning system for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy or for other techniques which require very small field sizes.