Effect of patient positioning on carbon-ion therapy planned dose distribution to pancreatic tumors and organs at risk

Evaluation of the availability of single-position treatment with a rotating gantry and the validity of deformable image registration dose assessment for pancreatic cancer carbon-ion radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical acceptability of rotational gantry-based single-position carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) to reduce the gastrointestinal (GI) dose in pancreatic cancer. We also evaluated the usefulness of the deformable image registration (DIR)-based dosimetry method for CIRT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with pancreatic cancer were analyzed. The treatment plans were developed for four beam angles in the supine (SP plan) and prone (PR plan) positions. In the case of using multiple positions, the treatment plan was created with two angles for each of the supine and prone position (SP + PR plan). Dose evaluation for multiple positions was performed in two ways: by directly adding the values of the DVH parameters for each position treatment plan (DVH sum), and by calculating the DVH parameters from the accumulative dose distribution created using DIR (DIR sum). The D2cc and D6cc of the stomach and duodenum were recorded for each treatment plan and dosimetry method and compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among any of the treatment planning and dosimetry methods (p > 0.05). The DVH parameters for the stomach and duodenum were higher in the PR plan and SP plan, respectively, and DVH sum tended to be between the SP and PR plans. DVH sum and DIR sum, DVH sum tended to be higher for D2cc and DIR sum tended to be higher for D6cc.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in the GI dose, which suggests that treatment with a simple workflow performed in one position should be clinically acceptable. In CIRT, DIR-based dosimetry should be carefully considered because of the potential for increased uncertainty due to the steep dose distributions.

Robust Beam Selection Based on Water Equivalent Thickness Analysis in Passive Scattering Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is one of the most effective radiotherapeutic modalities. This study aimed to select robust-beam configurations (BC) by water equivalent thickness (WET) analysis in passive CIRT for pancreatic cancer. The study analyzed 110 computed tomography (CT) images and 600 dose distributions of eight patients with pancreatic cancer. The robustness in the beam range was evaluated using both planning and daily CT images, and two robust BCs for the rotating gantry and fixed port were selected. The planned, daily, and accumulated doses were calculated and compared after bone matching (BM) and tumor matching (TM). The dose-volume parameters for the target and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated. Posterior oblique beams (120-240°) in the supine position and anteroposterior beams (0° and 180°) in the prone position were the most robust to WET changes. The mean CTV V95% reductions with TM were -3.8% and -5.2% with the BC for gantry and the BC for fixed ports, respectively. Despite ensuring robustness, the dose to the OARs increased slightly with WET-based BCs but remained below the dose constraint. The robustness of dose distribution can be improved by BCs that are robust to ΔWET. Robust BC with TM improves the accuracy of passive CIRT for pancreatic cancer.

Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: A Review

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related morality worldwide, and the prognosis remains poor despite aggressive therapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy has favorable radiobiological and physical characteristics in the treatment, including a higher linear energy transfer and higher relative biological effectiveness, which increase the cell kill while potentially reducing toxicities to nearby normal tissues. Although small, early clinical studies have shown promise in both the resectable and unresectable settings to improve local control and overall survival while minimizing toxicities. Currently, there are several trials, including 2 sponsored by institutions in the United States, investigating the role of carbon ion radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Perturbation analysis of 4D dose distribution for scanned carbon-ion beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the patients' set-up error-induced perturbation effects on 4D dose distributions (4DDD) of range-adapted internal target volume-based (raITV) treatment plan using lung and liver 4DCT data sets.

METHODS

We enrolled 20 patients with lung and liver cancer treated with respiratory-gated carbon-ion beam scanning therapy. PTVs were generated by adding a 2 mm range-adapted set-up margin on the raITVs. Set-up errors were simulated by shifting the beam isocenter in three translational directions of ±2 mm, ±4 mm, and ±6 mm. 4DDDs were calculated for both nominal and isocenter-shifted situations. Dose metrics of CTV dose coverage (D95) and normal tissue sparing were evaluated. Statistical significance with p < 0.01 was considered by Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

The CTV dose coverage was more sensitive to set-up errors for lung cases than for liver cases, and more serious in superior-inferior direction. The sufficient CTV-D95 > 98% could be achieved with set-up errors less than ±2 mm in all shift directions both for lung and liver cases. With the increase of set-up error, the CTV dose coverage decreased gradually. The clinical criterial of CTV-D95 > 95% could not be fulfilled with set-up error reached to ±4 mm for lung cases, and ±6 mm for liver cases. OAR doses did not have a significant difference with each set-up error for both lung and liver cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The range-adapted set-up margin successfully prevented dose degradation of 4DDDs in the presence of the same magnitude of set-up error for raITV-based carbon-ion beam scanning therapy.

Scanned carbon-ion beam therapy throughput over the first 7 years at National Institute of Radiological Sciences

INTRODUCTION

In the 7 years since our facility opened, we have treated >2000 patients with pencil-beam scanned carbon-ion beam therapy.

METHODS

To summarize treatment workflow, we evaluated the following five metrics: i) total number of treated patients; ii) treatment planning time, not including contouring procedure; iii) quality assurance (QA) time (daily and patient-specific); iv) treatment room occupancy time, including patient setup, preparation time, and beam irradiation time; and v) daily treatment hours. These were derived from the oncology information system and patient handling system log files.

RESULTS

The annual number of treated patients reached 594, 7 years from the facility startup, using two treatment rooms. Mean treatment planning time was 6.0 h (minimum: 3.4 h for prostate, maximum: 9.3 h for esophagus). Mean time devoted to daily QA and patient-specific QA were 22 min and 13.5 min per port, respectively, for the irradiation beam system. Room occupancy time was 14.5 min without gating for the first year, improving to 9.2 min (8.2 min without gating and 12.8 min with gating) in the second. At full capacity, the system ran for 7.5 h per day.

CONCLUSIONS

We are now capable of treating approximately 600 patients per year in two treatment rooms. Accounting for the staff working time, this performance appears reasonable compared to the other facilities.

Effective radiotherapeutic treatment intensification in patients with pancreatic cancer: higher doses alone, higher RBE or both?

Pancreatic cancer, especially in case of locally advanced stage has a poor prognosis. Radiotherapy in general can lead to tumor volume reduction, but further improvements, such as ion beam therapy have to be promoted in order to enable dose escalation, which in turn results in better local control rates and downsizing of the tumor itself. Ion beam therapy with its highly promising physical properties is also accompanied by distinct inter- and intrafractional challenges in case of robustness. First clinical results are promising, but further research in motion mitigation and biological treatment planning is necessary, in order to determine the best clinical rationales and conditions of ion beam therapy of pancreatic cancer. This review summarizes the current knowledge and studies on ion beam therapy of pancreatic cancer.