1
|
Abdelmajeed M, Attalla EM, Elshemey WM, Elfiky AA, Awadly ME, Eldesoky AR. In vivo dose measurements for tangential field-in-field ultra-hypofractionated breast radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024; 55:37-44. [PMID: 38042641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHF-RT) mandates more accuracy in each part of the treatment cycle to maximize cure rates and minimize toxicities. In vivo dosimetry is a direct method for verifying overall treatment accuracy. This study evaluated uncertainties in the delivered dose of Hypofractionated (HF) and UHF Whole Breast Irradiation (WBI) and to analyze the accuracy of the workflow to pave the way for a wide-scale use of UHF-RT. METHODS Thirty-three breast cancer cases, including 16 HF-WBI and 17 UHF-WBI were treated with 3D conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), where 79 fields were analyzed for dose verification. The measurement point was set at the beam entrance (1.5 cm depth). The expected dose at Dmax was calculated via TPS. Before in vivo measurements, diode detectors were tested and calibrated. We developed initial validation measurements for UHF-RT on an anthropomorphic breast phantom for the first time. RESULTS For RANDO phantom, the percentage difference between measured and calculated doses showed an average of -0.52 ± 5.4%, in addition to an excellent dose reproducibility within 0.6%. The overall in vivo measurements for studied cases showed that 83.5% of the measured doses were within ±5% and only 1.8% of the measured doses were greater than ±10% of the calculated doses. The percentage accuracy was slightly larger for UHF cohort (84.2%) compared to HF cohort (83.2%). The maximum percentage difference between them was less than 1%. CONCLUSION Breast in vivo dosimetry is an adequate tool for treatment verification that improves the accuracy of the treatment cycle. UHF-RT may contribute in reducing the long waiting lists, increasing patient convenience, and saving the available resources for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abdelmajeed
- Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
| | - Ehab M Attalla
- Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Wael M Elshemey
- Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, KSA.
| | - Abdo A Elfiky
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Marwa El Awadly
- Department of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Ahmed R Eldesoky
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martins JC, Maier J, Gianoli C, Neppl S, Dedes G, Alhazmi A, Veloza S, Reiner M, Belka C, Kachelrieß M, Parodi K. Towards real-time EPID-based 3D in vivo dosimetry for IMRT with Deep Neural Networks: A feasibility study. Phys Med 2023; 114:103148. [PMID: 37801811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
We investigate the potential of the Deep Dose Estimate (DDE) neural network to predict 3D dose distributions inside patients with Monte Carlo (MC) accuracy, based on transmitted EPID signals and patient CTs. The network was trained using as input patient CTs and first-order dose approximations (FOD). Accurate dose distributions (ADD) simulated with MC were given as training targets. 83 pelvic CTs were used to simulate ADDs and respective EPID signals for subfields of prostate IMRT plans (gantry at 0∘). FODs were produced as backprojections from the EPID signals. 581 ADD-FOD sets were produced and divided into training and test sets. An additional dataset simulated with gantry at 90∘ (lateral set) was used for evaluating the performance of the DDE at different beam directions. The quality of the FODs and DDE-predicted dose distributions (DDEP) with respect to ADDs, from the test and lateral sets, was evaluated with gamma analysis (3%,2 mm). The passing rates between FODs and ADDs were as low as 46%, while for DDEPs the passing rates were above 97% for the test set. Meaningful improvements were also observed for the lateral set. The high passing rates for DDEPs indicate that the DDE is able to convert FODs into ADDs. Moreover, the trained DDE predicts the dose inside a patient CT within 0.6 s/subfield (GPU), in contrast to 14 h needed for MC (CPU-cluster). 3D in vivo dose distributions due to clinical patient irradiation can be obtained within seconds, with MC-like accuracy, potentially paving the way towards real-time EPID-based in vivo dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Cristina Martins
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, Garching b. München, 85748, Germany.
| | - Joscha Maier
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
| | - Chiara Gianoli
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, Garching b. München, 85748, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Neppl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
| | - George Dedes
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, Garching b. München, 85748, Germany.
| | - Abdulaziz Alhazmi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, Garching b. München, 85748, Germany.
| | - Stella Veloza
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, Garching b. München, 85748, Germany.
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
| | - Marc Kachelrieß
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; Heidelberg University, Grabengasse 1, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany.
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, Garching b. München, 85748, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dogan N, Mijnheer BJ, Padgett K, Nalichowski A, Wu C, Nyflot MJ, Olch AJ, Papanikolaou N, Shi J, Holmes SM, Moran J, Greer PB. AAPM Task Group Report 307: Use of EPIDs for Patient-Specific IMRT and VMAT QA. Med Phys 2023; 50:e865-e903. [PMID: 37384416 PMCID: PMC11230298 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have been widely utilized for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) and their use for transit dosimetry applications is emerging. Yet there are no specific guidelines on the potential uses, limitations, and correct utilization of EPIDs for these purposes. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 307 (TG-307) provides a comprehensive review of the physics, modeling, algorithms and clinical experience with EPID-based pre-treatment and transit dosimetry techniques. This review also includes the limitations and challenges in the clinical implementation of EPIDs, including recommendations for commissioning, calibration and validation, routine QA, tolerance levels for gamma analysis and risk-based analysis. METHODS Characteristics of the currently available EPID systems and EPID-based PSQA techniques are reviewed. The details of the physics, modeling, and algorithms for both pre-treatment and transit dosimetry methods are discussed, including clinical experience with different EPID dosimetry systems. Commissioning, calibration, and validation, tolerance levels and recommended tests, are reviewed, and analyzed. Risk-based analysis for EPID dosimetry is also addressed. RESULTS Clinical experience, commissioning methods and tolerances for EPID-based PSQA system are described for pre-treatment and transit dosimetry applications. The sensitivity, specificity, and clinical results for EPID dosimetry techniques are presented as well as examples of patient-related and machine-related error detection by these dosimetry solutions. Limitations and challenges in clinical implementation of EPIDs for dosimetric purposes are discussed and acceptance and rejection criteria are outlined. Potential causes of and evaluations of pre-treatment and transit dosimetry failures are discussed. Guidelines and recommendations developed in this report are based on the extensive published data on EPID QA along with the clinical experience of the TG-307 members. CONCLUSION TG-307 focused on the commercially available EPID-based dosimetric tools and provides guidance for medical physicists in the clinical implementation of EPID-based patient-specific pre-treatment and transit dosimetry QA solutions including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nesrin Dogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ben J Mijnheer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kyle Padgett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Adrian Nalichowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Chuan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sutter Medical Foundation, Roseville, California, USA
| | - Matthew J Nyflot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Niko Papanikolaou
- Division of Medical Physics, UT Health-MD Anderson, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Jie Shi
- Sun Nuclear Corporation - A Mirion Medical Company, Melbourne, Florida, USA
| | | | - Jean Moran
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter B Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yedekci Y, Elmalı A, Demirkiran G, Ozyigit G, Yazici G. Transit dosimetry of stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments with electronic portal dosimetry device in patient with spinal implant. Phys Eng Sci Med 2022; 45:1103-1109. [PMID: 36074299 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-022-01177-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the use of the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) as an in vivo dosimeter has become widespread. However, reports of EPID for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) applications is scarce. There is no data on this topic especially when there are high-density materials in the radiation field. In this study, we aimed to investigate the dose distributions of SBRT treatment plans in patients with spinal implants by transit EPID dosimetry. Implants were inserted in phantoms that mimic the vertebrae, and VMAT plans were created on the phantoms to deliver 16 Gy radiation doses to the target in 1 fraction. Transit EPID measurements were performed for each irradiation. The results were compared with the treatment planning system using the gamma analysis method. According to the gamma analysis results, while the non-implant model met the acceptance criteria with a rate of 95.4%, the implanted models did not pass the test with results between the rates of 70% to 73%. In addition, while the dose difference in the isocenter was 1.3% for the non-implanted model, this difference was observed to be between 7 and 8% in the implanted models. Our study revealed that EPID can be used as transit dosimetry for the VMAT-SBRT applications. However, unacceptable dose differences were obtained by transit EPID dosimetry in the VMAT-SBRT applications of patients with an implant. In the treatment of such patients, alternative treatment methods should be preferred in which the interaction of the implants with radiation can be prevented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagiz Yedekci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Aysenur Elmalı
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Demirkiran
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gözde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsuruta Y, Nakamura M, Nakata M, Hirashima H, Zhou D, Uto M, Takehana K, Fujimoto T, Mizowaki T. Evaluation of correlation between intrafractional residual setup errors and accumulation of delivered dose distributions in single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy for multiple brain metastases. Phys Med 2022; 98:45-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
Verification of an optimizer algorithm by the beam delivery evaluation of intensity-modulated arc therapy plans. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:508-515. [PMID: 34821138 PMCID: PMC8647790 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the case of dynamic radiotherapy plans, the fractionation schemes can have dosimetric effects. Our goal was to define the effect of the fraction dose on the plan quality and the beam delivery. Materials and methods Treatment plans were created for 5 early-stage lung cancer patients with different dose schedules. The planned total dose was 60 Gy, fraction dose was 2 Gy, 3 Gy, 5 Gy, 12 Gy and 20 Gy. Additionally renormalized plans were created by changing the prescribed fraction dose after optimization. The dosimetric parameters and the beam delivery parameters were collected to define the plan quality and the complexity of the treatment plans. The accuracy of dose delivery was verified with dose measurements using electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Results The plan quality was independent from the used fractionation scheme. The fraction dose could be changed safely after the optimization, the delivery accuracy of the treatment plans with changed prescribed dose was not lower. According to EPID based measurements, the high fraction dose and dose rate caused the saturation of the detector, which lowered the gamma passing rate. The aperture complexity score, the gantry speed and the dose rate changes were not predicting factors for the gamma passing rate values. Conclusions The plan quality and the delivery accuracy are independent from the fraction dose, moreover the fraction dose can be changed safely after the dose optimization. The saturation effect of the EPID has to be considered when the action limits of the quality assurance system are defined.
Collapse
|
7
|
Esposito M, Piermattei A, Bresciani S, Orlandini LC, Falco MD, Giancaterino S, Cilla S, Ianiro A, Nigro R, Botez L, Riccardi S, Fidanzio A, Greco F, Villaggi E, Russo S, Stasi M. Improving dose delivery accuracy with EPID in vivo dosimetry: results from a multicenter study. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:633-643. [PMID: 33594471 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01749-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate critical aspects and effectiveness of in vivo dosimetry (IVD) tests obtained by an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) in a multicenter and multisystem context. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight centers with three commercial systems-SoftDiso (SD, Best Medical Italy, Chianciano, Italy), Dosimetry Check (DC, Math Resolution, LCC), and PerFRACTION (PF, Sun Nuclear Corporation, SNC, Melbourne, FL)-collected IVD results for a total of 2002 patients and 32,276 tests. Data are summarized for IVD software, radiotherapy technique, and anatomical site. Every center reported the number of patients and tests analyzed, and the percentage of tests outside of the tolerance level (OTL%). OTL% was categorized as being due to incorrect patient setup, incorrect use of immobilization devices, incorrect dose computation, anatomical variations, and unknown causes. RESULTS The three systems use different approaches and customized alert indices, based on local protocols. For Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatments OTL% mean values were up to 8.9% for SD, 18.0% for DC, and 16.0% for PF. Errors due to "anatomical variations" for head and neck were up to 9.0% for SD and DC and 8.0% for PF systems, while for abdomen and pelvis/prostate treatments were up to 9%, 17.0%, and 9.0% for SD, DC, and PF, respectively. The comparison among techniques gave 3% for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, 7.0% (range 4.7-8.9%) for VMAT, 10.4% (range 7.0-12.2%) for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, and 13.2% (range 8.8-21.0%) for 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy. CONCLUSION The results obtained with different IVD software and among centers were consistent and showed an acceptable homogeneity. EPID IVD was effective in intercepting important errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Esposito
- S. C. Fisica Sanitaria Firenze-Empoli, Medical Physics Unit of Radiation Oncology Dept., Azienda Sanitaria USL Toscana Centro Florence, Via dell'Antella 58, 50012, Bagno a Ripoli, Firenze, Italy.
| | - A Piermattei
- UOC di Fisica Sanitaria, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S Bresciani
- Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - L C Orlandini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - M D Falco
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia, Università di Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - S Giancaterino
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia, Università di Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - S Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II", Campobasso, Italy
| | - A Ianiro
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II", Campobasso, Italy
| | - R Nigro
- OGP S. Camillo de Lellis, Rieti, Italy
| | - L Botez
- Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | | | - A Fidanzio
- UOC di Fisica Sanitaria, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Greco
- UOC di Fisica Sanitaria, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - S Russo
- S. C. Fisica Sanitaria Firenze-Empoli, Azienda Sanitaria USL Toscana Centro Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Stasi
- S.C. Fisica Sanitaria, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang G, Li Z, Li G, Dai G, Xiao Q, Bai L, He Y, Liu Y, Bai S. Real-time liver tracking algorithm based on LSTM and SVR networks for use in surface-guided radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:13. [PMID: 33446245 PMCID: PMC7807524 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01729-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Surface-guided radiation therapy can be used to continuously monitor a patient’s surface motions during radiotherapy by a non-irradiating, noninvasive optical surface imaging technique. In this study, machine learning methods were applied to predict external respiratory motion signals and predict internal liver motion in this therapeutic context. Methods Seven groups of interrelated external/internal respiratory liver motion samples lasting from 5 to 6 min collected simultaneously were used as a dataset, Dv. Long short-term memory (LSTM) and support vector regression (SVR) networks were then used to establish external respiratory signal prediction models (LSTMpred/SVRpred) and external/internal respiratory motion correlation models (LSTMcorr/SVRcorr). These external prediction and external/internal correlation models were then combined into an integrated model. Finally, the LSTMcorr model was used to perform five groups of model updating experiments to confirm the necessity of continuously updating the external/internal correlation model. The root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and maximum absolute error (MAX_AE) were used to evaluate the performance of each model. Results The models established using the LSTM neural network performed better than those established using the SVR network in the tasks of predicting external respiratory signals for latency-compensation (RMSE < 0.5 mm at a latency of 450 ms) and predicting internal liver motion using external signals (RMSE < 0.6 mm). The prediction errors of the integrated model (RMSE ≤ 1.0 mm) were slightly higher than those of the external prediction and external/internal correlation models. The RMSE/MAE of the fifth model update was approximately ten times smaller than that of the first model update. Conclusions The LSTM networks outperform SVR networks at predicting external respiratory signals and internal liver motion because of LSTM’s strong ability to deal with time-dependencies. The LSTM-based integrated model performs well at predicting liver motion from external respiratory signals with system latencies of up to 450 ms. It is necessary to update the external/internal correlation model continuously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangyu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhibin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guangjun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Guyu Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qing Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Long Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yisong He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yaxin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,College of Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China
| | - Sen Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barbeiro AR, Parent L, Vieillevigne L, Ferrand R, Franceries X. Dosimetric performance of continuous EPID imaging in stereotactic treatment conditions. Phys Med 2020; 78:117-122. [PMID: 32980588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims at investigating the dosimetric characteristics of a Varian aS1000 EPID, focusing on its continuous acquisition mode under the challenging conditions that can be met in stereotactic radiotherapy verification. METHODS An aS1000 EPID installed on a Varian TrueBeamSTx was irradiated with 6 and 10 MV unflattened and flattened photon beams. In order to avoid detector saturation, the source-to-detector distance (SDD) was set to 150 or 180 cm depending on the dose rate. EPID image sets were acquired in continuous mode (CM) and also in the commonly used integrated mode (IM) for comparison, to evaluate dose linearity (including dose rate dependence), repeatability, reproducibility, stability, ghosting effect and field size dependence. RESULTS CM response linearity was found to be within 0.8% of IM and independent of dose rate. Response repeatability was slightly better for IM and FF beams, being in all cases within 0.9%. Reproducibility was within 0.6% for both modes and all beam qualities. Response stability between continuous frames varied within 1% for dynamic and static irradiations and for all the beam qualities, showing its independence from these parameters. Ghosting effect was not significant, being comparable to signal variations between continuous frames (±1%). Field size dependence in both modes agreed within 1%. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric response of the aS1000 EPID in CM with FFF beams and high dose rates is comparable to that in IM and for flattened beams provided that the appropriate SDD is used. aS1000 EPID in continuous acquisition mode is therefore suitable for stereotactic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rita Barbeiro
- CRCT, UMR 1037, INSERM, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France.
| | - Laure Parent
- Engineering and Medical Physics Department, IUCT-Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Laure Vieillevigne
- CRCT, UMR 1037, INSERM, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; Engineering and Medical Physics Department, IUCT-Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Regis Ferrand
- CRCT, UMR 1037, INSERM, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; Engineering and Medical Physics Department, IUCT-Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Xavier Franceries
- CRCT, UMR 1037, INSERM, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, 31037 Toulouse, France; Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Beddar S, Greer P, Jornet N, McCurdy B, Paiva-Fonseca G, Mijnheer B, Verhaegen F. In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:108-116. [PMID: 33458335 PMCID: PMC7807612 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy with photon beams is a highly accurate treatment modality, but requires extensive quality assurance programs to confirm that radiation therapy will be or was administered appropriately. In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is an essential element of modern radiation therapy because it provides the ability to catch treatment delivery errors, assist in treatment adaptation, and record the actual dose delivered to the patient. However, for various reasons, its clinical implementation has been slow and limited. The purpose of this report is to stimulate the wider use of IVD for external beam radiotherapy, and in particular of systems using electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). After documenting the current IVD methods, this report provides detailed software, hardware and system requirements for in vivo EPID dosimetry systems in order to help in bridging the current vendor-user gap. The report also outlines directions for further development and research. In vivo EPID dosimetry vendors, in collaboration with users across multiple institutions, are requested to improve the understanding and reduce the uncertainties of the system and to help in the determination of optimal action limits for error detection. Finally, the report recommends that automation of all aspects of IVD is needed to help facilitate clinical adoption, including automation of image acquisition, analysis, result interpretation, and reporting/documentation. With the guidance of this report, it is hoped that widespread clinical use of IVD will be significantly accelerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sam Beddar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Greer
- Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nuria Jornet
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Boyd McCurdy
- Medical Physics Department, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Gabriel Paiva-Fonseca
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ben Mijnheer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Verhaegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Esposito M, Villaggi E, Bresciani S, Cilla S, Falco MD, Garibaldi C, Russo S, Talamonti C, Stasi M, Mancosu P. Estimating dose delivery accuracy in stereotactic body radiation therapy: A review of in-vivo measurement methods. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:158-167. [PMID: 32416282 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been recognized as a standard treatment option for many anatomical sites. Sophisticated radiation therapy techniques have been developed for carrying out these treatments and new quality assurance (QA) programs are therefore required to guarantee high geometrical and dosimetric accuracy. This paper focuses on recent advances on in-vivo measurements methods (IVM) for SBRT treatment. More specifically, all of the online QA methods for estimating the effective dose delivered to patients were compared. Determining the optimal IVM for performing SBRT treatments would reduce the risk of errors that could jeopardize treatment outcome. A total of 89 papers were included. The papers were subdivided into the following topics: point dosimeters (PD), transmission detectors (TD), log file analysis (LFA), electronic portal imaging device dosimetry (EPID), dose accumulation methods (DAM). The detectability capability of the main IVM detectors/devices were evaluated. All of the systems have some limitations: PD has no spatial data, EPID has limited sensitivity towards set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in some anatomical sites, TD is insensitive towards patient related errors, LFA is not an independent measure, DAMs are not always based on measures. In order to minimize errors in SBRT dose delivery, we recommend using synergic combinations of two or more of the systems described in our review: on-line tumor position and patient information should be combined with MLC position and linac output detection accuracy. In this way the effects of SBRT dose delivery errors will be reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Esposito
- S.C. Fisica Sanitaria Firenze-Empoli, Azienda Sanitaria USL Toscana Centro, Italy.
| | | | - Sara Bresciani
- Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maria Daniela Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology "G. D'Annunzio", University of Chieti, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- Radiation Research Unit, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- S.C. Fisica Sanitaria Firenze-Empoli, Azienda Sanitaria USL Toscana Centro, Italy
| | - Cinzia Talamonti
- University of Florence, Dept Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Science, "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Stasi
- Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics Unit of Radiotherapy Dept., Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yedekci Y, Biltekin F, Ozyigit G. Feasibility study of an electronic portal imaging based in vivo dose verification system for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy. Phys Med 2019; 64:204-209. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
13
|
Cilla S, Ianiro A, Craus M, Viola P, Deodato F, Macchia G, Buwenge M, Morganti AG, Valentini V, Piermattei A. Epid-based in vivo dose verification for lung stereotactic treatments delivered with multiple breath-hold segmented volumetric modulated arc therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:37-44. [PMID: 30790439 PMCID: PMC6414179 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated an EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) method for the dose verification and the treatment reproducibility of lung SBRT-VMAT treatments in clinical routine. Ten patients with lung metastases treated with Elekta VMAT technique were enrolled. All patients were irradiated in five consecutive fractions, with total doses of 50 Gy. Set-up was carried out with the Elekta stereotactic body frame. Eight patients were simulated and treated using the Active Breath Control (ABC) system, a spirometer enabling patients to maintain a breath-hold at a predetermined lung volume. Two patients were simulated and treated in free-breathing using an abdominal compressor. IVD was performed using the SOFTDISO software. IVD tests were evaluated by means of (a) ratio R between daily in-vivo isocenter dose and planned dose and (b) γ-analysis between EPID integral portal images in terms of percentage of points with γ-value smaller than one (γ% ) and mean γ-values (γmean ) using a 3%(global)/3 mm criteria. Alert criteria of ±5% for R ratio, γ% < 90%, and γmean > 0.67 were chosen. 50 transit EPID images were acquired. For the patients treated with ABC spirometer, the results reported a high level of accuracy in dose delivery with 100% of tests within ±5%. The γ-analysis showed a mean value of γmean equal to 0.21 (range: 0.04-0.56) and a mean γ% equal to 96.9 (range: 78-100). Relevant discrepancies were observed only for the two patients treated without ABC, mainly due to a blurring dose effect due to residual respiratory motion. Our method provided a fast and accurate procedure in clinical routine for verifying delivered dose as well as for detecting errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Anna Ianiro
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maurizio Craus
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Pietro Viola
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Angelo Piermattei
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bouacid SS, Kharfi F, Boulakhssaim F. Comparison of measured and calculated doses in a Rando phantom with a realistic lung radiotherapy treatment plan including heterogeneities. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2018; 57:365-373. [PMID: 30206695 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0755-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In this work, dose measurements were performed to evaluate an external radiotherapy treatment plan and, particularly, to validate dose calculations for a lung lesion case. Doses were calculated by the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system using the AAA anisotropic analytical algorithm. The measurements were performed using a Rando anthropomorphic phantom and TLD700 thermoluminescent dosimeters. The comparison between doses calculated and doses measured by means of thermoluminescence (TL) shows compatibility except for a few points, due to the limitations in the heterogeneity correction used for the case studied here. The deviation between the calculated and measured doses is about 6.5% for low (< 0.5 Gy) doses and about 1% for higher doses (> 0.5 Gy).The deviation between AAA-calculated and TL-measured doses was also found to be higher in proximity to heterogeneous tissue interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serine Sarra Bouacid
- Department of Physics, University of Ferhat Abbas-Setif1, Campus El-Bèz, 19000, Sétif, Algeria
- Laboratory of Dosing, Analysis and Characterization with High Resolution (DAC), Campus El-Bèz, 19000, Sétif, Algeria
| | - Fayçal Kharfi
- Department of Physics, University of Ferhat Abbas-Setif1, Campus El-Bèz, 19000, Sétif, Algeria.
- Laboratory of Dosing, Analysis and Characterization with High Resolution (DAC), Campus El-Bèz, 19000, Sétif, Algeria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mijnheer B, Jomehzadeh A, González P, Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Rozendaal R, Shokrani P, Spreeuw H, Tielenburg R, Mans A. Error detection during VMAT delivery using EPID-based 3D transit dosimetry. Phys Med 2018; 54:137-145. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
16
|
González-López A. A multiresolution processing method for contrast enhancement in portal imaging. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:145003. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aacd19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
17
|
Aznar MC, Warren S, Hoogeman M, Josipovic M. The impact of technology on the changing practice of lung SBRT. Phys Med 2018; 47:129-138. [PMID: 29331227 PMCID: PMC5883320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumours has been gaining wide acceptance in lung cancer. Here, we review the technological evolution of SBRT delivery in lung cancer, from the first treatments using the stereotactic body frame in the 1990's to modern developments in image guidance and motion management. Finally, we discuss the impact of current technological approaches on the requirements for quality assurance as well as future technological developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Camille Aznar
- Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Samantha Warren
- Hall Edwards Radiotherapy Group, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Section for Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mancosu P, Nisbet A, Jornet N. Editorial: The role of medical physics in lung SBRT. Phys Med 2018; 45:205-206. [PMID: 29325801 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a standard treatment for non-operable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this context, medical physics community has largely helped in the starting and the growth of this technique. In fact, SBRT requires the convergence of many different features for delivering large doses in few fractions to small moving target in an heterogeneous medium. The special issue of last month, was focused on the different physics challenges in lung SBRT. Eleven reviews were presented, covering: imaging for treatment planning and for treatment assessment; dosimetry and planning optimization; treatment delivery possibilities; image guidance during delivery; radiobiology. The current cutting edge role of medical physics was reported. We aimed to give a complete overview of different aspects of lung SBRT that would be of interest to both physicists implementing this technique in their institutions and more experienced physicists that would be inspired to start research projects in areas that still need further developments. We also feel that the role that medical physicists have played in the development and safe implementation of SBRT, particularly in lung region, can be taken as an excellent example to be translated to other areas, not only in Radiation Oncology but also in other health sectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Mancosu
- Medical Physics service, Radiotherapy department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano-Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrew Nisbet
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, United Kingdom; Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Núria Jornet
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|