Validation of frame-based positioning accuracy with cone-beam computed tomography in Gamma Knife Icon radiosurgery

Mask-Based versus Frame-Based Gamma Knife ICON Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases: A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Radiosurgery is performed with a diversity of instruments relying usually either on a stereotactic frame or a mask for patient head fixation. Comfort and safety efficacy of the 2 systems have never been rigorously evaluated and compared.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between February 2016 and January 2017, 58 patients presenting with nonsmall cell lung cancer brain metastases have been treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) with random use of a frame or a mask for fixation were included patients older than 18, with <5 brain metastases (at the exclusion of brainstem and optic pathway's locations) and no earlier history of radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was the pain scale assessment (PSA) at the beginning of the GKS procedure.

RESULTS

The PSA at the beginning of the GKS procedure was not different between the 2 groups. The PSA at the day before GKS, before magnetic resonance imaging, just after frame application, and the day after radiosurgery (departure) has shown no difference between the 2 groups. At the end of the radiosurgery itself (just after frame or mask removal) and 1 h after, the mean pain scale was higher in patients treated with the frame (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) but 2 patients were not able to tolerate the mask discomfort and had to be treated with frame. Tumor control and morbidity probability were demonstrated to be no difference between the 2 groups in this population of patients with BM not in highly functional area. The median of the extra dose to the body due to the cone-beam computed tomography was 7.5 mGy with a maximum of 35 mGy in patients treated with a mask fixation (null in the others treated with frame). Mask fixation was associated to longer treatment time although the beam on time was not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, with brain oligo-metastases out of critical location, single-dose mask-based GKS can be done with a comfort and a safety efficacy comparable to frame-based GKS. There seems to be no clear patient data that confirm the value of the mask system with regards to comfort.

Assessment of single isocenter linear accelerator radiosurgery for metastases and base of skull lesions

BACKGROUND

Newer technology for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) should be assessed for different multi-leaf collimators (MLC).

OBJECTIVE

Assess plan quality of an automated, frameless, linear accelerator based (linac) planning and delivery system (HyperArc) for SRS using both standard MLC (SMLC) and high definition MLC (HDMLC) compared to a cobalt-60 based SRS system (Gamma Knife, GK).

METHODS

We re-planned twenty GK Perfexion-treated SRS patients (27 lesions) for HyperArc using SMLC and HDMLC. We assessed plan quality using the following metrics: gradient index (GI), Paddick and RTOG conformity indices (CI_Paddick, CI_RTOG), volume receiving half of prescription isodose (PIV_half) and maximum dose to 0.03 cc for brainstem, optic chiasm and optic nerves, and V12Gy for brain-GTV.

RESULTS

Linac plans had better conformity with HDMLC being most conformal. GK exhibited better GI. PIV_half demonstrated no statistically significant difference between HDMLC and GK, and SMLC was nominally worse than GK. Mean PIV_half was generally 0.85 cc larger for SMLC than HDMLC. For TV > 1.0 cc, the relative differences in CI_RTOG, GI, and PIV_half for SMLC vs. HDMLC were less than 21%. For TV less than < 1.0 cc, there were more obvious relative differences for SMLC vs. HDMLC in CI_RTOG (mean 146%, max 700%), GI (mean 49%, max 162%), and PIV_half (mean 77%, max 522%). Organ at risk doses were met in all plans.

CONCLUSIONS

New linac-based plans positively compare to GK plans overall. HDMLC should be strongly considered for treatment of lesions < 1.0 cc given the significant improvements in conformity and PIV_half over SMLC.

Stereotactic radiotherapy of appropriately selected meningiomas and metastatic brain tumor beds with gamma knife icon versus volumetric modulated arc therapy

PURPOSE

To determine if the gamma knife icon (GKI) can provide superior stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) dose distributions for appropriately selected meningioma and post-resection brain tumor bed treatments to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Appropriately selected targets were not proximal to great vessels, did not have sensitive soft tissue including organs-at-risk (OARs) within the planning target volume (PTV), and did not have concave tumors containing excessive normal brain tissue. Four of fourteen candidate meningioma patients and six of six candidate patients with brain tumor cavities were considered for this treatment planning comparison study. PTVs were generated for GKI and VMAT by adding 1 mm and 3 mm margins, respectively, to the GTVs. Identical PTV V_100% -values were obtained for the GKI and VMAT plans for each patient. Meningioma and tumor bed prescription doses were 52.7-54.0 in 1.7-1.8 Gy fractions and 25 Gy in 5 Gy fractions, respectively. GKI dose rate was 3.735 Gy/min for 16 mm collimators.

RESULTS

PTV radical dose homogeneity index was 3.03 ± 0.35 for GKI and 1.27 ± 0.19 for VMAT. Normal brain D_1% , D_5% , and D_10% were lower for GKI than VMAT by 45.8 ± 10.9%, 38.9 ± 11.5%, and 35.4 ± 16.5% respectively. All OARs considered received lower maximum doses for GKI than VMAT. GKI and VMAT treatment times for meningioma plans were 12.1 ± 4.13 min and 6.2 ± 0.32 min, respectively, and, for tumor cavities, were 18.1 ± 5.1 min and 11.0 ± 0.56 min, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriately selected meningioma and brain tumor bed patients may benefit from GKI-based SRT due to the decreased normal brain and OAR doses relative to VMAT enabled by smaller margins. Care must be taken in meningioma patient selection for SRT with the GKI, even if they are clinically appropriate for VMAT.

Reproducibilidad en el diagnóstico imagenológico de periodontitis apical a partir de CBCT

Objetivo: esta investigación evaluó la reproducibilidad en el diagnóstico imagenológico de PA en dientes del maxilar superior a partir de 60 CBCT tomadas en una institución clínica en una ciudad intermedia en Colombia. Métodos: el estudio fue realizado por dos observadores previamente calibrados de CBCT del maxilar superior que contenían dientes permanentes con ápice cerrado, correspondientes a adultos mayores de 18 años de edad. La presencia o ausencia de periodontitis apical se analizó utilizando el índice CBCT PAI. La información registrada fue relacionada con variables de interés. Resultados: la reproducibilidad entre los evaluadores fue sustancial o perfecta. La prevalencia de periodontitis apical encontrada fue del 21,6%, en los dientes con tratamiento de endodoncia 12,4% y en los dientes sin tratamiento endodóntico 9,2%. Conclusiones: la tomografía CBCT proporciona al clínico información que permite una mayor claridad en la fase de diagnóstico. Los dientes con la mayor prevalencia de PA fueron el primer molar y el primer premolar superior izquierdo respectivamente.

Gamma Knife® icon CBCT offers improved localization workflow for frame-based treatment

Object

The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of stereotactic localization in Gamma Knife treatment planning: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) or fiducial. While the fiducial method is the traditional method of localization, CBCT is now available for use with the Gamma Knife Icon. This study seeks to determine whether a difference exists between the two methods and then whether one is better than the other regarding accuracy and workflow optimization.

Methods

Cone beam computed tomography was used to define stereotactic space around the Elekta Film Pinprick phantom and then treated with film in place. The same phantom was offset known amounts from center and then imaged with CBCT and registered with the reference CBCT image to determine if measured offsets matched those known. Ten frameless and 10 frame‐based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to CBCT patient fusions were retrospectively evaluated using the TG‐132 TRE method. The stereotactic coordinates defined by CBCT and traditional fiducials were compared on the Elekta 8 cm Ball phantom, an anthropomorphic phantom, and actual patient data. Offsets were introduced to the anthropomorphic phantom in the stereotactic frame and CBCT's ability to detect those offsets was determined.

Results

Cone beam computed tomography defines stereotactic space well within the established limits of the mechanical alignment system. The CBCT to CBCT registration can detect offsets accurately to within 0.1 mm and 0.5°. In all cases, some disagreement existed between fiducial localization and that of CBCT which in some cases was small, but also was as high as 0.43 mm in the phantom domain and as much as 1.54 mm in actual patients.

Conclusion

Cone beam computed tomography demonstrates consistent accuracy in defining stereotactic space. Since both localization methods do not agree with each other consistently, the more reliable method must be identified. Cone beam computed tomography can accurately determine offsets occurring within stereotactic space that would be nondiscernible utilizing the fiducial method and seems to be more reliable. Using CBCT localization offers the opportunity to streamline workflow both from a patient and clinic perspective and also shows patient position immediately prior to treatment.

Performance of the cone beam computed tomography-based patient positioning system on the Gamma Knife Icon™

PURPOSE

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging has been implemented on the Leksell Gamma Knife^® Icon™ for assessing patient positioning in mask-based Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CBCT-based patient positioning system as a tool for frameless Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

METHODS

Daily quality assurance (QA) CBCT precision test results from a 12-month period were analyzed for the geometric accuracy and the stability of the imager. The performance of the image acquisition module and the image registration algorithm was evaluated using an anthropomorphic head phantom (CIRS Inc., Norfolk, VA) and a XYZR axis manual positioning stage (TOAUTO Inc., Guangdong, China). The head phantom was fixed on a mask adaptor and manually translated in the X, Y, Z directions or rotated around the X, Y, Z axes in the range of ±10 mm or ±10º. A CBCT scan was performed after each manual position setup followed by an image registration to the reference scan. To assess the overall setup uncertainties in fractionated treatment, two cylindrical Presage phantoms (Heuris Inc., Skillman, NJ) of 15 cm diameter and 10 cm height were irradiated with identical prescription dose and shot placement following standard mask-based treatment workflow according to two different fraction schedules: a single fraction treatment of 7.5 Gy and a 5-fraction treatment with 1.5 Gy per fraction.

RESULTS

The averaged vector deviations of the four marks from their preset values are 0.087, 0.085, 0.095, and 0.079 mm from the 212 daily QA tests. The averaged displacements in the X, Y, Z coordinates and the pitch, yaw, roll angles from the image registration tests are 0.23, 0.27, 0.14, 0.32º, 0.19º, 0.31º from the manual setup. The corresponding maximum differences are 0.41, 0.33, 0.29 mm, 0.45º, 0.31º, and 0.43º, respectively. Compared to the treatment plan using the 2% & 1 mm criteria, the averaged 2D Gamma passing rate is 98.25% for the measured dose distribution from the Presage phantom with 1-fraction irradiation and 95.12% for the 5-fraction irradiation. The averaged Gamma passing rates are 99.53% and 98.16% for the 1-fraction and 5-fraction irradiations using the 2% & 2 mm criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The CBCT imager and the image registration algorithm can reproduce phantom position with <0.5 mm/0.5º uncertainty. A systematic contribution from the interfraction phantom repositioning procedure was observed in the Gamma analysis over the irradiated volumes of two end-to-end test phantoms.