1
|
Wei W, Li Z, Xiao Q, Wang G, He H, Luo D, Chen L, Li J, Zhang X, Qin T, Song Y, Li G, Bai S. Quantifying dose uncertainties resulting from cardiorespiratory motion in intensity-modulated proton therapy for cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1399589. [PMID: 39040445 PMCID: PMC11260676 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (CSBRT) with photons efficaciously and safely treats cardiovascular arrhythmias. Proton therapy, with its unique physical and radiobiological properties, can offer advantages over traditional photon-based therapies in certain clinical scenarios, particularly pediatric tumors and those in anatomically challenging areas. However, dose uncertainties induced by cardiorespiratory motion are unknown. Objective This study investigated the effect of cardiorespiratory motion on intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and the effectiveness of motion-encompassing methods. Methods We retrospectively included 12 patients with refractory arrhythmia who underwent CSBRT with four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and 4D cardiac CT (4DcCT). Proton plans were simulated using an IBA accelerator based on the 4D average CT. The prescription was 25 Gy in a single fraction, with all plans normalized to ensure that 95% of the target volume received the prescribed dose. 4D dose reconstruction was performed to generate 4D accumulated and dynamic doses. Furthermore, dose uncertainties due to the interplay effect of the substrate target and organs at risk (OARs) were assessed. The differences between internal organs at risk volume (IRV) and OARreal (manually contoured on average CT) were compared. In 4D dynamic dose, meeting prescription requirements entails V25 and D95 reaching 95% and 25 Gy, respectively. Results The 4D dynamic dose significantly differed from the 3D static dose. The mean V25 and D95 were 89.23% and 24.69 Gy, respectively, in 4DCT and 94.35% and 24.99 Gy, respectively, in 4DcCT. Eleven patients in 4DCT and six in 4DcCT failed to meet the prescription requirements. Critical organs showed varying dose increases. All metrics, except for Dmean and D50, significantly changed in 4DCT; in 4DcCT, only D50 remained unchanged with regards to the target dose uncertainties induced by the interplay effect. The interplay effect was only significant for the Dmax values of several OARs. Generally, respiratory motion caused a more pronounced interplay effect than cardiac pulsation. Neither IRV nor OARreal effectively evaluated the dose discrepancies of the OARs. Conclusions Complex cardiorespiratory motion can introduce dose uncertainties during IMPT. Motion-encompassing techniques may mitigate but cannot entirely compensate for the dose discrepancies. Individualized 4D dose assessments are recommended to verify the effectiveness and safety of CSBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weige Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhibin Li
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institute of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Qing Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Guangyu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haiping He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Dashuang Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiangyu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Taolin Qin
- Department of Medical Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ying Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Guangjun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Sen Bai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics & Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Archawametheekul K, Puttanawarut C, Suphaphong S, Jiarpinitnun C, Sakulsingharoj S, Stansook N, Khachonkham S. The Investigating Image Registration Accuracy and Contour Propagation for Adaptive Radiotherapy Purposes in Line with the Task Group No. 132 Recommendation. J Med Phys 2024; 49:64-72. [PMID: 38828076 PMCID: PMC11141753 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_168_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Image registration is a crucial component of the adaptive radiotherapy workflow. This study investigates the accuracy of the deformable image registration (DIR) and contour propagation features of SmartAdapt, an application in the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) version 16.1. Materials and Methods The registration accuracy was validated using the Task Group No. 132 (TG-132) virtual phantom, which features contour evaluation and landmark analysis based on the quantitative criteria recommended in the American Association of Physicists in Medicine TG-132 report. The target registration error, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and center of mass displacement were used as quantitative validation metrics. The performance of the contour propagation feature was evaluated using clinical datasets (head and neck, pelvis, and chest) and an additional four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) dataset from TG-132. The primary planning and the second CT images were appropriately registered and deformed. The DSC was used to find the volume overlapping between the deformed contours and the radiation oncologist (RO)-drawn contour. The clinical value of the DIR-generated structure was reviewed and scored by an experienced RO to make a qualitative assessment. Results The registration accuracy fell within the specified tolerances. SmartAdapt exhibited a reasonably propagated contour for the chest and head-and-neck regions, with DSC values of 0.80 for organs at risk. Misregistration is frequently observed in the pelvic region, which is specified as a low-contrast region. However, 78% of structures required no modification or minor modification, demonstrating good agreement between contour comparison and the qualitative analysis. Conclusions SmartAdapt has adequate efficiency for image registration and contour propagation for adaptive purposes in various anatomical sites. However, there should be concern about its performance in regions with low contrast and small volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamonchanok Archawametheekul
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chanon Puttanawarut
- Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sithiphong Suphaphong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chuleeporn Jiarpinitnun
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Siwaporn Sakulsingharoj
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nauljun Stansook
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Suphalak Khachonkham
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nenoff L, Amstutz F, Murr M, Archibald-Heeren B, Fusella M, Hussein M, Lechner W, Zhang Y, Sharp G, Vasquez Osorio E. Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:24TR01. [PMID: 37972540 PMCID: PMC10725576 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0d8a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Deformable image registration (DIR) is a versatile tool used in many applications in radiotherapy (RT). DIR algorithms have been implemented in many commercial treatment planning systems providing accessible and easy-to-use solutions. However, the geometric uncertainty of DIR can be large and difficult to quantify, resulting in barriers to clinical practice. Currently, there is no agreement in the RT community on how to quantify these uncertainties and determine thresholds that distinguish a good DIR result from a poor one. This review summarises the current literature on sources of DIR uncertainties and their impact on RT applications. Recommendations are provided on how to handle these uncertainties for patient-specific use, commissioning, and research. Recommendations are also provided for developers and vendors to help users to understand DIR uncertainties and make the application of DIR in RT safer and more reliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Nenoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Dresden Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Florian Amstutz
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martina Murr
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Marco Fusella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abano Terme Hospital, Italy
| | - Mohammad Hussein
- Metrology for Medical Physics, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - Wolfgang Lechner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - Greg Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Eliana Vasquez Osorio
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie X, Song Y, Ye F, Yan H, Wang S, Zhao X, Dai J. The application of multiple metrics in deformable image registration for target volume delineation of breast tumor bed. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13793. [PMID: 36265074 PMCID: PMC9797164 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE For postoperative breast cancer patients, deformable image registration (DIR) is challenged due to the large deformations and non-correspondence caused by tumor resection and clip insertion. To deal with it, three metrics (fiducial-, region-, and intensity-based) were jointly used in DIR algorithm for improved accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three types of metrics were combined to form a single-objective function in DIR algorithm. Fiducial-based metric was used to minimize the distance between the corresponding point sets of two images. Region-based metric was used to improve the overlap between the corresponding areas of two images. Intensity-based metric was used to maximize the correlation between the corresponding voxel intensities of two images. The two CT images, one before surgery and the other after surgery, were acquired from the same patient in the same radiotherapy treatment position. Twenty patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. RESULTS For target registration error, the difference between the proposed and the conventional registration methods was statistically significant for soft tissue (2.06 vs. 7.82, p = 0.00024 < 0.05) and body boundary (3.70 vs. 6.93, p = 0.021 < 0.05). For visual assessment, the proposed method achieved better matching result for soft tissue and body boundary. CONCLUSIONS Comparing to the conventional method, the registration accuracy of the proposed method was significantly improved. This method provided a feasible way for target volume delineation of tumor bed in postoperative radiotherapy of breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yuchun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Feng Ye
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Hui Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Shulian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dossun C, Niederst C, Noel G, Meyer P. Evaluation of DIR algorithm performance in real patients for radiotherapy treatments: A systematic review of operator-dependent strategies. Phys Med 2022; 101:137-157. [PMID: 36007403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The performance of deformable medical image registration (DIR) algorithms has become a major concern. METHODS We aimed to obtain updated information on DIR algorithm performance quantification through a literature review of articles published between 2010 and 2022. We focused only on studies using operator-based methods to treat real patients. The PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS One hundred and seven articles were identified. The mean number of patients and registrations per publication was 20 and 63, respectively. We found 23 different geometric metrics appearing at least twice, and the dosimetric impact of DIR was quantified in 32 articles. Forty-eight different at-risk organs were described, and target volumes were studied in 43 publications. Prostate, head-and-neck and thoracic locations represented more than ¾ of the studied locations. We summarized the type of DIR and the images used, and other key elements. Intra/interobserver variability, threshold values and the correlation between metrics were also discussed. CONCLUSIONS This literature review covers the past decade and should facilitate the implementation of DIR algorithms in clinical practice by providing practical and pertinent information to quantify their performance on real patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dossun
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - C Niederst
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - P Meyer
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France; ICUBE, CNRS UMR 7357, Team IMAGES, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rong Y, Rosu-Bubulac M, Benedict SH, Cui Y, Ruo R, Connell T, Kashani R, Latifi K, Chen Q, Geng H, Sohn J, Xiao Y. Rigid and Deformable Image Registration for Radiation Therapy: A Self-Study Evaluation Guide for NRG Oncology Clinical Trial Participation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:282-298. [PMID: 33662576 PMCID: PMC8406084 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The registration of multiple imaging studies to radiation therapy computed tomography simulation, including magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, etc. is a widely used strategy in radiation oncology treatment planning, and these registrations have valuable roles in image guidance, dose composition/accumulation, and treatment delivery adaptation. The NRG Oncology Medical Physics subcommittee formed a working group to investigate feasible workflows for a self-study credentialing process of image registration commissioning. METHODS AND MATERIALS The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 132 (TG132) report on the use of image registration and fusion algorithms in radiation therapy provides basic guidelines for quality assurance and quality control of the image registration algorithms and the overall clinical process. The report recommends a series of tests and the corresponding metrics that should be evaluated and reported during commissioning and routine quality assurance, as well as a set of recommendations for vendors. The NRG Oncology medical physics subcommittee working group found incompatibility of some digital phantoms with commercial systems. Thus, there is still a need to provide further recommendations in terms of compatible digital phantoms, clinical feasible workflow, and achievable thresholds, especially for future clinical trials involving deformable image registration algorithms. Nine institutions participated and evaluated 4 commonly used commercial imaging registration software and various versions in the field of radiation oncology. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The NRG Oncology Working Group on image registration commissioning herein provides recommendations on the use of digital phantom/data sets and analytical software access for institutions and clinics to perform their own self-study evaluation of commercial imaging systems that might be employed for coregistration in radiation therapy treatment planning and image guidance procedures. Evaluation metrics and their corresponding values were given as guidelines to establish practical tolerances. Vendor compliance for image registration commissioning was evaluated, and recommendations were given for future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
| | - Mihaela Rosu-Bubulac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Stanley H Benedict
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Cancer Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Russell Ruo
- Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tanner Connell
- Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Rojano Kashani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Quan Chen
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Huaizhi Geng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason Sohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xie X, Song Y, Ye F, Yan H, Wang S, Zhao X, Dai J. Improving deformable image registration with point metric and masking technique for postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:1196-1208. [PMID: 33816160 DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Deformable image registration (DIR) is increasingly used for target volume definition in radiotherapy. However, this method is challenging for postoperative breast cancer patients due to the large deformations and non-correspondence caused by tumor resection and clip insertion. In this study, an improved B-splines based DIR method was developed to address this issue for higher registration accuracy. Methods The conventional B-splines based DIR method was improved with the introduction of point metric and masking technique. The point metric minimizes the distance between 2 point sets with known correspondence for regularization of intensity-based B-splines registration. The masking technique reduces the influence of non-corresponding regions in breast computed tomography (CT) images. Two sets of CT images before and after breast surgery were used for image registration. One set was the diagnostic CT image acquired before surgery, and another set was the planning CT image acquired after surgery for breast cancer radiotherapy. A total of 26 sets of CT images from 13 patients were collected retrospectively for the test. The improved DIR method's registration accuracy was evaluated by target registration error (TRE), the Jacobian determinant, and visual assessment. Results For soft tissue, the difference in the median TRE between the improved DIR method and the conventional DIR method was statistically significant (2.27 vs. 5.88, P<0.05). The Jacobian determinant of the deformation field was positive for all patients. For visual assessment, the improved DIR method with point metric achieved better matching for soft tissue. Conclusions The improved DIR method's registration accuracy was higher than the conventional DIR method based on the preliminary results. With point metric and masking technique, the influence of large deformations and non-correspondence on registration between pre- and post-operative CT images can be effectively reduced. Therefore, this method provides a feasible way for target volume definition in postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuchun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Ye
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shulian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vickress J, Rangel Baltazar MA, Afsharpour H. Evaluation of Varian's SmartAdapt for clinical use in radiation therapy for patients with thoracic lesions. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:150-156. [PMID: 33570225 PMCID: PMC7984488 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deformable image registration (DIR) is a required tool in any adaptive radiotherapy program to help account for anatomical changes that occur during a multifraction treatment. SmartAdapt is a DIR tool from Varian incorporated within the eclipse treatment planning system, that can be used for contour propagation and transfer of PET, MRI, or computed tomography (CT) data. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the registration and contour propagation accuracy of SmartAdapt for thoracic CT studies using the guidelines from AAPM TG 132. METHODS To evaluate the registration accuracy of SmartAdapt the mean target registration error (TRE) was measured for ten landmarked 4DCT images from the https://www.dir-labs.com/ which included 300 landmarks matching the inspiration and expiration phase images. To further characterize the registration accuracy, the magnitude of deformation for each 4DCT was measured and compared against the mean TRE for each study. Contour propagation accuracy was evaluated using 22 randomly selected lung cancer cases from our center where there was either a replan, or the patient was treated for a new lesion within the lung. Contours evaluated included the right and left lung, esophagus, spinal canal, heart and the GTV and the results were quantified using the DICE similarity coefficient. RESULTS The mean TRE from all ten cases was 1.89 mm, the maximum mean TRE per case was 3.8 mm from case #8, which also had the most landmark pairs with displacements >2 cm. For contour propagation accuracy, the DICE coefficient results for left lung, right lung, heart, esophagus, and spinal canal were 0.93, 0.94, 0.90, 0.61, and 0.82 respectively. CONCLUSION The results from our study demonstrate that for thoracic images SmartAdapt in most cases will be accurate to below 2 mm in registration error unless there is deformation greater than 2 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Vickress
- Trillium Health Partners/the Credit Valley HospitalMississaugaONCanada
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| | | | - Hossein Afsharpour
- Trillium Health Partners/the Credit Valley HospitalMississaugaONCanada
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang H, Xue J, Chen T, Qu T, Barbee D, Tam M, Hu K. Adaptive radiotherapy based on statistical process control for oropharyngeal cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:171-177. [PMID: 32770651 PMCID: PMC7497930 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to quantify dosimetric changes throughout the delivery of oropharyngeal cancer treatment and to investigate the application of statistical process control (SPC) for the management of significant deviations during the course of radiotherapy. METHODS Thirteen oropharyngeal cancer patients with daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were retrospectively reviewed. Cone beam computed tomography images of every other fraction were imported to the Velocity software and registered to planning CT using the 6 DOF (degrees of freedom) couch shifts generated during patient setup. Using Velocity "Adaptive Monitoring" module, the setup-corrected CBCT was matched to planning CT using a deformable registration. Volumes and dose metrics at each fraction were calculated and rated with plan values to evaluate interfractional dosimetric variations using a SPC framework. T-tests between plan and fraction volumes were performed to find statistically insignificant fractions. Average upper and lower process capacity limits (UCL, LCL) of each dose metric were derived from these fractions using conventional SPC guidelines. RESULTS Gross tumor volume (GTV) and organ at risk (OAR) volumes in the first 13 fractions had no significant changes from the pretreatment planning CT. The GTV and the parotid glands subsequently decreased by 10% at the completion of treatment. There were 3-4% increases in parotid mean doses, but no significant differences in dose metrics of GTV and other OARs. The changes were organ and patient dependent. Control charts for various dose metrics were generated to assess the metrics at each fraction for individual patient. CONCLUSIONS Daily CBCT could be used to monitor dosimetric variations of targets and OARs resulting from volume changes and tissue deformation in oropharyngeal cancer radiotherapy. Treatment review with the guidance of a SPC tool allows for an objective and consistent clinical decision to apply adaptive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jinyu Xue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ting Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tanxia Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Barbee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Moses Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Free-to-use DIR solutions in radiotherapy: Benchmark against commercial platforms through a contour-propagation study. Phys Med 2020; 74:110-117. [PMID: 32464468 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A contour propagation study has been conducted to benchmark three algorithms for Deformable Image Registration (DIR) freely available online against well-established commercial solutions. METHODS ElastiX, BRAINS and Plastimach, available as modules in the open source platform 3DSlicer, were tested as the recent AAPM Task group 132 guidelines proposes. The overlap of the DIR-mapped ROIs in four computational anthropomorphic phantoms was measured. To avoid bias every algorithm was left to run without any human interaction nor particular registration strategy. The accuracy of the algorithms was measured using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Mean Distance to Conformity (MDC) metrics. The registration quality was compared to the recommended geometrical accuracy suggested by AAPM TG132 and to the results of a large population-based study performed with commercial DIR solutions. RESULTS The considered free-to-use DIR solutions generally meet acceptable accuracy and good overlap (DSC > 0.85). Mild failures (DSC < 0.75) were detected only for the smallest structures. In case of extremely severe deformations acceptable accuracy was not met (MDC > 3 mm). The morphing capability of the tested algorithms equals those of commercial systems when the user interaction is avoided. Underperformances were detected only in cases where a specific registration strategy is mandatory to obtain a satisfying match. CONCLUSIONS All of the considered algorithms show performances not inferior to previously published data and have the potential to be good candidates for use in the clinical routine. The results and conclusions only apply to the considered phantoms and should not be considered to be generally applicable and extendable to patient cases.
Collapse
|
11
|
Shintani T, Nakamura M, Matsuo Y, Miyabe Y, Mukumoto N, Mitsuyoshi T, Iizuka Y, Mizowaki T. Investigation of 4D dose in volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy: does fractional dose or number of arcs matter? JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2020; 61:325-334. [PMID: 32030408 PMCID: PMC7246072 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of fractional dose and the number of arcs on interplay effects when volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is used to treat lung tumors with large respiratory motions. A three (fractional dose of 4, 7.5 or 12.5 Gy) by two (number of arcs, one or two) VMAT plan was created for 10 lung cancer cases. The median 3D tumor motion was 17.9 mm (range: 8.2-27.2 mm). Ten phase-specific subplans were generated by calculating the dose on each respiratory phase computed tomography (CT) scan using temporally assigned VMAT arcs. We performed temporal assignment of VMAT arcs using respiratory information obtained from infrared markers placed on the abdomens of the patients during CT simulations. Each phase-specific dose distribution was deformed onto exhale phase CT scans using contour-based deformable image registration, and a 4D plan was created by dose accumulation. The gross tumor volume dose of each 4D plan (4D GTV dose) was compared with the internal target volume dose of the original plan (3D ITV dose). The near-minimum 4D GTV dose (D99%) was higher than the near-minimum 3D internal target volume (ITV) dose, whereas the near-maximum 4D GTV dose (D1%) was lower than the near-maximum 3D ITV dose. However, the difference was negligible, and thus the 4D GTV dose corresponded well with the 3D ITV dose, regardless of the fractional dose and number of arcs. Therefore, interplay effects were negligible in VMAT-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors with large respiratory motions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Shintani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Information Technology and Medical Engineering, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yuki Miyabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Mukumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takamasa Mitsuyoshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yusuke Iizuka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ma C, Duan J, Yu S, Ma C. Dosimetric study of three-dimensional static and dynamic SBRT radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma based on 4DCT image deformable registration. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 21:60-66. [PMID: 31889422 PMCID: PMC7020978 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to determine the actual dose received by normal tissues during four‐dimensional radiation therapy (4DRT) composed of ten phases of four‐dimensional computer tomography (4DCT) images. The analysis was performed by tracking the hepatocellular carcinoma SBRT. Data were acquired from the tracking of each phase with the beam aperture for 28 hepatocellular carcinoma patients, and the data were used to generate a cumulative plan, which was compared to a three‐dimensional (3D) plan formed from a merged target volume based on 4DCT images in a radiation treatment planning system (TPS). The change in normal tissue dose was evaluated in the plan using the parameters V5, V10, V15, V20, V25, V30, V35, and V40 (volumes receiving 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40 Gy, respectively) in the dose‐volume histogram for the liver; the mean dose was analyzed for the following tissues: liver, left kidney, and right kidney. The maximum dose was analyzed for the following tissues: bowel, duodenum, esophagus, stomach, and heart. There was a significant difference in the dose between the 4D planning target volume (PTV) (average 115.71 cm3) and ITV (169.86 cm3). The planning objective was for 95% of the volume of the PTV to be covered by the prescription dose, but the mean dose for the liver, left kidney and right kidney had an average decrease of 23.13%, 49.51%, and 54.38%, respectively. The maximum dose for the bowel, duodenum, esophagus, stomach, and heart had an average decrease of 16.77%, 28.07%, 24.28%, 4.89%, and 4.45%, respectively. Compared to 3D RT, the radiation volume for the liver V5, V10, V15, V20, V25, V30, V35, and V40 using the 4D plans had a significant decrease (P ﹤ 0.05). The 4D method creates plans that permit sparing of the normal tissues more than the commonly used ITV method, which delivers the same dosimetric effects to the target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changdong Ma
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
| | - Jinghao Duan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250117, China
| | - Shuang Yu
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, China
| | - Changsheng Ma
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250117, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kiser KJ, Smith BD, Wang J, Fuller CD. "Après Mois, Le Déluge": Preparing for the Coming Data Flood in the MRI-Guided Radiotherapy Era. Front Oncol 2019; 9:983. [PMID: 31632914 PMCID: PMC6779062 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging provides a sea of quantitative and semi-quantitative data. While radiation oncologists already navigate a pool of clinical (semantic) and imaging data, the tide will swell with the advent of hybrid MRI/linear accelerator devices and increasing interest in MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT), including adaptive MRIgRT. The variety of MR sequences (of greater complexity than the single parameter Hounsfield unit of CT scanning routinely used in radiotherapy), the workflow of adaptive fractionation, and the sheer quantity of daily images acquired are challenges for scaling this technology. Biomedical informatics, which is the science of information in biomedicine, can provide helpful insights for this looming transition. Funneling MRIgRT data into clinically meaningful information streams requires committing to the flow of inter-institutional data accessibility and interoperability initiatives, standardizing MRIgRT dosimetry methods, streamlining MR linear accelerator workflow, and standardizing MRI acquisition and post-processing. This review will attempt to conceptually ford these topics using clinical informatics approaches as a theoretical bridge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendall J Kiser
- John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.,School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Evaluation of Intensity- and Contour-Based Deformable Image Registration Accuracy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11101447. [PMID: 31569617 PMCID: PMC6826682 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11101447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to clarify the accuracy of rigid image registration and deformable image registration (DIR) in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for pancreatic cancer. Six patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with passive irradiation CIRT were enrolled. Three registration patterns were evaluated: treatment planning computed tomography images (TPCT) to CT images acquired in the treatment room (IRCT) in the supine position, TPCT to IRCT in the prone position, and TPCT in the supine position to the prone position. After warping the contours of the original CT images to the destination CT images using deformation matrices from the registration, the warped delineated contours on the destination CT images were compared with the original ones using mean displacement to agreement (MDA). Four contours (clinical target volume (CTV), gross tumor volume (GTV), stomach, duodenum) and four registration algorithms (rigid image registration [RIR], intensity-based DIR [iDIR], contour-based DIR [cDIR], and a hybrid iDIR-cDIR ([hDIR]) were evaluated. The means ± standard deviation of the MDAs of all contours for RIR, iDIR, cDIR, and hDIR were 3.40 ± 3.30, 2.2 1± 2.48, 1.46 ± 1.49, and 1.46 ± 1.37 mm, respectively. There were significant differences between RIR and iDIR, and between RIR/iDIR and cDIR/hDIR. For the pancreatic cancer patient images, cDIR and hDIR had better accuracy than RIR and iDIR.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kiser K, Meheissen MA, Mohamed AS, Kamal M, Ng SP, Elhalawani H, Jethanandani A, He R, Ding Y, Rostom Y, Hegazy N, Bahig H, Garden A, Lai S, Phan J, Gunn GB, Rosenthal D, Frank S, Brock KK, Wang J, Fuller CD. Prospective quantitative quality assurance and deformation estimation of MRI-CT image registration in simulation of head and neck radiotherapy patients. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 18:120-127. [PMID: 31341987 PMCID: PMC6630195 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI-CT deformable image registration was not superior to rigid registration. Dice similarity coefficients were 0.65, 0.62, and 0.63 for deformable registrations. Dice similarity coefficient was 0.63 for rigid registration. Registration quality was superior in muscle and gland compared to bone and vessel.
Background MRI-guided radiotherapy planning (MRIgRT) may be superior to CT-guided planning in some instances owing to its improved soft tissue contrast. However, MR images do not communicate tissue electron density information necessary for dose calculation and therefore must either be co-registered to CT or algorithmically converted to synthetic CT. No robust quality assessment of commercially available MR-CT registration algorithms is yet available; thus we sought to quantify MR-CT registration formally. Methods Head and neck non-contrast CT and T2 MRI scans acquired with standard treatment immobilization techniques were prospectively acquired from 15 patients. Per scan, 35 anatomic regions of interest (ROIs) were manually segmented. MRIs were registered to CT rigidly (RIR) and by three commercially available deformable registration algorithms (DIR). Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance mean (HD mean) and Hausdorff distance max (HD max) metrics were calculated to assess concordance between MRI and CT segmentations. Each DIR algorithm was compared to DIR using the nonparametric Steel test with control for individual ROIs (n = 105 tests) and for all ROIs in aggregate (n = 3 tests). The influence of tissue type on registration fidelity was assessed using nonparametric Wilcoxon pairwise tests between ROIs grouped by tissue type (n = 12 tests). Bonferroni corrections were applied for multiple comparisons. Results No DIR algorithm improved the segmentation quality over RIR for any ROI nor all ROIs in aggregate (all p values >0.05). Muscle and gland ROIs were significantly more concordant than vessel and bone, but DIR remained non-different from RIR. Conclusions For MR-CT co-registration, our results question the utility and applicability of commercially available DIR over RIR alone. The poor overall performance also questions the feasibility of translating tissue electron density information to MRI by CT registration, rather than addressing this need with synthetic CT generation or bulk-density assignment.
Collapse
Key Words
- CT, computed tomography
- CT-MRI image registration
- DICOM, digital imaging and communications in medicine
- DIR, deformable image registration
- DSC, dice similarity coefficient
- Deformable image registration
- HD max, Hausdorff maximum distance
- HD mean, Hausdorff mean distance
- HNC, head and neck cancer
- HPV, human papillomavirus
- HU, Hounsfield units
- IMRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy
- MAE, mean absolute error
- MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
- MRI-guided radiotherapy
- MRIgRT, MRI-guided radiotherapy planning
- MRL, MRI linear accelerator
- OAR, organ(s) at risk
- Quality assessment
- RIR, rigid image registration
- RT, radiation therapy
- Rigid image registration
- sCT, synthetic computed tomography
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kendall Kiser
- University of Texas, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- UT Health School of Biomedical Informatics, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mohamed A.M. Meheissen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, 17 Champilion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Abdallah S.R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, 17 Champilion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria, Egypt
- MD Anderson Cancer Center/UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 6767 Bertner Avenue, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mona Kamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ain Shams, Lofty El-Said Street, 1156 Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncolog, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Hesham Elhalawani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Amit Jethanandani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Avenue #1002, Memphis, TN 38103, USA
| | - Renjie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yao Ding
- Department of Radiation Physics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yousri Rostom
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, 17 Champilion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Neamat Hegazy
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, 17 Champilion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal, 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Adam Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Stephen Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gary B. Gunn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David Rosenthal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Steven Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kristy K. Brock
- Department of Radiation Physics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mulić M, Lazović B, Detanac D, Detanac D, Milić R, Žugič V. Phantom tumor of the lung in patient with pneumonia. SANAMED 2019. [DOI: 10.24125/sanamed.v14i1.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Localized interlobar effusions in congestive heart failure (phantom or vanishing lung tumor/s) are infrequent, but widely recognized entities. Case report: A 80-years-old woman affected by progressive dyspnea over the previous three months, with productive cough. She was treated hypertension and had a pace maker implanted due to bradycardia. Chest X ray has shown right side pneumonia with high positive inflammatory markers. After resolution of pneumonia, phantom tumor of the lung was revealed, which disappear with intensive loop diuretics. Conclusions: The diagnosis of the phantom tumor ought to be pondered as a possibility in any patient with congestive heart failure and lung mass. The patient at hand featured no prior history of congestive heart failure, hence indicating that phantom tumor may occur in non-chronic heart failure patients. Albeid the reliable diagnosis of the phantom tumor through the utilization of imaging modalities in patients without congestive heart failure can be rather challenging, such possibility must be considered in a patient with a lung mass in the major fissure of the lungs. Due to accelerated expansion of the geriatric population and subsequent spread of the congestive heart failure, a rise in the incidence of vanishing tumors of the lung may be anticipated.
Collapse
|