1
|
Huang C, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Yin Y, Hu Z, She Q, Mao R, Wei K, Yang H, Tang K, Lu Z. Carbon ion radiography with a composite ionization chamber detector. Appl Radiat Isot 2024; 203:111072. [PMID: 37897938 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
Range uncertainty in carbon ion therapy can diminish treatment efficacy because it may cause deviation from the planned dose distribution. The precise and accurate determination of relative stopping power (RSP) maps of carbon ions in the patient is a direct solution to this problem. To obtain RSP maps in patients undergoing carbon ion radiography, our team developed a preliminary prototype of a composite ionization chamber detection (CICD) system. The CICD prototype employs synchronously gated integral electronics with the ability to measure the depth-to-dose curve and the beam profile simultaneously. Carbon ion radiography experiments were performed on hemispherical, sloped, and stepped phantoms using the Heavy Ion Medical Machine (HIMM) beam. The beam energy was 190.19 MeV/μ and the beam spot full width at half maximum (FWHM) was 7.42 mm. The radiographic image of the sloped phantom, the thickness prediction accuracy of each pixel (2 mm) is 88.25%, its absolute mean error (AME) is 1.07 mm, and the maximum absolute deviation (MAD) is 2.64 mm. The prediction accuracy of the CICD prototype is mainly affected by electronic noise, with a noise-to-signal ratio (NSR) of about 14.36 dB. Carbon ion radiography simulations were performed in this study using Geant4 software to eliminate the effect of the electronic noise. The thickness prediction accuracy is 98.54%, 98.62%, and 99.07% per pixel for hemispherical, sloped and stepped phantoms, respectively, with AME of 0.09 mm, 0.27 mm, and 0.48 mm. Carbon ion radiography utilizing the CICD prototype scheme has the ability to refine the accuracy and resolution of radiographic images, consequently establishing a scientific foundation for diminishing the effects of range uncertainty and fully exploiting the advantages of precision particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Huang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China; School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China
| | - Zhiguo Xu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| | - Zulong Zhao
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Yongzhi Yin
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China
| | - Zhengguo Hu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Qianshun She
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ruishi Mao
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Kun Wei
- Wuwei Occupational College, Wuwei, Gansu, 730000, China
| | - Herun Yang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Kai Tang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Ziwei Lu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aehle M, Alme J, Gábor Barnaföldi G, Blühdorn J, Bodova T, Borshchov V, van den Brink A, Eikeland V, Feofilov G, Garth C, Gauger NR, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Igolkin S, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, Kortus T, Kusch L, Leonhardt V, Mehendale S, Ningappa Mulawade R, Harald Odland O, O'Neill G, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Pettersen HES, Piersimoni P, Pochampalli R, Protsenko M, Rauch M, Ur Rehman A, Richter M, Röhrich D, Sagebaum M, Santana J, Schilling A, Seco J, Songmoolnak A, Sudár Á, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Volz L, Wagner B, Wendzel S, Wiebel A, Xiao R, Yang S, Zillien S. Exploration of differentiability in a proton computed tomography simulation framework. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:244002. [PMID: 37949060 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0bdd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Gradient-based optimization using algorithmic derivatives can be a useful technique to improve engineering designs with respect to a computer-implemented objective function. Likewise, uncertainty quantification through computer simulations can be carried out by means of derivatives of the computer simulation. However, the effectiveness of these techniques depends on how 'well-linearizable' the software is. In this study, we assess how promising derivative information of a typical proton computed tomography (pCT) scan computer simulation is for the aforementioned applications.Approach.This study is mainly based on numerical experiments, in which we repeatedly evaluate three representative computational steps with perturbed input values. We support our observations with a review of the algorithmic steps and arithmetic operations performed by the software, using debugging techniques.Main results.The model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) subprocedure (at the end of the software pipeline) and the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation (at the beginning) were piecewise differentiable. However, the observed high density and magnitude of jumps was likely to preclude most meaningful uses of the derivatives. Jumps in the MBIR function arose from the discrete computation of the set of voxels intersected by a proton path, and could be reduced in magnitude by a 'fuzzy voxels' approach. The investigated jumps in the MC function arose from local changes in the control flow that affected the amount of consumed random numbers. The tracking algorithm solves an inherently non-differentiable problem.Significance.Besides the technical challenges of merely applying AD to existing software projects, the MC and MBIR codes must be adapted to compute smoother functions. For the MBIR code, we presented one possible approach for this while for the MC code, this will be subject to further research. For the tracking subprocedure, further research on surrogate models is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Aehle
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Johan Alme
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Johannes Blühdorn
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Tea Bodova
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Viljar Eikeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Christoph Garth
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Nicolas R Gauger
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Ola Grøttvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Håvard Helstrup
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Ralf Keidel
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Chinorat Kobdaj
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Tobias Kortus
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Lisa Kusch
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Viktor Leonhardt
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Shruti Mehendale
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Raju Ningappa Mulawade
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Odd Harald Odland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - George O'Neill
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Gábor Papp
- Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/A Pázmány P. Sétány, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Peitzmann
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Pierluigi Piersimoni
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- FSN Department, ENEA, Frascati Research Center, I-00044, Frascati, Italy
| | - Rohit Pochampalli
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Maksym Protsenko
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Max Rauch
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Attiq Ur Rehman
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Dieter Röhrich
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Max Sagebaum
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Joshua Santana
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Schilling
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZGerman Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnon Songmoolnak
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Ákos Sudár
- Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ganesh Tambave
- Center for Medical and Radiation Physics (CMRP), National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Ihor Tymchuk
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Kjetil Ullaland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Boris Wagner
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Steffen Wendzel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Wiebel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - RenZheng Xiao
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiming Yang
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Sebastian Zillien
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schilling A, Aehle M, Alme J, Barnaföldi GG, Bodova T, Borshchov V, van den Brink A, Eikeland V, Feofilov G, Garth C, Gauger NR, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Igolkin S, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, Kortus T, Leonhardt V, Mehendale S, Ningappa Mulawade R, Harald Odland O, O'Neill G, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Pettersen HES, Piersimoni P, Protsenko M, Rauch M, Ur Rehman A, Richter M, Röhrich D, Santana J, Seco J, Songmoolnak A, Sudár Á, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Volz L, Wagner B, Wendzel S, Wiebel A, Xiao R, Yang S, Zillien S. Uncertainty-aware spot rejection rate as quality metric for proton therapy using a digital tracking calorimeter. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:194001. [PMID: 37652034 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf5c2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Proton therapy is highly sensitive to range uncertainties due to the nature of the dose deposition of charged particles. To ensure treatment quality, range verification methods can be used to verify that the individual spots in a pencil beam scanning treatment fraction match the treatment plan. This study introduces a novel metric for proton therapy quality control based on uncertainties in range verification of individual spots.Approach.We employ uncertainty-aware deep neural networks to predict the Bragg peak depth in an anthropomorphic phantom based on secondary charged particle detection in a silicon pixel telescope designed for proton computed tomography. The subsequently predicted Bragg peak positions, along with their uncertainties, are compared to the treatment plan, rejecting spots which are predicted to be outside the 95% confidence interval. The such-produced spot rejection rate presents a metric for the quality of the treatment fraction.Main results.The introduced spot rejection rate metric is shown to be well-defined for range predictors with well-calibrated uncertainties. Using this method, treatment errors in the form of lateral shifts can be detected down to 1 mm after around 1400 treated spots with spot intensities of 1 × 107protons. The range verification model used in this metric predicts the Bragg peak depth to a mean absolute error of 1.107 ± 0.015 mm.Significance.Uncertainty-aware machine learning has potential applications in proton therapy quality control. This work presents the foundation for future developments in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Schilling
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Max Aehle
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Johan Alme
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Tea Bodova
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | - Viljar Eikeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Christoph Garth
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Nicolas R Gauger
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Ola Grøttvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Håvard Helstrup
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Ralf Keidel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
- Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Chinorat Kobdaj
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Tobias Kortus
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Viktor Leonhardt
- Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Shruti Mehendale
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Raju Ningappa Mulawade
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Odd Harald Odland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - George O'Neill
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Gábor Papp
- Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/A Pázmány P. Sétány, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Peitzmann
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Pierluigi Piersimoni
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | - Maksym Protsenko
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPELTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Max Rauch
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Attiq Ur Rehman
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Matthias Richter
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Dieter Röhrich
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Joshua Santana
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnon Songmoolnak
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Ákos Sudár
- Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
- Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ganesh Tambave
- Center for Medical and Radiation Physics (CMRP), National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Ihor Tymchuk
- Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPELTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Kjetil Ullaland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Boris Wagner
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Steffen Wendzel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Wiebel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| | - RenZheng Xiao
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
- College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiming Yang
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Sebastian Zillien
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ulrich-Pur F, Bergauer T, Burker A, Hirtl A, Irmler C, Kaser S, Pitters F, Rit S. Feasibility study of a proton CT system based on 4D-tracking and residual energy determination via time-of-flight. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35354129 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac628b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.For dose calculations in ion beam therapy, it is vital to accurately determine the relative stopping power (RSP) distribution within the treatment volume. A suitable imaging modality to achieve the required RSP accuracy is proton computed tomography (pCT), which usually uses a tracking system and a separate residual energy (or range) detector to directly measure the RSP distribution. This work investigates the potential of a novel pCT system based on a single detector technology, namely low gain avalanche detectors (LGADs). LGADs are fast 4D-tracking detectors, which can be used to simultaneously measure the particle position and time with precise timing and spatial resolution. In contrast to standard pCT systems, the residual energy is determined via a time-of-flight (TOF) measurement between different 4D-tracking stations.Approach.To show the potential of using 4D-tracking for proton imaging, we studied and optimized the design parameters for a realistic TOF-pCT system using Monte Carlo simulations. We calculated the RSP accuracy and RSP resolution inside the inserts of the CTP404 phantom and compared the results to a simulation of an ideal pCT system.Main results.After introducing a dedicated calibration procedure for the TOF calorimeter, RSP accuracies less than 0.6% could be achieved. We also identified the design parameters with the strongest impact on the RSP resolution and proposed a strategy to further improve the image quality.Significance.This comprehensive study of the most important design aspects for a novel TOF-pCT system could help guide future hardware developments and, once implemented, improve the quality of treatment planning in ion beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ulrich-Pur
- Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute of High Energy Physics (HEPHY), Nikolsdorfer Gasse 18, A-1050 Wien, Austria
| | - Thomas Bergauer
- Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute of High Energy Physics (HEPHY), Nikolsdorfer Gasse 18, A-1050 Wien, Austria
| | | | - Albert Hirtl
- TU Wien, Atominstitut, Stadionallee 2, A-1020 Wien, Austria
| | - Christian Irmler
- Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute of High Energy Physics (HEPHY), Nikolsdorfer Gasse 18, A-1050 Wien, Austria
| | - Stefanie Kaser
- Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute of High Energy Physics (HEPHY), Nikolsdorfer Gasse 18, A-1050 Wien, Austria
| | - Florian Pitters
- Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute of High Energy Physics (HEPHY), Nikolsdorfer Gasse 18, A-1050 Wien, Austria
| | - Simon Rit
- Lyon University, INSA-Lyon, University Lyon1, UJM-Saint Etienne, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR5220, U1206, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dedes G, Dickmann J, Giacometti V, Rit S, Krah N, Meyer S, Bashkirov V, Schulte R, Johnson RP, Parodi K, Landry G. The role of Monte Carlo simulation in understanding the performance of proton computed tomography. Z Med Phys 2022; 32:23-38. [PMID: 32798033 PMCID: PMC9948882 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Proton computed tomography (pCT) is a promising tomographic imaging modality allowing direct reconstruction of proton relative stopping power (RSP) required for proton therapy dose calculation. In this review article, we aim at highlighting the role of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation in pCT studies. After describing the requirements for performing proton computed tomography and the various pCT scanners actively used in recent research projects, we present an overview of available MC simulation platforms. The use of MC simulations in the scope of investigations of image reconstruction, and for the evaluation of optimal RSP accuracy, precision and spatial resolution omitting detector effects is then described. In the final sections of the review article, we present specific applications of realistic MC simulations of an existing pCT scanner prototype, which we describe in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Dedes
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching b. München, Germany.
| | - Jannis Dickmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Valentina Giacometti
- The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Rit
- University of Lyon, CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Nils Krah
- University of Lyon, CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; University of Lyon, Institute of Nuclear Physics Lyon (IPNL), CNRS UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Sebastian Meyer
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching b. München, Germany; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Vladimir Bashkirov
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States of America
| | - Reinhard Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States of America
| | - Robert P Johnson
- Department of Physics, U. C. Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching b. München, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, (DKTK), Munich, Germany; Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching b. München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Volz L, Collins-Fekete CA, Bär E, Brons S, Graeff C, Johnson RP, Runz A, Sarosiek C, Schulte RW, Seco J. The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:10.1088/1361-6560/ac33ec. [PMID: 34706355 PMCID: PMC8792995 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac33ec] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
This work provides a quantitative assessment of helium ion CT (HeCT) for particle therapy treatment planning. For the first time, HeCT based range prediction accuracy in a heterogeneous tissue phantom is presented and compared to single-energy x-ray CT (SECT), dual-energy x-ray CT (DECT) and proton CT (pCT). HeCT and pCT scans were acquired using the US pCT collaboration prototype particle CT scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. SECT and DECT scans were done with a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash and converted to RSP. A Catphan CTP404 module was used to study the RSP accuracy of HeCT. A custom phantom of 20 cm diameter containing several tissue equivalent plastic cubes was used to assess the spatial resolution of HeCT and compare it to DECT. A clinically realistic heterogeneous tissue phantom was constructed using cranial slices from a pig head placed inside a cylindrical phantom (ø150 mm). A proton beam (84.67 mm range) depth-dose measurement was acquired using a stack of GafchromicTM EBT-XD films in a central dosimetry insert in the phantom. CT scans of the phantom were acquired with each modality, and proton depth-dose estimates were simulated based on the reconstructions. The RSP accuracy of HeCT for the plastic phantom was found to be 0.3 ± 0.1%. The spatial resolution for HeCT of the cube phantom was 5.9 ± 0.4 lp cm-1for central, and 7.6 ± 0.8 lp cm-1for peripheral cubes, comparable to DECT spatial resolution (7.7 ± 0.3 lp cm-1and 7.4 ± 0.2 lp cm-1, respectively). For the pig head, HeCT, SECT, DECT and pCT predicted range accuracy was 0.25%, -1.40%, -0.45% and 0.39%, respectively. In this study, HeCT acquired with a prototype system showed potential for particle therapy treatment planning, offering RSP accuracy, spatial resolution, and range prediction accuracy comparable to that achieved with a commercial DECT scanner. Still, technical improvements of HeCT are needed to enable clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Volz
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C-A Collins-Fekete
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Universitäts Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Graeff
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - R P Johnson
- Department of Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States of America
| | - A Runz
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Therapy, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Sarosiek
- Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, United States of America
| | - R W Schulte
- Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, United States of America
| | - J Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pettersen HES, Aehle M, Alme J, Barnaföldi GG, Borshchov V, van den Brink A, Chaar M, Eikeland V, Feofilov G, Garth C, Gauger NR, Genov G, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Igolkin S, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, Kortus T, Leonhardt V, Mehendale S, Mulawade RN, Odland OH, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Piersimoni P, Protsenko M, Rehman AU, Richter M, Santana J, Schilling A, Seco J, Songmoolnak A, Sølie JR, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Volz L, Wagner B, Wendzel S, Wiebel A, Xiao R, Yang S, Yokoyama H, Zillien S, Röhrich D. Investigating particle track topology for range telescopes in particle radiography using convolutional neural networks. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1413-1418. [PMID: 34259117 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1949037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton computed tomography (pCT) and radiography (pRad) are proposed modalities for improved treatment plan accuracy and in situ treatment validation in proton therapy. The pCT system of the Bergen pCT collaboration is able to handle very high particle intensities by means of track reconstruction. However, incorrectly reconstructed and secondary tracks degrade the image quality. We have investigated whether a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based filter is able to improve the image quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS The CNN was trained by simulation and reconstruction of tens of millions of proton and helium tracks. The CNN filter was then compared to simple energy loss threshold methods using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC), and by comparing the image quality and Water Equivalent Path Length (WEPL) error of proton and helium radiographs filtered with the same methods. RESULTS The CNN method led to a considerable improvement of the AUROC, from 74.3% to 97.5% with protons and from 94.2% to 99.5% with helium. The CNN filtering reduced the WEPL error in the helium radiograph from 1.03 mm to 0.93 mm while no improvement was seen in the CNN filtered pRads. CONCLUSION The CNN improved the filtering of proton and helium tracks. Only in the helium radiograph did this lead to improved image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Max Aehle
- Chair for Scientific Computing, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Johan Alme
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Mamdouh Chaar
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Viljar Eikeland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Grigory Feofilov
- Department of High Energy and Elementary Particles Physics, St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Christoph Garth
- Scientific Visualization Lab, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Nicolas R. Gauger
- Chair for Scientific Computing, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Georgi Genov
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ola Grøttvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Håvard Helstrup
- Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sergey Igolkin
- Department of High Energy and Elementary Particles Physics, St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Ralf Keidel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Chinorat Kobdaj
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Tobias Kortus
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Viktor Leonhardt
- Scientific Visualization Lab, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Shruti Mehendale
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Raju Ningappa Mulawade
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Odd Harald Odland
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Gábor Papp
- Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Peitzmann
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Maksym Protsenko
- Research and Production Enterprise “LTU” (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Attiq Ur Rehman
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Joshua Santana
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Schilling
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arnon Songmoolnak
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Jarle Rambo Sølie
- Department of Diagnostic Physics, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ganesh Tambave
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ihor Tymchuk
- Research and Production Enterprise “LTU” (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Kjetil Ullaland
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Lennart Volz
- Department of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Boris Wagner
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Steffen Wendzel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Alexander Wiebel
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - RenZheng Xiao
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- College of Mechanical & Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shiming Yang
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hiroki Yokoyama
- Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Zillien
- Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany
| | - Dieter Röhrich
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pettersen HES, Volz L, Sølie JR, Alme J, Barnaföldi GG, Barthel R, van den Brink A, Borshchov V, Chaar M, Eikeland V, Genov G, Grøttvik O, Helstrup H, Keidel R, Kobdaj C, van der Kolk N, Mehendale S, Meric I, Harald Odland O, Papp G, Peitzmann T, Piersimoni P, Protsenko M, Ur Rehman A, Richter M, Tefre Samnøy A, Seco J, Shafiee H, Songmoolnak A, Tambave G, Tymchuk I, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Wagner B, Xiao R, Yang S, Yokoyama H, Röhrich D. Helium radiography with a digital tracking calorimeter-a Monte Carlo study for secondary track rejection. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035004. [PMID: 33181502 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abca03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy using protons and heavier ions is a fast-growing therapeutic option for cancer patients. A clinical system for particle imaging in particle therapy would enable online patient position verification, estimation of the dose deposition through range monitoring and a reduction of uncertainties in the calculation of the relative stopping power of the patient. Several prototype imaging modalities offer radiography and computed tomography using protons and heavy ions. A Digital Tracking Calorimeter (DTC), currently under development, has been proposed as one such detector. In the DTC 43 longitudinal layers of laterally stacked ALPIDE CMOS monolithic active pixel sensor chips are able to reconstruct a large number of simultaneously recorded proton tracks. In this study, we explored the capability of the DTC for helium imaging which offers favorable spatial resolution over proton imaging. Helium ions exhibit a larger cross section for inelastic nuclear interactions, increasing the number of produced secondaries in the imaged object and in the detector itself. To that end, a filtering process able to remove a large fraction of the secondaries was identified, and the track reconstruction process was adapted for helium ions. By filtering on the energy loss along the tracks, on the incoming angle and on the particle ranges, 97.5% of the secondaries were removed. After passing through 16 cm water, 50.0% of the primary helium ions survived; after the proposed filtering 42.4% of the primaries remained; finally after subsequent image reconstruction 31% of the primaries remained. Helium track reconstruction leads to more track matching errors compared to protons due to the increased available focus strength of the helium beam. In a head phantom radiograph, the Water Equivalent Path Length error envelope was 1.0 mm for helium and 1.1 mm for protons. This accuracy is expected to be sufficient for helium imaging for pre-treatment verification purposes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rambo Sølie J, Volz L, Egil Seime Pettersen H, Piersimoni P, Harald Odland O, Röhrich D, Helstrup H, Peitzmann T, Ullaland K, Varga-Kofarago M, Mehendale S, Slettevoll Grøttvik O, Nilsen Eikeland V, Meric I, Seco J. Image quality of list-mode proton imaging without front trackers. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:135012. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8ddb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
10
|
Amato C, Martisikova M, Gehrke T. A technique for spatial resolution improvement in helium‐beam radiography. Med Phys 2020; 47:2212-2221. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C. Amato
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Physics University of Pisa Pisa Italy
| | - M. Martisikova
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
| | - T. Gehrke
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Incerti S, Brown JM, Guatelli S. Advances in Geant4 applications in medicine. Phys Med 2020; 70:224-227. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
12
|
Michelet C, Li Z, Yang W, Incerti S, Desbarats P, Giovannelli JF, Barberet P, Delville MH, Gordillo N, Devès G, Seznec H. A Geant4 simulation for three-dimensional proton imaging of microscopic samples. Phys Med 2019; 65:172-180. [PMID: 31494371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton imaging can be carried out on microscopic samples by focusing the beam to a diameter ranging from a few micrometers down to a few tens of nanometers, depending on the required beam intensity and spatial resolution. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging by tomography is obtained from proton transmission (STIM: Scanning Transmission Ion Microscopy) and/or X-ray emission (PIXE: Particle Induced X-ray Emission). In these experiments, the samples are dehydrated for under vacuum analysis. In situ quantification of nanoparticles has been carried out at CENBG in the frame of nanotoxicology studies, on cells and small organisms used as biological models, especially on Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) nematodes. Tomography experiments reveal the distribution of mass density and chemical content (in g.cm-3) within the analyzed volume. These density values are obtained using an inversion algorithm. To investigate the effect of this data reduction process, we defined different numerical phantoms, including a (dehydrated) C. elegans phantom whose geometry and density were derived from experimental data. A Monte Carlo simulation based on the Geant4 toolkit was developed. Using different simulation and reconstruction conditions, we compared the resulting tomographic images to the initial numerical reference phantom. A study of the relative error between the reconstructed and the reference images lead to the result that 20 protons per shot can be considered as an optimal number for 3D STIM imaging. Preliminary results for PIXE tomography are also presented, showing the interest of such numerical phantoms to produce reference data for future studies on X-ray signal attenuation in thick samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Michelet
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France.
| | - Zhuxin Li
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France
| | - Wen Yang
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France
| | - Sébastien Incerti
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France.
| | - Pascal Desbarats
- Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (LaBRI, UMR5800) Univ. Bordeaux, 351 Cours de la Libération, F-33405 Talence cedex, France.
| | | | - Philippe Barberet
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France.
| | - Marie-Hélène Delville
- CNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, ICMCB, UMR5026, 87 avenue du Dr. A. Schweitzer, Pessac F-33608, France.
| | - Nuria Gordillo
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France
| | - Guillaume Devès
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France.
| | - Hervé Seznec
- CENBG, UMR5797, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, F-33170 Gradignan, France.
| |
Collapse
|