A compressed sensing accelerated radial MS-CAIPIRINHA technique for extended anatomical coverage in myocardial perfusion studies on PET/MR systems

Spiral 3D time-of-flight MR angiography for rapid non-contrast carotid artery imaging: Clinical feasibility and protocol optimization

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical feasibility of spiral 3D Time-Of-Flight (TOF) MR Angiography (MRA) sequence variants for rapid non-contrast carotid artery imaging.

METHODS

Nine different 3D TOF MRA sequences were acquired in nine healthy volunteers on a standard clinical 1.5 T scanner. Three cartesian sequences (fully sampled (10:15 min), accelerated with SENSE (05:08 min), accelerated with Compressed SENSE (03:32 min)) and six different spiral sequences were acquired (spiral acquisition windows ranging from 10 to 5 ms (01:32 min-03:05 min)). Three readers graded the images qualitatively in terms of overall image quality, vessel sharpness, inhomogeneous intraluminal signal, background noise, visualization of large and small vessels and overall impression of the number of visible vessels. Cross-sectional areas of the vessel lumen were measured and vessel sharpness was quantified.

RESULTS

The SENSE and Compressed SENSE accelerated cartesian sequences and the Spiral 6 ms and 5 ms sequences were deemed comparable to the fully sampled cartesian sequence in most qualitative categories (p > 0.05) based on exact binomial tests. The Spiral 6 ms and 5 ms sequences achieved a scan time reduction of 75.3% and 69.9% respectively compared to the fully sampled cartesian sequence. The spiral sequences (generally) exhibited improved subjective vessel sharpness (p < 0.01-p = 0.13) but increased background noise (p = 0.03-p = 0.25). Cross-sectional area measurements were similar between all sequences (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.955-0.982). Quantitative vessel sharpness was increased for all spiral sequences compared to all cartesian sequences (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Spiral 3D TOF MRA sequences with a spiral acquisition window of 5 ms or 6 ms may be used for accurate, rapid, clinical non-contrast carotid artery imaging.

All-systolic first-pass myocardial rest perfusion at a long saturation time using simultaneous multi-slice imaging and compressed sensing acceleration

PURPOSE

To enable all-systolic first-pass rest myocardial perfusion with long saturation times. To investigate the change in perfusion contrast and dark rim artefacts through simulations and surrogate measurements.

METHODS

Simulations were employed to investigate optimal saturation time for myocardium-perfusion defect contrast and blood-to-myocardium signal ratios. Two saturation recovery blocks with long/short saturation times (LTS/STS) were employed to image 3 slices at end-systole and diastole. Simultaneous multi-slice balanced steady state free precession imaging and compressed sensing acceleration were combined. The sequence was compared to a 3 slice-by-slice clinical protocol in 10 patients. Quantitative assessment of myocardium-peak pre contrast and blood-to-myocardium signal ratios, as well as qualitative assessment of perceived SNR, image quality, blurring, and dark rim artefacts, were performed.

RESULTS

Simulations showed that with a bolus of 0.075 mmol/kg, a LTS of 240-470 ms led to a relative increase in myocardium-perfusion defect contrast of 34% ± 9%-28% ± 27% than a STS = 120 ms, while reducing blood-to-myocardium signal ratio by 18% ± 10%-32% ± 14% at peak myocardium. With a bolus of 0.05 mmol/kg, LTS was 320-570 ms with an increase in myocardium-perfusion defect contrast of 63% ± 13%-62% ± 29%. Across patients, LTS led to an average increase in myocardium-peak pre contrast of 59% (P < .001) at peak myocardium and a lower blood-to-myocardium signal ratio of 47% (P < .001) and 15% (P < .001) at peak blood/myocardium. LTS had improved motion robustness (P = .002), image quality (P < .001), and decreased dark rim artefacts (P = .008) than the clinical protocol.

CONCLUSION

All-systolic rest perfusion can be achieved by combining simultaneous multi-slice and compressed sensing acceleration, enabling 3-slice cardiac coverage with reduced motion and dark rim artefacts. Numerical simulations indicate that myocardium-perfusion defect contrast increases at LTS.

Combined simultaneous multislice bSSFP and compressed sensing for first-pass myocardial perfusion at 1.5 T with high spatial resolution and coverage

PURPOSE

To implement and evaluate a pseudorandom undersampling scheme for combined simultaneous multislice (SMS) balanced SSFP (bSSFP) and compressed-sensing (CS) reconstruction to enable myocardial perfusion imaging with high spatial resolution and coverage at 1.5 T.

METHODS

A prospective pseudorandom undersampling scheme that is compatible with SMS-bSSFP phase-cycling requirements and CS was developed. The SMS-bSSFP CS with pseudorandom and linear undersampling schemes were compared in a phantom. A high-resolution (1.4 × 1.4 mm2 ) six-slice SMS-bSSFP CS perfusion sequence was compared with a conventional (1.9 × 1.9 mm2 ) three-slice sequence in 10 patients. Qualitative assessment of image quality, perceived SNR, and number of diagnostic segments and quantitative measurements of sharpness, upslope index, and contrast ratio were performed.

RESULTS

In phantom experiments, pseudorandom undersampling resulted in residual artifact (RMS error) reduction by a factor of 7 compared with linear undersampling. In vivo, the proposed sequence demonstrated higher perceived SNR (2.9 ± 0.3 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6, P = .04), improved sharpness (0.35 ± 0.03 vs. 0.32 ± 0.05, P = .01), and a higher number of diagnostic segments (100% vs. 94%, P = .03) compared with the conventional sequence. There were no significant differences between the sequences in terms of image quality (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.2, P = .08), upslope index (0.11 ± 0.02 vs. 0.10 ± 0.01, P = .3), or contrast ratio (3.28 ± 0.35 vs. 3.36 ± 0.43, P = .7).

CONCLUSION

A pseudorandom k-space undersampling compatible with SMS-bSSFP and CS reconstruction has been developed and enables cardiac MR perfusion imaging with increased spatial resolution and myocardial coverage, increased number of diagnostic segments and perceived SNR, and no difference in image quality, upslope index, and contrast ratio.