The impact of image processing algorithms on digital radiography of patients with metalic hip implants

Evaluation of the performance of digital x-ray systems in pelvis radiography

The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of eight digital radiography systems and to optimise the dose-image quality relationship for digital pelvis radiography. The study involved eight digital radiography systems used for general examinations at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos. An anthropomorphic pelvic phantom (CIRS, US) was used to simulate a patient undergoing clinical pelvis radiography. Dose quantities entrance surface dose, dose area product (DAP) and exposure parameters (kVp, mA, mAs) were measured and the effects on the images were evaluated, considering physical contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and observer-based evaluations as image quality metrics. Increasing the tube voltage by 5 kVp from standard protocol led to a reduction in radiation dose (DAP) by 12%-20% with a slight impact on image quality (CNR decreases by 2%-10%). There was an inter-observer variability in image rating across different equipment (kappa value between 0 and 0.3); however, both observers agreed that increasing kVp up to 85-90 kV had no effect on perceived image quality. The results indicate that optimisation strategies should be tailored specifically for each x-ray system since significant performance differences and wide variations in radiation dose exist across various digital radiography systems used in clinical settings. The use of high kVp can be used for dose optimisation in digital pelvis radiography without compromising image diagnostic accuracy.

Automatic image quality evaluation in digital radiography using for-processing and for-presentation images

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of digital image post-processing algorithms on various image quality (IQ) metrics of radiographic images under different exposure conditions.

METHODS

A custom-made phantom constructed according to the instructions given in the IAEA Human Health Series No.39 publication was used, along with the respective software that automatically calculates various IQ metrics. Images with various exposure parameters were acquired with a digital radiography unit, which for each acquisition produces two images: one for-processing (raw) and one for-presentation (clinical). Various examination protocols were used, which incorporate diverse post-processing algorithms. The IQ metrics' values (IQ-scores) obtained were analyzed to investigate the effects of increasing incident air kerma (IAK) on the image receptor, tube potential (kVp), additional filtration, and examination protocol on image quality, and the differences between image type (raw or clinical).

RESULTS

The IQ-scores were consistent for repeated identical exposures for both raw and clinical images. The effect that changes in exposure parameters and examination protocol had on IQ-scores were different depending on the IQ metric and image type. The expected positive effect that increasing IAK and decreasing tube potential should have on IQ was clearly exhibited in two IQ metrics only, the signal difference-to-noise-ratio (SDNR) and the detectability index (d'), for both image types. No effect of additional filtration on any of the IQ metrics was detected on images of either type. An interesting finding of the study was that for all different image acquisition selections the d' scores were larger in raw images, whereas the other IQ metrics were larger in clinical images for most of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Since IQ-scores of raw and their respective clinical images may be largely different, the same type of image should be consistently used for monitoring IQ constancy and when results from different X-ray systems are compared.

Evaluation of image quality and patient exposure in fluoroscopy using a phantom: Is there any clinical relevance?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of X-ray preset acquisition protocol settings on fluoroscopy image quality (IQ) and radiation exposure.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A quality control (QC) phantom was imaged with a modern digital C-arm system, using various preset fluoroscopy protocols. IQ was assessed using human observers and in-house software for automated evaluation, based on contrast-to-noise ratios of details and their background. Patient radiation exposure was evaluated using the displayed Incident Air-Kerma and Kerma-Area Product values.

RESULTS

Protocol selection affects radiation exposure by a factor of about 3. IQ evaluation showed that acquisition protocols produce images with quite different characteristics. The visual IQ evaluation method was time consuming and cumbersome. The automated method, utilized the visual IQ evaluation results for calibration of detection thresholds. However, it failed to reproduce these results for all images and details types. In some images, digital image processing created artifacts which affected the pixel value distributions around details in a way that could be handled only by the human vision.

CONCLUSION

Manufacturers provide many preset protocols designated for specific clinical uses, which have large impact on IQ characteristics and radiation exposure. However, protocol settings' selection rationale is essentially a "black box" for the end user. Though QC phantoms are currently used for IQ evaluation, they are not appropriate for drawing firm conclusions concerning the expected performance of each protocol in clinical practice. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimum technical characteristics of preset protocols for specific procedures. More work is needed in this area.