Experimental evaluation of a radiation dose management system-integrated 3D skin dose map by comparison with XR-RV3 Gafchromic® films

Optimized radiological alert thresholds based on device-dosimetric information to predict peak skin dose between 2 and 4 Gy during vascular fluoroscopically guided intervention

OBJECTIVES

To provide radiologists and physicists with methodological tools to improve patient management after vascular fluoroscopically guided intervention (FGI) by providing optimized thresholds (OT) values that could be used as a surrogate to the thresholds classically proposed by the National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) or could be useful to adapt their own substantial radiation dose levels (SRDL) values.

METHODS

PSD of 2000-4000 mGy after FGI were calculated for 258 patients with dedicated software. Overall, the kerma and KAP 3D-ROC curves were used to assess the sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) of NCRP thresholds and OT for each PSD. Kiviat diagram and density curves were plotted for the best SEN/SPE pair of 3D-ROC curves and compared to the NCRP thresholds.

RESULTS

OT for both kerma and KAP generating the best SEN/SPE couple for PSD of 2000-4000 mGy were obtained. The SEN/SPE couple of each OT was always better than that obtained using NCRP ones. The best OT among all those calculated providing the highest SEN/SPE values for kerma (3020.5 mGy) and KAP (741.02 Gy.cm2) were obtained when PSD was equal to 3300 mGy.

CONCLUSIONS

We have calculated OT in terms of kerma and KAP based on 3D-ROC curves analysis and peak skin dose calculations that can be obtained to better predict high skin dose. The use of OT that predicted PSD greater than 3000 mGy is likely to improve patient follow-up. The methodology developed in this work could be adapted to other institutions in order to better define their own SRDL.

KEY POINTS

• Optimized dose thresholds in terms of kerma and KAP based on 3D-ROC curves analysis and peak skin dose calculations between 2000 and 4000 mGy can be obtained to better predict high skin dose. • Patients receiving a peak skin dose between 2000 and 4000 mGy have their follow-up enhanced by using the optimized thresholds instead of the NCRP thresholds. • The best-optimized thresholds, corresponding to 3020.5 mGy and 741.02 Gy.cm2 for kerma and KAP respectively can be used instead of NRCP ones to trigger patient follow-up after fluoroscopically guided vascular interventions.

UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS UTILIZING DICOM RDSR FOR SKIN DOSE ASSESSMENT IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY AND CARDIOLOGY

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive analysis of uncertainties associated with the use of software solutions utilizing DICOM RDSRs for skin dose assessment in the interventional fluoroscopic environment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three different scenarios have been defined for determining the overall uncertainty, each with a specific assumption on the maximum deviations of factors affecting the calculated dose. Relative expanded uncertainty has been calculated using two approaches: the law of propagation of uncertainty and the propagation of distributions based on the Monte Carlo method. According to the propagation of uncertainty, it is estimated that the lowest possible relative expanded uncertainty of ~13% (at the 95% level of confidence, i.e. with the coverage factor of k = 2 assuming normal distribution) could only be achieved if all sources of uncertainties are carefully controlled, whereas maximum relative expanded uncertainty could reach up to 61% if none of the influencing parameters are controlled properly. When the influencing parameters are reasonably well-controlled, realistic relative expanded uncertainty amounts to 28%. Values for the relative expanded uncertainty obtained from the Monte Carlo propagation of distributions concur with the results obtained from the propagation of uncertainty to within 3% in all three considered scenarios, validating the assumption of normality.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall skin dose relative uncertainty has been found to range from 13 to 61%, emphasizing the importance of adequate analysis and control of all relevant uncertainty sources.

Effect of equalization filters on measurements with kerma-area product meter in a cardiovascular angiography system

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of equalization filters (EFs) on the kerma‐area product (KAPQKM) and incident air‐kerma (Ka,i,QKM) using a kerma‐area product (KAP) meter. In addition, potential underestimations of the Ka,i,QKM values by EFs were identified.

Materials and methods

A portable flat‐panel detector (FPD) was placed to measure the X‐ray beam area (A) and EFs dimension at patient entrance reference point (PERP). Afterward, a 6‐cm³ external ionization chamber was placed to measure incident air‐kerma (Ka,i,Qext) at PERP instead of the portable FPD. KAP reading and Ka,i,Qext were simultaneously measured at several X‐ray beam qualities with and without EFs. The X‐ray beam quality correction factor by KAP meter (kQ,Q0KM) was calculated by A, Ka,i,Qext and KAP reading to acquire the KAPQKM and Ka,i,QKM. Upon completion of the measurements, KAPQKM, Ka,i,QKM, and Ka,i,Qext were plotted as functions of tube potential, spectral filter, and EFs dimension. Moreover, Ka,i,QKM/Ka,i,Qext values were calculated to evaluate the Ka,i,QKM underestimation.

Results

The kQ,Q0KM values increased with an increase in the X‐ray tube potential and spectral filter, and the maximum kQ,Q0KM was 1.18. KAPQKM and Ka,i,QKM decreased as functions of EFs dimension, whereas Ka,i,Qext was almost constant. Ka,i,QKM/Ka,i,Qext decreased with an increase in EFs dimension but increased with an increase in tube potential and spectral filter, and the range was 0.55–1.01.

Conclusions

Ka,i,QKM value was up to approximately two times lower than the Ka,i,Qext values by EFs. When using the Ka,i,QKM value, the potential Ka,i,QKM underestimation with EFs should be considered.

A retrospective comparison of organ dose and effective dose in percutaneous vertebroplasty performed under CT guidance or using a fixed C-arm with a flat-panel detector

PURPOSE

To compare the organ-dose and effective-dose (E) delivered to the patient during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) of one thoracic or lumbar vertebra performed under CT guidance or using a fixed C-arm.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients undergoing PVP of one vertebra under CT-guidance, with optimized protocol and training of physicians, or using a fixed C-arm were retrospectively included from January 2016 to June 2017. Organ-doses were computed on 16 organs using CT Expo 2.4 software for the CT procedures and PCXMC 2.0 for the fixed C-arm procedures. E was also computed with both software. Dosimetric values per anatomic locations for all procedures were compared using the paired Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

In total, 73 patients were analysed (27 men and 46 women, mean age 78 ± 10 years) among whom 35 (48%) underwent PVP under CT guidance and 38 (52%) PVP using a fixed C-arm. The median E was 11.31 [6.54; 15.82] mSv for all PVPs performed under CT guidance and 5.58 [3.33; 8.71] mSv for fixed C-arm and the differences was significant (p<0.001). For lumbar PVP, the organ doses of stomach, liver and colon were significantly higher with CT-scan than with the fixed C-arm: 97% (p=0.02); 21% (p=0.099) and 375% (p=0.002), respectively. For thoracic PVP, the lung organ dose was significantly higher with CT-scan than with the fixed C-arm (127%; p<0.001) and the oesophagus organ doses were not significantly different (p = 0.626).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the E and the organ dose on directly exposed organs were both higher for PVP performed under CT-guidance than with the fixed C-arm.

Calibration of Gafchromic XR-RV3 film under interventional radiology conditions

Introduction: The purpose of the study was the calibration of Gafchromic films in clinical interventional radiology conditions and the assessment of the influence of dose range, the shape of the fitting curve, and its practical application. The aim of the work was to show how practically perform calibration in a wide range of doses.

Material and methods: Gafchromic XR–RV3 films were included in the study. The calibration was performed for A and B film series separately. Doses from the range of 0 – 8 Gy were used. Film dosimeters were read out in reflective mode with a commercial flatbed scanner.

Results: Among various degrees of a polynomial function, the best fit, which fulfilled the chosen criterion of 95% agreement between measured and reconstructed doses and simple equation criterion, was observed for third-degree polynomial. The fitting curve where the dose is the function of optical density (logMPV) was demonstrated to be more precise than the fitting curve based on MPV only. To minimize the difference between dose absorbed by the film and dose reconstructed from the fitting curve below 5% it is necessary to divide the calibration range of 0 – 8 Gy into two subranges for use in interventional radiology. This difference was set at a maximum level of 3.8% and 1.9% for the lowand high-dose range, respectively. Each series of films may have a slightly different calibration curve, especially for the low dose range. A deviation of up to 36% between two batches of Gafchromic film was observed.

Conclusions: For the third-degree polynomial fitting function (one of the recommended in the literature) calibration should be done into low and high dose ranges and for each batch separately. A systematic error higher than 20% could be introduced when the fitting curve from one film batch is applied to the other film batch.

A comparison of two peak skin dose metrics calculated by patient dose management systems: implications for clinical management

Objective:

The patient dose monitoring systems DoseWatch and DoseWise were compared to evaluate their reported patient Peak Skin Dose.

Methods:

20 patients with the highest Peak Skin Dose on DoseWise were obtained; the values were converted to a Reference Point Air Kerma (RPAK) value and used for comparison. These patients were accessed in DoseWatch to obtain the recorded Worst Case RPAK. The co-ordinates for the position were obtained for each patient to find a primary and secondary angular position for the peak skin dose. The two positions produced by the two softwares were compared.

Results:

There is a mean deviation of over 0.5 Gy between the two software packages when comparing the calculated maximum skin air kerma Peak skin dose from DoseWise and the Worst Case RPAK from DoseWatch.

Conclusion:

We have shown mean deviations between these two systems. This difference is enough, for higher peak skin absorbed dose patients, to change the management of patients, so local services must understand their models to properly implement patient management.

Advances in knowledge:

Neither system is incorrect, but these differences show that a deeper understanding of the analysis limitations is required to properly inform post-procedural high-skin dose follow-up procedures.

Accuracy of skin dose mapping in interventional cardiology: Comparison of 10 software products following a common protocol

PURPOSE

Online and offline software products can estimate the maximum skin dose (MSD) delivered to the patient during interventional cardiology procedures. The capabilities and accuracy of several skin dose mapping (SDM) software products were assessed on X-ray systems from the main manufacturers following a common protocol.

METHODS

Skin dose was measured on four X-ray systems following a protocol composed of nine fundamental irradiation set-ups and three set-ups simulating short, clinical procedures. Dosimeters/multimeters with semiconductor-based detectors, radiochromic films and thermoluminescent dosimeters were used. Results were compared with up to eight of 10 SDM products, depending on their compatibility.

RESULTS

The MSD estimates generally agreed with the measurements within ± 40% for fundamental irradiation set-ups and simulated procedures. Only three SDM products provided estimates within ± 40% for all tested configurations on at least one compatible X-ray system. No SDM product provided estimates within ± 40% for all combinations of configurations and compatible systems. The accuracy of the MSD estimate for lateral irradiations was variable and could be poor (up to 66% underestimation). Most SDM products produced maps which qualitatively represented the dimensions, the shape and the relative position of the MSD region. Some products, however, missed the MSD region when situated at the intersection of multiple fields, which is of radiation protection concern.

CONCLUSIONS

It is very challenging to establish a common protocol for quality control (QC) and acceptance testing because not all information necessary for accurate MSD calculation is available or standardised in the radiation dose structured reports (RDSRs).

Vendor-independent skin dose mapping application for interventional radiology and cardiology

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to present and validate an originally developed application SkinCare used for skin dose mapping in interventional procedures, which are associated with relatively high radiation doses to the patient's skin and possible skin reactions.

METHODS

SkinCare is an application tool for generating skin dose maps following interventional radiology and cardiology procedures using the realistic 3D patient models. Skin dose is calculated using data from Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Radiation Dose Structured Reports (RDSRs). SkinCare validation was performed by using the data from the Siemens Artis Zee Biplane fluoroscopy system and conducting "Acceptance and quality control protocols for skin dose calculating software solutions in interventional cardiology" developed and tested in the frame of the VERIDIC project. XR-RV3 Gafchromic films were used as dosimeters to compare peak skin doses (PSDs) and dose maps obtained through measurements and calculations. DICOM RDSRs from four fluoroscopy systems of different vendors (Canon, GE, Philips, and Siemens) were used for the development of the SkinCare and for the comparison of skin dose maps generated using SkinCare to skin dose maps generated by different commercial software tools (Dose Tracking System (DTS) from Canon, RadimetricsTM from Bayer and RDM from MEDSQUARE). The same RDSRs generated during a cardiology clinical procedure (percutaneous coronary intervention-PCI) were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Validation performed using VERIDIC's protocols for skin dose calculation software showed that PSD calculated by SkinCare is within 17% and 16% accuracy compared to measurements using XR-RV3 Gafchromic films for fundamental irradiation setups and simplified clinical procedures, respectively. Good visual agreement between dose maps generated by SkinCare and DTS, RadimetricsTM and RDM was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

SkinCare is proved to be very convenient solution that can be used for monitoring delivered dose following interventional procedures.

Feasibility of dosimetric measurements using Al2O3:C OSL dosimeter during fluoroscopy-guided procedures

This study investigated the feasibility of dosimetric measurements using Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters during fluoroscopy-guided procedures. The linearity and energy dependence of Al2O3:C OSL dosimeters were evaluated, and the air kerma rate at the operator's position was measured. The response of Al2O3:C OSL dosimeters to short, repetitive irradiations was compared to that of long uninterrupted irradiation. The change in response of the Al2O3:C OSL dosimeter under automatic exposure rate control (AERC) was evaluated with the use of various thicknesses of polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) plates (15-30 cm). The Al2O3:C OSL dosimeters could detect 5µGy and showed good linearity in doses of ≥10µGy (R²: 0.997-0.999,p< 0.001). The relative response of the Al2O3:C OSL dosimeter normalised to that of 36.8 keV was 0.828-1.101 at the energies investigated (30.6-46.0 keV). The air kerma rate at the operator's position was estimated to be 2.61-7.17µGy min^-1depending on the heights representing different body parts. Repetitive short irradiations had no significant impact on the relative response of the Al2O3:C OSL dosimeters (p> 0.05). Despite a high energy dependence on the low energy beam used in fluoroscopy, the change in relative response of the Al2O3:C OSL dosimeter under AERC was within 5.7% depending on the thickness of the PMMA plates. Dosimetric measurement using Al2O3:C OSL dosimeters for patients and operators is feasible. However, one should be cautious about high standard deviations when measuring small doses of ≤20µGy using Al2O3:C OSL dosimeters. It is essential to perform intensive bleaching before measuring very small doses to minimise pre-irradiation counts.

Optimized radiological alert thresholds based on device dosimetric information and peak skin dose in vascular fluoroscopically guided intervention

OBJECTIVES

The National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) report no. 168 recommended that during fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGIs), each patient should be monitored when one of the following thresholds is reached: an air kerma > 5 Gy, a kerma area product (KAP) > 500 Gy.cm², a fluoroscopy time > 60 min, or a peak skin dose (PSD) > 3 Gy. Whereas PSD is the most accurate metric regarding the prevention of radiological risks, it remains the most difficult parameter to assess. We aimed to evaluate the relevance of the other, more accessible metrics and propose new optimized threshold (OT) for improved patient follow-up.

METHODS

Overall, 108 patients who underwent FGI in which at least one NCRP threshold was reached and PSD was measured were considered. The correlation between all metrics was assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). ROC curves and the sensitivity/specificity of both NCRP and OT to predict PSD > 3 Gy were evaluated.

RESULTS

The PCA shows that FGI can be decomposed with two components based on time and dose variables. Only KAP and kerma were correlated with PSD. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the new OT regarding KAP (67.6/93.0), kerma (97.3/81.7), and time (62.2/62.0) were better compared with NCRP thresholds (97.3/16.9, 40.5/95.4, and 21.6/74.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that fluoroscopy time is not a relevant metric when used to predict PSDs > 3 Gy. By adapting KAP and kerma thresholds to predict PSD over 3 Gy, patient follow-ups following vascular FGI can be improved.

KEY POINTS

• In vascular fluoroscopically guided interventions, principal component analysis demonstrates that between fluoroscopy time, KAP, and kerma, only the two last were correlated to the peak skin dose. • Optimized thresholds replacing NRCP ones obtained with ROC curves analysis were 85,451 μGy.cm², 2938 mGy, and 41 min for KAP, kerma, and fluoroscopy time respectively. • Improvements to trigger patient follow-up after vascular fluoroscopically guided interventions may be obtained by using the optimized thresholds.