Local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric non-cardiac interventional radiology procedures

Expansion of Typical Values for Paediatric Patients in Ireland and Comparison with Published DRLs - Experiences of a Single Institution

INTRODUCTION

To reduce the risks involved with ionising radiation exposure, typical values (TVs) and diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) have been established to help keep radiation doses 'as low as reasonably practicable. TVs/DRLs provide standardised radiation dose metrics that can be used for comparative purposes. However, for paediatrics, such values should consider the size of the child instead of their age. This study aimed to establish and compare paediatric TVs for chest, abdomen and pelvis radiography.

METHODS

Study methods followed processes for establishing paediatric DRLs as outlined by the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). Kerma-area product (KAP) values, excluding rejected images, were retrospectively acquired from the study institution's Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS). Paediatric patients were categorised into the following weight-based groupings (5 to <15 kg, 15 to <30 kg, 30 to <50 kg, 50 to 80 kg) and stratified based on the examination that was performed (chest, abdomen, and pelvis), and where it was performed (the different X-ray rooms). Anonymised data were inputted into Microsoft Excel for analysis. Median and 3rd quartile KAP values were reported together with graphical illustrations.

RESULTS

Data from 407 X-ray examinations were analysed. For the previously identified weight categories (5 to <15 kg, 15 to <30 kg, 30 to <50 kg, 50 to 80 kg), TVs for the chest were 0.10, 0.19, 0.37 and 0.53 dGy.cm2, respectively. For the abdomen 0.39, 1.04, 3.51 and 4.05 dGy.cm2 and for the pelvis 0.43, 0.87, 3.50 and 7.58 dGy.cm2. Between X-ray rooms TVs varied against the institutional TVs by -60 to 119 % (chest), -50 to 103 % (abdomen) and -14 and 24 %% (pelvis).

CONCLUSION

TVs in this study follow established trends with patient weight and examination type and are comparable with published literature. Variations do exist between individual examination rooms and reasons are multifactorial. Given that age and size do not perfectly correlate further work should be undertaken around weight-based TVs/DRLs in the paediatric setting.

Patient Radiation Doses in IR Procedures: The American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy Pilot

PURPOSE

To update normative data on fluoroscopy dose indices in the United States for the first time since the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology study in the late 1990s.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy pilot study collected data from March 2018 through December 2019, with 50 fluoroscopes from 10 sites submitting data. Primary radiation dose indices including fluoroscopy time (FT), cumulative air kerma (Ka,r), and kerma area product (PKA) were collected for interventional radiology fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. Clinical facility procedure names were mapped to the American College of Radiology (ACR) common procedure lexicon. Distribution parameters including the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th, and 99th percentiles were computed.

RESULTS

Dose indices were collected for 70,377 FGI procedures, with 50,501 ultimately eligible for analysis. Distribution parameters are reported for 100 ACR Common IDs. FT in minutes, Ka,r in mGy, and PKA in Gy-cm2 are reported in this study as (n; median) for select ACR Common IDs: inferior vena cava filter insertion (1,726; FT: 2.9; Ka,r: 55.8; PKA: 14.19); inferior vena cava filter removal (464; FT: 5.7; Ka,r: 178.6; PKA: 34.73); nephrostomy placement (2,037; FT: 4.1; Ka,r: 39.2; PKA: 6.61); percutaneous biliary drainage (952; FT: 12.4; Ka,r: 160.5; PKA: 21.32); gastrostomy placement (1,643; FT: 3.2; Ka,r: 29.1; PKA: 7.29); and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement (327; FT: 34.8; Ka,r: 813.0; PKA: 181.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACR DIR-Fluoro pilot has provided state-of-the-practice statistics for radiation dose indices from IR FGI procedures. These data can be used to prioritize procedures for radiation optimization, as demonstrated in this work.

How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement

Abstract

Although the Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) have been shown to be an important tool for optimising patient radiation protection, there are still difficulties related to the methodology that should be used to establish and use local DRL values. This statement represents the current view of the EuroSafe Imaging ‘Clinical DRLs’ working group formed with the purpose to produce scientific and educational material on DRLs and promote the concept of local DRLs. Guidelines on how to establish and how to use local DRLs presented herein can be implemented using a multidisciplinary team approach. Local DRLs are easy to determine and implement and they reflect local equipment performance and local clinical needs. They can be updated more frequently than the national DRLs, especially if a dose management system is available. To establish local DRLs, a practical approach could be to collect a reasonable set, i.e., at least 20–30 procedures, of data for well-defined clinical indications and calculate the 3rd quartile values. The median values of the distribution can be set to define the ‘typical values’. The International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) suggests setting ‘typical values’ for newer technologies that enable decreased amounts of radiation exposure for a similar level of image quality. Local DRLs should be similar or lower to the national DRLs. They could be higher only if the clinical benefits for some medical indications are fully explained and reported. Local DRLs may be used as a quality benchmark to track outliers and can be also used as alert values.

Key points

Guidelines on how to establish and use local DRLs are presented.

Local DRLs are easy to determine and implement and can be updated frequently

Additionally, local DRLs can be used to track outliers.

Local reference and achievable dose levels for vascular and enterostomy access procedures in pediatric interventional radiology

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of radiation quantities delivered in routine practice is an essential responsibility of a pediatric interventional radiology department.

OBJECTIVE

To review radiation indices in frequently performed vascular and enterostomy access procedures at a quaternary pediatric hospital to formulate dosimetric reference levels and achievable levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patient demographics, procedure information and quantitative dose metrics over a 2-year period was performed. Dosimetric details for common procedures (central line insertions, gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy insertions and maintenance) were evaluated, correlated with demographic data and stratified across five weight groups (0-5 kg, 5-15 kg, 15-30 kg, 30-50 kg, 50-80 kg). Achievable (50th percentile) and reference (75th percentile) levels with confidence intervals were established for each procedure.

RESULTS

Within the evaluation period, 3,165 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Five were classified as device insertions (peripherally inserted central catheter, n=1,145; port-a-catheter, n=321; central venous line, n=285; gastrostomy-tube [G-tube], n=262, and gastrojejunostomy-tube [GJ-tube], n=66), and two were classified as maintenance procedures (G-tube, n=358, and GJ-tube, n=728, checks, exchanges and reinsertions). Representative reference and achievable levels were calculated for each procedure category and weight group.

CONCLUSION

This work highlights the creation of local reference and achievable levels for common pediatric interventional procedures. These data establish a dosimetric reference to understand the quantity of radiation routinely applied, allowing for improved relative radiation risk assessment and enriched communication to interventionalists, health care providers, parents and patients.

ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE IN THE MAIN PAEDIATRIC INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the personal dose equivalent Hp(10) in the most frequent (non-cardiac) paediatric interventional radiology (PIR) procedures: central venous catheters (CVC), hepatic/biliary and sclerotherapy interventions. i2 active solid-state dosemeters placed over the lead apron were used to monitor the exposure of three interventional radiologists over 18 months. A database was created to register all procedures performed by each radiologist (including the type of procedure and the kerma-area product, PKA). The mean Hp(10) per procedure for CVC, sclerotherapy and hepatic/biliary interventions was respectively 0.01 ± 0.01 mSv, 0.18 ± 0.13 mSv and 0.12 ± 0.06 mSv (k = 2). A similar value of Hp(10)/PKA was found despite the type of procedure or the patient weight (~10 μSv/Gy·cm2). There was high variability among individual interventions, probably due to the variable level of complexity, which led to uncertainties in the measurements' mean higher than those associated with the dosemeter's angular and energy dependence. i2 therefore proved suitable for monitoring Hp(10) in PIR procedures.

LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR PEDIATRIC RETROGRADE WEDGE PORTOGRAPHY INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES USING A DOSE MONITORING SOFTWARE AT A TRANSPLANTATION INSTITUTE

The aim of this work was to establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for retrograde wedge portography (RWP) performed on pediatric patients assessing the usefulness of radiation dose monitoring software in the establishing process. Between September 2016 and April 2020, 66 consecutive RWP were performed at a transplantation institute and were included in our study. Patients were divided in three groups according to age: n = 25 infants, n = 20 middle childhood and n = 21 early adolescence. The third quartile of both Air Kerma at the reference point (Ka,r) and air kerma-area product (PKA) were evaluated to establish local DRLs (lDRLs). In addition, to control high Ka,r levels during procedures, the software notified to operators if Ka,r exceeded the dose 'alert' threshold set at 2 Gy. lDRLs were established for all three groups using PKA and Ka,r: infant group: 5.6 Gy.cm 2 and 0.034 Gy; middle childhood: 6.4 Gy.cm2 and 0.018 Gy and early adolescence: 12.8 Gy.cm2 and 0.059 Gy. The dose threshold 'alert' was never encountered (alert quota: 0%). The dose monitoring system supports the feasibility of accurate and easier lDRLs' establishment.

Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Interventional Procedures

The article is part of the series of articles on radiation protection. You can find further articles in the special section of the CVIR issue. The expanding applications of interventional procedures coupled with the potential harmful effects of ionizing radiation highlight the need to assess the delivered radiation dose and establish an effective radiation protection program, particularly in the radiosensitive pediatric population. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of interventional procedures as well as the unique characteristics of children, the management of radiation dose is proving to be quite challenging. The aim of the current article is to provide an overview of the radiation exposure in pediatric patients during interventional procedures focusing on the importance of radiation protection in the pediatric population, the reported radiation doses and the techniques of minimizing radiation dose.