The influence of respiratory motion on dose distribution in accelerated partial breast irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy

Residual image registration error by fiducial markers in accelerated partial breast irradiation using C-arm linac: a phantom study

External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an alternative treatment for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The efficacy of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) using fiducial markers, such as gold markers or surgical clips, has been demonstrated. However, the effects of respiratory motion during a single fraction have not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the residual image registration error of fiducial marker-based IGRT by respiratory motion and propose a suitable treatment strategy. We developed an acrylic phantom embedded with surgical clips to verify the registration error under moving conditions. The frequency of the phase difference in the respiratory cycle due to sequential acquisition was verified in a preliminary study. Fiducial marker-based IGRT was then performed in ten scenarios. The residual registration error (RRE) was calculated on the basis of the differences in the coordinates of clips between the true position if not moved and the last position. The frequencies of the phase differences in 0.0-0.99, 1.0-1.99, 2.0-2.99, 3.0-3.99, and 4.0-5.0 mm were 23%, 24%, 22%, 20%, and 11%, respectively. When assuming a clinical case, the mean RREs for all directions were within 1.0 mm, even if respiratory motion of 5 mm existed in two axes. For APBI with fiducial marker-based IGRT, the introduction of an image registration strategy that employs stepwise couch correction using at least three orthogonal images should be considered.

Is it advantageous to use deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) over free breathing for FAST-Forward dose fractionation scheme in treating carcinoma of left-sided breast? A dosimetric study

Aim:

To study the effect of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) on Fast-Forward trial for left-sided breast radiotherapy dosimetrically using tangential field-in-field (FiF), flattening filtered volumetric-modulated arc therapy (FF-VMAT) and flattening filter free volumetric-modulated arc therapy (FFF-VMAT) in comparison with free breathing (FB).

Methods:

Computed tomography images were acquired on 15 patients with carcinoma of left breast in FB and DIBH. Planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk were contoured on both image sets. Dose of 26 Gy in five daily fractions was prescribed to PTV. FiF, FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT plans were created in treatment planning system on both FB and DIBH. PTV V95%, V107%, D0·1 cc, CI and HI, heart V1·5 Gy, V7 Gy, lung left V8 Gy, monitor units (MU) and beam ON time were used for evaluation. Different technique analysis in same breathing condition and FB versus DIBH for same planning technique were performed.

Results:

Mean of all 15 patients was reported as mean ± 1 standard deviation. PTV V95% was 97·55 ± 0·10 (FiF), 95·75 ± 0·66 (FF-VMAT) and 96·15 ± 0·46 (FFF-VMAT) in FB while 97·34 ± 0·50 (FiF), 96·03 ± 0·71 (FF-VMAT) and 95·86 ± 0·63 (FFF-VMAT) in DIBH. Heart V7 Gy was 8·53 ± 4·26 (FiF), 8·86 ± 2·20 (FF-VMAT) and 9·27 ± 2·46 (FFF-VMAT) in FB while 6·30 ± 2·98 (FiF), 5·23 ± 2·20 (FF-VMAT) and 4·68 ± 2·01 (FFF-VMAT) in DIBH. p-value of heart V7 Gy between FB and DIBH was 0·278 (FiF), 0·009 (FF-VMAT) and 0·003 (FFF-VMAT). Beam ON time for FFF-VMAT was reduced by 65% (FF-VMAT) and 11% (FiF).

Conclusion:

Conformal dose to PTV was achieved better with VMAT plans. FFF-VMAT was delivered in less time compared to FF-VMAT and FiF for 26 Gy in five fractions. Heart dose can be significantly minimised with DIBH for VMAT plans.