1
|
Aminafshar B, Baghani HR, Mowlavi AA. Analytical parameterization of Bragg curves for proton beams in muscle, bone, and polymethylmethacrylate. Radiol Phys Technol 2024; 17:745-755. [PMID: 38822972 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00816-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Proton dose calculation in media other than water may be of interest for either research purposes or clinical practice. Current study aims to quantify the required parameters for analytical proton dosimetry in muscle, bone, and PMMA. Required analytical dosimetry parameters were extracted from ICRU-49 report and Janni study. Geant4 Toolkit was also used for Bragg curve simulation inside the investigated media at different proton energies. Calculated and simulated dosimetry data were compared using gamma analysis. Simulated and calculated Bragg curves are consistent, a fact that confirms the validity of reported parameters for analytical proton dosimetry inside considered media. Furthermore, derived analytical parameters for these media are different from those of water. Listed parameters can be reliably utilized for analytical proton dosimetry inside muscle, bone, and PMMA. Furthermore, accurate proton dosimetry inside each medium demands dedicated analytical parameters and one is not allowed to use the water coefficients for non-water media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behzad Aminafshar
- Physics Department, Hakim Sabzevari University, Daneshgah Blvd, P.O. 9617976487, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Hamid Reza Baghani
- Physics Department, Hakim Sabzevari University, Daneshgah Blvd, P.O. 9617976487, Sabzevar, Iran.
| | - Ali Asghar Mowlavi
- Physics Department, Hakim Sabzevari University, Daneshgah Blvd, P.O. 9617976487, Sabzevar, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sethi A, Gros S, Brodin P, Ghavidel B, Chai X, Popovic M, Tomé WA, Trichter S, Yang X, Zhang H, Uhl V. Intraoperative radiation therapy with 50 kV x-rays: A multi-institutional review. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14272. [PMID: 38279520 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This report covers clinical implementation of a low kV intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) program with the INTRABEAM® System (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Based on collective user experience from eight institutions, we discuss best methods of INTRABEAM quality assurance (QA) tests, commissioning measurements, clinical workflow, treatment planning, and potential avenues for research. The guide provides pertinent background information and clinical justification for IORT. It describes the INTRABEAM system and commissioning measurements along with a TG100 risk management analysis to ensure safety and accuracy of the IORT program. Following safety checks, dosimetry measurements are performed for verification of field flatness and symmetry, x-ray output, and depth dose. Also discussed are dose linearity checks, beam isotropy, ion chamber measurements, calibration protocols, and in-vivo dosimetry with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters OSLDs, and radiochromic film. Emphasis is placed on the importance of routine QA procedures (daily, monthly, and annual) performed at regular intervals for a successful IORT program. For safe and accurate dose delivery, tests of important components of IORT clinical workflow are emphasized, such as, dose prescription, pre-treatment QA, treatment setup, safety checks, radiation surveys, and independent checks of delivered dose. Challenges associated with in-vivo dose measurements are discussed, along with special treatment procedures and shielding requirements. The importance of treatment planning in IORT is reviewed with reference to a Monte Carlo-based commercial treatment planning system highlighting its main features and limitations. The report concludes with suggested topics for research including CT-based image-guided treatment planning and improved prescription dose accuracy. We hope that this multi-institutional report will serve as a guidance document on the clinical implementation and use of INTRABEAM IORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Sethi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Sebastien Gros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Patrik Brodin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Beth Ghavidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Xuedong Chai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Marija Popovic
- Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wolfgang Axel Tomé
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Samuel Trichter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hualin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Valery Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Summit Medical Center, Emeryville, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petoukhova A, Snijder R, Vissers T, Ceha H, Struikmans H. In vivodosimetry in cancer patients undergoing intraoperative radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:18TR01. [PMID: 37607566 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf2e4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
In vivodosimetry (IVD) is an important tool in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to detect major errors by assessing differences between expected and delivered dose and to record the received dose by individual patients. Also, in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), IVD is highly relevant to register the delivered dose. This is especially relevant in low-risk breast cancer patients since a high dose of IORT is delivered in a single fraction. In contrast to EBRT, online treatment planning based on intraoperative imaging is only under development for IORT. Up to date, two commercial treatment planning systems proposed intraoperative ultrasound or in-room cone-beam CT for real-time IORT planning. This makes IVD even more important because of the possibility for real-time treatment adaptation. Here, we summarize recent developments and applications of IVD methods for IORT in clinical practice, highlighting important contributions and identifying specific challenges such as a treatment planning system for IORT. HDR brachytherapy as a delivery technique was not considered. We add IVD for ultrahigh dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy that promises to improve the treatment efficacy, when compared to conventional radiotherapy by limiting the rate of toxicity while maintaining similar tumour control probabilities. To date, FLASH IORT is not yet in clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Petoukhova
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Medical Physics, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Snijder
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Medical Physics, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Vissers
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Medical Library, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen Ceha
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Radiation Oncology, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Struikmans
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Radiation Oncology, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lozares-Cordero S, Bermejo-Barbanoj C, Badías-Herbera A, Ibáñez-Carreras R, Ligorred-Padilla L, Ponce-Ortega JM, González-Pérez V, Gandía-Martínez A, Font-Gómez JA, Blas-Borroy O, González-Ibáñez D. An open-source development based on photogrammetry for a real-time IORT treatment planning system. Phys Med 2023; 112:102622. [PMID: 37331081 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study presents a treatment planning system for intraoperative low-energy photon radiotherapy based on photogrammetry from real images of the surgical site taken in the operating room. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study population comprised 15 patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. The system obtains the images of the area to be irradiated with a smartphone or tablet, so that the absorbed doses in the tissue can be calculated from the reconstruction without the need for computed tomography. The system was commissioned using 3D printing of the reconstructions of the tumor beds. The absorbed doses at various points were verified using radiochromic films that were suitably calibrated for the corresponding energy and beam quality. RESULTS The average reconstruction time of the 3D model from the video sequence in the 15 patients was 229,6±7,0 s. The entire procedure, including video capture, reconstruction, planning, and dose calculation was 520,6±39,9 s. Absorbed doses were measured on the 3D printed model with radiochromic film, the differences between these measurements and those calculated by the treatment planning system were 1.4% at the applicator surface, 2.6% at 1 cm, 3.9% at 2 cm and 6.2% at 3 cm. CONCLUSIONS The study shows a photogrammetry-based low-energy photon IORT planning system, capable of obtaining real-time images inside the operating room, immediately after removal of the tumor and immediately before irradiation. The system was commissioned with radiochromic films measurements in 3D-printed model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Lozares-Cordero
- Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | | | - Alberto Badías-Herbera
- Higher Technical School of Industrial Engineering, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Luis Ligorred-Padilla
- Esophagogastric Surgery and Sarcoma Unit (Department of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery), Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | | | - José Antonio Font-Gómez
- Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Olga Blas-Borroy
- Engineering and Maintenance Service, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Can S, Atilla Ö, Karaçetin D. Calculated and measured radiation dose for the low energy xoft axxent eBT X-ray source. BMC Res Notes 2023; 16:25. [PMID: 36855193 PMCID: PMC9976427 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06287-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the functionality to deliver different prescription dose except 20 Gy for the Xoft Axxent Ebt (electronic Brachytherapy) system and analyzing the system in terms of radiation dosimetry in water and 0.9% isotonic Sodium Chloride (NaCl) solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the Xoft Axxent eBT, different prescription dose in single fraction were calculated for different balloon applicator volumes based on source position and irradiation times. EBT-XD Gafchromic film was calibrated at 6MV photon energy. A balloon applicator filled with 0.9% isotonic NaCl solution was used to deliver a radiation dose of 20 Gy, 16 Gy, 10 Gy on the applicator surface. Then the balloon applicator was filled with water and the same measurements were repeated. Finally, the balloon applicator was irradiated by positioning it at different distances in the water phantom to simulate the isodose contour. RESULTS At the time the balloon applicator was filled with water and 0,9% NaCl solution, the difference between the planned dose and the absorbed dose was ~ 2% vs. 15% for 30 cc, ~ 5% vs. 14% for 35 cc and ~ 3,5% vs. 10% for 40 cc respectively. Finally, the absorbed dose at a distance of 1 cm from the applicator surface was measured as 9.63 Gy. CONCLUSION In this study, it was showed that different prescription dose could be possible to deliver in the Xoft Axxent eBT system based on the standard plan. In addition, the absorbed dose was higher than the planned dose depending on the effective atomic number of NaCl solution comparing to water due to photoelectric effect in low energy photons. By measuring the dose distributions at different distances from the balloon applicator surface, the absorbed dose in tissue equivalent medium was determined and the isodose contours characteristics was simulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sümeyra Can
- Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital Radiation Oncology Department, 34480, Basaksehir Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Özge Atilla
- Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital Radiation Oncology Department, 34480 Basaksehir Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Didem Karaçetin
- Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital Radiation Oncology Department, 34480 Basaksehir Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Méndez I, Rovira-Escutia JJ, Casar B. A protocol for accurate radiochromic film dosimetry using Radiochromic.com. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:369-378. [PMID: 34384012 PMCID: PMC8366735 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiochromic films have many applications in radiology and radiation therapy. Generally, the dosimetry system for radiochromic film dosimetry is composed of radiochromic films, flatbed scanner, and film analysis software. The purpose of this work is to present the effectiveness of a protocol for accurate radiochromic film dosimetry using Radiochromic.com as software for film analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Procedures for image acquisition, lot calibration, and dose calculation are explained and analyzed. Radiochromic.com enables state-of-the-art models and corrections for radiochromic film dosimetry, such as the Multigaussian model for multichannel film dosimetry, and lateral, inter-scan, and re-calibration corrections of the response. RESULTS The protocol presented here provides accurate dose results by mitigating the sources of uncertainty that affect radiochromic film dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS Appropriate procedures for film and scanner handling in combination with Radiochromic.com as software for film analysis make easy and accurate radiochromic film dosimetry feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignasi Méndez
- Department for dosimetry and quality of radiological procedures, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Bozidar Casar
- Department for dosimetry and quality of radiological procedures, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wong JHD, Zaili Z, Abdul Malik R, Bustam AZ, Saad M, Jamaris S, Mosiun JA, Mohd Taib NA, Ung NM, See M. Evaluation of skin dose and skin toxicity in patients undergoing intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:139-147. [PMID: 34254425 PMCID: PMC8364274 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate in vivo skin dose delivered by intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and determine the factors associated with an increased risk of radiation-induced skin toxicity. METHODOLOGY A total of 21 breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and IORT, either as IORT alone or IORT boost plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), were recruited in this prospective study. EBT3 film was calibrated in water and used to measure skin dose during IORT at concentric circles of 5 mm and 40 mm away from the applicator. For patients who also had EBRT, the maximum skin dose was estimated using the radiotherapy treatment planning system. Mid-term skin toxicities were evaluated at 3 and 6 months post-IORT. RESULTS The average skin dose at 5 mm and 40 mm away from the applicator was 3.07 ± 0.82 Gy and 0.99 ± 0.28 Gy, respectively. Patients treated with IORT boost plus EBRT received an additional skin dose of 41.07 ± 1.57 Gy from the EBRT component. At 3 months post-IORT, 86% of patients showed no evidence of skin toxicity. However, the number of patients suffering from skin toxicity increased from 15% to 38% at 6 months post-IORT. We found no association between the IORT alone or with the IORT boost plus EBRT and skin toxicity. Older age was associated with increased risk of skin toxicities. A mathematical model was derived to predict skin dose. CONCLUSION EBT3 film is a suitable dosimeter for in vivo skin dosimetry in IORT, providing patient-specific skin doses. Both IORT alone and IORT boost techniques resulted in similar skin toxicity rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
- Department of Biomedical ImagingFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Zainor Zaili
- Department of Biomedical ImagingFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Rozita Abdul Malik
- Clinical Oncology UnitFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Anita Zarina Bustam
- Clinical Oncology UnitFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Marniza Saad
- Clinical Oncology UnitFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Suniza Jamaris
- Breast Surgery UnitDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Joanne Aisha Mosiun
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
- Breast Surgery UnitDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Ngie Min Ung
- Clinical Oncology UnitFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Mee‐Hoong See
- Breast Surgery UnitDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| |
Collapse
|