Monte Carlo-based patient internal dosimetry in fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: A review

Associated radiation exposure from medical imaging and excess lifetime risk of developing cancer in pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension

Pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) receive imaging studies that use ionizing radiation (radiation) such as computed tomography (CT) and cardiac catheterization to guide clinical care. Radiation exposure is associated with increased cancer risk. It is unknown how much radiation pediatric PH patients receive. The objective of this study is to quantify radiation received from imaging and compute associated lifetime cancer risks for pediatric patients with PH. Electronic health records between 2012 and 2022 were reviewed and radiation dose data were extracted. Organ doses were estimated using Monte Carlo modeling. Cancer risks for each patient were calculated from accumulated exposures using National Cancer Institute tools. Two hundred and forty-nine patients with PH comprised the study cohort; 97% of patients had pulmonary arterial hypertension, PH due to left heart disease, or PH due to chronic lung disease. Mean age at the time of the first imaging study was 2.5 years (standard deviation [SD] = 4.9 years). Patients underwent a mean of 12 studies per patient per year, SD = 32. Most (90%) exams were done in children <5 years of age. Radiation from CT and cardiac catheterization accounted for 88% of the total radiation dose received. Cumulative mean effective dose was 19 mSv per patient (SD = 30). Radiation dose exposure resulted in a mean increased estimated lifetime cancer risk of 7.6% (90% uncertainty interval 3.0%-14.2%) in females and 2.8% (1.2%-5.3%) in males. Careful consideration for the need of radiation-based imaging studies is warranted, especially in the youngest of children.

Fluoroscopically guided vascular and cardiac transcatheter procedures: a comparison of occupational and patient dose by anatomical region

X-ray guided procedures are being performed by an increasing variety of medical specialties. Due to improvements in vascular transcatheter therapies, there is an increasing overlap of imaged anatomy between medical specialties. There is concern that non-radiology fluoroscopic operators may not have sufficient training to be well informed of the potential implications of radiation exposure and mitigation strategies to reduce dose. This was a prospective, observational, single center study to compare occupational and patient dose levels when imaging different anatomical regions during fluoroscopically guided cardiac and endovascular procedures. Occupational radiation dose was measured at the level of the temple of 24 cardiologists and 3 vascular surgeons (n = 1369), 32 scrub nurses (n = 1307) and 35 circulating nurses (n = 885). The patient dose was recorded for procedures (n = 1792) performed in three angiography suites. Abdominal imaging during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures was associated with a comparatively high average patient, operator and scrub nurse dose despite additional table-mounted lead shields. Air kerma was relatively high for procedures performed in the chest, and chest + pelvis. Higher dose area product and staff eye dose were recorded during procedures of the chest + pelvis due to the use of digital subtraction angiography to evaluate access route prior to/during transaortic valve implantation. Scrub nurses were exposed to higher average radiation levels than the operator during some procedures. Staff should be cognizant of the potentially higher radiation burden to patients and exposed personnel during EVAR procedures and cardiac procedures using digital subtraction angiography.

Development of a voxel S-value database for patient internal radiation dosimetry

PURPOSE

Personalized dosimetry with high accuracy drew great attention in clinical practices. Voxel S-value (VSV) convolution has been proposed to speed up absorbed dose calculations. However, the VSV method is efficient for personalized internal radiation dosimetry only when there are pre-calculated VSVs of the radioisotope. In this work, we propose a new method for VSV calculation based on the developed mono-energetic particle VSV database of γ, β, α, and X-ray for any radioisotopes.

METHODS

Mono-energetic VSV database for γ, β, α, and X-ray was calculated using Monte Carlo methods. Radiation dose was first calculated based on mono-energetic VSVs for [F-18]-FDG in 10 patients. The estimated doses were compared with the values obtained from direct Monte Carlo simulation for validation of the proposed method. The number of VSVs used in calculation was optimized based on the estimated dose accuracy and computation time.

RESULTS

The generated VSVs showed a great consistency with the results calculated using direct Monte Carlo simulation. For [F-18]-FDG, the proposed VSV method with number of VSV of 9 shows the best relative average organ absorbed dose uncertainty of 3.25% while the calculation time was reduced by 99% and 97% compared to the Monte Carlo simulation and traditional multiple VSV methods, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, we provided a method to generate the VSV kernels for any radioisotope based on the pre-calculated mono-energetic VSV database and significantly reduced the time cost for the multiple VSVs dosimetry approach. A software was developed to generate VSV kernels for any radioisotope in 19 mediums.

Novel phantom for performance evaluation of contrast-enhanced 3D rotational angiography

PURPOSE

This technical note presents an in-house phantom with a specially designed contrast-object module constructed to address the need for three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) testing.

METHODS

The initial part of the study was a brief evaluation on the commercially available phantom used for 3DRA and computed tomography angiography (CTA) to confirm the need for a special phantom for 3D angiography. Once confirmed, an in-house phantom was constructed. The novel phantom was tested to evaluate the basic image performance metrics, i.e., unsharpness (MTF) and noise characterization (NPS), as well as to show its capability for vessel contrast visibility study.

RESULTS

The low contrast objects in the commercially available tools dedicated for CT is found to yield significantly lower signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) when used for 3DRA, therefore deemed inadequate for 3DRA contrast evaluation. The constructed in-house phantom demonstrates a capability to serve for basic imaging performance check (MTF, NPS, and low contrast evaluation) for 3DRA and CTA. With higher and potentially adjustable visibility of contrast objects as artificial vessels, the in-house phantom also makes more clinically relevant tests, e.g., human- or model observer study and task-based optimization, possible.

CONCLUSION

The novel phantom with special contrast object module shows higher visibility in 3DRA compared to the currently available commercial phantom and, therefore, is recommended for use in 3D angiography.