Comparison of patient effective doses from multiple CT examinations based on different calculation methods

Estimating of radiation output of X-RAY tube using mathematical model: Case of high-frequency machines

PURPOSE

During any radiological procedure, it is important to know the dose to be-administered to the patient and this can be done by estimating the output of the X-ray tube either with a dosimeter or with a mathematical equation or Monte Carlo simulations. The aim of this work is to develop a new mathematical model equation (NMME) for estimating the output of high-frequency X-ray tubes.

METHODS

To achieve this, data collected from ten machines in many regions of Cameroon were used (for nine machines) to build an initial model that does not take into account the anode angle and the tenth machine was used to test the model. Using the SpekCalc software, some simulations were carried out to evaluate the influence of the anode angle. This allowed the NMME to be proposed.

RESULTS

The deviations frequencies between 0.65% and 19.61% were obtained by comparing the output values obtained using initial model with the measured values. The statistical hypothesis test showed that the estimated values using initial model and NMME are in agreement with those measured unlike the Kothan and Tungjai model. For the tenth machine, the percentage difference between estimated and measured values is less than 8 %.

CONCLUSION

These results show that the proposed model performed better than the previous models. In the absence of a dosimeter, the NMME could be used to estimate the output of high frequency X-ray machines and therefore the radiation doses received by patients during diagnostic X-ray examinations.

Organ dose in CT: Comparison between measurements and computational methods

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare two methods for the organ dose evaluation in computed tomography (CT) in the head- and thorax regions: an experimental method, using radiochromic films, and a computational one, using a commercial software.

METHODS

Gafchromic® XR-QA2 and EBT-3 were characterized in terms of energetic, angular, and irradiation configurations dependence. Two free-in-air irradiation calibration configurations were employed using a CT scanner: with the sensitive surface of the film orthogonal (OC) and parallel (PC) to the beam axis. Different dose-response curves were obtained by varying the irradiation configurations and the beam quality (BQ). Subsequently, films were irradiated within an anthropomorphic phantom using CT-thorax and -head protocols, and the organ dose values obtained were compared with those provided by the commercial software.

RESULTS

At different configurations, an unchanged dose response was achieved with EBT-3, while a dose response of 15% was obtained with XR-QA2. By varying BQ, XR-QA2 showed a different response below 10%, while EBT-3 showed a variation below 5% for dose values >20 mGy. For films irradiation angle equal to 90°, the normalized to 0° relative response was 41% for the XR-QA2 model and 83% for the EBT-3 one. Organ dose values obtained with EBT-3 for both configurations and with XR-QA2 for OC were in agreement with the DW values, showing percentage discrepancies of less than 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained results showed the potential of EBT-3 in CT patient dosimetry since the lower angular dependence, compared to XR-QA2, compensates for low sensitivity in the diagnostic dose range.

Cancer risk in healthy patients who underwent chest tomography comparing three different technologies

This research aimed to estimate the risk of cancer associated with patients without previous disease undergoing chest tomography. Siemens CT scanners have 6, 64, and 128 detectors. The Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation Reports - BEIR VII methodology was used. The study presented a sample of 64 patients aged between 18 and 80 years, in the city of Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais - Brazil. The IMPACT CT software and CalDose X CT Online were used to calculate the absorbed and equivalent dose from the Volumetric Computed Tomography Dose Index - CTDIvol (mGy) and Dose Length Product - DLP values provided by the equipment. CT-Expo Software was also used to estimate Specific Dose Estimates (SSDEs) values. The CTDvol results for the MG1, MG,2 and MG3 Diagnostic Centers in mGy were respectively 4.369 ± 1.352, 6.99 4 ± 1.53,3 and 9.984 ± 2.282 and the SSDE values were 3.800, 6.40,0 and 9,.500. The values for the equivalent dose, at the MG2 Diagnostic Center, by IMPACT CT, in (mSv) for the breasts, esophagus, heart, thyroid, lung and thymus were respectively 3.9, 5.7, 4.7, 1.0, 4.8 and 5.7. The CalDose Software, for the same equipment and the same organs, in mSv, estimated the values 7.4, 9.4, 11.1, 5.3, 10.8 and 11.3 for women and 7.1, 9.3, 11.0, 5.3, 10.2 and 10.9 for men. The estimated risk of cancer decreased according to the patient's age, but with a higher incidence for females. The use of each software must be carefully analyzed to avoid undue values due to the particularities of each one. The results also showed that the risk of developing cancer due to radiation decreases with patient age and is higher in females.

Patient size as a parameter for determining Diagnostic Reference Levels for paediatric Computed Tomography (CT) procedures

INTRODUCTION

The paediatric radiation dose has never been studied in Sri Lanka, nor has a national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) established. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRL) and achievable dose (AD) values for paediatric CT examinations based on size.

METHODS

A total of 658 paediatric (0-15 years) non-contrast-enhanced (NC) studies of head, chest and abdomen regions performed during six months in two dedicated paediatric hospitals (out of the three such institutions in the country) were included. For head examinations, the dose indexes were analysed based on age, while for body examinations, both age and effective diameter (D_eff) were used. The median and the third quartile of the pooled dose distribution were given as AD and NDRL, respectively.

RESULTS

The AD ranges for the head, chest and abdomen regions based on CTDI_vol were 45.8-57.2 mGy, 2.9-10.0 mGy and 3.8-10.3 mGy. The corresponding NDRL ranges were 45.8-95.8 mGy, 3.5-14.1 mGy and 4.5-11.9 mGy. The AD ranges based on SSDE_deff and d_eff were 3.5-9.6 mGy and 4.1-10.3 mGy in chest and abdomen regions. The corresponding NDRL were 4.5-14.1 mGy and 6.1-10.6 mGy.

CONCLUSION

Other institutions can use the present study DRLs as a reference dose for paediatric CT. The AD values can be used as a baseline for target dose optimisations, reducing doses up to 90%.