Human seminal plasma hypersensitivity: an unusual indication for in vitro fertilization

Seminal plasma hypersensitivity: A systematic review of clinical presentation, diagnostics, and management options

INTRODUCTION

Seminal plasma hypersensitivity (SPH) is a rare and often misdiagnosed condition characterized by local and/or systemic reactions to seminal plasma proteins following exposure to semen. We aimed to summarize key symptomatology, diagnostic features, and management options for SPH.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Review were searched with key words "seminal plasma hypersensitivity" and "seminal fluid allergy" through September 2023. Exclusion criteria included non-English articles, in vitro studies, publication before 1990, duplicates, and articles with no clinical relevance to SPH in women.

RESULTS

The search yielded 53 articles for review. Of these, 60.5% described systemic SPH and 39.5% described localized.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of SPH relies on a thorough patient history and confirmatory skin prick testing. The use of IgE assays is controversial and less accurate for cases of localized SPH. Knowledge of disease immunopathology, systemic versus localized symptom presentation, patient preference, and desire to conceive should guide management options. Artificial insemination has the potential for severe adverse reactions in systemic SPH so necessitates extra procedural precautions. SPH does not appear to impair fertility. Additional research on specific allergens implicated in SPH can aid in the development of more targeted immunotherapy approaches with improved safety and efficacy.

An Overview of Seminal Plasma Hypersensitivity and Approach to Treatment

Seminal plasma hypersensitivity (SPH) presents with localized vaginal and/or systemic allergic symptoms on exposure to protein components of seminal plasma. Although the true incidence is unclear, it is a likely underdiagnosed but an important cause of vulvovaginitis and dyspareunia that affects women across the entire globe. Systemic SPH is likely elicited by an IgE-mediated reaction to seminal plasma proteins other than spermatozoa. Localized reactions are likely mediated by a non-IgE immunologic mechanism. The diagnosis of both conditions is made clinically. Clinical presentation typically involves local vaginal discomfort and/or systemic symptoms including urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, dyspnea, gastrointestinal symptoms, or frank anaphylaxis. In roughly half of cases of localized SPH, reactions occur after first-time intercourse. Use of a condom prevents reactions, which aids confirming a diagnosis. In addition to a detailed history, skin prick and/or serologic testing may assist in making the diagnosis. Both local and systemic SPH are managed by the use of barrier contraception or intravaginal graded desensitization. Although SPH has not been shown to directly cause infertility, it may make conception challenging due to the discomfort or systemic symptoms caused by unprotected vaginal intercourse. Data indicate that women with localized reactions have variable fertility outcomes, although the majority are able to have resolution of symptoms after desensitization and have normal term pregnancies. This review provides a step-by-step approach for evaluating and treating women with localized or systemic SPH.