Selective termination in dichorionic twins discordant for congenital defect

Late selective termination in dichorionic twins: comparing late second and third trimester procedures

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do perinatal outcomes of selective termination performed in the late second versus third trimester differ and what risk factors are associated with subsequent preterm birth?

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of late selective terminations performed in dichorionic twins between 2009 and 2021. Perinatal outcomes were compared between two groups: group A, late second trimester (20.2 to 24.2 weeks, n = 26), and group B, third trimester (≥28.2 weeks, n = 55) selective terminations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with post-procedure preterm birth.

RESULTS

In total, 81 dichorionic twin pregnancies were included. There were no pregnancy losses but 16% (13/81) of cases experienced complications. Group A had a higher median birthweight centile (36.5th versus 15th centile, P = 0.002) and lower rates of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and Caesarean delivery (11.5% versus 32.7%, P = 0.04; and 26.9% versus 61.8%, P = 0.003) than group B. Preterm birth rates were similar (46.2% versus 63.6%, P = 0.15). Multiple regression revealed that reduction of the presenting twin and cervical length ≤35 mm were independently associated with post-procedure preterm birth (odds ratio [OR] 8.7, P = 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-29.8; OR 3.8, P = 0.015, 95% CI 1.3-11).

CONCLUSIONS

Late second trimester selective termination is associated with a higher birthweight centile and lower rates of IUGR and Caesarean delivery, compared with third trimester selective termination. Cervical length 35 mm or less and reduction of the presenting twin are independent risk factors for post-procedural preterm birth. These findings may help determine the optimal time to perform a late selective termination.

Perinatal outcome and timing of selective fetal reduction in dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a single-center retrospective study

Objective

The study aimed to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies that were reduced to singletons at different gestational ages.

Study design

This was a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies that underwent fetal reduction to singletons in a single tertiary referral center between 2011 and 2020. A total of 433 cases were included. The cohort was divided into five groups according to gestational age at surgery: Group A: <16 weeks (125 cases); Group B: 16-19+6 weeks (80 cases); Group C: 20-23+6 weeks (74 cases); Group D: 24-26+6 weeks (48 cases); and Group E: ≥27 weeks (106 cases). Outcome data were obtained by reviewing the electronic medical records or interviews.

Results

Selective reduction was technically successful. The clinical characteristics of the population were not different. The overall live birth rate and the survival rate were 96.5 and 95.4%, respectively. Although the rate of spontaneous miscarriage was comparable, gestational age at delivery significantly differed among groups (p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a trend that gestational age at delivery decreased with the increasing gestational age at surgery in Groups A, B, C, and D, whereas gestational age at delivery in Group E was later than that in Group D. In Groups A, B, C, and D, the rates of preterm birth at <32 weeks and <34 weeks increased with the increasing gestational age at surgery, while the rates in Group E were significantly lower than that in Group D. Regression analysis showed that timing of reduction may be an independent factor after adjusting for maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy BMI, ART, and cervical length.

Conclusion

Selective reduction performed by experienced hands for a dizygotic abnormal twin is safe and effective. Gestational age at surgery (<26+6 weeks) was inversely correlated with gestational age at delivery and positively with the rate of preterm birth. Reduction after 27 weeks, where legal, can be performed with a good outcome for the retained fetus.

Structural Anomalies in Multifetal Gestations

Multifetal gestations are at increased risk for structural anomalies relative to singletons. Determination of chorionicity is critical, as the risk is highest for monochorionic pregnancies. In a singleton gestation, counseling is structured around optimization of fetal outcomes and careful consideration of the patient's choices in management decisions. However, in multifetal gestations affected by a fetal anomaly, complex counseling with consideration for the pregnancy as a whole is necessary. We review the incidence of structural anomalies in twins and highlight unique considerations including selective termination for discordant anomalies. We emphasize the role of shared decision making between provider and patient.

Adverse outcome following selective termination of presenting twin vs non-presenting twin

OBJECTIVE

Data are lacking on the impact on pregnancy outcome of the position of the abnormal fetus in a discordant twin pregnancy undergoing selective termination (ST). Tissue maceration post ST of the presenting twin may lead to early rupture of membranes, amnionitis and preterm labor. The aim of this study was to evaluate pregnancy complications and outcome following ST of the presenting vs non-presenting twin.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies that underwent ST due to a discordant fetal anomaly (structural or genetic) between 2007 and 2021. The study population was divided into two groups according to the position of the reduced twin (presenting or non-presenting) and outcomes were studied accordingly. The primary outcome was a composite of early complications following ST, including infection, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and pregnancy loss.

RESULTS

A total of 190 dichorionic twin pregnancies were included, of which 73 underwent ST of the presenting twin and 117 of the non-presenting twin. The groups did not differ in either baseline demographic characteristics or mean gestational age at the time of the procedure. ST of the presenting twin resulted in a significantly higher rate of early complications compared with the non-presenting twin (19.2% vs 7.7%; P = 0.018). Moreover, the rates of preterm delivery (75.3% vs 37.6%; P < 0.001) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (45.3% vs 17.1%; P < 0.001) were higher, and birth weight was lower (P < 0.001), in those pregnancies in which the presenting twin was reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

ST of the presenting twin resulted in a higher rate of adverse pregnancy outcome compared with that of the non-presenting twin. These findings should be acknowledged during patient counseling and, if legislation permits, taken into consideration when planning ST. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of early vs late selective termination in dichorionic twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies undergoing early vs late selective termination of pregnancy (ST).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Web of Science databases were searched electronically up to March 2022. The primary outcome of this study was pregnancy loss prior to 24 weeks' gestation. The secondary outcomes included preterm birth (PTB) before 37, 34, and 32 weeks, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), gestational age (GA) at delivery, Cesarean delivery, mean birth weight, 5-min Apgar score < 7, overall neonatal morbidity and neonatal survival. Only prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on the outcome of early (before 18 weeks) vs late (at or after 18 weeks) ST in dichorionic twin pregnancies were considered suitable for inclusion. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. Random-effects head-to-head meta-analysis was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Seven studies reporting on 649 dichorionic twin pregnancies were included in this systematic review. The risk of pregnancy loss prior to 24 weeks was significantly lower in dichorionic twin pregnancies undergoing early compared with late ST (1% vs 8%; odds ratio (OR), 0.25 (95% CI, 0.10-0.65); P = 0.004). The risk of PTB was significantly lower in dichorionic twin pregnancies undergoing early compared with late ST when considering PTB before 37 weeks (19% vs 45%; OR, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.23-0.57); P < 0.00001), before 34 weeks (4% vs 19%; OR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.11-0.54); P = 0.0005) and before 32 weeks (4% vs 20%; OR, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.05-0.85); P = 0.03). The mean birth weight was significantly greater in the early-ST group (mean difference (MD), 392.2 g (95% CI, 59.1-726.7 g); P = 0.02), as was the mean GA at delivery (MD, 2.47 weeks (95% CI, 0.04-4.91 weeks); P = 0.049). There was no significant difference between dichorionic twin pregnancies undergoing early compared with late ST in terms of PPROM (P = 0.27), Cesarean delivery (P = 0.38), 5-min Apgar score < 7 (P = 0.35) and neonatal survival of the non-reduced twin (P = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of pregnancy loss prior to 24 weeks and the rate of PTB before 37, 34 and 32 weeks were significantly higher in dichorionic twin pregnancies undergoing late vs early ST, thus highlighting the importance of early diagnosis of fetal anomalies in twin pregnancies. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Correlation analysis of adverse outcomes for the selective reduction of twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Due to the extensive development of assisted reproductive technology, the number of twin pregnancies has increased significantly over recent decades. Twin pregnancy is the most representative type of multiple pregnancies and is associated with high infant morbidity and mortality. Perinatal complications of twin pregnancy are also markedly increased compared with those of single pregnancy. Transabdominal selective reduction (SR) is a remedial intervention. This study aimed to research the adverse outcomes of transabdominal selective reduction of twin pregnancy and the correlation between the reduction week and pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the adverse outcomes of the transabdominal selective reduction of twin pregnancy and the correlation between the reduction week and pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of the transabdominal reduction of twin pregnancy was conducted in a single prenatal diagnosis medical centre from September 2012 to October 2020. According to chorionicity, women with twin pregnancies were divided into 2 groups: dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies and monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies. Women with DC twin pregnancies underwent potassium chloride reduction, and those with MC twin pregnancies underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The reduction indications included pregnancy complications, foetal abnormalities, and maternal factors. The perinatal outcomes of different chorionic twins after reduction were analysed. Each foetus with an adverse outcome was included. The relative relationship between the reduction weeks and delivery weeks of twins was examined by correlation analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 161 women were included in this study. A total of 112 women had DC twin pregnancies, and 49 women had MC twin pregnancies. Preterm delivery rates were significantly higher in the MC twin reduction group than in the DC twin reduction group prior to 37 weeks (53.1% vs. 29.5%, P = 0.004). The mean gestational age at delivery of the foetuses in the DC twin group that underwent SR was significantly older than that of those in the MC twin group that underwent SR (36.9 ± 4.0 vs. 33.5 ± 6.6 weeks, P = 0.001). The number of DC twins that underwent SR and were delivered after 37 weeks was obviously greater than that of the MC twins that underwent SR (70.5% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.004). The foetal survival rate was 95.5% in the DC twin reduction group and 77.6% in the MC twin reduction group. If the indication of TTTS was not included, there was no significant difference in the foetal survival rate of the DC and MC twin reduction groups (95.5% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.160). Cotwin death 1 week after reduction was greater in the MC group (6.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.027). Compared to other indications, this finding indicated that a significantly lower proportion of women remained undelivered after selective reduction with the indication of TTTS. There was a significant negative correlation between the reduction weeks and delivery weeks of the two groups (P < 0.01), and the best opportunity for reduction was before 22 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlighted an obviously negative correlation between the reduction week and delivery week. The transabdominal selective reduction of twin pregnancy should be considered for a lower rate of miscarriage or premature delivery if the reduction week takes place earlier in pregnancy. The rate of preterm delivery was the lowest when transabdominal selective reduction was completed before 22 weeks of gestation. Compared with other RFA indications, a higher rate of premature delivery was shown for MC twins with a reduction indication of TTTS. TTTS with sIUGR might be one of the reasons for the adverse outcomes of reduction for MC twin pregnancy.

Fetal reduction from twin to singleton gestation: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of fetal reduction in twin pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched from 1980 through December 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective or retrospective studies of pregnant women with twin gestations who had a transabdominal reduction of twin to singleton pregnancy with a comparison group of ongoing twin gestations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcomes were meta-analyzed only if reported in at least three studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies with a pooled sample of 2867 women with a twin pregnancy of whom 624 underwent 2-to-1 reduction and 2243 did not. In the fetal reduction group, the odds of preterm birth before 34 and 37 weeks of pregnancy were lower by 36% (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.86, P < 0.003) and 77% (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.12-0.44, P < 0.001), respectively, than in the control group, and the odds of hypertensive disorders and cesarean delivery were lower by 75% (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.15-0.43, P < 0.001) and 65% (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.62, P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Twin reduction to singleton pregnancy decreased the possibility of preterm birth, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and cesarean delivery. Sufficiently powered prospective studies are needed to support these findings.

Perinatal outcome after selective termination in dichorionic twins discordant for congenital anomalies

INTRODUCTION

Our objective was to evaluate the perinatal outcome of selective termination of dichorionic twin pregnancies with discordant anomalies, according to gestational age at time of procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 147 dichorionic twin pregnancies referred to our Fetal Medicine Unit between 2003 and 2018 for selective termination. Gestational age at delivery, fetal loss, and overall and 28-day post-delivery survival rates, were evaluated according to gestational age at time of procedure. Selective termination procedure was defined as early, intermediate, and late when performed before 18 weeks, between 18 and 23 weeks, and after 23 weeks, respectively. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared test were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 28 days post-delivery, pregnancy loss, and preterm delivery before 32 weeks of gestation rates were 93.4%, 6.9%, and 15.5%, respectively. When stratified by gestational age at procedure, intermediate selective termination was associated with a lower survival rate than early and late procedures (86% vs. 96.9% and 100%, respectively; p = 0.035), and a nonsignificant trend for higher pregnancy loss (12% vs. 3.1%). Preterm delivery before 32 weeks of gestation occurred in 27% of late procedures, which was significantly higher than in early (9.5%) and intermediate (18.2%) procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective termination in dichorionic twin pregnancies with discordant fetal anomaly is associated with low pregnancy loss and preterm delivery rate, primarily when performed before 18 weeks. When legally possible, late procedures can be a good alternative, particularly in those cases diagnosed beyond the 18th week of gestation.

Optimal timing of fetal reduction from twins to singleton: earlier the better or later the better?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of pregnancy complications and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies that were reduced to singleton at an early compared with a later gestational age.

METHODS

This was a historical cohort study of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies that underwent fetal reduction to singletons in a single tertiary referral center between January 2005 and February 2017. The study population was divided into two groups according to gestational age at fetal reduction: those performed at 11-14 weeks' gestation, mainly at the patient's request or as a result of a complicated medical or obstetric history; and selective reductions performed at 15-23 weeks for structural or genetic anomalies. The main outcome measures compared between pregnancies that underwent early reduction and those that underwent late reduction included rates of pregnancy complications, pregnancy loss, preterm delivery and adverse neonatal outcome.

RESULTS

In total, 248 dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies were included, of which 172 underwent early reduction and 76 underwent late reduction. Although gestational age at delivery was not significantly different between the late- and early-reduction groups (38 weeks, (interquartile range (IQR), 36-40 weeks) vs 39 weeks (IQR, 38-40 weeks); P = 0.2), the rates of preterm delivery < 37 weeks (28.0% vs 14.0%; P = 0.01), < 34 weeks (12.0% vs 1.8%; P = 0.002) and < 32 weeks (8.0% vs 1.8%; P = 0.026) were significantly higher in pregnancies that underwent late reduction. Regression analysis revealed that late reduction of twins was an independent risk factor for preterm delivery, after adjustment for maternal age, parity, body mass index and the location of the reduced sac. Rates of early complications linked to the reduction procedure itself, such as infection, vaginal bleeding and leakage of fluids, were comparable between the groups (7.0% for early reduction vs 9.2% for late reduction; P = 0.53). There was no significant difference in the rate of pregnancy loss before 24 weeks (0.6% for early reduction vs 1.3% for late reduction; P = 0.52), and no cases of intrauterine fetal death at or after 24 weeks were documented. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes or small-for-gestational age. The rates of respiratory distress syndrome (6.7% vs 0%; P = 0.002), need for mechanical ventilation (6.7% vs 0.6%; P = 0.01) and composite neonatal morbidity (defined as one or more of respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, need for respiratory support or neonatal death) (10.7% vs 2.9%; P = 0.025) were higher in the late- than in the early-reduction group. Other neonatal outcomes were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with late first-trimester reduction of twins, second-trimester reduction is associated with an increased rate of prematurity and adverse neonatal outcome, without increasing the rate of procedure-related complications. Technological advances in sonographic diagnosis and more frequent use of chorionic villus sampling have enabled earlier detection of fetal anatomic and chromosomal abnormalities. Therefore, efforts should be made to complete early fetal assessment to allow reduction during the first trimester. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Effects of the timing of selective reduction and finishing number of fetuses on the perinatal outcome in triplets: a single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the timing of selective reduction and finishing the number of fetuses on perinatal outcomes in triplets.

METHOD

The study assessed 417 cases of triplets. Perinatal outcomes were compared between selective reduction (SR) performed at 11-14⁺⁶weeks of gestation and SR performed at 15-24⁺⁶weeks of gestation for the same starting and finishing numbers of fetuses. Then, the perinatal outcomes of reduction to singletons and twins were compared for the same range of SR of gestational weeks.

RESULTS

The spontaneous abortion rate was 6.5% and 14.9%, respectively, when SR was performed at 11-14⁺⁶weeks of gestation (214 cases) and at 15-24⁺⁶ weeks of gestation (94 cases) (p = .019). In total, 74 cases of triplets were reduced to singletons and 214 cases were reduced to twins when SR was performed at 11-14⁺⁶weeks of gestation. Preterm labor rates, low birth weight rates, birth weights, and gestational ages at delivery also showed significant differences (p < .001). In total, 35 cases of triplets were reduced to singletons and 94 cases were reduced to twins when SR was performed at 15-24⁺⁶weeks of gestation. The preterm labor rates, low birth weight rates, birth weights and gestational ages at delivery also significantly differed (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

When the starting and finishing numbers of fetuses were the same, the timing of SR could affect the spontaneous abortion rates. When the starting number of fetuses was the same, the timing of SR did not affect the neonatal outcome. However, the finishing number of fetuses was the influencing factor.

Transabdominal fetal reduction: a report of 124 cases

To prevent fetal loss, preterm delivery, and perinatal morbidity of multifetal pregnancies (MPs), fetal reduction (FR) is offered to some patients. We retrospectively analysed the data of 124 MPs that underwent transabdominal FR to twin (n = 63) and singleton (n = 61) pregnancies at a mean gestational age of 12 + 6 weeks between December 2006 and January 2018. FR was performed transabdominally with the injection of potassium chloride into the intracardiac or intrathoracic space of the fetus or fetuses after ultrasound screening for nuchal translucency and anatomical defects. The initial number of embryos were 48 twins, 63 triplets, 11 quadruplets, and 2 quintuplets. The procedure-related pregnancy loss rate was 0.8% (1/124), the overall pregnancy loss rate was 2.4% (3/124), the fetal loss rate was 1.6% (2/124), and the neonatal death rate was 0.8% (1/124). The baby take-home rates were 96% for twin pregnancies and 96.7% for singletons. This study shows that transabdominal FR is an effective and safe procedure with a pregnancy loss rate of 2.4%.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? The incidence of multifetal pregnancies has increased over the years. Because multifetal pregnancies increase perinatal morbidity and mortality due to prematurity, fetal reduction is offed to some patients.What the results of this study add? The results of this study add to the growing body of research on fetal reduction. The study showed that transabdominal fetal reduction is a safe procedure with a pregnancy loss rate of 2.4%.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The results of this study can be used in counselling couples with multifetal pregnancies who are considering fetal reduction. Further research is needed to confirm the current findings.

[Perinatal issues of biamniotic twin pregnancies depending on gestational ages of selective termination]

OBJECTIVES

A severe fetal abnormality is found in 1-2% of biamniotic twin gestations leading to the dilemma of expectative management or selective termination of the defective fetus. The primary objective of our study was to determinate the relationship between perinatal outcomes and gestational ages of selective termination.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective and observational study which reviewed 58 biamniotic twin pregnancies that underwent selective termination for discordant fetal anomalies between January 2006 and September 2017. Fetal anomalies, ages of diagnostic and selective termination, perinatal outcomes were noted.

RESULTS

Selective terminations realised before 20 weeks (group A) were complicated by 8,7% of fetal loss and 28,6% of prematurity, of which 14,3% before 32 GA. In group B (selective termination planned between 20 and 32 weeks), there was no fetal loss but 40% of prematurity of which 13,3% before 32 GA. In group C (selective termination planned after 32 weeks), there was no fetal loss, but 42,1% of prematurity, and one birth before 32 GA (5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational age of a selective termination should be determined together with the parents, after informing them about the risks and technical difficulties at each gestational age.

Transabdominal selective feticide in dichorionic twins: Ten years' experience at a single center

AIM

The present study investigates the procedure-related fetal loss rate and obstetrical outcomes of selective feticide in dichorionic twins.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 44 cases of dichorionic twins. Two different indications for selective feticide were set: (i) the presence of genetic or congenital anomaly; and (ii) an obstetrical indication specified as a past maternal history of preterm delivery that caused fetal death or cerebral palsy of the child. Primarily, data on procedure-related fetal loss and obstetrical outcomes were retrieved. Additionally, data on obstetrical outcomes by reduction time and by indication of SF were obtained.

RESULTS

Selective feticide was performed in 44 cases - specifically, in 23 cases with genetic or congenital anomaly and in 21 cases with obstetrical indications. The median gestational age at delivery was 38 + 4 weeks. One pregnancy loss (2.3%, 1/44) occurred within 4 weeks after the procedure. The overall pregnancy loss rate throughout the pregnancy term was 2.3% (1/44). When selective feticide was performed at 15 weeks and beyond, the birth weight was significantly decreased compared with when selective feticide was performed earlier than 15 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Transabdominal ultrasound-guided selective feticide in dichorionic twins is an effective and safe procedure. If a patient desires to maximize her chances of having a healthy child and decrease the risk of prematurity, the option of selective feticide should be considered in certain cases of twin pregnancies. Selective feticide may be a reasonable alternative to expectant management or termination of the whole twin pregnancy.

Expectant management in di-chorionic pregnancies complicated by discordant anomalous twin

Fetal malformations are more frequent in twins than in singletons. The aim of our study was to define the influence of a malformed twin on di-chorionic pregnancy outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of di-chorionic pregnancies delivered between 2000 and 2015. Exclusion criteria were: both twins affected by fetal malformations, double intra-uterine fetal death in pregnancies without fetal malformation, selective feticide and therapeutic pregnancy termination. We compared maternal and fetal outcomes of di-chorionic pregnancies not complicated by fetal malformations with pregnancies affected by a single malformed fetus with conservative management. We included 642 di-chorionic pregnancies: 56 (case group, 8.7%) with one twin affected by a malformation (20 minor, 36 major ones), 586 (control group, 91.3%) without fetal malformation. No differences were found on maternal and not malformed co-twin outcomes when compared to pregnancies with no malformation; case vs control group presented similar rates of preeclampsia (8.9% vs. 10.8%, respectively), intrauterine growth restriction (7.1% vs. 9.4%) and composite adverse neonatal outcomes (19.6% vs. 15.1%). No case of fetal death in not malformed co-twin was reported. Expectant management could be a safe option for both mother and co-twin in case of di-chorionic twin pregnancy complicated by only one malformed fetus.

Pregnancy outcome after fetal reduction in women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy

STUDY QUESTION

What are the pregnancy outcomes for women with a twin pregnancy that is reduced to a singleton pregnancy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Fetal reduction of a twin pregnancy significantly improves gestational age at birth and neonatal birthweight, however at an increased risk of pregnancy loss and preterm delivery.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Women with a multiple pregnancy are at increased risk for preterm delivery. Fetal reduction can be considered in these women.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, AND DURATION

Retrospective cohort study of 118 women with a twin pregnancy reduced to a singleton pregnancy between 2000 and 2010.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, AND METHODS

We compared the outcome of pregnancy in consecutive women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy that was reduced to a singleton pregnancy to that of women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy that was managed expectantly and women with a primary singleton pregnancy. Reductions were performed between 10-23(6/7) weeks' gestation by intracardiac or intrathoracic injection of potassium chloride, mostly for congenital anomalies. We compared median gestational age, pregnancy loss <24 weeks, preterm delivery <32 weeks, neonatal birthweight and perinatal deaths.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

We studied 118 women with a twin pregnancy that was reduced to a singleton, 818 women with an ongoing dichorionic twin pregnancy and 611 women with a primary singleton pregnancy. Loss of the entire pregnancy <24 weeks and preterm delivery occurred significantly more in the reduction group compared with the ongoing twin group (11.9 versus 3.1% <24 weeks, P< 0.001 and 18.6 versus 11.5% <32 weeks, respectively, P < 0.001). In the reduction group, the percentage of women without any surviving child was significantly higher compared with the ongoing twin and primary singleton group (14.4, 3.4 and 0.7%, respectively, P < 0.001). Median gestational age was 38.9 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 34.7-40.3) for reduced pregnancies, 37.1 weeks (IQR 35.3-38.1) for ongoing twin pregnancies and 40.1 (IQR 39.1-40.9) for primary singletons (P < 0.001 for all comparisons).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitations of the study were its retrospective character, and the fact that indications for reduction were heterogeneous.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In women with a dichorionic twin pregnancy fetal reduction increases median gestational age only at considerable risk of complete early pregnancy loss.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The study was not funded. None of the authors has conflicts of interest.

The outcome of twin pregnancies discordant for trisomy 21

The management of twin pregnancies discordant for trisomy 21 is dependent on the gestation at diagnosis, chorionicity, and parental preference. Our experience with the management of 15 cases in 1,839 twin pregnancies over a 12-year period is described. Selective termination is not always associated with a successful outcome for the normal co-twin. Two of the three monochorionic twin pregnancies affected by trisomy 21 were discordant. Amniocentesis should be strongly considered rather than chorionic villus sampling in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Pregnancies that continue with a trisomy 21 affected fetus are at risk of polyhydramnios and premature labor.

Differences between selective termination of pregnancy and fetal reduction in multiple pregnancy: a narrative review

Although selective termination of pregnancy and fetal reduction in multiple pregnancy both involve the termination in utero of the development of live fetuses, these two procedures are different in several aspects. Nevertheless, several authors tend to amalgamate and confuse their psychosocial consequences and the ethical issues they raise. Therefore, this narrative review, derived from a comparative analysis of 91 articles, shines a light on these amalgamations and confusions, as well as on the medical, contextual, experiential and ethical differences specific to selective termination and fetal reduction.