Use of GnRH analogues pre-operatively for hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The use of oral nomegestrol acetate/estradiol in rapid and random start preparation of endometrium before office hysteroscopic polypectomies: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of oral nomegestrol acetate/estradiol in random start rapid preparation of endometrium before office hysteroscopic polypectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

80 adult women undergoing office hysteroscopic polypectomy between January 2023 and March 2024 were randomized to intervention (n = 40) or control (n = 40). Exclusion criteria included the presence of endouterine pathology other than endometrial polyps solely.

METHODS

Subjects in the intervention group were treated with oral nomegestrol acetate/estradiol 1.5 mg/2.5 mg/day started taking the drug from an indefinite time in the menstrual cycle (random start) for 14 days. Subjects in the control group did not receive any pharmaceutical treatment and underwent polypectomy between days 8 and 11 of the menstrual cycle.

RESULTS

On the day of the procedure, the difference in pre- and post-office hysteroscopic polypectomy endometrial ultrasound thickness was statistically significant between the two groups, with endometrial thickness in both measurements being thinner for the intervention group (p < 0.001). In the nomegestrol acetate/estradiol-treated group, compared with the control, there was also a statistically significant difference in the physician's assessment of the quality of endometrial preparation (p < 0.001), the quality of visualization of the uterine cavity (p < 0.001), and satisfaction with the performance of the procedure (p < 0.001). Finally, all surgical outcomes analyzed were better in the treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with nomegestrol acetate/estradiol could provide rapid, satisfactory and low-cost preparation of the endometrium before office polypectomy, thus improving surgical performance and woman's compliance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06316219.

Pharmacologic Interventions to Minimize Fluid Absorption at the Time of Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess which interventions are effective in reducing fluid absorption at the time of hysteroscopy.

DATA SOURCE

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PubMed (non-MEDLINE records only), EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov , and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 2022 without restriction on language or geographic origin.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, all English-language, full-text articles reporting fluid balance, with an intervention and comparator arm, were included. Title and abstract screening and full-text review were completed independently by two authors. Conflicts were resolved through discussion and consensus. Studies' risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The search identified 906 studies, 28 of which were eligible for inclusion, examining the following interventions: gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist; ulipristal acetate; vasopressin; danazol; oxytocin; and local, general, and regional anesthesia. A significant reduction in mean fluid absorption was seen in patients preoperatively treated with danazol (-175.7 mL, 95% CI -325.4 to -26.0) and a GnRH agonist (-139.68 mL, 95% CI -203.2, -76.2) compared with patients in a control group. Ulipristal acetate and type of anesthesia showed no difference. Data on type of anesthesia and vasopressin use were not amenable to meta-analysis; however, four studies favored vasopressin over control regarding fluid absorption. Mean operative time was reduced after preoperative treatment with ulipristal acetate (-7.1 min, 95% CI -11.31 to -2.9), danazol (-7.5 min, 95% CI -8.7 to -6.3), and a GnRH agonist (-3.3 min, 95% CI -5.6 to -0.98).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative treatment with a GnRH agonist and danazol were both found to be effective in reducing fluid absorption and operative time across a range of hysteroscopic procedures. High-quality research aimed at evaluating other interventions, such as combined hormonal contraception, progestin therapy, and vasopressin, are still lacking in the literature.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42021233804.

Clinical observation of different dosages of dexmedetomidine combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy

Objective

This study aimed to explore the clinical effects of different dosages of dexmedetomidine (Dex) combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy.

Methods

Ninety patients who underwent hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy between September 2021 and March 2022 were enrolled and randomly divided into three groups, with 30 patients in each group. Patients in Groups A, B, and C received injections of 0.25, 0.5, or 0.75 µg/kg of Dex, respectively, by intravenous pump over 10 min. After this time, a maintenance dosage of 0.5 µg/kg/h was administered by intravenous infusion until the end of the surgery. Anesthesia was induced using 1.5 mg/kg of propofol and 0.3 µg/kg of sufentanil that were introduced through a laryngeal mask. The plasma concentration of propofol was maintained at 3 µg/ml by target-controlled infusion until the end of the surgery. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and electroencephalographic bispectral index (BIS) were observed when the patient entered the operating room (T0), after catheter indwelling for anesthesia (T1), at the time of cervical dilation (T2), at the time of hysteroscopic surgery (T3), and at the end of the surgery (T4) in all three groups. The total dosage of propofol for induction and maintenance, anesthesia awakening time, orientation recovery time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of the post-awakening uterine contraction pain, and adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

The intraoperative reductions of MAP and HR in patients were significant in Group C when compared with those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05), and BIS was significantly lower in Group C at T2 and T3 when compared with the baseline measurement at T0 (P < 0.05). The dosage of propofol was significantly higher for Group A than for Groups B and C (P < 0.05). The anesthesia awakening time and orientation recovery time were significantly longer for patients in Group C when compared with patients in Groups A and B (P < 0.05). Within 5-30 min after awakening, the VAS scores in Groups B and C were significantly lower than those for Group A (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in Group B was significantly less than that for Groups A and C (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The continuous pumping of 0.5 µg/kg of Dex combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in hysteroscopic submucosal myomectomy resulted in positive anesthetic and analgesia effects and fewer adverse reactions. It therefore has high clinical significance.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for a Single Uterine Fibroid Greater than 300 cm3

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for a single uterine fibroid greater than 300 cm³.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, China.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven patients each with a single fibroid greater than 300 cm³ diagnosed by ultrasound and core needle biopsy.

INTERVENTIONS

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 12 months postoperatively to assess the postoperative lesion volume reduction rate, degree of symptomatic relief, improvements in quality of life, and occurrence of adverse events. All 37 patients met the criteria for complete ablation, and the lesion volume significantly decreased from 334.28 cm³ (95% confidence interval [CI] 326.75-366.73) preoperatively to 52.01 cm³ (95% CI, 46.95-74.69) at the 12-month follow-up (difference: 280.15 cm³; 95% CI, 267.92-294.65; p <.001). The lesion volume reduction rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were 27.30% (95% CI, 24.12-31.45), 52.90% (95% CI, 47.95-55.80), 67.90% (95% CI, 63.03-70.77), and 84.00% (95% CI, 80.22-85.94), respectively. The differences in the preoperative and postoperative Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were significant (p <.01). The hemoglobin levels of the anemic patients were significantly elevated after the procedure (p <.001). Of the 37 patients in this study, 29 patients (78.38%) had a highly significant treatment effect, and 8 patients (21.62%) had a significant treatment effect. Seventeen patients (45.95%) had Society of Interventional Radiology grade A to B adverse effects that required no clinical intervention or only simple clinical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA has good clinical efficacy and high safety in the treatment of a single uterine fibroid greater than 300 cm³.

The Use of Hysteroscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 800

This Committee Opinion provides guidance on the current uses of hysteroscopy in the office and the operating room for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathology and the potential associated complications. General considerations for the use of diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy include managing distending media, timing for optimal visualization, and cervical preparations. In premenopausal women with regular menstrual cycles, the optimal timing for diagnostic hysteroscopy is during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle after menstruation. Pregnancy should be reasonably excluded before performing hysteroscopy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine cervical ripening before diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy, but it may be considered for those patients at higher risk of cervical stenosis or increased pain with the surgical procedure. In randomized trials, patients reported a preference for office-based hysteroscopy, and office-based procedures are associated with higher patient satisfaction and faster recovery when compared with hospital-based operative hysteroscopy. Other potential benefits of office hysteroscopy include patient and physician convenience, avoidance of general anesthesia, less patient anxiety related to familiarity with the office setting, cost effectiveness, and more efficient use of the operating room for more complex hysteroscopic cases. Appropriate patient selection for office-based hysteroscopic procedures for women with known uterine pathology relies on thorough knowledge and understanding of the target pathology, size of the lesion, depth of penetration of the lesion, patient willingness to undergo an office-based procedure, physician skills and expertise, assessment of patient comorbidities, and availability of proper equipment and patient support. Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) agree that vaginoscopy may be considered when performing office hysteroscopy because studies have shown that it can significantly reduce procedural pain with similar efficacy. The office hysteroscopy analgesia regimens commonly described in the literature include a single agent or a combination of multiple agents, including a topical anesthetic, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, acetaminophen, a benzodiazepine, an opiate, and an intracervical or paracervical block, or both. Based on the currently available evidence, there is no clinically significant difference in safety or effectiveness of these regimens for pain management when compared to each other or placebo. Patient safety and comfort must be prioritized when performing office hysteroscopic procedures. Patients have the right to expect the same level of patient safety as is present in the hospital or ambulatory surgery setting.

Use of GnRH Analogues in the Reduction of Submucous Fibroid for Surgical Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) have been used preoperatively before hysteroscopic myomectomy to decrease the size and vascularization of the myomas, but evidence to support this practice is weak. Our objective was to analyze the use of GnRH-a in the reduction of submucous fibroid as a facilitator for surgical hysteroscopy from published clinical trials.

Data sources Studies from electronic databases (Pubmed, Scielo, EMBASE, Scopus, PROSPERO), published between 1980 and December 2018. The keywords used were fibroid, GnRH analogue, submucous, histeroscopy, histeroscopic resection and their correspondents in Portuguese.

Study selection The inclusion criteria were controlled trials that evaluated the GnRH-a treatment before hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas. Four clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis.

Data collection Two review authors extracted the data without modification of the original data, using the agreed form. We resolved discrepancies through discussion or, if required, we consulted a third person.

Data synthesis The present meta-analysis included a total of 213 women and showed no statistically significant differences in the use of GnRH-a compared with the control group for complete resection of submucous myoma (relative risk [RR]: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80–1.11); operative time (mean difference [MD]: - 3.81; 95%CI : - 3.81–2.13); fluid absorption (MD: - 65.90; 95%CI: - 9.75–2.13); or complications (RR 0.92; 95%CI: 0.18–4.82).

Conclusion The present review did not support the routine preoperative use of GnRH-a prior to hysteroscopic myomectomy. However, it is not possible to determine its inferiority when compared with the other methods due to the heterogeneity of existing studies and the small sample size.

Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comparison of techniques and review of current evidence in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Submucosal uterine leiomyomas are a common benign pelvic tumor that can cause abnormal uterine bleeding and may contribute to infertility and miscarriage. Hysteroscopic myomectomy is the treatment of choice to alleviate bleeding from these myomas and to normalize the uterine cavity. This review discusses the techniques and recent evidence for hysteroscopic myomectomy and examines the two primary surgical tools employed today: the bipolar resectoscope and hysteroscopic mechanical morcellator.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hysteroscopic myomectomy has been a popular treatment for symptomatic submucosal fibroids for decades; it is a minimally invasive, low-cost, low-risk procedure, and is associated with high patient satisfaction. There have been rapid advances in the surgical technology available for this procedure. Both the bipolar resectoscope and the hysteroscopic mechanical morcellator are appropriate tools to remove submucosal myomas. Although the hysteroscopic morcellators have been associated with shortened operative time and a decreased learning curve, the data are limited for their use on type 2 fibroids. The strength of the bipolar resectoscope lies in its ability to resect deeper type 2 fibroids.

SUMMARY

The evidence suggests that no one technique should be used for all patients, but rather a choice of technique should be taken on a case-by-case basis, depending on the myoma number, size, type, and location. Gynecologists must become knowledgeable about each of these techniques and their associated risks to safely offer these surgeries to their patients.

Prediction of the operative time for hysteroscopic myomectomy for leiomyomas penetrating the intramural cavity using leiomyoma weight and clinical characteristics of patients

PURPOSE

To preoperatively predict the operative time (OT) for hysteroscopic myomectomy for G1 or G2 leiomyoma based on leiomyoma weight.

METHODS

The data from 544 patients who underwent one-step hysteroscopic myomectomy were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 340 patients with leiomyoma penetrating the intramural cavity were identified as suitable candidates for calculation of the OT based on leiomyoma weight; we considered leiomyoma weight to be the most objective parameter for evaluating leiomyoma tissues. Additionally, 460 patients with a single leiomyoma were analyzed to estimate the weight of the resected leiomyoma based on its diameter.

RESULTS

Considering total leiomyoma weight (TLW) and two additional coefficients (1.5: G2 leiomyoma, 0.75: vaginal parity of the patient), we demonstrated that our formula correlated well with OT (R 2 = 0.72). TLW also correlated well with the cube of the average diameter (AD) of leiomyomas (R 2 = 0.89). Predicting TLW significantly improved the application of specific coefficients depending on its value (1.0: AD 0.1-2.0 cm, 0.8: AD 2.1-3.0 cm, 0.7: AD 3.1-5.7 cm).

CONCLUSION

The OT for hysteroscopic myomectomy of intracavital leiomyoma can be predicted prior to surgery using simple clinical information of the target leiomyoma and the patient.

Preoperative medical therapy before surgery for uterine fibroids

BACKGROUND

Uterine fibroids occur in up to 40% of women aged over 35 years. Some are asymptomatic, but up to 50% cause symptoms that warrant therapy. Symptoms include anaemia caused by heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, infertility and low quality of life. Surgery is the first choice of treatment. In recent years, medical therapies have been used before surgery to improve intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. However, such therapies tend to be expensive.Fibroid growth is stimulated by oestrogen. Gonadotropin-hormone releasing analogues (GnRHa) induce a state of hypo-oestrogenism that shrinks fibroids , but has unacceptable side effects if used long-term. Other potential hormonal treatments, include progestins and selective progesterone-receptor modulators (SPRMs).This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2000 and 2001; the scope has been broadened to include all preoperative medical treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of medical treatments prior to surgery for uterine fibroids.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL in June 2017. We also searched trials registers (ClinicalTrials.com; WHO ICTRP), theses and dissertations and the grey literature, handsearched reference lists of retrieved articles and contacted pharmaceutical companies for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised comparisons of medical therapy versus placebo, no treatment, or other medical therapy before surgery, myomectomy, hysterectomy or endometrial resection, for uterine fibroids.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 38 RCTs (3623 women); 19 studies compared GnRHa to no pretreatment (n = 19), placebo (n = 8), other medical pretreatments (progestin, SPRMs, selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), dopamine agonists, oestrogen receptor antagonists) (n = 7), and four compared SPRMs with placebo. Most results provided low-quality evidence due to limitations in study design (poor reporting of randomisation procedures, lack of blinding), imprecision and inconsistency. GnRHa versus no treatment or placebo GnRHa treatments were associated with reductions in both uterine (MD -175 mL, 95% CI -219.0 to -131.7; 13 studies; 858 participants; I² = 67%; low-quality evidence) and fibroid volume (heterogeneous studies, MD 5.7 mL to 155.4 mL), and increased preoperative haemoglobin (MD 0.88 g/dL, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.1; 10 studies; 834 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), at the expense of a greater likelihood of adverse events, particularly hot flushes (OR 7.68, 95% CI 4.6 to 13.0; 6 studies; 877 participants; I² = 46%; moderate-quality evidence).Duration of hysterectomy surgery was reduced among women who received GnRHa treatment (-9.59 minutes, 95% CI 15.9 to -3.28; 6 studies; 617 participants; I² = 57%; low-quality evidence) and there was less blood loss (heterogeneous studies, MD 25 mL to 148 mL), fewer blood transfusions (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0; 6 studies; 601 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-quality evidence), and fewer postoperative complications (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.9; 7 studies; 772 participants; I² = 28%; low-quality evidence).GnRHa appeared to reduce intraoperative blood loss during myomectomy (MD 22 mL to 157 mL). There was no clear evidence of a difference among groups for other primary outcomes after myomectomy: duration of surgery (studies too heterogeneous for pooling), blood transfusions (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.3 to 2.8; 4 studies; 121 participants; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence) or postoperative complications (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.64; I² = 0%; 5 studies; 190 participants; low-quality evidence). No suitable data were available for analysis of preoperative bleeding. GnRHa versus other medical therapies GnRHa was associated with a greater reduction in uterine volume (-47% with GnRHa compared to -20% and -22% with 5 mg and 10 mg ulipristal acetate) but was more likely to cause hot flushes (OR 12.3, 95% CI 4.04 to 37.48; 5 studies; 183 participants; I² = 61%; low-quality evidence) compared with ulipristal acetate. There was no clear evidence of a difference in bleeding reduction (ulipristal acetate 5 mg: OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.7; 1 study; 199 participants; moderate-quality evidence; ulipristal acetate 10 mg: OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.1; 1 study; 203 participants; moderate-quality evidence) or haemoglobin levels (MD -0.2, 95% CI -0.6 to 0.2; 188 participants; moderate-quality evidence).There was no clear evidence of a difference in fibroid volume between GnRHa and cabergoline (MD 12.71 mL, 95% CI -5.9 to 31.3; 2 studies; 110 participants; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence).The included studies did not report usable data for any other primary outcomes. SPRMs versus placebo SPRMs (mifepristone, CDB-2914, ulipristal acetate and asoprisnil) were associated with greater reductions in uterine or fibroid volume than placebo (studies too heterogeneous to pool) and increased preoperative haemoglobin levels (MD 0.93 g/dL, 0.5 to 1.4; 2 studies; 173 participants; I² = 0%; high-quality evidence). Ulipristal acetate and asoprisnil were also associated with greater reductions in bleeding before surgery (ulipristal acetate 5 mg: OR 41.41, 95% CI 15.3 to 112.4; 1 study; 143 participants; low-quality evidence; ulipristal acetate 10 mg: OR 78.83, 95% CI 24.0 to 258.7; 1 study; 146 participants; low-quality evidence; asoprisnil: MD -166.9 mL; 95% CI -277.6 to -56.2; 1 study; 22 participants; low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of differences in preoperative complications. No other primary outcomes were measured.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A rationale for the use of preoperative medical therapy before surgery for fibroids is to make surgery easier. There is clear evidence that preoperative GnRHa reduces uterine and fibroid volume, and increases preoperative haemoglobin levels, although GnRHa increases the incidence of hot flushes. During hysterectomy, blood loss, operation time and complication rates were also reduced. Evidence suggests that ulipristal acetate may offer similar advantages (reduced fibroid volume and fibroid-related bleeding and increased haemoglobin levels) although replication of these studies is advised before firm conclusions can be made. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness and distinguish between groups of women with fibroids who would most benefit.

Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur?

Ulipristal acetate (Esmya^©) has been hailed the new wonder drug with regard to the medical management of uterine fibroids, and many postulate that it will remove the need for surgical treatment in the future. While the results from the PEARL studies are certainly promising and its amenorrhoeic rates and reduction in fibroid size are unquestionable, there is still a paucity of data with regard to its long-term effects, the effects on its usage prior to surgery and its variable efficacy in different ethnic populations. To facilitate our knowledge further, independent studies with clear outcome measures evaluating the long-term effects of the drug in a wider, more representative, ethnic minority population as well as assessing its true cost-effectiveness compared to surgery are needed. The aim of this article is to review the historical aspects with regard to the management of uterine fibroids to gain an understanding of where we are now and to evaluate the wider use of ulipristal acetate, both its benefits and limitations and postulate where to go in the future in order to allow our women to make safe and informed choices regarding their treatment options.

A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Effect of Ulipristal Acetate during Myomectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical experience at myomectomy between patients with myomas pretreated with ulipristal acetate versus no pretreatment.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational, multicenter study of myomectomy procedures by any route (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, or laparotomy) (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Five university-affiliated hospitals including tertiary care and community sites.

PATIENTS

Any patient who underwent hysteroscopic, laparotomic, or laparoscopic myomectomy regardless of medical pretreatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgeons completed a Web-based questionnaire after each myomectomy procedure. Surgeons evaluated visualization, the myoma-myometrium relationship, extrusion, fluid deficit, blood loss, and overall ease of hysteroscopic myomectomies. For laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies, plane delineation, myoma separation, blood loss, and overall ease were assessed. The total surgical experience score was calculated by summing the values for each subscale.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 309 myomectomies were evaluated by 52 surgeons (response rate = 83%) at 5 institutions. Of 140 hysteroscopic myomectomies, 84 (60%) were performed without pretreatment, 29 (21%) after ulipristal acetate pretreatment, and 27 (19%) after pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/other. Of 169 laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies, 104 (62%) were performed without pretreatment, 46 (27%) after ulipristal acetate, and 19 (11%) after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/other. The mean surgical experience score (±standard deviation) was comparable between the no pretreatment and ulipristal acetate groups for hysteroscopic myomectomies (13.8 ± 2.2 vs 13.3 ± 2.2, p = .35) and laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies (12.9 ± 4.1 vs 12.1 ± 4.2, p = .30). Compared with no pretreatment, more laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies after ulipristal acetate pretreatment were associated with difficult delineation of surgical planes (22 [47.8%] vs 23 [22.1%], p = .002) and difficult myoma separation (20 [43.5%] vs 21 [20.2%], p = .003). More myomas were described as soft with ulipristal acetate pretreatment (14 [30.4%] vs 17 [16.4%], p = .049). The rates of profuse/abundant endometrium during hysteroscopy were similar between the no pretreatment (21 [25.0%]) and ulipristal acetate (7 [24.1%], p = .93) groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences in surgical nuances, the overall myomectomy experience was not negatively affected by ulipristal acetate pretreatment.

Pre-treatment with GnRHa or ulipristal acetate prior to laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Myomectomy has potential risks of complications. To reduce these risks, medical pre-treatment can be applied to reduce fibroid size and thereby potentially decrease intra-operative blood loss, the need for blood transfusion and emergency hysterectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to study the effectiveness of medical pre-treatment with Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or ulipristal acetate prior to laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy on intra-operative and post-operative outcomes.

Methods

We performed an extensive search in Embase.com, Wiley/Cochrane Library and PubMed in accordance with the Prisma guidelines. All studies published as full papers in peer reviewed journals using GnRHa or ulipristal acetate as medical pre-treatment independent of route of administration or dosage before laparotomic or laparoscopic myomectomy were included. The primary outcome was duration of surgery. Secondary outcomes were duration of enucleation, blood loss, degree of difficulty of surgery, identification of cleavage planes, proportion of vertical incisions, conversion rate, frequency of blood transfusions, post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay, frequency of recurrence of fibroids, frequency of uterine adhesions, recovery time and quality of life. No language restrictions were applied. Meta-analysis were performed where possible.

Findings

Twenty-three studies were included. In laparotomic myomectomy, pre-treatment with GnRHa decreases intra-operative blood loss with 97.39ml (95% CI -111.80 to -82.97) compared to no pre-treatment or placebo. Pre-treatment with GnRHa before laparoscopic myomectomies also shows a reduction in intra-operative blood loss by 23.03ml (95% CI -40.79 to -5.27) and in the frequency of blood transfusions (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.55) compared to no pre-treatment.

Only two retrospective cohort studies reported on pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate compared to no pre-treatment before laparoscopic myomectomy showing a statistically significant reduction in intra-operative blood loss, duration of surgery and frequency of blood transfusions after pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate.

Conclusion

Administration of GnRHa prior to laparotomic myomectomy reduces blood loss and might decrease uterine adhesion formation. Pre-treatment with GnRHa before laparoscopic myomectomy reduces blood loss, the frequency of blood transfusions and might increase recurrence rate of fibroids, however it should be taken into account that some results are mainly based on cohort studies. Other pre-treatment agent ulipristal acetate has not been investigated sufficiently for relevant surgical outcomes.

Review of nonsurgical/minimally invasive treatments and open myomectomy for uterine fibroids

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The main purpose of this review is to collect the most recent evidence with regards to safety and effectiveness of the nonsurgical and minimally invasive treatment options for uterine fibroids.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among the nonsurgical options, uterine artery embolization (UAE), and in eligible patients, magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) are emerging as effective alternatives to surgical options for treatment of symptomatic fibroids. MRgFUS is comparable to UAE, and appears to be a cost effective treatment option, especially in older women, although long-term data are awaited. The transvaginal route for radiofrequency ablation is a promising new nonsurgical alternative, which needs to be studied in larger trials to establish its safety and efficacy.The laparoscopic myomectomy results in less postoperative pain, reduced febrile morbidity, and shorter hospital stay when compared with open laparotomy. The newer robotic approach is comparable to traditional laparoscopic technique in short surgical outcomes but is associated with higher costs. Hysteroscopic myoma resection is an effective surgical intervention for submucous fibroids and prior misoprostol use can help in reducing cervical lacerations.

SUMMARY

UAE and MRgFUS can be offered as an alternative nonsurgical option for eligible women with symptomatic fibroids. Laparoscopic myomectomy remains a safe and effective surgical option with advantage of less postoperative pain and faster recovery compared with open laparotomy for women who wish to retain their fertility options.

Uterine fibroids

Uterine fibroids (also known as leiomyomas or myomas) are common clonal neoplasms of the uterus. Fibroids have both smooth muscle and fibroblast components, in addition to a substantial amount of fibrous extracellular matrix, which all contribute to the pathogenetic process. Fibroids are extremely heterogeneous in their pathophysiology, size, location and clinical symptomatology. They are also a part of a range of disease in which some variants have facets of malignant behaviour but overall are benign. Risk for fibroids is associated with race; black women have a higher risk of developing fibroids earlier in life than their white counterparts and also develop more-severe forms of the disease. Clinically, fibroids account for one-third to half of all hysterectomies and are associated with substantial morbidity and health care costs for women of reproductive age. Indeed, current treatments are primarily surgical and interventional; approximately three-quarters of all fibroid treatments are hysterectomies. However, clinical innovations are emerging in the use of progesterone receptor modulators as a medical therapy. New information is rapidly accumulating about the genetic subgroups that lead to fibroid formation, which might aid further understanding of the clinical heterogeneity of this disease and lead to individualized treatments. This information is a crucial development given the current lack of high-quality evidence on which to base therapeutic decisions.

Hysteroscopic myomectomy outcomes after 3-month treatment with either Ulipristal Acetate or GnRH analogues: a retrospective comparative study

Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) modifies the endometrium, as well as fibroids, and therefore it might make hysteroscopic surgery more difficult. To confirm that pre-treatment with UPA is as safe and effective an option as pre-treatment with GnRH analogues, considered the gold standard. We present the first series of 26 hysteroscopic myomectomies after 3 months treatment with UPA and we compare the results with a series of 24 cases pretreated with GnRH analogues. This was a retrospective cohort study between July 2013 and May 2015. We analyszed patients with submucous myomas >2.5 in diameter. Hysteroscopic myomectomy was performed after 3 months of treatment with either UPA (5mg daily) or the GnRH agonist (3.75mg/month). Both groups were similar in age, myoma initial size and classification. There were no significant differences between UPA and GnRHa treated groups in terms of percentage of myomas resected (93% vs 98%), duration of surgery (38 vs 37min), fluid deficit (200 vs 350ml) and complications. In the surgeon's subjective opinion, UPA treatment was associated with an easier resection. Based on our experience, previous treatment with UPA does not difficult Hhysteroscopic myomectomy. Endometrial changes have no impact on surgery. Safety and feasibility are comparable to hysteroscopic myomectomies with previous treatment with GnRH analogues. This allows us to take advantage of the reduction in size of fibroids before surgery with less side effects.

Comparing the Use of Uterine Artery Embolization to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Shrinking Fibroid Size: A Pilot Study in Kazakhstan

Introduction:

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumor in women in Kazakhstan. In the past two decades, endoscopic surgery has played an important role in the development of gynecologic surgery, particularly in the treatment of uterine fibroids. The goal of this paper is to evaluate whether uterine artery embolization (UAE) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) prior to myomectomy was more effective in decreasing fibroid size and improving surgical outcomes in a pilot study of women in Kazakhstan.

Methods:

This pilot investigation included 24 patients separated into 2 groups: medication group (pre-treatment with GnRHa – 13 patients) and embolization group (pre-treatment with UAE – 11 patients). All patients had uterine fibroids, 3–10 cm in diameter, and were treated with myomectomy at the National Research Center for Maternal and Child Health, Astana, Kazakhstan. All patient data were obtained by a retrospective medical records review. Descriptive statistics were utilized to characterize participant demographics data. Independent t-tests were used to analyze continuous variables, and Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used where appropriate for count data.

Results:

The group treated with GnRHa had an operating time of 40±10 minutes longer than the group treated with UAE, due to the peri-operative difficulties encountered by surgeons in detecting the layer between the myometrium and fibroid capsule. The group treated with UAE experienced better patient outcomes (less blood loss, less surgical time, and reduced use of anesthesia) and was a technically easier surgery due to visible differences in uterine layers.

Conclusions:

Despite the fact that both treatments (GnRHa and UAE) were effective for fibroid shrinking, embolization resulted in more optimal surgical time and improved patient outcomes. Results of this pilot study need to be confirmed in a randomized clinical trial, specifically focused on Kazakhstan and the Central Asian Region.