Three-month treatment with ulipristal acetate prior to laparoscopic myomectomy of large uterine myomas: a retrospective study

Impact of FIGO type 3 uterine fibroids on in vitro fertilization outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology & Obstetrics) type 3 myomas on in vitro fertilization (IVF) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether FIGO type 3 myomas affect IVF outcomes, through a systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42022379700).

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases were searched until November 15, 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies evaluating the effects of FIGO type 3 myomas on IVF outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Pooled results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2 . Sources of heterogeneity were explored with sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

In total, 1020 patients were included: 324 with FIGO type 3 myomas and 696 controls (without myomas). A pooled data analysis showed a significantly lower live birth rate (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.55-3.01, I2  = 0%, P < 0.00001), clinical pregnancy rate (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.52-2.81, I2  = 0%, P < 0.00001), and implantation rate (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.35-2.32, I2  = 0%, P < 0.00001) in women with untreated myomas compared with controls. The number and size of fibroids correlated with a worsening of IVF outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

FIGO type 3 myomas are significantly associated with a lower implantation rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. Furthermore, their deleterious effect on the outcome of IVF increases further with increasing size and number. Nevertheless, no firm conclusions could be drawn about the potential benefits of surgery for FIGO type 3 uterine fibroids on IVF outcomes.

Feasibility and Surgical Outcomes of Hysteroscopic Myomectomy of FIGO Type 3 Myoma: A Systematic Review

The latest classification from the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) has reclassified type 3 myomas, changing their classification from intramural to submucosal. While hysteroscopic myomectomy is considered the gold standard treatment for patients experiencing symptoms from submucosal myomas, there are currently no specific guidelines available for managing type 3 myomas, and the optimal surgical approach remains uncertain. Methods: The search for suitable articles published in English was carried out using the following databases (PROSPERO ID CRD42023418602): MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), Health Technology Assessment Database, Web of Science and search register. Only original studies reporting data on hysteroscopic myomectomy of type 3 myoma were considered eligible. The main outcomes investigated were the effectiveness and feasibility of hysteroscopic myomectomy and reproductive outcomes after surgical treatment. Results: Two hundred and sixty-one studies were screened and nineteen of these were read for eligibility. Three studies encompassing 56 patients in total were included. Among the overall population studied, three patients needed an additional procedure to completely remove the myoma and five cases of post-surgical synechiae were recorded. No complications were reported. Of 42 patients wishing for pregnancy, the cumulative live birth rates before and after the hysteroscopic myomectomy were 14.3% and 42.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic myomectomy appears to be a safe and feasible approach. Nevertheless, data reported in the literature are extremely scarce and based on studies with few patients enrolled. New evidence is needed to assess the safety and effectiveness of hysteroscopic treatment for FIGO type 3 myomas.

Contemporary approaches in the management of uterine leiomyomas

BACKGROUND

Leiomyomas (fibroids), the most common benign solid tumours in females, originate from the myometrium and are associated with poor quality of life for patients. The current management of uterine leiomyomas mainly includes surgical interventions such as hysterectomy and myomectomy, either by laparoscopy or laparotomy, which have several complications and are not ideal for preserving fertility. Therefore, there is a need to develop or repurpose medical treatments that do not require surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE

Many drugs are used to treat the symptoms associated with uterine fibroids. The main objective of this systematic review is to give an up-to-date account of potential pharmacological agents (non-surgical methods) for the management of uterine leiomyomas.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed was searched for scientific and clinical literature using the keyword 'uterine fibroids' along with the drug names described in each section. For example, 'uterine fibroids' and 'ulipristal acetate' were the keywords used to search for literature on ulipristal acetate (UPA).

RESULTS

Various preclinical and clinical studies have shown that some drugs and herbal formulations exhibit activity in the management of uterine leiomyomas. Recent studies found that drugs such as UPA, elagolix, EC313, asoprisnol, nutritional supplements and herbal preparations were helpful in treating the symptoms associated with uterine leiomyomas.

CONCLUSION

Many drugs show efficacy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. UPA is one of the most studied and prescribed medicines for uterine fibroids; however, its usage has been restricted due to a few recent incidences of hepatic toxicity. Herbal drugs and natural supplements have also shown promising effects on uterine fibroids. The synergistic effects of nutritional and herbal supplements have been reported in certain cases, and should be studied in detail. Further research is warranted to identify the mode of action of the drugs, and to determine the precise conditions that would explain the causes of toxicity in some patients.

Measurement of changes in uterine and fibroid volume during treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB)

STUDY QUESTION

Does application of an unbiased method for analysis of magnetic resonance (MR) images reveal any effect on uterine or fibroid volume from treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) with three 12-week courses of the selective progesterone receptor modulator ulipristal acetate (SPRM-UPA)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Application of an unbiased method for analysis of MR images showed that treatment of HMB with SPRM-UPA was not associated with a significant reduction in the volume of the uterus or in the volume of uterine fibroids.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

SPRM-UPA shows therapeutic efficacy for treating HMB. However, the mechanism of action (MoA) is not well understood and there have been mixed reports, using potentially biased methodology, regarding whether SPRM-UPA has an effect on the volume of the uterus and fibroids.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

In a prospective clinical study (with no comparator), 19 women with HMB were treated over a period of 12 months with SPRM-UPA and uterine and fibroid size were assessed with high resolution structural MRI and stereology.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

A cohort of 19 women aged 38-52 years (8 with and 11 without fibroids) were treated with three 12-week courses of 5 mg SPRM-UPA given daily, with four weeks off medication in-between treatment courses. Unbiased estimates of the volume of uterus and total volume of fibroids were obtained at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months of treatment, by using the Cavalieri method of modern design-based stereology in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Bland-Altman plots showed good intra-rater repeatability and good inter-rater reproducibility for measurement of the volume of both fibroids and the uterus. For the total patient cohort, two-way ANOVA did not show a significant reduction in the volume of the uterus after two or three treatment courses of SPRM-UPA (P = 0.51), which was also the case when the groups of women with and without fibroids were considered separately (P = 0.63). One-way ANOVA did not show a significant reduction in total fibroid volume in the eight patients with fibroids (P = 0.17).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study has been performed in a relatively small cohort of women and simulations that have subsequently been performed using the acquired data have shown that for three time points and a group size of up to 50, with alpha (Type I Error) and beta (Type II Error) set to 95% significance and 80% power, respectively, at least 35 patients would need to be recruited in order for the null hypothesis (that there is no significant reduction in total fibroid volume) to be potentially rejected.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The imaging protocol that we have developed represents a generic paradigm for measuring the volume of the uterus and uterine fibroids that can be readily incorporated in future studies of medical treatments of HMB. In the present study, SPRM-UPA failed to produce a significant reduction in the volume of the uterus or the total volume of fibroids (which were present in approximately half of the patients) after either two or three 12-week courses of treatment. This finding represents a new insight in respect of the management of HMB using treatment strategies that target hormone-dependence.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The UPA Versus Conventional Management of HMB (UCON) trial was funded by the EME Programme (Medical Research Council (MRC) and National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)) (12/206/52). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, or Department of Health and Social Care.Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre grants to the Centre for Reproductive Health (CRH) (G1002033 and MR/N022556/1) are also gratefully acknowledged. H.C. has clinical research support for laboratory consumables and staff from Bayer AG and provides consultancy advice (All paid to Institution) for Bayer AG, PregLem SA, Gedeon Richter, Vifor Pharma UK Ltd, AbbVie Inc., and Myovant Sciences GmbH. H.C. has received royalties from UpToDate for an article on abnormal uterine bleeding. L.W. has received grant funding from Roche Diagnostics (Paid to Institution). All other authors have no conflicts to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study reported here is an embedded mechanism of action study (no comparator) within the UCON clinical trial (registration ISRCTN: 20426843).

What happens after randomised controlled trials? Uterine fibroids and ulipristal acetate: systematic review and meta-analysis of "real-world" data

PURPOSE

"Real-world" data incorporates studies performed outside of controlled environments, allowing for a better understanding of the effects of treatment in routine clinical practice. We, therefore, performed a systematic review to summarise available "real-world studies" reporting on the use of ulipristal acetate (UPA) for management of uterine fibroids.

METHODS

We designed a prospective protocol according to PRISMA guidelines and registered it with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019151393). We searched all major databases for relevant citations until 20th September 2019. Our screen included studies for risk of bias using an adapted structured quality assessment tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate proportion estimates for each outcome including 95% confidence interval. Reported heterogeneity was assessed using I².

RESULTS

Initial search yielded 755 studies and 13 were included in the final synthesis. Administration of UPA resulted in reduction in the size of fibroids in 56.5% of women, improved menorrhagia in 83% of women, improved perception of pain in 80.1% of women and lead to an improvement in global symptom scores in 85.2% of women. Mean reduction in surgical blood loss and surgical time with use of UPA was 59.85 ml and 12.47 min, respectively. Qualitative analysis suggested that there was no difference in overall surgical experience for patients treated with UPA compared to those without pre-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are consistent with previously reported data that UPA is an acceptable management option for women with fibroids. However, it provides limited benefits when used as a pre-operative adjunct, in terms of blood loss and surgical time.

Vilaprisan, a New Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator in Uterine Fibroid Pharmacotherapy-Will it Really be a Breakthrough?

BACKGROUND

Vilaprisan (VPR) is a new orally available selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM), with anti-proliferative activity against uterine fibroids (UFs). It definitively causes suppression of ovulation and inhibition of proliferation of endometrial, myometrial and UF cells.

PURPOSE

This review aims to summarize current knowledge on VPR from all studies, including clinical trials, conducted to date and to contextualize the potential role of VPR in future medical regimens for the treatment of UFs.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in PubMed US National Library of Medicine and Google Scholar databases. Both databases were extensively searched for all original and review articles/book chapters as well as congress abstracts published in English until July 2019. The use of VPR for UF therapy was identified by using the keywords: "uterine fibroids" and "vilaprisan".

RESULTS

In phase I and II clinical trials, VPR was shown to be effective in ameliorating UF-related clinical symptoms, especially abnormal or excessive uterine bleeding and in shrinking UFs. The tolerability of VPR is roughly similar to that of ulipristal acetate (UPA) and it tends to be more favorable than that of GnRH-agonists.

CONCLUSION

Presently, all trials examining the utility of VPR for the treatment of UF are halted; likely, due to the recently reported cases of hepato-toxicity with UPA, in addition to non reassuring toxicology results from preclinical long-term testing on rodents, carried out in parallel with late stage testing on humans. An accurate summary of robust data related to the safety of VPR is urgently needed to draw definitive conclusions on the future clinical development of this drug for UF therapy.

Ulipristal acetate versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Long term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ulipristal acetate (UPA) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) before laparoscopic myomectomy on long term secondary outcomes of the MYOMEX-trial, regarding quality of life, ultrasound characteristics, hemoglobin levels 6 weeks post-operative, sexual function and menstrual bleeding control. A cost-analysis was also performed. Short-term primary and secondary outcomes are reported elsewhere.

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blind, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial in nine hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio (block size of four, stratified per hospital) to either UPA or GnRHa pre-treatment. Additional placebo injections containing saline, respectively daily placebo tablets were given to both groups to ensure double-blinding. Surgery was performed within a month after the last tablet. Women were followed up until six months post-surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 55 participants were randomized: 30 to the UPA- and 25 to the GnRHa-group between May 2015 and July 2017. Uterine volume at six weeks post-operative did not differ significantly between both pre-treatment groups with 170.1 cm³ (106.8-243.5; N = 29) vs. 152.8 cm³ (92.3-205.6; N = 23) for the UPA- and GnRHa-group respectively (p = 0.423). Hemoglobin levels six weeks post-operatively recovered back to baseline and were not significantly different between groups with 7.7 mmol/L for the UPA- vs. 8.1 mmol/L for the GnRHa-group (p = 0.157; mean difference -0.4 (CI -0.9, 0.2). Menstrual bleeding pattern, quality of life, effects on general and sexual health showed a significant improvement compared to baseline in both groups without any differences between the treatment groups. Symptom severity scores also decreased significantly at 6 week post-operatively compared to baseline, but did not differ between the treatment groups. Fibroid characteristics at baseline (e.g. mean diameter of largest fibroid) appeared not to be a confounding factor. An exploratory cost analysis showed no significant differences in absenteeism costs, total healthcare and societal costs, after adjustment for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment prior to laparoscopic myomectomy with UPA compared to GnRHa has similar effects on bleeding pattern, menopausal symptoms, sexual functioning, symptom severity and quality of life from baseline up to six months post-operative. Due to the small sample size, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Also, no firm conclusions on costs could be made.

The potential role of elagolix for treating uterine bleeding associated to uterine myomas

INTRODUCTION

Uterine myomas represents a widespread gynecological disease of women in reproductive age. Although surgery remains the first choice for treating most patients, in the last years, new medical approaches have been considered in order to ameliorate heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) related to their presence. Elagolix is a second-generation gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist under investigation for the long-term treatment of uterine myomas.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this drug evaluation is to give a complete overview of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on elagolix for treating HMB related to uterine myomas and to report the results of the current clinical trials in this setting.

EXPERT OPINION

In two previous phase II studies, this drug succeeded in ameliorating blood loss and quality of life of patients affected by uterine myomas with a good safety profile. Three phase III trials (ELARIS UF-I, UF-II, and EXTEND) investigated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of elagolix at 300 mg twice daily with add-back therapy. The primary endpoint, consisting in the reduction in HMB compared to placebo, was met in the majority of patients under treatment. Currently, elagolix is under investigation in two other ongoing multicenter phase III clinical studies.

The Significant Risk Factors of Intra-Operative Hemorrhage during Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Systematic Review

Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is becoming increasingly common in the management of uterine myomas and is usually offered regardless of the number, location, and size of the myomas. It has a generally low rate of periprocedural complications and is preferred to laparotomy for several reasons that are not limited to decreased length of hospital stay, number of sutures, smaller incisions, and decreased pain. However, blood loss during LM remains a challenge. To be able to stratify patients and provide better management after LM, it is crucial to identify these predictors of blood loss. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify the risk factors for periprocedural blood loss after laparoscopic uterine myomectomy. According to our data synthesis, age, body mass index, and phase of the menstrual cycle do not seem to affect the blood loss during LM. Conversely, size and number of myomas, as well as operative time, was directly related to the increase of blood loss.

Laparoscopic myomectomy after or without pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate

INTRODUCTION

The aim was to compare the surgical experience and the clinical results of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) with or without pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate (UPA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-four women who underwent LM for intramural myomas and were pre-treated with three months of UPA were matched with 54 patients with the same procedure but no hormonal pre-treatment. All operations were performed by one team. The technical features of the procedures were reviewed and evaluated by two other laparoscopists, unaware of the eventual use of UPA. The clinical, histological, and reproductive outcomes of each patient were assessed and the results of both groups were compared.

RESULTS

The groups did not significantly differ in operation time, intra-operative blood loss, drop in hemoglobin concentration, number of complications, pregnancy rate, and delivery rate. Women pre-treated with UPA had significantly longer hospital stays, higher numbers of histologically abnormal leiomyomas, and higher rates of fibroids peri-procedurally assessed as soft and disintegrating. The other four technical parameters of LM were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgeons performing LM in women pre-treated with UPA should be aware of the abnormal texture of enucleated myomas. Nevertheless, this does not negatively affect the other surgical and clinical outcomes of these patients.

Esmolol Infusion Reduces Blood Loss and Opiate Consumption during Fertility Preserving Myomectomy

Objectives

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of esmolol-induced hypotensive anesthesia (EIHA) on intra-operative (IO) bleeding during open myomectomy.

Patients and Methods

Eighty-eight women were randomly divided into the study group received EIHA without uterine tourniquet and control group who received normotensive anesthesia with uterine tourniquet. EIHA was provided as priming dose of esmolol (0.5 mg.kg^-1) before the induction of anesthesia and esmolol infusion (0.05-0.3 mg.kg^-1.min^-1) to maintain mean arterial pressure at 60-70 mmHg that was stopped on completion of myomectomy. Fentanyl was used as IO analgesia (loading dose: 1.0 μg.kg^-1 then infusion of 0.2-0.4 μg.kg^-1.h^-1). All patients received 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES; initially, 3 mL.kg^-1 over 5-10 minutes and supplemental doses according to requirements) and Lactated Ringer's solution (LR; 5 mL.kg^-1.h^-1). Trigger for blood transfusion was hemoglobin concentration (HBC) <7 g.dL^-1. Study outcomes included the extent of postoperative (PO) HBC deficit in relation to preoperative HBC, frequency of tourniquet application for the study patients, and total fentanyl consumption.

Results

EIHA significantly reduced blood pressure measures since laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation till the end of surgery in the study group compared to control group. Eight study patients (18.9%) required tourniquet application for control of bleeding; however, amount of IO blood loss; total field visibility score and PO HBC deficit were non significantly lower in the study group. EIHA allowed significant reduction of the IO amount of LR and additional amounts of HES infusions. Study patients group consumed significantly lower IO fentanyl doses with significantly longer duration till the 1^st PO request and the number of additional fentanyl, and lower numeric rating scale scores in study group compared to controls.

Conclusion

Open myomectomy under EIHA is feasible and safe and allows fertility-sparing with minimal risk of blood transfusion. The applied procedure of EIHA allowed blunting of pressor reflexes secondary to LIT, surgical stresses and extubation, and allowed reduction of IO and PO opioid doses.

First Impressions Can Be Deceiving: Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Myomectomy in Patients Pretreated with Ulipristal Acetate

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare enucleation time, total operative time, and perioperative complications during laparoscopic myomectomy in patients pretreated with ulipristal acetate (UPA) compared with untreated patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational pilot study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, Sant'Orsola Academic Hospital, Bologna, Italy.

PATIENTS

Seventy-four of 108 patients scheduled for laparoscopic myomectomy from January to November 2017 were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic myomectomy following pretreatment with UPA or no hormonal pretreatment therapy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 74 patients who were enrolled, 29 were pretreated with UPA (UPA group), and 45 did not receive any hormonal therapy before surgery (control group). Surgeons, blinded to patient pre-operative treatment, completed a 3-item questionnaire after each procedure to evaluate surgical difficulty. Based on surgeon response, myomas in the UPA group appeared softer and more difficult to enucleate because of less clear cleavage planes than the control group. The overall difficulty of myoma detachment from the myometrium was judged considerably higher in the UPA group. Despite this, enucleation time, total operative time, and perioperative complications were not statistically different in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Myomas in patients pretreated with UPA are subjectively less easy to enucleate; however, surgical times and perioperative outcomes are not affected by pretreatment with UPA.

The Use of Ulipristal Acetate (Esmya) Prior to Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Help or Hindrance?

Introduction:

The aim of this study was to assess the operative effects, both positive and negative, of pretreatment with ulipristal acetate (UPA) on laparoscopic myomectomy.

Materials and Methods:

We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy over a 2-year period.

Results:

A total of 62 patients were included, of which 10 received a 3-month preoperative course of UPA, and 52 patients received no pretreatment. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (no pretreatment vs. UPA pretreatment) with regard to blood loss (214.4 [±214.96] vs. 160 [±51.64], P = 0.432), operating time (111.64 [±41.8] vs. 117.5 [±50.4], P = 0.694), and duration of inpatient stay (1.27 [±0.56] vs. 1.11 [±0.33], P = 0.419). There were no complications in either group. In 100% of cases with UPA pretreatment, a distortion of the fibroid capsule with a more technically challenging dissection was noted, compared to 0% in the no pretreatment group. This anatomical distortion may result in more cases of incomplete resection and a potentially higher risk of recurrence.

Conclusion:

We conclude that UPA confers no operative benefits and should be used with caution in the presurgical treatment of fibroids. The use of UPA may indeed result in a more technically difficult myomectomy with distorted cleavage planes and carry a potential risk of incomplete resection.

Factors influencing the difficulty of laparoscopic myomectomy: the development of a surgical rating tool

Objective To obtain expert consensus on the patient and fibroid characteristics that affect the complexity of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and to use these factors to create a grading tool for objective evaluation of LM procedures. Study design Modified Delphi Methodology Study (Canadian Task Force III). Setting included a series of online surveys via SurveyMonkey (SurveyMonkey Inc., San Mateo, California, USA). Participants were Canadian minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons (MIGS) who perform LM. A list consisting of patient, uterine and procedural characteristics was disseminated to Canadian MIGS. Opportunity to include additional factors was provided. Consensus was predefined as Cronbach's α of ≥0.80. A second Delphi survey was then done to assign weight value for each item in the grading tool. Results Twenty-seven surgeons from across Canada participated. Most (23/27, 85%) were MIGS fellowship trained, and performed more than 6 LM per year (18/27, 66.7%). Consensus was achieved in the first round of the survey (Cronbach's α = 0.93). Sixteen of 27 factors met the criteria for inclusion (>80% respondents agreed or strongly agreed) and were included in the final rating tool. Factors that met the criteria for inclusion were grouped as patient factors (including body mass index), uterine factors (including number of fibroids, size of largest fibroid), and surgical factors (including ease of developing the cleavage plane). Conclusions Using the Delphi methodology to obtain expert consensus on the factors influencing the difficulty of LM, we have developed an objective grading tool to evaluate the degree of technical complexity of LM.

The past, present, and future of selective progesterone receptor modulators in the management of uterine fibroids

Uterine fibroids are common in women of reproductive age and can have a significant impact on quality of life and fertility. Although a number of international obstetrics/gynecology societies have issued evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of symptomatic uterine fibroids, many of these guidelines do not yet reflect the most recent clinical evidence and approved indication for one of the key medical management options: the selective progesterone receptor modulator class. This article aims to share the clinical experience gained with selective progesterone receptor modulators in Europe and Canada by reviewing the historical development of selective progesterone receptor modulators, current best practices for selective progesterone receptor modulator use based on available data, and potential future uses for selective progesterone receptor modulators in uterine fibroids and other gynecologic conditions.

Current Practices for Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

The treatment of uterine fibroids depends on symptoms of patients, size of the fibroid, desire for future pregnancy, and preference of the treating gynecologist. The present study was undertaken to compare treatment preferences in women desirous and nondesirous of pregnancy by an experienced gynecologist in symptomatic uterine fibroids. Newer medical or minimally invasive treatment modalities are increasingly being used for the treatment of fibroids. However, conventional surgical treatment such as myomectomy and hysterectomy are still preferred by gynecologists.

Outcome of patients with uterine fibroids after 3-month ulipristal acetate therapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion and the characteristics of patients who did or did not respond after 3 months of ulipristal acetate (UPA) therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study conducted in the University Hospital of Bordeaux (France) and University Medical Center Ljubljana (Slovenia), symptomatic non-menopausal patients with fibroids that qualified for surgery were pretreated by 3 months of oral UPA 5 mg/day. Clinical success was defined by normalization of the bleeding score, and/or regression of pelvic pain, and/or abdominal distension. Imaging success was defined by reduction in fibroid volume ≥ 25%.

RESULTS

The clinical and imaging success rates were 54/66 (82%) and 39/66 (59%) respectively. The absence of previous pregnancy (p = 0.004) and the size of the dominant fibroid ≥ 80 mm (p = 0.004) were independent factors associated with clinical failure. Age <35 years (p = 0.02) was the only independent factor associated with imaging failure.

CONCLUSION

Young women developing fibroids and/or women with large fibroids may be resistant to ulipristal acetate therapy.

Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur?

Ulipristal acetate (Esmya^©) has been hailed the new wonder drug with regard to the medical management of uterine fibroids, and many postulate that it will remove the need for surgical treatment in the future. While the results from the PEARL studies are certainly promising and its amenorrhoeic rates and reduction in fibroid size are unquestionable, there is still a paucity of data with regard to its long-term effects, the effects on its usage prior to surgery and its variable efficacy in different ethnic populations. To facilitate our knowledge further, independent studies with clear outcome measures evaluating the long-term effects of the drug in a wider, more representative, ethnic minority population as well as assessing its true cost-effectiveness compared to surgery are needed. The aim of this article is to review the historical aspects with regard to the management of uterine fibroids to gain an understanding of where we are now and to evaluate the wider use of ulipristal acetate, both its benefits and limitations and postulate where to go in the future in order to allow our women to make safe and informed choices regarding their treatment options.

A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Effect of Ulipristal Acetate during Myomectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical experience at myomectomy between patients with myomas pretreated with ulipristal acetate versus no pretreatment.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational, multicenter study of myomectomy procedures by any route (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, or laparotomy) (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Five university-affiliated hospitals including tertiary care and community sites.

PATIENTS

Any patient who underwent hysteroscopic, laparotomic, or laparoscopic myomectomy regardless of medical pretreatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgeons completed a Web-based questionnaire after each myomectomy procedure. Surgeons evaluated visualization, the myoma-myometrium relationship, extrusion, fluid deficit, blood loss, and overall ease of hysteroscopic myomectomies. For laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies, plane delineation, myoma separation, blood loss, and overall ease were assessed. The total surgical experience score was calculated by summing the values for each subscale.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 309 myomectomies were evaluated by 52 surgeons (response rate = 83%) at 5 institutions. Of 140 hysteroscopic myomectomies, 84 (60%) were performed without pretreatment, 29 (21%) after ulipristal acetate pretreatment, and 27 (19%) after pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/other. Of 169 laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies, 104 (62%) were performed without pretreatment, 46 (27%) after ulipristal acetate, and 19 (11%) after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/other. The mean surgical experience score (±standard deviation) was comparable between the no pretreatment and ulipristal acetate groups for hysteroscopic myomectomies (13.8 ± 2.2 vs 13.3 ± 2.2, p = .35) and laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies (12.9 ± 4.1 vs 12.1 ± 4.2, p = .30). Compared with no pretreatment, more laparotomic/laparoscopic myomectomies after ulipristal acetate pretreatment were associated with difficult delineation of surgical planes (22 [47.8%] vs 23 [22.1%], p = .002) and difficult myoma separation (20 [43.5%] vs 21 [20.2%], p = .003). More myomas were described as soft with ulipristal acetate pretreatment (14 [30.4%] vs 17 [16.4%], p = .049). The rates of profuse/abundant endometrium during hysteroscopy were similar between the no pretreatment (21 [25.0%]) and ulipristal acetate (7 [24.1%], p = .93) groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences in surgical nuances, the overall myomectomy experience was not negatively affected by ulipristal acetate pretreatment.

Pre-treatment with GnRHa or ulipristal acetate prior to laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Myomectomy has potential risks of complications. To reduce these risks, medical pre-treatment can be applied to reduce fibroid size and thereby potentially decrease intra-operative blood loss, the need for blood transfusion and emergency hysterectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to study the effectiveness of medical pre-treatment with Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or ulipristal acetate prior to laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy on intra-operative and post-operative outcomes.

Methods

We performed an extensive search in Embase.com, Wiley/Cochrane Library and PubMed in accordance with the Prisma guidelines. All studies published as full papers in peer reviewed journals using GnRHa or ulipristal acetate as medical pre-treatment independent of route of administration or dosage before laparotomic or laparoscopic myomectomy were included. The primary outcome was duration of surgery. Secondary outcomes were duration of enucleation, blood loss, degree of difficulty of surgery, identification of cleavage planes, proportion of vertical incisions, conversion rate, frequency of blood transfusions, post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay, frequency of recurrence of fibroids, frequency of uterine adhesions, recovery time and quality of life. No language restrictions were applied. Meta-analysis were performed where possible.

Findings

Twenty-three studies were included. In laparotomic myomectomy, pre-treatment with GnRHa decreases intra-operative blood loss with 97.39ml (95% CI -111.80 to -82.97) compared to no pre-treatment or placebo. Pre-treatment with GnRHa before laparoscopic myomectomies also shows a reduction in intra-operative blood loss by 23.03ml (95% CI -40.79 to -5.27) and in the frequency of blood transfusions (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.55) compared to no pre-treatment.

Only two retrospective cohort studies reported on pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate compared to no pre-treatment before laparoscopic myomectomy showing a statistically significant reduction in intra-operative blood loss, duration of surgery and frequency of blood transfusions after pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate.

Conclusion

Administration of GnRHa prior to laparotomic myomectomy reduces blood loss and might decrease uterine adhesion formation. Pre-treatment with GnRHa before laparoscopic myomectomy reduces blood loss, the frequency of blood transfusions and might increase recurrence rate of fibroids, however it should be taken into account that some results are mainly based on cohort studies. Other pre-treatment agent ulipristal acetate has not been investigated sufficiently for relevant surgical outcomes.

The use of selective progestin receptor modulators (SPRMs) and more specifically ulipristal acetate in the practice of gynaecology

This review discusses the development of selective progestin receptor modulators (SPRMs) for use in women's health and specifically the use of ulipristal acetate (UPA) as emergency contraception (EC) and as a treatment for symptomatic fibroids in women who want to preserve their fertility or avoid a hysterectomy. As an EC, UPA 30 mg should be recommended for women, within 102 h of unprotected intercourse. As a treatment of fibroids, UPA (5 mg daily dose) should be administered for periods of three months as a pre-surgical strategy, reducing bleeding and fibroid size and facilitating surgery. A proportion of these patients may even avoid surgery. Future developments will demonstrate whether UPA can be used for other indications such as endometriosis and breast cancer prevention or treatment.

Ulipristal acetate before high complexity endoscopic (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic) myomectomy - a mini-review

Uterine myomas (fibromas, leiomyomas) are the most common tumours in women, and their clinical signs and symptoms are presented by 25-40% of patients with these benign tumours.

According to current guidelines, the armamentarium for myoma management consists of: medical therapy (GnRH, SPRMs), non-surgical alternatives including uterine artery embolisation (UAE), vaginal temporary occlusion of uterine arteries using clamp-like device or MRgFUS technique, and surgical treatment (including minimally invasive techniques). In cases of submucous myomas STEPW classification correlates very well with the risk of incomplete hysteroscopic myomectomies. According to limited literature data, ulipristal acetate as a pre-treatment seems to be very prudent in high complexity hysteroscopic myomectomy (STEPW II, score 5-6). In patients with large uterine myomas (FIGO type 3, 4, 5) undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy, three-month pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate before laparoscopy is feasible and can be recommended because of shorter time of surgery, lower intraoperative blood loss, lower haemoglobin drop, and low postoperative blood transfusion rate.