Chromosomal uniparental disomy 16 and fetal intrauterine growth restriction

Prenatal ultrasound findings and clinical outcomes of uniparental disomy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Uniparental disomy is the inheritance of a homologous chromosome pair or part of homologous chromosomes from only one parent. However, the clinical significance of uniparental disomy and the difference among the prognosis of involvement of different chromosomes remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the associated prenatal ultrasound presentations and clinical outcomes of uniparental disomy on different chromosomes and to analyze the relationship between prenatal ultrasound markers and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed data from fetuses with uniparental disomy diagnosed using chromosome microarray analysis with the Affymetrix CytoScan HD array at our institution between January 2013 and September 2022. The relationship between prenatal ultrasound findings, the involved chromosome(s), and clinical outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 36 fetuses with uniparental disomy were diagnosed, and two cases were excluded for non-available postnatal data. Finally, 34 fetuses were included in our study, of which 30 (88.2%) had uniparental disomy occurring on a single chromosome, while four (11.8%) were identified with uniparental disomy on different chromosomes. The most frequently involved chromosomes were chromosomes 16, X and 2, which presented in 8 (23.5%), 5 (14.7%) and 4 (11.8%), respectively. Prenatal ultrasound abnormalities were detected in 21 fetuses, with the most common category being multiple abnormalities (12 (57.1%)). Fetal growth restriction was identified in 14 (41.2%) fetuses, all of which coexisted with other abnormal findings. The rate of adverse perinatal outcomes in patients with uniparental disomy and fetal abnormalities was significantly higher than those without abnormalities (76.2% versus 15.4%, P = 0.002). The incidence of fetal or neonatal death was significantly higher in fetuses with fetal growth restriction than those without (85.7% versus 30.0%, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of fetuses with uniparental disomy combined with fetal abnormalities, especially fetal growth restriction, was much poorer than those without.

Genetic testing for fetal loss of heterozygosity using single nucleotide polymorphism array and whole-exome sequencing

The study explored the clinical significance of fetal loss of heterozygosity (LOH) identified by single-nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array). We retrospectively reviewed data from pregnant women who underwent invasive diagnostic procedures at prenatal diagnosis centers in southeastern China from December 2016 to December 2021. SNP array was performed by the Affymetrix CytoScan 750 K array platform. Fetuses with LOH were further identified by parental verification, MS-MLPA, and/or trio whole-exome sequencing (trio-WES). The genetic results, fetal clinical manifestations, and perinatal outcome were analyzed. Of 11,062 fetuses, 106 (0.96%) had LOH exhibiting a neutral copy number, 88 (83.0%) had LOH in a single chromosome, whereas 18 (17.0%) had multiple LOHs on different chromosomes. Sixty-six fetuses had ultrasound anomalies (UAs), most frequently fetal growth restriction (18/66 (27.3%)). Parental SNP array verification was performed in 21 cases and trio-WES in 21 cases. Twelve cases had clinically relevant uniparental disomy, five had pathogenic variants, four had likely pathogenic variants, six had variants of unknown significance, and eight had identity by descent. The rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes in fetuses with LOH and UAs (24/66 (36.4%)) was higher than in those without UAs (6/40 (15.0%)) (p < 0.05). LOH is not uncommon. Molecular genetic testing techniques, including parental SNP array verification, trio-WES, methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, regular and systematic ultrasonic monitoring, and placental study, can accurately assess the prognosis and guide the management of the affected pregnancy.

Classifying and evaluating fetuses with multicystic dysplastic kidney in etiologic studies

Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) is one of the most common fetal malformations, but its etiology remains unclear. Identification of the molecular etiology could provide a basis for prenatal diagnosis, consultation, and prognosis evaluation for MCDK fetuses. We used chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) to conduct genetic tests on MCDK fetuses and explore their genetic etiology. A total of 108 MCDK fetuses with or without other extrarenal abnormalities were selected. Karyotype analysis of 108 MCDK fetuses showed an abnormal karyotype in 4 (3.7%, 4/108) of the fetuses. However, CMA detected 15 abnormal copy number variations (CNVs) (14 pathogenic CNVs, and one variant of unknown significance [VUS] CNVs), in addition to four cases that were consistent with the results of karyotype analysis. Out of the 14 pathogenic CNVs cases, three were of 17q12 microdeletion, two of 22q11.21 microdeletion, 22q11.21 microduplication uniparental disomy (UPD), and one case of 4q31.3q32.2 microdeletion, 7q11.23 microduplication, 15q11.2 microdeletion, 16p11.2 microdeletion, and 17p12 microdeletion. Of the 89 MCDK fetuses with normal karyotype analysis and CMA, 15 were tested by WES. Two (13.3%, 2/15) fetuses were identified by WES as Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) 1 and BBS2. Combined application of CMA-WES to detect MCDK fetuses can significantly improve the detection rate of genetic etiology, providing a basis for consultation, and prognosis evaluation.

Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with region of homozygosity detected by single nucleotide polymorphism array: a retrospective cohort study

Region of homozygosity (ROH) is classified as uniparental disomy (UPD) or identity by descent, depending on its origin. To explore the clinical relevance of ROH in prenatal diagnoses, we reviewed 5063 fetal samples subjected to single nucleotide polymorphism array at our center over 5 years. ROH cases meeting our reporting threshold were further analyzed. ROHs were detected in 22 fetuses (0.43%, 22/5063), of which, 77.3% (17/22) showed a ROH on a single chromosome and 22.7% (5/22) showed multiple ROHs on different chromosomes. Among 5063 fetuses undergoing invasive prenatal diagnoses owing to various indications, five cases were identified as UPDs with a rate of ~1/1000. We observed clinically relevant UPDs in two cases related to Prader-Willi syndrome and transient neonatal diabetes mellitus. Of note, one case showed 50% mosaicism for trisomy 2 in amniotic fluid, whereas a complete UPD (2) was observed in umbilical cord blood. Trio whole-exome sequencing was performed for three cases. Clinically relevant variants were identified in two cases, one of which, NM_000302:c.2071_2072insCC (p.R693Qfs*122) in PLOD1 located in the ROH, may be related to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type, 1. Overall, 72.7% (16/22) of the ROH carriers showed ultrasound abnormalities, of whom eight (50%, 8/16) had adverse perinatal outcomes. Our study demonstrates that the clinical relevance of ROHs should be examined regarding fetuses with ROHs occurring on imprinted chromosomes or those derived from consanguineous parents in prenatal diagnoses; imprinting disorders and/or autosomal recessive diseases attributed to ROHs should be considered during genetic counseling.

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 16 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with abnormal first-trimester screening result (low PAPP-A and low PlGF), intrauterine growth restriction and a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 16 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with an abnormal first-trimester screening result, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 27-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of an abnormal first-trimester screening result with maternal serum free β-hCG of 1.474 multiples of the median (MoM), pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) of 0.122 MoM and placental growth factor (PlGF) of 0.101 MoM, and a Down syndrome risk of 1/45. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+16 [9]/46,XY [16] and an abnormal array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) result of arr (16) × 3 [0.54] compatible with 54% mosaicism for trisomy 16 in uncultured amniocytes. At 24 weeks of gestation, repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+16 [4]/46,XY [16] and an aCGH result of arr 16p13.3q24.3 (96,766-90,567,357) × 2.25 with a log₂ ratio = 0.2 compatible with 20-30% mosaicism for trisomy 16 in uncultured amniocytes. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 16. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 19.4% (12/62 cells) mosaic trisomy 16. Prenatal ultrasound revealed IUGR. At 36 weeks of gestation, a phenotypically normal baby was delivered with a body weight of 1900 g. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY. QF-PCR analysis confirmed biparentally inherited disomy 16 in the cord blood and maternal-origin of trisomy 16 in the placenta. When follow-up at age two months, FISH analysis on 101 buccal mucosal cells and 32 urinary cells revealed no signal of trisomy 16.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis can be associated with IUGR and an abnormal first-trimester screening result with low PAPP-A and low PlGF. Mosaic trisomy 16 without UPD 16 at amniocentesis can have a favorable outcome, and the abnormal triosmy 16 cell line may disappear after birth.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for the Fetuses with Aortic Arch Abnormalities and Normal Karyotype

Background

Aortic arch abnormalities (AAA) are abnormal embryologic developments of the aorta and its branches. Their outcomes often depend on their association with other congenital diseases and genetic testing results.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with different patterns of AAA and normal karyotype.

Methods

Data from 158 pregnancies referred for prenatal CMA testing due to fetal AAA were obtained between April 2016 and April 2019. Fetuses with isolated AAA, AAA accompanied by soft ultrasound markers, and AAA with other ultrasound malformations were classified into groups A, B, and C, respectively. Cases with detectable karyotype aberrations were excluded from the study.

Results

Twenty cases (12.7%) of submicroscopic anomalies were detected in 158 cases with normal karyotype, comprising 16 cases (10.1%) of clinically significant variants, two cases (1.3%) of variants of unknown significance, and two variants (1.3%) that were likely benign. Microdeletion of 22q11.2 accounted for 25% (4/16) of the clinically significant variants. The overall incremental yields by CMA in group A, group B, and group C were 1.8%, 2.3%, and 24.1%, respectively. Except for double aortic arch, the incremental yield of clinical significant findings for each type of AAA in group C was much higher than that in group A and group B. In group A, a clinically significant variant was only detected in one fetus with right aortic arch (RAA) (1.8%, 1/57).

Conclusions

In addition to 22q11.2 microdeletion, many other clinically significant submicroscopic variants are present in fetuses with AAA, especially in fetuses with other ultrasound malformations. Although CMA is always recommended in the presence of any malformation in many countries, our results suggest insufficient evidence to recommend CMA in fetuses with isolated AAA, except for isolated RAA.

Prenatal diagnosis of maternal uniparental disomy 16 associated with mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis, and pericardial effusion and intrauterine growth restriction in the fetus

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 16 associated with mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis, and pericardial effusion and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in the fetus.

CASE REPORT

A 38-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 17 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age, and the result was 47,XX,+16[2]/46,XX[54]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed 14% mosaicism for trisomy 16 and a paternally inherited 319-kb microdeletion of 15q11.2 encompassing the genes of TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, NIPA2 and NIPA1. Prenatal ultrasound revealed persistent left superior vena cava, pericardial effusion and severe IUGR. Cordocentesis at 23 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XX, but polymorphic DNA marker analysis revealed maternal UPD 16. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 27 weeks of gestation and revealed a karyotype of 46, XX in 21/21 colonies. Molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 22.4% mosaicism (26/116 cells) for trisomy 16 on interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis, and 20% mosaicism for trisomy 16 on aCGH. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on the DNAs extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods revealed maternal UPD 16. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a fetus was delivered with facial dysmorphism and severe IUGR. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XX,+16[28]/46,XX[16]. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on placenta confirmed a maternal origin of trisomy 16.

CONCLUSION

Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes may present in mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis. Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 16 should alert the association of maternal UPD 16 which may be associated with congenital heart defects and severe IUGR on prenatal ultrasound.

Low-level mosaicism for trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with intrauterine growth restriction and a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present low-level mosaicism for trisomy 16 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 31-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 24 weeks of gestation because of IUGR. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [3]/46,XX [22]. Simultaneous array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed gene dosage increase in chromosome 16 consistent with 28% mosaicism for trisomy 16. Uniparental disomy (UPD) 7 and UPD 11 were excluded. She underwent repeat amniocentesis at 27 weeks of gestation. Repeat amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [1]/46,XX [24]. Simultaneous aCGH analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes revealed 25%-35% (log₂ ratio = 0.17-0.25) mosaicism for trisomy 16. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis detected trisomy 16 signals in 28/100 (28%) uncultured amniocytes. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis excluded UPD 16. Level II ultrasound revealed no fetal abnormalities except symmetric IUGR. The pregnancy was continued to 37 weeks of gestation, and a 2306-g phenotypically normal baby was delivered. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46, XX in 50/50 lymphocytes. The umbilical cord had a karyotype of 47,XX,+16 [14]/46,XX [36]. Interphase FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells and urinary cells at age three days revealed trisomy 16 signals in 3.8% (4/106) buccal mucosal cells and 6.5% (7/107) urinary cells, compared with 1% in the normal control. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis on placenta confirmed trisomy 16 in the placenta and a maternal origin of the extra chromosome 16.

CONCLUSION

Cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes may present in mosaic trisomy 16 at amniocentesis. Low-level mosaicism for trisomy 16 at amniocentesis without maternal UPD 16 can be associated with a favorable outcome despite the presence of IUGR.

Absence of heterozygosity detected by single-nucleotide polymorphism array in prenatal diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the general occurrence and clinical significance of absence of heterozygosity (AOH), detected by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array on prenatal diagnosis.

METHODS

We recruited pregnancies undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis at our fetal medicine center over a 6-year period. All fetuses underwent SNP array using the Affymetrix CytoScan HD array platform. AOH was defined as a chromosomal homozygosity segment with neutral copy number. Cases with AOH over 10 Mb in size or with suspected pathogenicity were further analyzed, and the clinical features and outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 10 294 recruited fetuses, 100 (0.97%) with AOH were identified; in 81 (81.0%) of these, AOH occurred in a single chromosome, while 19 (19.0%) patients had multiple AOHs in different chromosomes. AOH was observed in all chromosomes, chromosomes X, 2 and 16 being the most frequently involved. The length of AOH ranged from partial chromosome (9.002-80.222 Mb) to the entire chromosome. Similar AOH regions displayed varied clinical manifestations. In total, 55 patients presented with concomitant ultrasound abnormalities, the most common being multiple abnormalities (14/55 (25.5%)), genitourinary malformations (8/55 (14.5%)), skeletal malformations (5/55 (9.1%)) and small-for-gestational age (5/55 (9.1%)). Notably, the rate of adverse perinatal outcome (including termination of pregnancy, neonatal death, fetal death, selective reduction and miscarriage) in fetuses with AOH and ultrasound abnormalities (30/48 (62.5%)) was higher than in those without ultrasound abnormalities (6/40 (15.0%)) (P < 0.001). Further non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free fetal DNA from maternal blood indicated chromosomal copy number abnormalities in 11 patients; however, they were confirmed as AOH by SNP array of the amniotic fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic counseling regarding a prenatal diagnosis of AOH remains challenging. To evaluate comprehensively its significance, we propose a management strategy involving further serial ultrasound examinations, parental verification, whole-exome sequencing, placental study and effective follow-up. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

SNP Array as a Tool for Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease Screened by Echocardiography: Implications for Precision Assessment of Fetal Prognosis

Objective

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of the SNP array for the prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) screened by echocardiography.

Patients and Methods

A total of 356 pregnant women with fetal congenital heart malformations revealed by echocardiography at the Center for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fujian Maternal and Children Hospital during the period from November 2016 through July 2019 were recruited. The fetuses were assigned into three cohorts, including 142 with a single cardiac malformation, 106 with multiple cardiac malformations and 108 with cardiac and extracardiac malformations. All fetuses underwent chromosomal karyotyping and SNP array simultaneously, and the effectiveness of the SNP array for the prenatal diagnosis of CHD was evaluated.

Results

The overall prevalence of abnormal karyotypes was 9.3% among the 356 fetuses with CHD, and a higher proportion was found in fetuses with cardiac and extracardiac malformations (18.5%) than in those with single (5.6%) or multiple cardiac malformations (4.7%) (P<0.05). Consistent with karyotype analysis, SNP array detected an additional 25 fetuses with pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs), seven with variant of unknown significance (VOUS) and seven with benign CNVs, and a lower proportion of abnormal CNV was found in fetuses with a single cardiac malformation (4.2%) than in those with multiple cardiac malformations (9.4%) or cardiac and extracardiac malformations (14.8%) (P<0.05). Among the 33 fetuses with chromosomal abnormality, postnatal follow-up showed termination of pregnancy in 25 with pathogenic CNVs, one with VOUS, and six with normal karyotypes and SNP array findings but severe multiple malformations by ultrasonography.

Conclusion

SNP array increases the overall detection of abnormal CNVs by 9%, which improves the detection of CNVs associated with CHD. SNP array may serve as a tool for prenatal diagnosis of CHD that facilitates the discovery of pathogenic genes associated with CHD and provide valuable insights into the precision assessment of fetal prognosis during the prenatal counseling.

The Genetic Etiology Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction Using Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Chromosomal Microarray Analysis

Background: An increase in pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs) has been recognized to associate with fetal growth restriction (FGR). Here, we aim to explore the application value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in prenatal diagnosis of FGR. Methods: Prenatal ultrasound was applied to identify FGR. A total of 149 pregnant women with FGR were enrolled in our study. All subjects underwent karyotype analysis and CMA to reveal the chromosomal abnormalities. Results: In this study, all subjects were successfully detected by karyotype and CMA analyses. Of these subjects, the chromosomal abnormalities detection rate was 5.37% (8/149) for karyotyping and 13.42% (20/149) for CMA, respectively. Among them, an 8.05% (12/149) incremental yield of CMA over karyotype analysis was observed (p = 0.004). In addition, a significant difference of pCNV detection rate was observed between the groups with different high-risk factors (p = 0.005). The FGR with structural anomalies group showed the highest pCNV detection rate (33.33%), followed by the FGR with non-structural anomalies group (8.77%) and the isolated FGR group (8.06%). Conclusion: In conclusion, CMA technology showed an effective application value in etiology diagnosis of FGR. We believe that CMA should be recommended as first-line detection technology for prenatal diagnosis in FGR.

Copy number variations associated with fetal congenital kidney malformations

Background

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) constitute 20–30% of all congenital malformations. Within the CAKUT phenotypic spectrum, renal hypodysplasia (RHD) is particularly severe. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array test in prenatal diagnosis of RHD for improving prenatal genetic counseling and to search for evidence of a possible causative role of copy-number variations (CNVs) in RHD.

Results

We performed a systematic survey of CNV burden in 120 fetuses with RHD: 103 cases were isolated RHD and 17 were non-isolated RHD. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array test was performed using the Affymetrix CytoScan HD platform. All annotated CNVs were validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. We identified abnormal CNVs in 15 (12.5%) cases of RHD; of these CNVs, 11 were pathogenic and 4 were variants of uncertain significance. The detection rate of abnormal CNVs in non-isolated RHD was higher (29.4%, 5/17) than that in isolated RHD (9.7%, 10/103) (P = 0.060). Parents are more inclined to terminate the pregnancy if the fetuses have pathogenic results of the SNP-array test.

Conclusions

The variable phenotypes that abnormal CNVs may cause indicate the genetic counseling is needed for RHD cases.

Clinical value of genetic analysis in prenatal diagnosis of short femur

Background

Fetal femur length (FL) is an important biometric index in prenatal screening. The etiology of short femur is diverse, with some pathogenic causes leading to adverse outcomes. To improve the accuracy and practicability of diagnosis, we investigated the value of genetic analysis in prenatal diagnosis of short femur.

Methods

We examined chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) (64 fetuses) and karyotyping (59 fetuses) data retrospectively for short femur without fetal growth restriction (FGR). Genetic testing was conducted for 15 fetuses.

Results

Karyotyping and CMA detected chromosomal aberrations at rates of 13.6% and 27.2%, respectively. Among fetuses with other abnormalities, detection rates were 21.0% higher with CMA than karyotyping. CMA identified chromosomal abnormalities in 36.4% of cases with a FL 2–4 standard deviations (SDs) below the gestational age (GA) mean. Abnormality detection by CMA reached 38.5% in the second trimester. Duplication of 12p, 16p13.1 deletion, and uniparental disomy 16 were identified by CMA in three cases of short femur. Gene sequencing detected clinically notable mutations in 12/15 fetuses, among which 9/12 fetuses had FLs >4 SDs below the GA mean.

Conclusions

CMA yielded a higher detection value than karyotyping in fetuses with other abnormalities or a FL 2–4 SDs below the GA mean during the second trimester. Gene sequencing should be performed when FL is >4 SDs below the mean.

UPD16 itself is not a cause of intrauterine growth restriction

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of uniparental disomy (UPD16) for chromosome 16 is currently unclear.

METHODS AND RESULT

We performed chromosome microarray analysis on two fetus and their placentas, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to exclude the hidden chr16 trisomy mosaicism in the fetuses, and clinical whole-exome sequencing to assess for homozygosity mutations of autosomal-recessive diseases.

RESULTS

Microarray analysis of two fetuses had UPD16. The membranous placenta of the case 1 had confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 16. Clinical whole-exome sequencing on chromosome 16 revealed three potentially pathogenic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Gap-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and MLPA for a-thal deletions demonstrated that case 2 was homozygous for the -SEA deletion.

CONCLUSIONS

The poor outcome in these fetuses may be attributed to other factors, the membranous placenta and the -SEA deletion, respectively. Fetal UPD16 itself might be not correlated with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and thus is not the basic cause of IUGR.

Uniparental disomy as a cause of pediatric endocrine disorders

Uniparental disomy (UPD) refers to a condition in which two homologous chromosomes or chromosomal regions are inherited from one parent. Recent studies have shown that UPD is not rare among the general population, arising from trisomy rescue, gamete complementation, and other mechanisms. Although UPD is not necessarily pathogenic, it can lead to various disease phenotypes by causing imprinting disorders or by unmasking autosomal recessive mutations. Notably, known UPD-mediated autosomal recessive disorders include congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency, 11β-hydroxylase deficiency, and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency. In addition, UPD can occur in combination with additional cytogenetic abnormalities that may affect growth and development. Therefore, UPD represents a clinically important condition that accounts for a certain percentage of the etiology of growth failure and endocrine abnormalities. Although UPD is barely detectable by standard karyotyping or sequence analyses, it can be screened by single nucleotide polymorphism- and microsatellite-genotyping of patients and their parents, or by DNA methylation analysis of the patients. This mini-review introduces the underlying mechanisms and phenotypic consequences of UPD in association with pediatric endocrine disorders.