Transumbilical versus lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses in laparoscopic surgery-A randomized trial

Does size matter? Opioid use after laparoscopy for apical pelvic organ prolapse using an 8mm versus 10-12mm accessory port

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if a change in lateral accessory port (LAP) size from 10-12mm to 8mm among women undergoing laparoscopic native tissue pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery was effective at reducing opioid use after surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort of women taking part in a POP surgical registry.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital in Calgary, Canada.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing laparoscopic uterosacral ligament apical suspensions for stage ≥2 POP with either uterine preservation or concomitant hysterectomy. 92 women were included during a 15-month study period from June 2020 to September 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic apical suspension using either a 10-12mm or 8mm LAP, with the change occurring at the mid-point of the study period. Fascial defects from 10-12mm ports were closed with a fascial closure device. Perioperative care and technique were otherwise unchanged.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Post-operative opioid use was measured by mean morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), accounting for all oral and intravenous opioids used in the first 24-hours post-surgery. 50 cases (54.3%) used a 10-12mm LAP, 42 cases (45.7%) used an 8mm LAP. Mean MEDD after surgery with a 10-12mm LAP was significantly higher than with an 8mm LAP (35.3 (95% CI 24.9-45.6) vs. 13.6 (95% CI 8.0-19.2), p<0.001). Proportion of women who did not require opioids post-operatively was higher in the 8mm group (45.2%, n=19) than the 10-12mm group (18.0%, n=9) (cOR 3.76, 95% CI 1.47-9.66). Similarly, the proportion of women who did not fill an opioid prescription after discharge was higher in the 8mm group (35.7%, n=15) than the 10-12mm group (16.0%, n=8) (cOR 2.92, 95% CI 1.09-7.81). These results remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, length of procedure, and concomitant procedures performed.

CONCLUSION

Compared to 10-12mm port, use of an 8mm LAP during laparoscopic native-tissue apical POP surgery is associated with decreased opioid use in the first 24 hours after surgery.

Comparison of novel two-port and conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery approaches for benign adnexal masses: The Bagli method

AIM

This study primarily aims to describe the safety and efficacy of a novel two-port (5 and 10-mm) laparoscopic surgery (TPLS) approach for benign adnexal masses compared with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (CMLS) in excisional procedures such as salpingectomy and oophorectomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study. Forty-four patients were divided into two groups: two-port (5 mm and 10 mm) laparoscopic surgery group (n: 22) and conventional multiport (three/four port) laparoscopic surgery group (n: 22), with similar indications. All procedures, except ovarian detorsions, included salpingectomy, oophorectomy or salpingo-ophorectomy. The groups were evaluated using their demographic, clinical, intraoperative and postoperative data, and survey questions that were asked were used for analyzing cosmetic satisfaction, surgical satisfaction and preference rates of the TPLS.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups on demographic features. All patients were discharged within 24 h after both the procedures without any major (organ injury) or minor complication. Surgical satisfaction range was 8.82 (±1.01) in TPLS group and 7.27 (±1.6) in the CMLS group, and differences were significant (P = 0.002). Satisfaction with cosmesis was 95% in the TPLS group and 77% in the CMLS group, and this difference was not significant (P = 0.11). The preferences rate of TPLS was 68% among the 44 women.

CONCLUSION

Novel TPLS is feasible and safe in expert hands. In addition, it provides more surgical satisfaction to patients. However, there were not significant differences in long-term cosmesis results between the TPLS and CMLS groups.

Evaluation of the optimal laparoscopic method for benign ovarian mass extraction: a transumbilical route using a bag made from a surgical glove versus a lateral transabdominal route employing a standard endobag

We compared two transumbilical (TU) routes of surgical specimen retrieval in women with ovarian masses treated via laparoscopy: a bag made from a surgical glove and lateral transabdominal (LTA) retrieval employing a standard endobag. A total of 109 women undergoing laparoscopic surgery to treat benign adnexal masses were retrospectively evaluated between 2014 and 2017. In total, 57 masses were removed via the TU route and 52 via the LTA route. We recorded the ovarian mass size; additional postoperative analgesic drug requirements. Postoperative incisional pain scores were assessed using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS), time to discharge and procedure type. The mean VAS scores at 1 h (5.0 ± 1.7 vs. 6.3 ± 1.3; p < .001); 12 h (0.7 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 1.1; p = .004); and 24 h (0.1 ± 0.3 vs. 0.7 ± 0.6; p < .001) were lower in the TU-removal group. Furthermore, additional postoperative analgesic drug requirements were significantly higher in the LTA-removal group (10 (19.2%) vs. 3 (5.3%); p = .03). During laparoscopic surgery, removal of an ovarian mass via an umbilical port (compared to a lateral port) causes less postoperative pain and does not increase the risk of wound complications such as infection or hernia.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Laparoscopy has been used for the last 30 years. Constant improvement in the technique and equipment has allowed extensive, laparoscopic pelvic and abdominal surgery affording better outcomes than open surgery, an improved recovery, less pain, and fewer postoperative complications. However, mass removal remains a concern. Most laparoscopic specimens are larger than the initial trocar incision. Minimally invasive, adnexal mass surgery usually requires a trocar at least 10 mm wide to remove the mass. Alternatively, adnexal mass extraction from the abdominal cavity can proceed via a suprapubic, umbilical, or vaginal route.What do the results of this study add? During laparoscopic surgery, ovarian mass removal through an umbilical port using an endobag made from a surgical glove is useful due to the method requiring little funds, is easy to do, and results in a lower amount of postoperative pain than a removal via a lateral port using a standard endobag.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? A transumbilical route using a bag made from a surgical glove is easy, economical, and causes less postoperative pain to the patient than removal via a lateral port employing a standard endobag.