Reduced growth velocity at term is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in non-small for gestational age infants

Assessment of fetal growth trajectory identifies infants at high risk of perinatal mortality

OBJECTIVE

To analyze perinatal risks associated with three distinct scenarios of fetal growth trajectory in the latter half of pregnancy compared with a reference group.

METHODS

This cohort study included women with a singleton pregnancy that delivered between 32 + 0 and 41 + 6 weeks' gestation and had two or more ultrasound scans, at least 4 weeks apart, from 18 + 0 weeks. We evaluated three different scenarios of fetal growth against a reference group, which comprised appropriate-for-gestational-age fetuses with appropriate forward-growth trajectory. The comparator growth trajectories were categorized as: Group 1, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses (estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) persistently < 10th centile) with appropriate forward growth; Group 2, fetuses with decreased growth trajectory (decrease of ≥ 50 centiles) and EFW or AC ≥ 10th centile (i.e. non-SGA) at their final ultrasound scan; and Group 3, fetuses with decreased growth trajectory and EFW or AC < 10th centile (i.e. SGA) at their final scan. The primary outcome was overall perinatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal death). Secondary outcomes included stillbirth, delivery of a SGA infant, preterm birth, emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status and composite severe neonatal morbidity. Associations were analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The final study cohort comprised 5319 pregnancies. Compared to the reference group, the adjusted odds of perinatal mortality were increased significantly in Group 2 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.00 (95% CI, 1.36-11.22)) and Group 3 (aOR, 7.71 (95% CI, 2.39-24.91)). Only Group 3 had increased odds of stillbirth (aOR, 5.69 (95% CI, 1.55-20.93)). In contrast, infants in Group 1 did not have significantly increased odds of demise. The odds of a SGA infant at birth were increased in all three groups compared with the reference group, but was highest in Group 1 (aOR, 111.86 (95% CI, 62.58-199.95)) and Group 3 (aOR, 40.63 (95% CI, 29.01-56.92)). In both groups, more than 80% of infants were born SGA and nearly half had a birth weight < 3rd centile. Likewise, the odds of preterm birth were increased in all three groups compared with the reference group, being highest in Group 3, with an aOR of 4.27 (95% CI, 3.23-5.64). Lastly, the odds of composite severe neonatal morbidity were increased in Groups 1 and 3, whereas the odds of emergency Cesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status were increased only in Group 3.

CONCLUSION

Assessing the fetal growth trajectory in the latter half of pregnancy can help identify infants at increased risk of perinatal mortality and birth weight < 3rd centile for gestation. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Does decreased fetal growth estimation in the appropriate for gestational age range affect delivery outcomes?

PURPOSE

To study the effect of decreased estimated fetal weight (EFW) percentiles in appropriate for gestational age fetuses.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included women who had second and third trimester ultrasound examinations. Delivery and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with decreased EFW of ≥  30 percentiles in EFW between ultrasound examinations (decreased growth group) and those without such a decrease (control group) were compared. Deliveries with EFW or birthweight below the 10th percentile were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 1610 deliveries, 57 were in the decreased growth group and 1553 in the control group. Maternal characteristics did not differ between the groups except for higher rate of nulliparity in the decreased growth group. We found similar rates of Category II/III monitoring, cesarean deliveries due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate and adverse neonatal outcomes. Neonatal birthweight was lower in the decreased growth group as compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find association between the group of appropriate for gestational age fetuses with decreased growth, with adverse outcomes.

Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Fetal growth restriction is an independent risk factor for fetal death and adverse neonatal outcomes. The main aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound of fetal biometry in detecting late-onset fetal growth restriction and predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published until June 2022, using the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Cohort studies in low-risk or unselected singleton pregnancies with screening ultrasound performed at ≥32 weeks of gestation were used.

METHODS

The estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference were assessed as index tests for the prediction of small for gestational age (birthweight of <10th percentile) and detecting fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and/or abdominal circumference of <10th percentile). The quality of the included studies was independently assessed by 2 reviewers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. For the meta-analysis, hierarchical summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, and quantitative data synthesis was performed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

The analysis included 25 studies encompassing 73,981 low-risk pregnancies undergoing third-trimester ultrasound assessment for growth, of which 5380 neonates (7.3%) were small for gestational age at birth. The pooled sensitivities for estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and abdominal circumference of <10th percentile in predicting small for gestational age were 36% (95% confidence interval, 27%-46%) and 37% (95% confidence interval, 19%-60%), respectively, at 32 weeks ultrasound and 48% (95% confidence interval, 41%-56%) and 50% (95% confidence interval, 25%-74%), respectively, at 36 weeks ultrasound. The pooled specificities for estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and abdominal circumference of <10th percentile in detecting small for gestational age were 93% (95% confidence interval, 91%-95%) and 95% (95% confidence interval, 85%-98%), respectively, at 32 weeks ultrasound and 93% (95% confidence interval, 91%-95%) and 97% (95% confidence interval, 85%-98%), respectively, at 36 weeks ultrasound. The observed diagnostic odds ratios for an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and an abdominal circumference of <10th percentile in detecting small for gestational age were 8.8 (95% confidence interval, 5.4-14.4) and 11.6 (95% confidence interval, 6.2-21.6), respectively, at 32 weeks ultrasound and 13.3 (95% confidence interval, 10.4-16.9) and 36.0 (95% confidence interval, 4.9-260.0), respectively, at 36 weeks ultrasound. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio in predicting fetal growth restriction were 71% (95% confidence interval, 52%-85%), 90% (95% confidence interval, 79%-95%), and 25.8 (95% confidence interval, 14.5-45.8), respectively, at 32 weeks ultrasound and 48% (95% confidence interval, 41%-55%), 94% (95% confidence interval, 93%-96%), and 16.9 (95% confidence interval, 10.8-26.6), respectively, at 36 weeks ultrasound. Abdominal circumference of <10th percentile seemed to have comparable sensitivity to estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile in predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates.

CONCLUSION

An ultrasound assessment of the fetal biometry at 36 weeks of gestation seemed to have better predictive accuracy for small-for-gestational-age neonates than an ultrasound assessment at 32 weeks of gestation. However, an opposite trend was noted when the outcome was fetal growth restriction. Fetal abdominal circumference had a similar predictive accuracy to that of estimated fetal weight in detecting small-for-gestational-age neonates.

Increased newborn NICU admission for evaluation of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy during COVID-19 pandemic in a public hospital

Background

Prenatal and perinatal care of pregnant mothers has been adversely affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a leading cause of neonatal death and long-term neurological disabilities. Therapeutic hypothermia is effective for neonatal HIE. This study evaluated the effect of the pandemic on neonatal HIE.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study compared neonatal HIE evaluation and hypothermia treatment between pre-COVID-19 pandemic (1 January 2018-31 December 2019) and COVID-19 pandemic (1 January 2020-31 December 2021) periods. Infants with abnormal neurological examination and or significant metabolic acidosis were admitted to NICU for evaluation of HIE and therapeutic hypothermia. Demographics, NICU admission and interventions, and neonatal outcomes were compared between infants born during the two periods using χ², t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. Statistical Process Control charts show the yearly proportion of infants evaluated for HIE and those treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Results

From the pre-pandemic to the pandemic period, the proportion of infants that met HIE screening criteria increased from 13% to 16% (p < 0.0001), the proportion of infants admitted to NICU for HIE evaluation increased from 1% to 1.4% (p = 0.02), and the maternal hypertension rates of the admitted infants increased from 30% to 55% (p = 0.006). There was no difference in the proportions of the infants diagnosed with HIE (0.7% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.3) or treated with therapeutic hypothermia (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.3) between the two periods. There were no differences in the HIE severity and outcomes of the infants treated with therapeutic hypothermia between the two periods.

Conclusion

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a significant increase in NICU admission for HIE evaluation. While we did not find significant increases in neonatal HIE and the need for therapeutic hypothermia, larger studies are needed for a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatal HIE.

Personalized Model to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Delivery Using Fetal Biometrics, Maternal Characteristics, and Pregnancy Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Births Assisted at a Spanish Hospital

Small for gestational age (SGA) is defined as a newborn with a birth weight for gestational age < 10th percentile. Routine third-trimester ultrasound screening for fetal growth assessment has detection rates (DR) from 50 to 80%. For this reason, the addition of other markers is being studied, such as maternal characteristics, biochemical values, and biophysical models, in order to create personalized combinations that can increase the predictive capacity of the ultrasound. With this purpose, this retrospective cohort study of 12,912 cases aims to compare the potential value of third-trimester screening, based on estimated weight percentile (EPW), by universal ultrasound at 35−37 weeks of gestation, with a combined model integrating maternal characteristics and biochemical markers (PAPP-A and β-HCG) for the prediction of SGA newborns. We observed that DR improved from 58.9% with the EW alone to 63.5% with the predictive model. Moreover, the AUC for the multivariate model was 0.882 (0.873−0.891 95% C.I.), showing a statistically significant difference with EPW alone (AUC 0.864 (95% C.I.: 0.854−0.873)). Although the improvements were modest, contingent detection models appear to be more sensitive than third-trimester ultrasound alone at predicting SGA at delivery.

Reduced Growth in Non-Small for Gestational Age Fetuses from 35 Weeks of Gestation to Birth and Perinatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess reduced fetal growth between 35 weeks of gestation and birth in non-small for gestational age fetuses associated with adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

It is a retrospective cohort study of 9,164 non-small for gestational age fetuses estimated by ultrasound at 35 weeks. The difference between the birth weight percentile and the estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of gestation was calculated, and we studied the relationship of this difference with the appearance of APO. APOs were defined as cesarean or instrumental delivery rates for nonreassuring fetal status, 5-min Apgar score <7, arterial cord blood pH <7.10, and stillbirth. Fetuses that exhibited a percentile decrease between both moments were classified into 6 categories according to the amount of percentile decrease (0.01-10.0, 10.01-20.0, 20.01-30.0, 30.01-40.0, 40.01-50.0, and >50.0 percentiles). It was evaluated whether the appearance of APO was related to the amount of this percentile decrease. Relative risk (RR) was calculated in these subgroups to predict APOs in general and for each APO in particular. Receiver operating characteristic and area under curves (AUC) for the difference in the percentile was calculated, used as a continuous parameter in the entire study population.

RESULTS

The median gestational age at delivery in uncomplicated pregnancies was 40.0 (39.1-40.7) and in pregnancies with APOs 40.3 (49.4-41.0), p < 0.001. The prevalence of APOs was greater in the group of fetuses with a decrease in percentile (7.6%) compared to those with increased percentile (4.8%) (p < 0.001). The RR was 1.63 (95% CI: 1.365-1.944, p < 0.001). Although the differences were significant in all decreased percentile groups, RRs were significantly higher when decreased growth values were >40 points (RR: 2.036, 95% CI: 1.581-2.623, p < 0.001). The estimated value of the AUC for percentile decrease was 0.58 (0.56-0.61, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Fetuses with a decrease in the EPW between the ultrasound at 35 weeks of gestation and birth have a higher risk of APOs, being double in fetuses with a decrease of >40 percentile points.

Perinatal Adverse Effects in Newborns with Estimated Loss of Weight Percentile between the Third Trimester Ultrasound and Delivery. The GROWIN Study

Fetal growth restriction has been associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs). We determined the importance of fetal growth detention (FGD) in late gestation for the occurrence of APOs in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) newborns. For this purpose, we analyzed a retrospective cohort study of 1067 singleton pregnancies. The newborns with higher APOs were SGA non-FGD and SGA FGD in 40.9% and 31.5% of cases, respectively, and we found an association between SGA non-FGD and any APO (OR 2.61; 95% CI: 1.35–4.99; p = 0.004). We did not find an increased APO risk in AGA FGD newborns (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.59; p = 0.483), except for cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS) with a decrease in percentile cutoff greater than 40 (RR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.11–5.21) and 50 (RR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.14–7.54). Conclusions: Newborns with the highest probability of APOs are SGA non-FGDs. AGA FGD newborns do not have a higher incidence of APOs than AGA non-FGDs, although with falls in percentile cutoff over 40, they have an increased risk of cesarean section due to NRFS. Further studies are warranted to detect these newborns who would benefit from close surveillance in late gestation and at delivery.

Growth Velocity and Doppler Evaluation to Predict Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Rate at Birth in Low-Risk Women: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated whether fetal growth deceleration in term, appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) fetuses is associated with placental insufficiency and nonreassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) at birth.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 246 low-risk, singleton pregnancies at term with AGA fetuses were recruited. Correlation between decreased growth velocity (decline in estimated fetal weight [EFW] percentile), low EFW (EFWQ1 = latest EFW between 11 and 25% percentiles), umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, and cerebro-placental ratio (CPR) with cesarean and instrumental deliveries due to NRFHR were tested.

RESULTS

The median change between fetal weight estimates (percentiles/week) was +0.49% (95% CI: -4 to +5%). Ten percent had decreased EFW percentile >3.5%/week. Fetal growth velocity/week was associated with MCA (r = 0.21, p < 0.001) and CPR (r = 0.24, p < 0.001) and inversely correlated with UA PI (r = -0.28, p < 0.001). NRFHR and cesarean section (CS) rates due to NRFHR were associated with decreased growth velocity, EFWQ1, and low CPR. The combination of abnormal CPR with decreased growth velocity occurred in 12 pregnancies, of which 5 (42%) had urgent CS due to NRFHR. The combination of abnormal CPR with EFWQ1 occurred in 9 pregnancies, of which 4 (44%) had urgent CS due to NRFHR. These combinations increased the likelihood ratio of CS due to NRFHR two-fold (8.41; 2.54-24.5) but did not significantly alter the number needed to treat by elective CS (3.78-4.68).

CONCLUSION

Fetal growth velocity, EFW between 10 and 25th percentiles (EFWQ1), and abnormal CPR improves prediction of unplanned CS due to NRFHR among term AGA fetuses. This should be considered when counseling about the delivery method.