The effects of intrauterine insemination and single embryo transfer or modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization on offspring's health-Follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

Infertility treatment and offspring blood pressure-a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have inconsistently observed that children conceived by IVF or ICSI have higher blood pressure compared to children not conceived by these ARTs.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of blood pressure measures of offspring conceived by ART and those conceived naturally. Resolving the suspicion of ART as a risk factor of higher blood pressure, and therefore of heart disease, has public health and clinical implications.

SEARCH METHODS

A biomedical librarian searched the Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. Searches were limited to records published in English since 1978. Grey literature was searched. Inclusion criteria were humans born via infertility treatment (vs no treatment) who underwent a blood pressure assessment. Exclusion criteria were non-human participants, non-quantitative studies, absence of a control group, and specialty populations (e.g. cancer patients only). Two reviewers independently screened each record's title and abstract and full text using Covidence, extracted data using Excel, and assessed bias using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Quality Assessment Tool for cohort studies.

OUTCOMES

Of 5082 records identified, 79 were included in the systematic review and 36 were included in the meta-analysis of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in ART and non-ART groups. Overall, 34 reports including 40 effect sizes from 25 unique cohorts, compared blood pressure between ART (N = 5229) and non-ART (N = 8509, reference) groups with no covariate adjustment. No standardized mean differences (SMD) in SBP (0.06 per SD of mmHg, 95% CI = -0.05, 0.18) or DBP (0.11, 95% CI = -0.04, 0.25) by treatment were found, but the heterogeneity was considerable (I2=76% for SBP and 87% for DBP). Adjusted analyses were presented in 12 reports, representing 28 effect sizes from 21 unique cohorts (N = 2242 treatment vs N = 37 590 non-treatment). Studies adjusted for varied covariates including maternal (e.g. age, education, body mass index, smoking, pregnancy complications), child (e.g. sex, age, physical activity, BMI, height), and birth characteristics (e.g. birth weight and gestational age). Adjusted results similarly showed no SMD for SBP (-0.03, 95% CI = -0.13, 0.08) or DBP (0.02, 95% CI = -0.12, 0.16), though heterogeneity remained high (I2 = 64% and 86%). Funnel plots indicated a slight publication bias, but the trim and fill approach suggested no missing studies. Removal of five studies which adjusted for birth outcomes (potentially over-adjusting for mediators) made no material difference. Type of treatment (e.g. IVF vs ICSI), period effects by birth year (≤2000 vs >2000), offspring age group (<8, 8-14, 15+), or study location (e.g. Europe) did not modify the results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

In conclusion, conception by ART was not associated with offspring blood pressure in a meta-analysis, although considerable heterogeneity was observed. Given the increasing number of children born using ART, perpetuating a difference in blood pressure would mean unnecessary risk screening for many children/adults on a population level. At a clinical level, couples considering these reproductive technologies have some reassurance that there is no evidence of strong vascular 'programming' due to the techniques used.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO No. CRD42022374232.

Which factors play a role in the decision of mothers to participate in child follow-up examinations after participation in an RCT?: a semi-quantitative study

OBJECTIVES

To determine which factors contribute to the decision of mothers to participate with their child in follow-up (FU) examinations after participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) prior to conception.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey, including Likert-scale items. Comparisons will be made between respondents who participated in all FU rounds of data collection and those who did not participate in any FU round with their child.

PARTICIPANTS

Women who participated in an RCT investigating the effect of a preconception lifestyle intervention (LIFEstyle study: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR1530) were invited to participate with their child in three FU data collections when the child had a mean age of 4.2 years, 4.6 years and 6.5 years, respectively. FU rounds included a health questionnaire, physical examination and cardiac assessment, successively.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven respondents were included, of whom 7 (10%) did not participate in any FU round and 24 (36%) participated in all FU rounds. Women who participated with their child in all 3 FU data collection rounds felt more involved in the FU research (95.8%) and agreed more often that the FU was introduced well (91.7%) as compared with women that did not participate in any FU data collection round with their child (14.3% and 28.6%, respectively). Participants of FU rounds more often agreed that participation felt like a health check for their child as compared with non-participants. In addition, participants of the physical examination and cardiac assessment more often let their decision to participate depend fully on their child, as compared with non-participants (39.4% vs 17.7% and 52.5% vs 24%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

To increase participation rates in future FU studies of children after maternal participation in an RCT, we suggest to involve women in the design of the FU study, to emphasise possible perceived benefits of participation and to encourage women to actively involve their child in the decision of participation.

Conception by fertility treatment and cardiometabolic risk in middle childhood

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether children conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) or ovulation induction (OI) have greater cardiometabolic risk than children conceived without treatment.

DESIGN

Clinical assessments in 2018-2019 in the Upstate KIDS cohort.

SETTING

Clinical sites in New York.

PATIENT(S)

Three hundred thirty-three singletons and 226 twins from 448 families.

INTERVENTION(S)

Mothers reported their use of fertility treatment and its specific type at baseline and approximately 4 months after delivery. High validity of the self-reported use of ART was previously confirmed. The children were followed up from infancy through 8-10 years of age. A subgroup was invited to participate in clinic visits.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The measurements of blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness using pulse wave velocity, anthropometric measures, and body fat using bioelectrical impedance analysis were performed (n = 559). The levels of plasma lipids, C-reactive protein, and hemoglobin A1c were measured using blood samples obtained from 263 children.

RESULT(S)

The average age of the children was 9.4 years at the time of the clinic visits Approximately 39% were conceived using fertility treatment (18% using ART and 21% using OI). Singletons conceived using fertility treatment (any type or using ART or OI specifically) did not statistically differ in systolic or diastolic BP, heart rate, or pulse wave velocity. Singletons conceived using OI were smaller than singletons conceived without treatment, but the average body mass index of the latter was higher (z-score: 0.41 [SD, 1.24]) than the national norms. Twins conceived using either treatment had lower BP than twins conceived without treatment. However, twins conceived using OI had significantly higher arterial stiffness (0.59; 95% CI, 0.03-1.15 m/s), which was attenuated after accounting for maternal BP (0.29; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.46 m/s). Twins did not significantly differ in size or fat measures across the groups. The mode of conception was not associated with the levels of lipids, C-reactive protein, or glycosylated hemoglobin.

CONCLUSION(S)

Clinical measures at the age of 9 years did not indicate greater cardiometabolic risk in children conceived using ART or OI compared with that in children conceived without treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03106493.

Assisted reproductive technology and childhood morbidity: a longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and offspring morbidity in the first decade of life.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Provincial health registry in Quebec, Canada.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 797,654 singleton children born between 2008 and 2019, followed up to 2020.

INTERVENTION(S)

Retrospective, noninterventional study of any ART procedure vs. no ART.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Childhood morbidity, including hospitalization for infectious, allergic, malignant, and other diseases, assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association with ART. We controlled for unmeasured family-level confounders that were shared among siblings through stratified Cox regression. To do so, we restricted the analysis to 10,097 siblings with discordant exposure to ART and compared the risk of outcomes in exposed vs. unexposed siblings.

RESULT(S)

Compared with no ART, ART was associated with 1.23 times the risk of any hospitalization (95% CI 1.19-1.27), 1.25 times the risk of infectious disease hospitalization (95% CI 1.21-1.29), and 1.25 times the risk of allergy hospitalization (95% CI 1.14-1.38). When we used a sibling design to control for shared genetic and environmental confounders, ART was not associated with a greater risk of childhood hospitalization (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.08).

CONCLUSION(S)

ART is associated with an elevated risk of hospitalization up to 11 years of age, but discordant sibling analysis suggests that the association may be due to genetic, environmental, or other shared familial confounders.

Early Embryo Exposure to Assisted Reproductive Manipulation Induced Subtle Changes in Liver Epigenetics with No Apparent Negative Health Consequences in Rabbit

Embryo manipulation is a requisite step in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Therefore, it is of great necessity to appraise the safety of ART and investigate the long-term effect, including lipid metabolism, on ART-conceived offspring. Augmenting our ART rabbit model to investigate lipid metabolic outcomes in offspring longitudinally, we detected variations in hepatic DNA methylation ART offspring in the F3 generation for embryonic exposure (multiple ovulation, vitrification and embryo transfer). Through adult liver metabolomics and proteomics, we identified changes mainly related to lipid metabolism (e.g., polyunsaturated fatty acids, steroids, steroid hormone). We also found that DNA methylation analysis was linked to changes in lipid metabolism and apoptosis genes. Nevertheless, these differences did not apparently alter the general health status. Thus, our findings suggest that ART is likely to be a player in embryo epigenetic events related to hepatic homeostasis alteration in adulthood.

Treatment Strategies for Unexplained Infertility

Unexplained infertility is a common diagnosis among couples with infertility. Pragmatic treatment options in these couples are directed at trying to improve chances to conceive, and consequently intrauterine insemination (IUI) with ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization (IVF) are standard clinical practice, while expectant management remains an important alternative. While evidence on IVF or IUI with ovarian stimulation versus expectant management was inconclusive, these interventions seem more effective in couples with a poor prognosis of natural conception. Strategies such as strict cancellation criteria and single-embryo transfer aim to reduce multiple pregnancies without compromising cumulative live birth. We propose a prognosis-based approach to manage couples with unexplained infertility so as to expose less couples to unnecessary interventions and less mothers and children to the potential adverse effects of ovarian stimulation or laboratory procedures.