Evaluation of mode of birth in pregnant women with heart disease

Mode of delivery and peripartum outcome in women with heart disease according to the ESC guidelines: an Italian multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines (GL) provide indications on the mode of delivery in women with heart disease. However available data suggests that the rate of Cesarean Delivery (CD) is high and widely variable among such patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the degree of adherence to the ESC recommendations among women delivering in four tertiary maternity services in Italy and how this affects the maternal and neonatal outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective multicenter cohort study including pregnant women with heart disease who gave birth between January 2014 and July 2020. Composite adverse maternal outcome (CAM) was defined by the occurrence of one or more of the following: major postpartum hemorrhage, thrombo-embolic or ischemic event, de novo arrhythmia, heart failure, endocarditis, aortic dissection, need for re-surgery, sepsis, maternal death. Composite Adverse Neonatal outcome (CAN) was defined as cord arterial pH <7.00, APGAR <7 at 5 min, admission to the intensive care unit, and neonatal death. We compared the incidence of CAM and CAN between the cases with planned delivery in accordance (group "ESC consistent") or in disagreement (group "ESC not consistent") with the ESC GL.

RESULTS

Overall, 175 women and 181 liveborn were included. A higher frequency of CAN was found when delivery was not planned accordingly to the ESC guidelines [("ESC consistent" 9/124 (7.2%) vs "ESC not consistent" 13/57 (22.8%) p = 0.002 OR 3.74 (CI 95% 1.49-9.74) , while the occurrence of CAM was comparable between the two groups. At logistic regression analysis, the gestational age at delivery was the only parameter independently associated with the occurrence of CAN (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Among pregnant women with heart disease, deviating from the ESC guidelines scheduling cesarean delivery does not seem to improve maternal outcomes and it is associated with worse perinatal outcomes, mainly due to lower gestational age at birth.

Validation of Risk Stratification for Cardiac Events in Pregnant Women With Valvular Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

Most risk stratification tools for pregnant patients with heart disease were developed in high-income countries and in populations with predominantly congenital heart disease, and therefore, may not be generalizable to those with valvular heart disease (VHD).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to validate and establish the clinical utility of 2 risk stratification tools-DEVI (VHD-specific tool) and CARPREG-II-for predicting adverse cardiac events in pregnant patients with VHD.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study involving consecutive pregnancies complicated with VHD admitted to a tertiary center in a middle-income setting from January 2019 to April 2022. Individual risk for adverse composite cardiac events was calculated using DEVI and CARPREG-II models. Performance was assessed through discrimination and calibration characteristics. Clinical utility was evaluated with Decision Curve Analysis.

RESULTS

Of 577 eligible pregnancies, 69 (12.1%) experienced a component of the composite outcome. A majority (94.7%) had rheumatic etiology, with mitral regurgitation as the predominant lesion (48.2%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.884 (95% CI: 0.844-0.923) for the DEVI and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.753-0.863) for the CARPREG-II models. Calibration plots suggested that DEVI score overestimates risk at higher probabilities, whereas CARPREG-II score overestimates risk at both extremes and underestimates risk at middle probabilities. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that both models were useful across predicted probability thresholds between 10% and 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnant patients with VHD, DEVI and CARPREG-II scores showed good discriminative ability and clinical utility across a range of probabilities. The DEVI score showed better agreement between predicted probabilities and observed events.

Characteristics shifting of heart disease in pregnancy: A report from low middle-income country

BACKGROUND

Heart disease in pregnancy is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in developing countries. However, the characteristics of the disease vary between countries and regions. This study aimed to present the characteristics of pregnant women with heart disease in an economically advantageous region of a developing country.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Weekly Report of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department to assess pregnant women with heart disease characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. A total sample of 69 pregnant women with heart disease regarding their gestational age was included in the study. Variables observed were maternal characteristics, heart disease's clinical parameters, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Chi-square test was used to examine the different characteristics of congenital and acquired heart disease groups.

RESULTS

The prevalence of cardiac disease in pregnancy was 5.19%. Fifty-three point six percent of pregnant women with heart disease were suffered from congenital heart disease (CHD), while 46.4% were acquired heart disease (AHD). Most labor methods were Cesarean delivery, and 69.6% of women experienced cardiac complications. Maternal death was reported in 8.69% of cases. Four cases were CHD complicated by pulmonary hypertension, which leads to Eisenmenger syndrome. Two other cases were AHD complicated by Peripartum Cardiomyopathies. Although statistically insignificant, complications are more common in the AHD group than CHD.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac disease prevalence in pregnancy is considered high, with CHD as the most common case, which significantly differs from other developing countries.