1
|
Hall M, Wu L, Nanda S, Bakalis S, Shennan A, Story L. Fetal growth restriction: How reliable is information available to patients on Google? A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 292:133-137. [PMID: 38000107 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review systematically the quality, readability and credibility of English language webpages offering patient information on fetal growth restriction. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of patient information was undertaken on Google with location services and browser history disabled. Websites from the first page were included providing they gave at least 300 words of health information on fetal growth restriction aimed at patients. Validated assessment of readability, credibility and quality were undertaken. An accuracy assessment was performed based on international guidance. Characteristics were tabulated. RESULTS Thirty-one websites including 30 different texts were included. No pages had a reading age of 11 years or less, none were credible, and only one was of high quality. Median accuracy rating was 9/24. CONCLUSION Patients cannot rely on Google as a source of information on fetal growth restriction. As well as being difficult to read, information tends to be low quality, low accuracy and not credible. Healthcare professionals must consider how to enable access to high-quality patient information and give time for discussion of information patients have found: failure to do so may disenfranchise patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Hall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, UK; Department of Perinatal Imaging, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, UK.
| | - Lindsay Wu
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, UK
| | - Surabhi Nanda
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, UK; Department of Fetal Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Spyros Bakalis
- Department of Fetal Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, UK
| | - Lisa Story
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, UK; Department of Perinatal Imaging, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, UK; Department of Fetal Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grainger TC, McDougall A, Magama Z, Ranawakagedon J, Mallick R, Odejinmi F. Women's experiences of birth and birth options counselling after laparoscopic or open myomectomy. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2023; 43:2205516. [PMID: 37200382 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2205516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
There is emerging evidence that vaginal birth after open and laparoscopic myomectomy may be safe in many pregnancies, however, there are no studies examining the perspectives of women who have given birth post myomectomy and their preferences regarding mode of birth. We performed a retrospective questionnaire survey of women who had an open or laparoscopic myomectomy followed by a pregnancy within 3 maternity units in a single NHS trust in the UK over a 5-year period. Our results revealed only 53% felt actively involved in the decision making for their birth plan and 90% had not been offered a specific birth options counselling clinic. Of those who had either a successful trial of labour after myomectomy (TOLAM) or elective caesarean section (ELCS) in the index pregnancy, 95% indicated satisfaction with their mode of birth however, 80% would prefer vaginal birth in a future pregnancy. Whilst long term prospective data is required to fully establish the safety of vaginal birth after laparoscopic and open myomectomy, this study is the first to explore the subjective experiences of women who had given birth post laparoscopic or open myomectomy and has highlighted the inadequate involvement of these women in the decision-making process.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Fibroids are the commonest female solid tumours in women of childbearing age with surgical management including open and laparoscopic excision techniques. However, the management of a subsequent pregnancy and birth remains controversial with no robust guidance on which women may be suitable for vaginal birth.What do the results of this study add? We present the first study to our knowledge which explores women's experiences of birth and birth options counselling after open and laparoscopic myomectomy.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? We provide a rationale for using birth options clinics to facilitate an informed decision-making process and highlight the current inadequate guidance for clinicians on how to advise women having a pregnancy following a myomectomy. Whilst long term prospective data is required to fully establish the safety of vaginal birth after laparoscopic and open myomectomy, this needs to be carried out in a way which promotes the preferences of the women affected by this research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas C Grainger
- The Women's Centre, Division of Women's and Children's Health, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London, London, UK
| | - Anna McDougall
- The Women's Centre, Division of Women's and Children's Health, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London, London, UK
| | - Zwelihle Magama
- The Women's Centre, Division of Women's and Children's Health, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London, London, UK
| | - Jeewantha Ranawakagedon
- The Women's Centre, Division of Women's and Children's Health, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Mallick
- The Women's Centre, Division of Women's and Children's Health, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London, London, UK
| | - Funlayo Odejinmi
- The Women's Centre, Division of Women's and Children's Health, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hall M, Challacombe F, Curran C, Shennan A, Story L. Googling preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: A systematic review of patient information available on the internet. BJOG 2023; 130:1298-1305. [PMID: 37077130 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes (PPROM) complicates 3% of pregnancies and is associated with an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to better understand this diagnosis, patients routinely resort to the internet for medical information. The lack of governance online leaves patients at risk of relying on low-quality websites. OBJECTIVES To assess systematically the accuracy, quality, readability and credibility of World Wide Web pages on PPROM. SEARCH STRATEGY Five search engines (Google, AOL, Yahoo, Ask and Bing) were searched with location services and browser history disabled. Websites from the first page of all searches were included. SELECTION CRITERIA Websites were included if they provided at least 300 words of health information aimed at patients relating to PPROM. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Validated assessments of health information readability, credibility and quality were undertaken, as was an accuracy assessment. Pertinent facts for accuracy assessment were based on feedback from healthcare professionals and patients through a survey. Characteristics were tabulated. MAIN RESULTS In all, 39 websites were included, with 31 different texts. No pages were written with a reading age of 11 years or less, none were considered credible, and only three were high quality. An accuracy score of 50% or more was obtained by 45% of websites. Information that patients considered pertinent was not consistently reported. CONCLUSIONS Search engines produce information on PPROM that is low quality, low accuracy and not credible. It is also difficult to read. This risks disempowerment. Healthcare professionals and researchers must consider how to ensure patients have access to information that they can recognise as high quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Hall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Perinatal Imaging, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fiona Challacombe
- Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma, Maudsley Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ciara Curran
- Little Heartbeats, Patient Advocacy and Support Group for PPROM, London, UK
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Story
- Department of Women and Children's Health, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Perinatal Imaging, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Derico SQ, Hicklin K, Davis LB, Brooks KC. Data-driven analyses to quantify information seeking behaviour for women with uterine fibroids. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2022; 13:73-96. [PMID: 38800604 PMCID: PMC11123465 DOI: 10.1080/20476965.2022.2150570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine fibroids (UF) are noncancerous growths of the uterus and impact the livelihood of over 26 million women in the United States. Although UF may not have accompanying symptoms, for some women their presence leads to surgical treatment, which can be a difficult decision-making process. Web-scraping of online media is used to identify information-seeking behavior of women searching for UF treatment options. We synthesize the data to describe trends in UF treatment, including the identification of gaps between the information individuals are seeking (demand) and information that is publicly available as a resource (supply), which contributes to this study's creation of the term "information desert." We perform statistical analysis to understand information-seeking behavior, determine the gap between information supply and information demand, and determine the correlation between a doctor's treatment recommendation and a patient's treatment decision as a function of age, symptoms, and knowledge obtained about specific types of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saleigh Q. Derico
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC
| | - Karen Hicklin
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida,Gainesville, FL
| | - Lauren B. Davis
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida,Gainesville, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leonardi M, Rocha R, Tun-Ismail AN, Robledo KP, Armour M, Condous G. Assessing the knowledge of endometriosis diagnostic tools in a large, international lay population: an online survey. BJOG 2021; 128:2084-2090. [PMID: 34403184 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the general population's knowledge regarding the utility and availability of tools to diagnosis endometriosis, with a focus on ultrasound. DESIGN An international cross-sectional online survey study was performed between August and October 2019. SETTING AND POPULATION 5301 respondents, representing 73 countries. METHODS In all, 23 questions survey focused on knowledge of endometriosis diagnosis distributed globally via patient- and community-endometriosis groups using social media. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Descriptive data of the knowledge of diagnostic tools for diagnosing endometriosis, including details about diagnosis using ultrasound. RESULTS In all, 84.0% of respondents had been previously diagnosed with endometriosis, 71.5% of whom had been diagnosed at the time of surgery. Ultrasound and MRI were the methods of diagnosis in 6.5% and 1.8%, respectively. A total of 91.8%, 28.8% and 16.6% of respondents believed surgery, ultrasound and MRI could diagnose endometriosis, respectively (more than one answer allowed). In those diagnosed by surgery, 21.7% knew about ultrasound as a diagnosis method, whereas in those diagnosed non-surgically, 51.5% knew (P < 0.001). In all, 14.7%, 31.1% and 18.2% stated superficial, ovarian and deep endometriosis could be diagnosed with ultrasound (32.9% stated they did not know which phenotypes of endometriosis could be diagnosed). Lastly, 58.4% of respondents do not believe they could access an advanced ultrasound in their region. CONCLUSIONS There is a limited appreciation for the role of non-surgical diagnostic tests for endometriosis among lay respondents to this survey. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT International survey shows limited awareness of lay respondents about non-surgical endometriosis diagnostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Leonardi
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy, and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney Nepean Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - R Rocha
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy, and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney Nepean Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A N Tun-Ismail
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy, and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney Nepean Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - K P Robledo
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M Armour
- NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.,Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - G Condous
- Acute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy, and Advanced Endosurgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney Nepean Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,OMNI Ultrasound & Gynaecological Care, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|