Multidisciplinary treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis: A case report and literature review

Laparoscopic treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis: A case series

Objective

This report summarizes the characteristics of a series of 8 recent (2020-2022) patients with abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The feasibility and advantages of laparoscopy in the treatment of AWE are set out.

Methods

The clinical data of the 8 AWE patients were retrospectively analysed. Basic clinical characteristics, operation details and postoperative details were collected and analysed.

Results

Laparoscopic treatment was successful in all 8 cases. The mean operation time was 212.13 ± 48.16 min, the mean estimated blood loss was 25.00 ± 11.18 ml, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.25 ± 1.39 days. 7 of the patients were found to have concomitant pelvic endometriosis, and 1 patient was found to have concealed inguinal hernias during surgery. Concomitant laparoscopic surgery for pelvic lesions was performed, including electrocautery or lesion resection of the pelvic endometriosis lesions in 7 patients, uterine fibroidectomy in 2 patients, high ligation of the hernia sac in 1 patient and endometrial biopsy under hysteroscopy in 1 patient. Endometrial-like tissue was confirmed by postoperative pathological examination of resected AWE lesions in all patients. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean follow-up time was 18.75 ± 3.96 months, and no recurrence of AWE was found.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery is a safe, effective and feasible treatment option for AWE patients and has the advantages of simultaneous diagnosis and treatment of other pelvic lesions.

Endometriosis in Patients Undergoing Plastic Surgical Procedures: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background

Endometriosis is a common gynecological disorder described as the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside the uterus, which can also be found in extrapelvic locations. Although patients seeking treatment for endometriosis usually present to gynecologists, there are rare cases of endometriosis encountered by plastic surgeons in routine practice, either incidentally or as a concomitant finding.

Methods

We present a rare case of a 36-year-old woman with symptoms of panniculitis desiring panniculectomy. During surgery, an abdominal mass was excised and confirmed by pathological analysis to be endometriosis. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed search engine of the National Institutes of Health to identify cases of endometriosis in plastic surgery. Following screening of the results, 14 articles were included in this analysis that fit the criteria of our search.

Results

Of the 14 articles reviewed, cutaneous endometriosis was the most common subtype found in plastic surgery. None of the studies described findings of endometriosis in routine panniculectomies. Several identified endometriosis discovered during cosmetic abdominoplasties.

Conclusions

Endometriosis encountered in plastic surgery is a rare but clinically important occurrence, with the cutaneous subtype representing the majority of cases. Endometriosis should always be on the differential diagnosis when an abdominal mass is found in a patient with a history of abdominal surgery. Abdominal masses found during routine aesthetic or reconstructive surgery should be submitted for tissue analysis to guide possible secondary treatments.

Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Early Diagnosis of a Rare Iatrogenic Complication Following Cesarean Section

Abdominal wall endometriosis is a rare form of extrapelvic endometriosis, frequently diagnosed with delay in most cases. It is typically iatrogenic and primarily associated with procedures such as cesarean sections or other gynecological surgeries. In our patient, endometriosis at the laparotomy scar was diagnosed relatively early, approximately two months after the onset of symptoms, which manifested 10 months after the last cesarean section. The patient, who had an obstetric history of three cesarean sections, presented at the Gynecology outpatient clinic of the General Hospital of Trikala, complaining of pain associated with menstruation located in the lower abdomen, near the surgical scar. Based on clinical and imaging findings, abdominal wall endometriosis was suspected, leading to a decision for wide excision of the endometriotic lesion. Histological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed the diagnosis. The postoperative course was uneventful, and three months after the surgery, the patient reported complete resolution of symptoms. This case report emphasizes the importance of integrating advanced diagnostic methods alongside classic clinical findings for the accurate diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis. It also highlights the contribution of surgical treatment through wide excision of the endometriotic lesion, in facilitating early diagnosis, achieving cure, and minimizing the risk of disease recurrence in the future.

Abdominal wall endometriosis misdiagnosed as a desmoid tumor: A case report

Introduction

Abdominal wall masses have different aetiologies. Diagnosis includes desmoid tumors (DTs) and other benign and malignant lesions, among which abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). Diagnosis is challenging if symptoms are aspecific, and the contribution of imaging may be weak. We present a case of AWE that according to clinical history and imaging was misdiagnosed as DT.

Presentation of case

A healthy 35-year-old female presented, 4 years after a cesarean delivery, a rapidly growing painless subumbilical mass within the right rectus abdominis muscle. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging suspected a DT. The patient underwent complete resection of the mass and pathological examination revealed foci of endometriosis in the muscle. Patient's post-operative course was uneventful and at 18-month follow-up, no recurrence has been detected.

Discussion

The current case highlights differences in clinical presentation and imaging in case of AWE and DTs, underlining possible pitfalls in diagnosis. In young women with previous gynaecological abdominal surgery, AWE is the most likely disease when a mass in the region of the scar appears. Differential diagnosis is complex and rare entities like DTs should nevertheless be taken into consideration. A complete surgical resection with negative margins is considered the primary treatment for AWE and for selected DTs. Final pathology of the tumor can state the precise diagnosis.

Conclusion

Since AWE and DTs share similar clinical signs and aspecific imaging exams, both diseases should be considered in case of abdominal wall mass in female patients of childbearing age and history of uterine-related surgery.

•

In presence of abdominal wall mass in reproductive women, diagnosis is challenging.

•

Desmoid tumors and abdominal wall endometriosis can be misdiagnosed.

•

Both diseases share similar clinical signs and aspecific imaging exams.

•

Final pathology of the mass can state the precise diagnosis.

Abdominal wall endometriosis: an update in diagnosis, perioperative considerations and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is rare with limited evidence guiding diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of the diagnosis, perioperative considerations, and treatment of AWE.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies further characterize presenting symptoms and locations of AWE. Prior abdominal surgery remains the greatest risk factor for the development of AWE. Newer evidence suggests that increasing BMI may also be a risk factor. Ultrasound is first-line imaging for diagnosis. Magnetic resonance image is preferred for surgical planning for deep or extensive lesions. Laparotomy with wide local excision is considered standard treatment for AWE with great success. Novel techniques in minimally invasive surgery have been described as effective for the treatment of AWE. A multidisciplinary surgical approach is often warranted for successful excision and reapproximation of skin and/or fascial defects. Noninvasive therapies including ultrasonic ablation or cryotherapy are also emerging as promising treatment strategies in select patients.

SUMMARY

Recent studies provide further evidence to guide diagnosis through physical exam and imaging as well as pretreatment planning. Treatment options for AWE are rapidly expanding with novel approaches in minimally invasive and noninvasive therapies now available.