Prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: Neurosonography versus fetal magnetic resonance imaging

Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the agenesis of corpus callosum: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prenatal ultrasound has been regularly used as the screening tool for agenesis of corpus callosum (ACC) of the fetuses, which were mainly suspected on the basis of indirect signs rather than the visualization of the CC. However, the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound for ACC, compared to the gold standard of postmortem diagnosis or postnatal images, is still unknown. This meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of ACC.

METHODS

Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound for ACC compared to postmortem diagnosis or postnatal images were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with a random-effects model. The diagnostic accuracy was measured by summarized area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 544 fetuses with suspected anomalies of central nervous system were included, and 143 of them were with validated diagnosis of ACC. Pooled results showed that prenatal ultrasound has satisfying diagnostic efficacy for ACC, with the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.91), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.79-1.00), 43.73 (95% CI: 3.42-558.74, and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11-0.74), respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), suggesting good diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound. Subgroup analysis according to the prenatal ultrasound procedures showed a better diagnostic efficacy of neurosonography than that of regular ultrasound screening (sensitivity: 0.84 versus 0.57, specificity: 0.98 versus 0.89, and AUC: 0.97 versus 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal ultrasound, particularly for the neurosonography, confers satisfying efficacy for the diagnosis of ACC.

Applicability of a semiautomated volumetric approach (5D CNS+™) for detailed antenatal reconstruction of abnormal fetal CNS anatomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a semiautomated volumetric approach (5D CNS+™) when examining fetuses with an apparent abnormal anatomy of the central nervous system (CNS).

METHODS

Stored 3D volumes extracted from a cohort of > 1.400 consecutive 2nd and 3rd trimester pregnancies (range 15-36 gestational weeks) were analyzed using the semiautomatic software tool 5D CNS+™, enabling detailed reconstruction of nine diagnostic planes of the fetal brain. All 3D data sets were examined and judged for plane accuracy, the need for manual adjustment, and fetal CNS anomalies affecting successful plane reconstruction.

RESULTS

Based on our data of 91 fetuses with structural cerebral anomalies, we were able to reveal details of a wide range of CNS anomalies with application of the 5D CNS+™ technique. The corresponding anatomical features and consecutive changes of neighboring structures could be clearly demonstrated. Thus, a profound assessment of the entire altered CNS anatomy could be achieved in nearly all cases. The comparison with matched controls showed a significant difference in volume acquisition (p < 0.001) and in need for manual adjustment (p < 0.001) but not in the drop-out rates (p = 0.677) of both groups.

CONCLUSION

5D CNS+™ is applicable in the majority of cases with brain lesions and constitutes a reliable tool even if the integrity of the fetal CNS is compromised by structural anomalies. Using volume data that were acquired in identical cutting sections needed for conventional biometry allows for detailed anatomic surveys grossly independent of the examiner's experience.

Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of foetal intracranial haemorrhage and the correlation with ultrasound findings and postnatal outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) in the middle- and late trimesters and to explore the relationship between the MRI features of foetal ICH and postnatal outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study which recruited foetal ICH diagnosed by MRI in one tertiary centre from 2015 to 2019. The prenatal and postnatal medical records were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 39 ICH cases, 82.1% (32) had germinal matrix intraventricular haemorrhage (GM-IVH), and 18.9% (7) were diagnosed with non-GM-IVH. The cerebellum, corpus callosum and subdural space were affected in 5, 1 and 1 non-GM-IVH cases, respectively. MRI confirmed possible ICH on sonogram in 10 cases (35.7%) and the remaining 19 added ICH diagnoses that were not obtained on initial ultrasound imaging. Pregnancy outcome data were available in 82.1% of (32) cases, of which 21 were terminated pregnancies, 1 was foetal demise and 10 were delivered. One neonate died after birth and one infant suffered from hearing loss. The remaining eight patients had favourable outcome.

CONCLUSION

In our study, evaluation of the relationship between MRI findings and outcomes remains challenging, depending on the timing of examination and the hematoma itself. MRI was an adjunct to US in diagnosing ICH in utero which helps to assess postnatal development.

Diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: comparison of prenatal neurosonography and foetal magnetic resonance imaging findings

Magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) is gradually becoming the more preferred imaging modality in the evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities rather than foetal ultrasonography (USG). The aim of this study was to compare the findings of prenatal neurosonography and foetal MRI. The study was a retrospective study analysing the records of 160 pregnant women who underwent both foetal MRI and USG due to suspicion of CNS abnormalities between 2008 and 2019. Indications for applying foetal MRI were neurosonography and foetal MRI findings. When the compatibility between MRI and USG results was examined in CNS abnormalities, it was found fully compatible in 61.3% of cases, partially compatible in 24.53% of cases, and not compatible in 14.5% of cases. When comparing prenatal neurosonography and foetal MRI findings, additional findings were reported in 16.9% of cases, and no additional finding was reported in 66.8% of cases. While normal anatomical findings were reported in 8.8% of the cases in MRI, the diagnosis made by neurosonography changed in 7.5%. Foetal MRI has more advantages than USG both in imaging the CNS abnormalities in more detail and in determining the accompanying additional anomalies.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject: USG is a safe, practical and cost-effective primary imaging method that is widely used for foetal anomaly screening. However, there may sometimes be difficulties in evaluating the foetal brain structures due to foetal position which is unsuitable for imaging, extremely obese with a high body mass index, oligohydramnios and ossified foetal skull. For this reason, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as the most commonly used imaging method after USG in the evaluation of foetal anatomy, especially CNS.What do the results of this study add?: In our study, we saw that foetal MRI has more advantages than neurosonography in both seeing CNS abnormalities in more detail and recognising additional anomalies that may accompany.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research?: We have seen that besides neurosonography, foetal MRI can provide important information that can affect the clinical approach in pregnancy management by increasing the correct diagnosis in pregnancies with congenital CNS abnormalities. MRI: it is the best secondary imaging modality that can aid diagnosis in addition to neurosonography in the diagnosis of CNS abnormalities and in suspected cases. Therefore, foetal MRI should be used more widely in prenatal diagnosis.