1
|
Salman L, Covens A. Fertility Preservation in Cervical Cancer-Treatment Strategies and Indications. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:296-306. [PMID: 38248104 PMCID: PMC10814061 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is frequently diagnosed in women during their reproductive years, and fertility preservation is an essential part of their cancer treatment. In highly selected patients with early stage, low-risk cervical cancer and a tumor size ≤ 2 cm, several treatment strategies can be offered for patients wishing to preserve fertility, including radical/simple trachelectomy or conization with pelvic lymph node assessment. Trachelectomy can be performed through a vaginal, abdominal, or minimally invasive approach and has been shown to have an equivalent oncologic outcome compared to radical hysterectomy. All surgical approaches for radical trachelectomy seem to have excellent survival with comparable oncologic outcomes. Nevertheless, patients undergoing vaginal trachelectomy have better obstetric outcomes compared to the other routes. In patients with larger tumors (2-4 cm), neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery is an alternative option. Several chemotherapy regimens have been used for this indication, with a pathologic complete response rate of 17-73%. For locally advanced diseases that require radical hysterectomy or primary chemoradiation, fertility preservation can be performed using oocyte, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, as well as ovarian transposition. For these patients, future pregnancy is possible through surrogacy. In addition to fertility preservation, ovarian transposition, where the ovaries are repositioned outside of the radiation field, is performed to maintain ovarian hormonal function and prevent premature ovarian failure. In summary, fertility-preservation treatment strategies for patients with early stage cervical cancer are continuously evolving, and less radical surgeries are becoming more acceptable. Additional and ongoing evidence is helping determine the impact of conservative procedures on oncologic and obstetric outcomes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Salman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
| | - Allan Covens
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wolswinkel JT, Eikelder MLGT, Verhoef CG, Zusterzeel PLM. High- or Intermediate-Risk Histologic Features in Patients with Clinical Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Planned for Fertility-Sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3920. [PMID: 37568735 PMCID: PMC10417237 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is a viable option for young women with early-stage cervical cancer (ECC); however, certain risk factors may necessitate additional treatments and impact fertility. This review examines the prevalence of these risk factors and available treatment options. METHODS A systematic search was conducted of studies including patients with ECC (IA1 with LVSI, IA2, IB1 (FIGO 2009)) who underwent FSS. RESULTS Sixty-four articles, comprising a total of 4118 women planned for FSS, were included. High- or intermediate-risk histologic features were found in 638 (15.5%) women: 5.1% had positive lymph node(s), 4.1% had positive resection margins, 0.3% had parametrial involvement, 1.0% had unspecified high-risk features, and 5.1% had intermediate-risk histology (primarily based on the Sedlis criteria). Adjuvant treatment impaired fertility in all women with adjuvant hysterectomy and/or (chemo)radiation (58.7%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 1351 (32.8%) patients, which may reduce fertility. CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation could be achieved in most women; but high- or intermediate-risk factors necessitate more extensive surgery or radiotherapy leading to infertility. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be an alternative treatment option considering its effectiveness, safety and higher change in fertility preservation. The low incidence of parametrial involvement justifies waiving parametrectomy in tumors < 2 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke T. Wolswinkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (J.T.W.); (M.L.G.t.E.)
| | - Mieke L. G. ten Eikelder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (J.T.W.); (M.L.G.t.E.)
| | - Cornelia G. Verhoef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Petra L. M. Zusterzeel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (J.T.W.); (M.L.G.t.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiyoda T, Yoshihara K, Kagabu M, Nagase S, Katabuchi H, Mikami M, Tabata T, Hirashima Y, Kobayashi Y, Kaneuchi M, Tokunaga H, Baba T. Sentinel node navigation surgery in cervical cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:1247-1255. [PMID: 35612720 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02178-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is used in clinical practice for the treatment of cervical cancer. This study aimed to elucidate the appropriate sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping method and assess the safety and benefits of SNNS. We searched the PubMed, Ichushi, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and studies on SLN in cervical cancer from January 2012 to December 2020. Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We quantitatively analyzed the detection rate, sensitivity/specificity, and complications and reviewed information, including the survival data of SLN biopsy (SLNB) without pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND). The detection rate of SLN mapping in the unilateral pelvis was median 95.7% and 100% and in the bilateral pelvis was median 80.4% and 90% for technetium-99 m (Tc) with/without blue dye (Tc w/wo BD) and indocyanine green (ICG) alone, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of each tracer were high; the area under the curve of each tracer was 0.988 (Tc w/wo BD), 0.931 (BD w/wo Tc), 0.966 (ICG), and 0.977 (carbon nanoparticle). Morbidities including lymphedema, neurological symptoms and blood loss were associated with PLND. One RCT and five studies all showed SNNS without systematic PLND does not impair recurrence or survival in early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size ≤ 2-4 cm. Both Tc w/wo BD and ICG are appropriate SLN tracers. SNNS can reduce the morbidities associated with PLND without affecting disease progression in early-stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuyuki Chiyoda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Yoshihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kagabu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Shiwa, Japan
| | - Satoru Nagase
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Katabuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Tabata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Hirashima
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoichi Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori Kaneuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Otaru General Hospital, Otaru, Japan
| | - Hideki Tokunaga
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Shiwa, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gil-Ibañez B, Gil-Moreno A, Torné A, Martín Jimenez A, Gorostidi M, Zapardiel I, Tejerizo Garcia A, Diaz-Feijoo B. Tumor Size and Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer Treated by Fertility Preservation Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2108. [PMID: 35565238 PMCID: PMC9105143 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of tumor size > 2 cm on oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in early cervical cancer in a Spanish cohort. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study of early cervical cancer (stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion -IB1 (FIGO 2009)) patients with gestational desire who underwent FSS at 12 tertiary departments of gynecology oncology between 01/2005 and 01/2019 throughout Spain. Results: A total of 111 patients were included, 82 (73.9%) with tumors < 2 cm and 29 (26.1%) with tumors 2−4 cm. Patients’ characteristics were balanced except from lymphovascular space invasion. All were intraoperative lymph node-negative. Median follow-up was 55.7 and 30.7 months, respectively. Eleven recurrences were diagnosed (9.9%), five (6.0%) and six (21.4%) (p < 0.05). The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 95.7% (95%CI 87.3−98.6) and 76.9% (95% CI 55.2−89.0) (p = 0.011). Only tumor size (<2 cm vs. 2−4 cm) was found to be significant for recurrence. After adjusting for the rest of the variables, tumor size 2−4 cm showed a Hazard Ratio of 5.99 (CI 95% 1.01−35.41, p = 0.036). Conclusions: Tumor size ≥ 2 cm is the most important negative prognostic factor in this multicenter cohort of patients with early cervical cancer and gestational desire who underwent FSS in Spain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blanca Gil-Ibañez
- Gynecological Oncology and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecological Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, CIBERONC, 28041 Madrid, Spain
| | - Aureli Torné
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Clinic Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (A.T.); (B.D.-F.)
| | | | - Mikel Gorostidi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Donostia, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain;
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Alvaro Tejerizo Garcia
- Gynecological Oncology and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Berta Diaz-Feijoo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Clinic Institute of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (A.T.); (B.D.-F.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051008. [PMID: 33670929 PMCID: PMC7975326 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is increasingly being offered to women with a gynecological malignancy who wish to preserve fertility. In this systematic review, we evaluate the best evidence currently available on oncological and reproductive outcome after FSS for early stage cervical cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer. An extensive literature search was conducted using the electronic databases Medline (OVID), Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies published up to December 2020. In total, 153 studies were included with 7544, 3944, and 1229 patients who underwent FSS for cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer, respectively. We assessed the different FSS techniques that are available to preserve fertility, i.e., omitting removal of the uterine body and preserving at least one ovary. Overall, recurrence rates after FSS are reassuring and therefore, these conservative procedures seem oncologically safe in the current selection of patients with low-stage and low-grade disease. However, generalized conclusions should be made with caution due to the methodology of available studies, i.e., mostly retrospective cohort studies with a heterogeneous patient population, inducing selection bias. Moreover, about half of patients do not pursue pregnancy despite FSS and the reasons for these decisions have not yet been well studied. International collaboration will facilitate the collection of solid evidence on FSS and the related decision-making process to optimize patient selection and counseling.
Collapse
|
6
|
Somigliana E, Mangili G, Martinelli F, Noli S, Filippi F, Bergamini A, Bocciolone L, Buonomo B, Peccatori F. Fertility preservation in women with cervical cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 154:103092. [PMID: 32896752 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation in women with cervical cancer is a demanding but evolving issue. Some remarkable achievements have been reached, in particular the improvement of primary and secondary prevention and the broadening of the indications for conservative surgery up to FIGO 2018 stage IB2. Natural pregnancy rate and the rate of obstetrics complications following conservative approach is satisfactory even if not optimal. On the other hand, the use of classic strategies for fertility preservation such as oocytes or ovarian cortex freezing is extremely limited, being the uterus compromised by treatment in a high proportion of cases. In fact, the availability of uterine surrogacy can play a role in the counseling and the decision-making process. The recent advent of uterus transplantation is fascinating but, at present, cannot be viewed as a realistic solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgardo Somigliana
- Dept of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Obstet-Gynecol Dept, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgia Mangili
- Obstet-Gynecol Dept, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Noli
- Dept of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Filippi
- Obstet-Gynecol Dept, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Bergamini
- Obstet-Gynecol Dept, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Bocciolone
- Obstet-Gynecol Dept, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, IRCCS Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Buonomo
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fedro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|