1
|
Szyszka M, Rzońca E, Rychlewicz S, Bączek G, Ślęzak D, Rzońca P. Association between Parity and Preterm Birth-Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center in Poland. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1763. [PMID: 37372882 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11121763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Preterm births and parity are two medical areas that seem to be entirely different from each other. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationships between parity and maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with preterm birth. This study involved a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records from St. Sophia Hospital in Warsaw (Poland). This study was conducted among women who gave birth to preterm infants between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021. A total of 2043 cases of preterm births were included in the final analysis. A higher odds ratio of preterm birth in primiparas was found in women living in a city/town (OR = 1.56) and having secondary (OR = 1.46) and higher education (OR = 1.82). Multiparas who gave birth to preterm infants were more frequently diagnosed with gestational diabetes (19.69%) than primiparas. Multiparas were more likely to give birth to preterm infants who received an Apgar score of ≤7 both at 1 and 5 min after birth (25.80% and 15.34%). The results of our study emphasize the differences between primiparas and multiparas who give birth to preterm infants. Knowledge of these differences is essential to improve the perinatal care provided to mothers and their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Szyszka
- Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ewa Rzońca
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Didactics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sylwia Rychlewicz
- St. Sophia's Specialist Hospital, Żelazna Medical Center, 01-004 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grażyna Bączek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Didactics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Daniel Ślęzak
- Department of Medical Rescue, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Patryk Rzońca
- Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Y, Zhang L, Huang L, Liang Y, Chen J, Bi S, Deng W, Lin L, Wang X, Ren L, Zeng S, Huang M, Huang B, Zhang Y, Xie S, Du L, Chen D. Association between the second-stage duration of labor and perinatal outcomes in women with a prior cesarean delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:543. [PMID: 35790947 PMCID: PMC9254554 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04871-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cesarean delivery (CD) rate has been increasing globally. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) has been used as a key method for the reduction of the CD rate. Little is known, however, about the association between the second-stage duration of TOLAC and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. This study evaluated the association between perinatal outcomes and the duration of second-stage labor in women undergoing TOLAC. METHODS A 10-year retrospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, between January 2010 and January 2020. Women undergoing TOLAC who reached the second stage of labor were included in this study. Duration of the second stage of labor was examined as a categorical variable (group I: <0.5 h, group II: 0.5-2 h and group III: ≥2 h) and as a continuous variable to evaluate the association with adverse perinatal outcomes by using multivariable regression models and a Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Of the 1,174 women who met the inclusion criteria, the median (interquartile range) length of the second stage was 0.5 h (0.3-0.9 h). Among them, 1,143 (97.4%) delivered vaginally and 31 underwent an unplanned CD. As the second-stage duration increased, operative vaginal delivery (OVD), CD, and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) rates increased. Women in group III had higher risks of OVD (aOR = 11.34; 95% CI [5.06-25.41]), CD (aOR = 4.22; 95% CI [1.32-13.43]), and PPH (aOR = 2.43; 95% CI [1.31-4.50]) compared with group I. Correspondingly, blood loss and the oxytocin used to treat PPH increased significantly, while the postpartum hemoglobin reduced significantly in group III compared with group I. The incidence of uterine rupture, uterine atony, cervical laceration, red blood cell transfusion, and intensive care unit admission were similar in all three groups. Neonatal outcomes were not affected by the second-stage duration. CONCLUSIONS Women undergoing TOLAC with second-stage duration of ≥2 h have higher odds of OVD, unplanned intrapartum CD, and PPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulian Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Lizi Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Lijun Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yingyu Liang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Jingsi Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Shilei Bi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Weinan Deng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Lin Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Xiaoyi Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Luwen Ren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Shanshan Zeng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Minshan Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Baoying Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yijian Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Sushan Xie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Lili Du
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 63 Duobao Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510150, China.
| | - Dunjin Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Higher Education Joint Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, The Medical Center for Critical Pregnant Women in Guangzhou, 63 Duobao Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510150, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rottenstreich M, Rotem R, Glick I, Reichman O, Rottenstreich A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Sela HY. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Deliveries with Prolonged Second-Stage Duration of the Presenting Twin: a Retrospective Cohort Study. Reprod Sci 2021; 29:143-153. [PMID: 34782987 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00798-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
To assess the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as a function of the presenting twin second-stage duration. A retrospective cohort study of deliveries taking place in an academic medical center between 2005 and 2019. The study group included women with twin pregnancies with the first fetus in vertex presentation, who attempted vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia and attained the second stage of labor. Prolonged second stage (PSS) was defined as when exceeding the 95th percentile of presenting twin second-stage duration recorded among all parturients who achieved spontaneous vaginal deliveries in our center during the study period, stratified by parity: 3 h in nulliparas and 1 h in multiparas. Women with and without PSS were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse maternal outcomes. A univariate analysis was conducted and followed by multivariate analysis. During the study period, 1,337 parturients (36% of twin deliveries) met study criteria, of these 22% (298) were nulliparous and 78% (1,039) were multiparous. The second stage of labor of the presenting twin was prolonged in 41 (13.8%) of the nulliparas and 64 (6.2%) multiparas. Prolonged second stage was associated with episiotomy, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and blood product transfusion, as well as vacuum deliveries of the first and second twin, second-stage cesarean, and a higher rate of composite adverse maternal outcome in nulliparous (41.5% vs. 20.2%, p<0.01) and with higher rates of episiotomy, postpartum hemorrhage, and vacuum deliveries of the first and second twin, but a similar rate of composite adverse maternal outcome in multiparous women (7.8% vs. 9.3%, p=0.68); moreover, the composite adverse neonatal outcome was not increased in nulliparous (36.6% vs. 38.5%, p=0.81) nor in multiparous women (21.9% vs. 23.6%, p=0.75). Prolonged second stage of labor of the presenting twin was associated with an adverse composite maternal outcome in nulliparous and with postpartum hemorrhage in multiparous. Further larger studies are warranted to reinforce our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misgav Rottenstreich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 Bayit Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.,Department of Nursing, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Reut Rotem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 Bayit Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Itamar Glick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 Bayit Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Orna Reichman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 Bayit Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amihai Rottenstreich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 Bayit Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hen Y Sela
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 Bayit Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Length of the Second Stage of Labor in Women Delivering Twins. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:664-669. [PMID: 33706361 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the length of the second stage of labor in twin deliveries and to compare the length of the second stage in twin and singleton gestations. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study from three large hospitals in Israel. Clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the length of the second stage (the time from documented 10-cm dilation until spontaneous vaginal delivery of the first twin). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association of clinical factors with the length of the second stage. The length of the second stage in twin and singleton pregnancies was compared. RESULTS From 2011 to June, 2020, there were 2,009 twin deliveries and 135,217 singleton deliveries. Of the twin deliveries, 655 (32.6%) of the patients were nulliparous (95th percentile length of the second stage 3 hours and 51 minutes), 1,235 (61.5%) were parous (95th percentile 1 hour 56 minutes), and 119 (5.9%) were grand multiparous (five or more prior deliveries) (95th percentile 1 hour 24 minutes). In women delivering twins, epidural use was associated with a statistically significant increase in the length of the second stage of 40 minutes in nulliparous patients and 15 minutes in parous patients. In all groups, the length of the second stage was longer in patients delivering twins compared with singletons. Second-stage length longer than the 95th percentile in twins was associated with admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and need for phototherapy. CONCLUSION Second-stage labor is longer in twins than singletons and is associated with obstetric history. Normal ranges for the second stage may be useful in guiding clinical practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Fetal Head Station at Second-Stage Dystocia and Subsequent Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery Success Rate. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:147-155. [PMID: 33278288 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery is associated with a subsequent trial of labor success rate among primiparous women. METHODS A retrospective cohort study conducted at two tertiary medical centers included all primiparous women with subsequent delivery after cesarean delivery for second-stage dystocia during 2009-2019, identified from the electronic medical record databases. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the factors associated with successful trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) (primary outcome). Additionally, all women with failed TOLAC were matched one-to-one to women with successful TOLAC, according to factors identified in the univariate analysis. RESULTS Of 481 primiparous women with prior cesarean delivery for second-stage dystocia, 64.4% (n=310) attempted TOLAC, and 222 (71.6%) successfully delivered vaginally. The rate of successful TOLAC was significantly higher in those with fetal head station below the ischial spines at the index cesarean delivery, as compared with those with higher head station (79.0% vs 60.5%, odds ratio [OR] 2.46, 95% CI 1.49-4.08). The proportion of neonates weighing more than 3,500 g in the subsequent delivery was lower in those with successful TOLAC compared with failed TOLAC (29.7% vs 43.2%, OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.93). In a multivariable analysis, lower fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery was the only independent factor associated with TOLAC success (adjusted OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.43-3.96). Matching all women with failed TOLAC one-to-one to women with successful TOLAC, according to birth weight and second-stage duration at the subsequent delivery, lower fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery remained the only factor associated with successful TOLAC. CONCLUSION Lower fetal head station at the index cesarean delivery for second-stage dystocia was independently associated with a higher vaginal birth after cesarean rate, with an overall acceptable success rate. These findings should improve patient counseling and reassure those who wish to deliver vaginally after prior second-stage arrest.
Collapse
|