1
|
Chen Z, Bernards N, Gregor A, Vannelli C, Kitazawa S, de Perrot M, Yasufuku K. Anatomic evaluation of Pancoast tumors using three-dimensional models for surgical strategy development. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 165:842-852.e5. [PMID: 36241449 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pancoast tumor resection planning requires precise interpretation of 2-dimensional images. We hypothesized that patient-specific 3-dimensional reconstructions, providing intuitive views of anatomy, would enable superior anatomic assessment. METHODS Cross-sectional images from 9 patients with representative Pancoast tumors, selected from an institutional database, were randomly assigned to presentation as 2-dimensional images, 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction, or 3-dimensional physical reconstruction. Thoracic surgeons (n = 15) completed questionnaires on the tumor extent and a zone-based algorithmic surgical approach for each patient. Responses were compared with surgical pathology, documented surgical approach, and the optimal "zone-specific" approach. A 5-point Likert scale assessed participants' opinions regarding data presentation and potential benefits of patient-specific 3-dimensional models. RESULTS Identification of tumor invasion of segmented neurovascular structures was more accurate with 3-dimensional physical reconstruction (2-dimensional 65.56%, 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction 58.52%, 3-dimensional physical reconstruction 87.50%, P < .001); there was no difference for unsegmented structures. Classification of assessed zonal invasion was better with 3-dimensional physical reconstruction (2-dimensional 67.41%, 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction 77.04%, 3-dimensional physical reconstruction 86.67%; P = .001). However, selected surgical approaches were often discordant from documented (2-dimensional 23.81%, 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction 42.86%, 3-dimensional physical reconstruction 45.24%, P = .084) and "zone-specific" approaches (2-dimensional 33.33%, 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction 42.86%, 3-dimensional physical reconstruction 45.24%, P = .501). All surgeons agreed that 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction and 3-dimensional physical reconstruction benefit surgical planning. Most surgeons (14/15) agreed that 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction and 3-dimensional physical reconstruction would facilitate patient and interdisciplinary communication. Finally, most surgeons (14/15) agreed that 3-dimensional virtual reconstruction and 3-dimensional physical reconstruction's benefits outweighed potential delays in care for model construction. CONCLUSIONS Although a consistent effect on surgical strategy was not identified, patient-specific 3-dimensional Pancoast tumor models provided accurate and user-friendly overviews of critical thoracic structures with perceived benefits for surgeons' clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenchian Chen
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nicholas Bernards
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander Gregor
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Vannelli
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shinsuke Kitazawa
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kazuhiro Yasufuku
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davidson J, Uus A, Egloff A, Poppel M, Matthew J, Steinweg J, Deprez M, Aertsen M, Deprest J, Rutherford M. Motion corrected fetal body MRI provides reliable 3D lung volumes in normal and abnormal fetuses. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:628-635. [PMID: 35262959 PMCID: PMC9310761 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To calculate 3D‐segmented total lung volume (TLV) in fetuses with thoracic anomalies using deformable slice‐to‐volume registration (DSVR) with comparison to 2D‐manual segmentation. To establish a normogram of TLV calculated by DSVR in healthy control fetuses. Methods A pilot study at a single regional fetal medicine referral centre included 16 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets of fetuses (22–32 weeks gestational age). Diagnosis was CDH (n = 6), CPAM (n = 2), and healthy controls (n = 8). Deformable slice‐to‐volume registration was used for reconstruction of 3D isotropic (0.85 mm) volumes of the fetal body followed by semi‐automated lung segmentation. 3D TLV were compared to traditional 2D‐based volumetry. Abnormal cases referenced to a normogram produced from 100 normal fetuses whose TLV was calculated by DSVR only. Results Deformable slice‐to‐volume registration‐derived TLV values have high correlation with the 2D‐based measurements but with a consistently lower volume; bias −1.44 cm3 [95% limits: −2.6 to −0.3] with improved resolution to exclude hilar structures even in cases of motion corruption or very low lung volumes. Conclusions Deformable slice‐to‐volume registration for fetal lung MRI aids analysis of motion corrupted scans and does not suffer from the interpolation error inherent to 2D‐segmentation. It increases information content of acquired data in terms of visualising organs in 3D space and quantification of volumes, which may improve counselling and surgical planning. What's already known about this topic?Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and congenital lung lesions (CLL) are prognosticated with ultrasound‐based measurements of the fetal lung in a single dimension; however true volumes may provide greater sensitivity for high risk cases. Current use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to calculate fetal lung volumes is limited as two‐dimensional segmentation is labour intensive and risks interpolation and motion‐corruption errors.
What does this study add?
Three‐dimensional lung volumes can be computed from deformable slice‐to‐volume registration (DSVR) 3D reconstructions and highly correlate with traditional 2D‐derived volumes. DSVR‐derived volumes, however, should be more reliable owing to higher resolution and semi‐automated calculations that do not rely on interpolation between slices on motion‐corrupted stacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Davidson
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Evelina Children's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,GOS-UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alena Uus
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexia Egloff
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Milou Poppel
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina Children's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Matthew
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Steinweg
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina Children's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Deprez
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Aertsen
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Clinical Department of Radiology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Deprest
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Clinical Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Academic Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mary Rutherford
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|