1
|
Lee PY, Cheong AT, Ghazali SS, Rashid AA, Ong SC, Ong SY, Alip A, Sylvia M, Chen MF, Taib NA, Jaganathan M, Ng CJ, Teo SH. Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country. Health Expect 2022; 25:2837-2850. [PMID: 36098241 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making has been shown to improve the quality of life in metastatic breast cancer patients in high-literacy and high-resource settings. However, limited studies have examined the cultural preferences of metastatic breast cancer patients with shared decision-making implementation and the barriers encountered in an Asian setting where societal norms predominate and physician decision-making is at the forefront. This paper aims to identify (1) barriers to practising shared decision-making faced by healthcare professionals and patients and (2) strategies for implementing shared decision-making in the context of metastatic breast cancer management in Malaysia. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study involving 12 patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer, 16 healthcare professionals and 5 policymakers from surgical and oncology departments at public healthcare centres in Malaysia. Semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the thematic approach. Nvivo software was used to manage and analyse the data. RESULTS Five main themes emerged from the study: healthcare provider-patient communication, workforce availability, cultural and belief systems, goals of care and paternalism versus autonomy. Other strategies proposed to overcome barriers to implementing shared decision-making were training of healthcare professionals and empowering nurses to manage patients' psychosocial issues. CONCLUSION This study found that practising shared decision-making in the public health sector remains challenging when managing patients with metastatic breast cancer. The utilization of decision-making tools, patient empowerment and healthcare provider training may help address the system and healthcare provider-patient barriers identified in this study. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients were involved in the study design, recruitment and analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Yein Lee
- UMeHealth Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya (UM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ai Theng Cheong
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sazlina Shariff Ghazali
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Aneesa Abdul Rashid
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Siu Ching Ong
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Cancer Research Malaysia (CRMY), Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Soo Ying Ong
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Cancer Research Malaysia (CRMY), Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Adlinda Alip
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya (UM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - McCarthy Sylvia
- Clinical Service Department, Hospis Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - May Feng Chen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya (UM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nur Aishah Taib
- Department of Surgery, Universiti Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya (UM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya (UM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,Health Services & Systems Research, Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia (CRMY), Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lupinacci L, Lamore K, Seyeux AL, Untas A. Facilitators and obstacles to couples' intimacy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a qualitative study. J Psychosoc Oncol 2021; 40:595-613. [PMID: 34872465 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2021.2004292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
To identify perceived factors related to intimacy following HSCT. Qualitative descriptive design. Patients diagnosed with hematological cancer, 6 months into their HSCT recovery, and their partners. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 participants (nine patients and their partners). A thematic analysis was carried out. Couples reported various obstacles to intimacy, such as emotional obstacles (i.e. negative emotions, emotional mismatch), the length of the disease, its treatments and side effects, and the patient's physical condition. Couples also reported facilitators to intimacy, such as using emotional facilitators (e.g. showing empathy), fostering open communication or sharing common experience of the disease. This study highlights specific factors that influence couples' intimacy in the context of HSCT.Implications for Psychosocial Providers: Couples' intervention delivered in cancer care should be adapted by focusing on specific factors that maintain or enhance couples' intimacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Lupinacci
- Psychologie et Psychiatrie de liaison, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Kristopher Lamore
- Université de Paris, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | | | - Aurélie Untas
- Université de Paris, Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,Institut Universitaire de France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li X, Meng M, Zhao J, Zhang X, Yang D, Fang J, Wang J, Han L, Hao Y. Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:2763-2781. [PMID: 34916786 PMCID: PMC8670888 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s335080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
For most breast cancer (BC) patients who have undergone a mastectomy, the decision whether to proceed with breast reconstruction (BR) is complicated and requires deliberation. Shared decision-making (SDM) helps to address those needs and promote informed value-based decisions. However, little is known about the SDM status for BR in BC patients. This scoping review describes: 1) basic characteristics of studies on BR SDM in BC patients; 2) factors influencing BR SDM in BC patients; 3) experience and perception of BR SDM in BC patients; and 4) outcome measures reported. This review was performed in accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley methodology. A total of 5 English and 4 Chinese databases were searched, as well as different sources from grey literature. The data extraction form was developed by referring to the objectives and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF). Data was analyzed using thematic analysis, framework analysis and descriptive statistics, with findings presented in the tables and diagrams. A total of 1481 records were retrieved and 42 of these included after screening. In 21 (21/42, 50%) of the studies, patient decision aids (PDAs) were utilized, and in 17 (17/42, 40.48%) of the studies, the factors influencing the implementation of SDM were explored. Of these 17 studies, the factors influencing the implementation of SDM were categorized into the following: the patient level (17/17, 100%), the healthcare level (2/17, 11.76%) and the organizational and system level (7/17, 41.18%). A total of 8 (19.05%) of the 42 studies focused on patients' experiences and perceptions of SDM, and all studies used qualitative research methods. Of these 8 studies, a total of 7 (7/8, 87.50%) focused on patients' experiences of SDM participation, and 4 (4/8, 50.00%) focused on patients' perceptions of SDM. A total of 24 studies (24/42, 57.14%) involved quantitative outcome measures, where 49 items were divided into three classifications according to the outcomes of ODSF: the quality of the decision (17/24, 70.83%), the quality of the decision-making process (20/24, 83.33%), and impact (13/24, 54.17%). Although researchers have paid less attention to other research points in the field of SDM, compared to the design and application of SDM interventional tools, the research team still presents some equally noteworthy points through scoping review. For instance, the various factors influencing BC patients' participation in SDM for BR (especially at the healthcare provider level and at the organizational system level), patients' experiences and perceptions. Systematic reviews (SRs) should be conducted to quantify the impact of these different factors on BR SDM. Implementation of scientific theories and methods can inform the exploration and integration of these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejing Li
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Meiqi Meng
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junqiang Zhao
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Research on Health and Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dan Yang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiaxin Fang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junxin Wang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liu Han
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yufang Hao
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Yufang Hao Liangxiang High Education Park, Fangshan District, Beijing, 102488, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-13552850210 Email
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lamore K, Flahault C, Untas A. Women and Partners' Information Need, Emotional Adjustment, and Breast Reconstruction Decision-Making Before Mastectomy. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2020; 28:179-188. [PMID: 32879875 PMCID: PMC7436843 DOI: 10.1177/2292550320928558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to explore the differences between women and their partners on information need, emotional adjustment, and breast reconstruction (BR) decision-making after breast cancer diagnosis. A second aim was to explore these differences regarding surgery type (mastectomy vs immediate BR). METHODS Women newly diagnosed with a first nonmetastatic breast cancer and having a mastectomy were invited to fill out online questionnaires, in conjunction with their partners, before mastectomy. Questionnaires assessed their information need (Patient Information Need Questionnaire), emotional adjustment (Profile of Mood States), motivations to have BR or not, shared decision-making (Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire), and partner influence in BR decision-making. RESULTS Thirty (15 women and their partners) people took part in the study. Women and partners had similar levels of information need, emotional adjustment, and shared decision-making. However, partners did not entirely perceive why BR is wished or not by the women. Furthermore, partners of women having a mastectomy alone had higher scores of mood disturbance and a greater need for information, compared to partners of women having an immediate BR (P < .05). Likewise, men expressed a greater need for disease-oriented information than their loved ones (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to highlight differences in couples' experiences of breast cancer diagnosis and BR decision-making before mastectomy. Partners express an important need for information and do not entirely perceive why BR is wished or not by their loved ones. An online tool providing information to both women and partners could help them in breast cancer care pathway and BR decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristopher Lamore
- Laboratory of Psychopathology and Health Processes (EA4057), Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Cécile Flahault
- Laboratory of Psychopathology and Health Processes (EA4057), Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Aurélie Untas
- Laboratory of Psychopathology and Health Processes (EA4057), Université de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|