Glycemic variability in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: An integrative review

Glycemic Variability Within 1 Year Following Surgery for Stage II-III Colon Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine glycemic variability within 1 month and 1 year following surgery among adult patients, with and without Type 2 Diabetes (T2D), treated for stage II-III colon cancer.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of electronic health record data was conducted. Glycemic variability (i.e., standard deviation [SD] and coefficient of variation [CV] of > 2 blood glucose measures) was assessed within 1 month and within 1 year following colon surgery. Chi-square (χ²), Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the analyses.

RESULTS

Among the sample of 165 patients with stage II-III colon cancer, those with T2D had higher glycemic variability compared to patients without T2D (p < .001), with values within 1 month following surgery (SD = 44.69 mg/dL, CV = 27.4%) vs (SD = 20.55 mg/dL, CV = 17.53%); and within 1 year following surgery (SD = 45.04 mg/dL, CV = 29.04%) vs (SD = 21.36 mg/dL, CV = 18.6%). Associations were found between lower body mass index and higher glycemic variability (i.e., SD [r = -.413, p < .05] and CV [r = -.481, p < .01]) within 1 month following surgery in patients with T2D. Higher preoperative glucose was associated with higher glycemic variability (i.e., SD r = .448, p < .01) within 1 year in patients with T2D. Demographic and clinical characteristics were weakly associated with glycemic variability in patients without T2D.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage II-III colon cancer with T2D experienced higher glycemic variability within 1 month and within 1 year following surgery compared to those without T2D. Associations between glycemic variability and demographic and clinical characteristics differed by T2D status. Further research in prospective studies is warranted.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Hospital Glycemic Management System for Patients with Malignant Tumors and Hyperglycemia

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of the hospital glycemic management system with information integration in patients with malignant tumors and hyperglycemia.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-three patients diagnosed with malignant tumors with hyperglycemia and hospitalized in the non-endocrinology department of a specialized cancer hospital from March 2019 to November 2020 were recruited. All the patients were diagnosed and treated according to the clinical department and disease course. In total, 196 patients were divided into the control group, who received the conventional blood glucose management mode, and 197 patients were divided into the intervention group, who received the hospital glycemic management system with information integration. The average daily glucose levels were recorded before and after breakfast, lunch, and dinner, at bedtime and at night. The average glucose level, glucose compliance rate, hypoglycemia rate, hyperglycemia rate, glucose measurements per day, average number of hospitalization days and patient satisfaction were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, the average glucose level was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia rates in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The glucose compliance rate in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The highest blood glucose level in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), and the lowest blood glucose level was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The glucose measurements per day in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the average number of hospitalization days in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Patient satisfaction in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The hospital glycemic management system with information integration significantly improved the glycemic management of patients with malignant non-endocrine tumors and hyperglycemia, including their glucose level and glucose compliance rate, as well as patient satisfaction, and reduced the average number of hospitalization days and risk of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia.