Living with cancer and multimorbidity: A qualitative study of self-management experiences of older adults with cancer

Symptom representations in people with multimorbidity undergoing treatment for cancer: a qualitative descriptive study

PURPOSE

The symptom representations (i.e., beliefs and attitudes) that people with cancer hold about their symptom experience can impact how they self-manage their symptoms. Having two or more chronic conditions (multimorbidity) can complicate illness representations. Little is known about symptom representations in people with cancer and multimorbidity.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study was conducted with a sample of adults with a diagnosis of cancer and at least one additional chronic condition. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand their symptom representations. Leventhal's Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations (i.e., identity, consequences, cure/control, timeline, and cause) provided the guiding framework. A qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify codes, themes, and subthemes.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants (n = 17) was 62.1 years and primary cancer sites were gastrointestinal, thoracic, or head/neck. Five themes were identified: (1) perceiving and living with symptoms, (2) being unable to do things, (3) self-management behaviors, (4) domino theory, and (5) a side effect of conditions. These themes aligned with Leventhal's Common-Sense Model dimensions. The interaction among diagnoses and multimorbidity was identified by a minority of participants.

CONCLUSION

People with cancer and multimorbidity described symptom representations primarily in the context of cancer. Consistent with previous research, symptoms negatively impacted their lives, and their representations include an understanding of how symptoms interact. Few participants described their symptoms within the larger context of multimorbidity. Future research is needed to determine how symptom representations impact their communication patterns with providers and coping behaviors.

Worse Morning Energy Profiles Are Associated with Significant Levels of Stress and Decrements in Resilience in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Evidence suggests that lower levels of morning energy are associated with higher levels of stress and lower levels of resilience in patients receiving chemotherapy. Study purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles; evaluate for differences among the profiles in demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as measures of stress, resilience, and coping.

METHODS

A total of 1,343 outpatients receiving chemotherapy completed a demographic questionnaire and measures of global, cancer-related, and cumulative life stress, and resilience at study enrollment. Morning energy was assessed using the Lee Fatigue Scale at six time points over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct morning energy profiles. Differences among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Three morning energy profiles were identified (i.e., High (17.3%), Low (60.3%), Very Low (22.4%)). Compared to High class, the other two morning energy classes were less likely to be employed; had a lower functional status and a higher comorbidity burden; and were more likely to self-report depression and back pain. For all three types of stress, significant differences were found among the three classes with scores that demonstrated a dose response effect (i.e., High < Low < Very Low; as decrements in morning energy increased, stress scores increased). Compared to High class, Very Low class reported higher rates of physical and sexual abuse. The resilience scores exhibited a dose response effect as well (i.e., High > Low > Very Low). Patients with the two worst energy profiles reported a higher use of disengagement coping strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight the complex relationships among decrements in morning energy, various types of stress, resilience, and coping in patients undergoing chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Clinicians need to assess for stress and adverse childhood experiences to develop individualized management plans to increase patients' energy levels.

Living With and Beyond Cancer With Comorbid Conditions: Qualitative Insights to Understand Psychosocial Support Needs

INTRODUCTION

There is a pressing need to understand and explore the complex experiences and psychosocial support needs of people LWBC-CM and their informal caregivers, to inform survivorship and supportive care interventions.

METHODS

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with people LWBC-CM and their informal caregivers in Scotland, invited via primary care. One-to-one, face-to-face interviews were conducted with informed consent exploring experiences of symptoms, psychosocial support needs and interactions with health services. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach.

RESULTS

Forty-one people LWBC-CM and twenty-three informal caregivers were interviewed. Four themes were identified: the Physical and Psychological Impact of Cancer and Comorbidity, Dominant Storie-Prioritising Conditions and Making Sense of Illness, Navigating Health Services and Treatments and Caring for People with Complex Health Conditions. Type and severity of conditions mediated people's experiences and daily living. Complex fatigue-fatigue arising from a number of health conditions-dominated symptomology. Participants navigated multiple appointments and complex medication regimes. Patients identified the need for acknowledgement of other chronic conditions and for streamlined care provision. Mutual caring and social isolation were also identified as part of the caring relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a mandate to address the psychosocial support needs of people LWBC-CM, and their informal carers, given the burden of treatment for cancer survivors with moderate to severe complex conditions as they navigate health services.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A patient representative has been involved in all stages of the study from development of the application through study design, commenting on documentation, analysis of transcripts and writing the manuscript. They are included as an author on the manuscript.

Tailored Self-Management App to Support Older Adults With Cancer and Multimorbidity: Development and Usability Testing

BACKGROUND

Globally, cancer predominates in adults aged older than 60 years, and 70% of older adults have ≥1 chronic condition. Cancer self-management interventions can improve symptom management and confidence, but few interventions target the complex needs of older adults with cancer and multimorbidity. Despite growing evidence of digital health tools in cancer care, there is a paucity of theoretically grounded digital self-management supports for older adults. Many apps for older adults have not been co-designed with older adults to ensure that they are tailored to their specific needs, which would increase usability and uptake.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to report on the user evaluations of a self- and symptom-management app to support older adults living with cancer and multimorbidity.

METHODS

This study used Grey's self-management framework, a design thinking approach, and involved older adults with lived experiences of cancer to design a medium-fidelity app prototype. Older adults with cancer or caregivers were recruited through community organizations or support groups to participate in co-designing or evaluations of the app. Data from interviews were iteratively integrated into the design process and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 15 older adults and 3 caregivers (n=18) participated in this study: 10 participated (8 older adults and 2 caregivers) in the design of the low-fidelity prototype, and 10 evaluated (9 older adults and 1 caregiver) the medium-fidelity prototype (2 older adults participated in both phases). Participants emphasized the importance of tracking functions to make sense of information across physical symptoms and psychosocial aspects; a clear display; and the organization of notes and reminders to communicate with care providers. Participants also emphasized the importance of medication initiation or cessation reminders to mitigate concerns related to polypharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

This app has the potential to support the complex health care needs of older adults with cancer, creating a "home base" for symptom management and support. The findings from this study will position the researchers to conduct feasibility testing and real-world implementation.

Multi-morbidity and its association with common cancer diagnoses: a UK Biobank prospective study

BACKGROUND

Whilst multi-morbidity is known to be a concern in people with cancer, very little is known about the risk of cancer in multi-morbid patients. This study aims to investigate the risk of being diagnosed with lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer associated with multi-morbidity.

METHODS

We investigated the association between multi-morbidity and subsequent risk of cancer diagnosis in UK Biobank. Cox models were used to estimate the relative risks of each cancer of interest in multi-morbid participants, using the Cambridge Multimorbidity Score. The extent to which reverse causation, residual confounding and ascertainment bias may have impacted on the findings was robustly investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 436,990 participants included in the study who were cancer-free at baseline, 21.6% (99,965) were multi-morbid (≥ 2 diseases). Over a median follow-up time of 10.9 [IQR 10.0-11.7] years, 9,019 prostate, 7,994 breast, 5,241 colorectal, and 3,591 lung cancers were diagnosed. After exclusion of the first year of follow-up, there was no clear association between multi-morbidity and risk of colorectal, prostate or breast cancer diagnosis. Those with ≥ 4 diseases at recruitment had double the risk of a subsequent lung cancer diagnosis compared to those with no diseases (HR 2.00 [95% CI 1.70-2.35] p for trend < 0.001). These findings were robust to sensitivity analyses aimed at reducing the impact of reverse causation, residual confounding from known cancer risk factors and ascertainment bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with multi-morbidity are at an increased risk of lung cancer diagnosis. While this association did not appear to be due to common sources of bias in observational studies, further research is needed to understand what underlies this association.

Caregivers’ contribution to self-care for patients treated with oral anticancer agents: A qualitative descriptive study

PURPOSE

To adequately manage oral anticancer agents (OAAs) therapy, appropriate self-care behaviours must be implemented. Informal caregivers could support and contribute to patient self-care. This study aimed to explore and describe the caregiver contribution to self-care and their related experience of caring among informal caregivers of patients on OAAs.

METHODS

Qualitative descriptive design. We conducted semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed, read in depth, and analysed with deductive and inductive content analysis, according to Mayring. Adult informal caregivers (>18 years) of elderly patients (>65 years) with solid malignancies undergoing OAAs therapy for at least 3 months were included.

FINDINGS

Twenty-three caregivers were interviewed with mean age of 57,2 (SD ± 15,8). A total of 18 codes from the qualitative content analysis were found, of which ten were referred to caregiver contribution and classified into the three dimensions of self-care maintenance (i.e. behaviours to maintain illness stable), self-care monitoring (i.e., tracking symptoms and side effects), and self-care management (i.e., management of worsening symptoms), according to the Middle Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illnesses. The eight codes on caregiver experience were aggregated into two main themes: negative aspects (i.e., burden, emotional state, self-denial, social isolation) and positive aspects of caregiving.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare professionals should consider the importance of caregiver role in supporting their loved one treated with OAAs, also taking into account their needs to prevent burdensome situations. A holistic view in which a patient-centred approach is established should be encouraged through the communication and education of the dyad.

Caregivers to older adults require support: A scoping review of their priorities

The vast majority of older adults who are chronically ill rely on informal caregivers for support. Caregivers often require additional support to facilitate their role. To the best of our knowledge, there has yet to be a collation of caregiver-identified priorities for support. Using existing research, this scoping review provides a comprehensive picture of what caregivers have indicated as priorities for support. Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework guides this review. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases on July 2, 2021. We selected databases based on their relevance to nursing, health and social science. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed research of any design, a sample population of caregivers to older adults (>55 years), manuscripts published in English and the priorities for caregiver support identified by caregivers themselves. We screened a total of 3591 records, and 33 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies were from geographic settings across the globe and used various quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method study designs. In our synthesis, we quantified the identified priorities within the studies using coding and content analysis. We present the following list of caregiver-identified priorities: (1) orientation to the caregiving role; (2) self-care and respite; (3) adapting healthcare; (4) improved supports; (5) information needs; (6) access to resources; (7) financial assistance. Policymakers, healthcare professionals and non-profit organisations can use evidence from this review to guide decisions when developing support services and interventions for caregivers.

Multimorbidity in patients living with and beyond cancer: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

The number of people living with and beyond cancer is increasing rapidly. Many of them will experience ongoing physical or psychological sequelae as a result of their original cancer diagnosis or comorbidities arising from risk factors common to cancers and other long-term conditions. This poses the complex problem of managing cancer as a 'chronic' illness along with other existing comorbidities. This scoping review aims to map the literature available on multimorbidity in patients living with and beyond cancer, to explore, quantify and understand the impact of comorbid illnesses to inform work around cancer care in UK primary care settings.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This review will be guided by Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's manual for scoping reviews. A systematic literature search using Medical Subject Heading and text words related to cancer survivors and multimorbidity will be performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Web of Science, from 1990. Results will be described in a narrative style, reported in extraction tables and diagrams, and where appropriate in themes and text.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The scoping review will undertake secondary analysis of published literature; therefore, ethics committee approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented in relevant conferences. The scoping review will inform understanding of the burden of multimorbidity for cancer survivors, thus allow families, practitioners, clinicians and researchers to take the steps necessary to improve patient-centred care.

The Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults with Chronic Illness: Results of a Quality Improvement Survey

Adolescent and young adults (AYAs) with chronic illnesses cope with complex issues that require unique psychological support and healthcare services to reduce psychosocial difficulties, improve disease management, and facilitate positive transitions to adult care. Engaging patients and caregivers can help providers understand the specific needs of this population and identify the perceived areas of support. The purpose of this quality improvement initiative is to assess the needs of AYAs with chronic medical conditions at a large government research hospital. Eighty-nine AYA patients (age = 23.5 years; range 13–34) with neurofibromatosis type 1, cancer, primary immunodeficiencies, or sickle cell disease, and a sample of caregivers (n = 37, age = 52 years; range: 41–65), completed an anonymized survey that assessed their preferences for a wide range of informational and service-related needs. The results indicate an overwhelming desire for information about general health and wellbeing and disease-specific medical knowledge. The most endorsed item was the need for more information about an individual’s medical condition (72%), which was a primary concern across disease, racial, and gender groups. Demographic and disease-specific needs were also identified. Thus, providing information to AYA patients and caregivers is a critical and largely unmet component of care, which requires the development and implementation of targeted educational and psychosocial interventions.

Exploring Perceptions of Technology Use to Support Self-Management Among Older Adults with Cancer and Multimorbidities

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to explore and describe how older adults engage with technology to support cancer self-management behaviors, particularly as they live with multimorbidity.

DATA SOURCES

We used a qualitative descriptive approach and semi-structured interviews with older adults with cancer who had at least one other chronic condition. Two authors analyzed the data using a descriptive thematic analysis approach using NVivo 12 software.

CONCLUSION

We found that older adults are interested in, if not already, engaging with technology and internet searching to manage their cancer diagnosis and treatment. Data were grouped into three themes: (1) Using technology to take control; (2) Confidence in technology supports competence in self-management; and (3) Desired features for future interventions. Participants felt they might need extra support learning how to craft a search, filter facts, and digest information from the internet to manage their cancer. Those who reported using technology to keep records about their health made more statements reflecting confidence in their technology usage.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Older adults are interested in engaging technology to support self-management. The specific implications that arise from this study are that (1) older adults' interest in engaging with technology has a unique potential to support foundations for self-management behaviors and activities and (2) empowering self-management behaviors and attitudes through technology may result in better treatment outcomes, as evidenced by increased capabilities in the six core self-management skills.