Redescription of Opalina triangulata (Heterokonta, Opalinea) from Fejervarya limnocharis based on morphological and molecular data

Integrated overview of stramenopile ecology, taxonomy, and heterotrophic origin

Stramenopiles represent a significant proportion of aquatic and terrestrial biota. Most biologists can name a few, but these are limited to the phototrophic (e.g. diatoms and kelp) or parasitic species (e.g. oomycetes, Blastocystis), with free-living heterotrophs largely overlooked. Though our attention is slowly turning towards heterotrophs, we have only a limited understanding of their biology due to a lack of cultured models. Recent metagenomic and single-cell investigations have revealed the species richness and ecological importance of stramenopiles-especially heterotrophs. However, our lack of knowledge of the cell biology and behaviour of these organisms leads to our inability to match species to their particular ecological functions. Because photosynthetic stramenopiles are studied independently of their heterotrophic relatives, they are often treated separately in the literature. Here, we present stramenopiles as a unified group with shared synapomorphies and evolutionary history. We introduce the main lineages, describe their important biological and ecological traits, and provide a concise update on the origin of the ochrophyte plastid. We highlight the crucial role of heterotrophs and mixotrophs in our understanding of stramenopiles with the goal of inspiring future investigations in taxonomy and life history. To understand each of the many diversifications within stramenopiles-towards autotrophy, osmotrophy, or parasitism-we must understand the ancestral heterotrophic flagellate from which they each evolved. We hope the following will serve as a primer for new stramenopile researchers or as an integrative refresher to those already in the field.

The Genome of the Mitochondrion-Related Organelle in Cepedea longa, a Large Endosymbiotic Opalinid Inhabiting the Recta of Frogs

Mitochondrion-related organelles (MROs) are loosely defined as degenerated mitochondria in anaerobic and microaerophilic lineages. Opalinids are commonly regarded as commensals in the guts of cold-blooded amphibians. It may represent an intermediate adaptation stage between the conventional aerobic mitochondria and derived anaerobic MROs. In the present study, we sequenced and analyzed the MRO genome of Cepedea longa. It has a linear MRO genome with large inverted repeat gene regions at both ends. Compared to Blastocystis and Proteromonas lacertae, the MRO genome of C. longa has a higher G + C content and repeat sequences near the central region. Although three Opalinata species have different morphological characteristics, phylogenetic analyses based on eight concatenated nad genes indicate that they are close relatives. The phylogenetic analysis showed that C. longa clustered with P. lacertae with strong support. The 18S rRNA gene-based phylogeny resolved the Opalinea clade as a sister clade to Karotomorpha, which then further grouped with Proteromonas. The paraphyly of Proteromonadea needs to be verified due to the lack of MRO genomes for key species, such as Karotomorpha, Opalina and Protoopalina. Besides, our dataset and analyses offered slight support for the paraphyly of Bigyra.

Morphological description of Opalina obtrigonoidea Metcalf, 1923 (Heterokonta, Opalinea) from Duttaphrynus melanostictus and evaluation of the ITS region as a suitable genetic marker for inter-species identification in Opalina

The redescription of Opalina obtrigonoidea Metcalf, 1923, collected from the rectum of the toads Duttaphrynus melanostictus, is presented in this paper based on detailed morphological information and molecular data. Our results revealed that O. obtrigonoidea varies greatly in body dimensions. Its morphological characteristics allow its differentiation from Opalina undulata. Surprisingly, we sequenced its SSU rDNA-ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2-LSU rDNA (5' end) and found the SSU rDNA of O. obtrigonoidea is nearly identical to that of O. undulata. However, there are differences in both the ITS1 and ITS2 regions that allow their distinction and confirm the morphological differences. Our results indicate that O. obtrigonoidea and O. undulata are closely related species in which morphological and genetic markers have evolved at different speeds. Due to this, the SSU rDNA gene may not be a valid marker for inter-species identification in Opalina, but the ITS is a valid marker for differentiating species in this genus.