Involvement of chemical mediators in nasal allergic responses of HDC-KO mice

Histamine drives severity of innate inflammation via histamine 4 receptor in murine experimental colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients exhibit elevated histamine, but how histamine exacerbates disease is unclear as targeting histamine 1 receptor (H1R) or H2R is clinically ineffective. We hypothesized that histamine functioned instead through the other colon-expressed histamine receptor, H4R. In humans, UC patient biopsies exhibited increased H4R RNA and protein expression over control tissue, and immunohistochemistry showed that H4R was in proximity to immunopathogenic myeloperoxidase-positive neutrophils. To characterize this association further, we employed both the oxazolone (Ox)- and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced experimental colitis mouse models and also found upregulated H4R expression. Mast cell (MC)-derived histamine and H4R drove experimental colitis, as H4R^-/- mice had lower symptom scores, neutrophil-recruitment mediators (colonic interleukin-6 (IL-6), CXCL1, CXCL2), and mucosal neutrophil infiltration than wild-type (WT) mice, as did MC-deficient Kit^W-sh/W-sh mice reconstituted with histidine decarboxylase-deficient (HDC^-/-) bone marrow-derived MCs compared with WT-reconstituted mice; adaptive responses remained intact. Furthermore, Rag2^-/- × H4R^-/- mice had reduced survival, exacerbated colitis, and increased bacterial translocation than Rag2^-/- mice, revealing an innate protective antibacterial role for H4R. Taken together, colonic MC-derived histamine initiates granulocyte infiltration into the colonic mucosa through H4R, suggesting alternative therapeutic targets beyond adaptive immunity for UC.

Antihistamines suppress upregulation of histidine decarboxylase gene expression with potencies different from their binding affinities for histamine H1 receptor in toluene 2,4-diisocyanate-sensitized rats

Antihistamines inhibit histamine signaling by blocking histamine H1 receptor (H1R) or suppressing H1R signaling as inverse agonists. The H1R gene is upregulated in patients with pollinosis, and its expression level is correlated with the severity of nasal symptoms. Here, we show that antihistamine suppressed upregulation of histidine decarboxylase (HDC) mRNA expression in patients with pollinosis, and its expression level was correlated with that of H1R mRNA. Certain antihistamines, including mepyramine and diphenhydramine, suppress toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI)-induced upregulation of HDC gene expression and increase HDC activity in TDI-sensitized rats. However, d-chlorpheniramine did not demonstrate any effect. The potencies of antihistamine suppressive effects on HDC mRNA elevation were different from their H1R receptor binding affinities. In TDI-sensitized rats, the potencies of antihistamine inhibitory effects on sneezing in the early phase were related to H1R binding. In contrast, the potencies of their inhibitory effects on sneezing in the late phase were correlated with those of suppressive effects on HDC mRNA elevation. Data suggest that in addition to the antihistaminic and inverse agonistic activities, certain antihistamines possess additional properties unrelated to receptor binding and alleviate nasal symptoms in the late phase by inhibiting synthesis and release of histamine by suppressing HDC gene transcription.

Effect of Intranasal Azelastine on Substance P Release in Perennial Nonallergic Rhinitis Patients

Background

Rhinitis symptoms can be produced or augmented by neural mechanisms. Azelastine, a pharmacologic agent with potent H1-receptor blocking activity can inhibit the release of various mediators implicated in the pathogenesis of nasal hyperresponsiveness. The therapeutic benefits of topical intranasal azelastine on symptoms of perennial nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) are in part because of an impact on neural mechanisms. Assessment of changes in the concentration of substance P (SP) in nasal lavage fluid before and after saline hypertonic challenge may be a means of assessing the effect of intranasal azelastine on neuropeptide release and severity of rhinitis symptoms.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with perennial NAR (negative skin-prick tests with inhalant allergens and concentration of total IgE in the normal range) were studied. Thirteen of 23 patients were treated with intranasal azelastine 0.15% spray at a dosage of 2 sprays (137 micrograms/spray) twice daily for 10 days. The control group consisted of 10 untreated patients with rhinitis. Nasal provocation using 4.5% saline solution was after 15 minutes by lavage before and after 10 days of treatment with intranasal azelastine. The concentration of SP in nasal lavage fluid was determined by enzyme immunoassay methods.

Results

Nasal lavage fluid baseline concentrations of SP were similar in both groups. After azelastine treatment, significantly greater concentrations of SP were seen in nasal lavage fluid 15 minutes after hypertonic saline challenge in the untreated patients (56.8 ± 13.8 pg/mL) in comparison with azelastine-treated patients (44.5 ± 16.5 pg/mL; p < 0.05). Total vasomotor rhinitis symptoms scores were substantially reduced in the azelastine-treated subjects compared with the control group.

Conclusion

Azelastine intranasal spray reduces SP release into nasal lavage fluid of NAR patients immediately after hypertonic nasal saline challenge. Reduction of neuropeptide release may be an important aspect of the clinical efficacy of topical azelastine in perennial NAR patients.

Suppression of antibody-mediated arthritis in mice by Fab fragments of the mediating antibodies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Fab fragments (Fabs) of antibodies maintain the ability to bind specific antigens, but lack the binding site for complement as well as the site for binding to receptors on effector cells, such as macrophages that play an important role in inflammation. In the present study, we investigated whether Fabs specific for ovalbumin (OVA) were specifically able to suppress anti-OVA antibody-mediated arthritis (AOA-MA) in mice.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

AOA-MA was induced by i.v. injection of purified anti-OVA antibodies into naïve mice followed by intra-articular (left ankle) challenge with the antigen. Anti-OVA Fabs prepared by digestion of anti-OVA antibodies with papain were injected i.v. immediately after administration of the intact antibodies. Normal Fabs were used as a control. Arthritis was assessed by thickness of the joints (caliper) and by histology of paw sections, stained with haematoxylin and eosin.

KEY RESULTS

AOA-MA was markedly suppressed by anti-OVA Fabs, but not by control Fabs. Histologically, mice treated with control Fabs showed marked oedema of synovial tissues with a large number of inflammatory cells including neutrophils, whereas animals given anti-OVA Fabs had mild oedema of the synovium and sparse infiltration of such cells. The antigen-specific suppression of joint inflammation by anti-OVA Fabs was associated with reduced consumption of complement. In vitro studies showed that anti-OVA Fabs significantly blocked the binding of intact anti-OVA antibodies to OVA.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Antibody-mediated arthritis appears to be specifically down-regulated by Fabs that competitively inhibit the binding of antibodies to antigens.

Antidiabetic properties of the histamine H3 receptor protean agonist proxyfan

Proxyfan is a histamine H3 receptor protean agonist that can produce a spectrum of pharmacological effects including agonist, inverse agonist, and antagonist. We have discovered that proxyfan (10 mg/kg orally) significantly improved glucose excursion after an ip glucose tolerance test in either lean or high-fat/cholesterol diet-induced obese mice. It also reduced plasma glucose levels comparable to that of metformin (300 mg/kg orally) in a nongenetic type 2 diabetes mouse model. The dose-dependent decrease in glucose excursion correlated with inhibition of ex vivo H3 receptor binding in the cerebral cortex. In addition, glucose levels were significantly reduced compared with vehicle-treated mice after intracerebroventricular administration of proxyfan, suggesting the involvement of central H3 receptors. Proxyfan-induced reduction of glucose excursion was not observed in the H3 receptor knockout mice, suggesting that proxyfan mediates this effect through H3 receptors. Proxyfan reduced glucose excursion by significantly increasing plasma insulin levels in a glucose-independent manner. However, no difference in insulin sensitivity was observed in proxyfan-treated mice. The H1 receptor antagonist chlorpheniramine and the H2 receptor antagonist zolantidine had modest effects on glucose excursion, and neither inhibited the glucose excursion reduced by proxyfan. The H3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, thioperamide, had weaker effects on glucose excursion compared with proxyfan, whereas the H3 receptor agonist imetit did not affect glucose excursion. In conclusion, these findings demonstrate, for the first time, that manipulation of central histamine H3 receptor by proxyfan can significantly improve glucose excursion by increasing plasma insulin levels via a glucose-independent mechanism.