Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists modulate brain noradrenaline and serotonin interactions

In vivo electrophysiological recordings of the effects of antidepressant drugs

Antidepressant drugs are a standard biological treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders, yet relatively little is known about their electrophysiologic and synaptic effects on mood systems that set moment-to-moment emotional tone. In vivo electrical recording of local field potentials (LFPs) and single neuron spiking has been crucial for elucidating important details of neural processing and control in many other systems, and yet electrical approaches have not been broadly applied to the actions of antidepressants on mood-related circuits. Here we review the literature encompassing electrophysiologic effects of antidepressants in animals, including studies that examine older drugs, and extending to more recently synthesized novel compounds, as well as rapidly acting antidepressants. The existing studies on neuromodulator-based drugs have focused on recording in the brainstem nuclei, with much less known about their effects on prefrontal or sensory cortex. Studies on neuromodulatory drugs have moreover focused on single unit firing patterns with less emphasis on LFPs, whereas the rapidly acting antidepressant literature shows the opposite trend. In a synthesis of this information, we hypothesize that all classes of antidepressants could have common final effects on limbic circuitry. Whereas NMDA receptor blockade may induce a high powered gamma oscillatory state via direct and fast alteration of glutamatergic systems in mood-related circuits, neuromodulatory antidepressants may induce similar effects over slower timescales, corresponding with the timecourse of response in patients, while resetting synaptic excitatory versus inhibitory signaling to a normal level. Thus, gamma signaling may provide a biomarker (or “neural readout”) of the therapeutic effects of all classes of antidepressants.

Elements toward novel therapeutic targeting of the adrenergic system

Adrenergic receptors belong to the family of the G protein coupled receptors that represent important targets in the modern pharmacotherapies. Studies on different physiological and pathophysiological properties of the adrenergic system have led to novel evidences and theories that suggest novel possible targeting of such system in a variety of pathologies and disorders, even beyond the classical known therapeutic possibilities. Herein, those advances have been illustrated with selected concepts and different examples. Furthermore, we illustrated the applications and the therapeutic implications that such findings and advances might have in the contexts of experimental pharmacology, therapeutics and clinic. We hope that the content of this work will guide researches devoted to the adrenergic aspects that combine neurosciences with pharmacology.

Psychostimulants, antidepressants and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists ('motor disinhibitors') have overlapping, but distinct, effects on monoamine transmission: the involvement of L-type Ca2+ channels and implications for the treatment of ADHD

Both psychostimulants and antidepressants target monoamine transporters and, as a consequence, augment monoamine transmission. These two groups of drugs also increase motor activity in preclinical behavioural screens for antidepressants. Substance P-preferring receptor (NK1R) antagonists similarly increase both motor activity in these tests and monoamine transmission in the brain. In this article, the neurochemical and behavioural responses to these three groups of drugs are compared. It becomes evident that NK1R antagonists represent a distinct class of compounds ('motor disinhibitors') that differ substantially from both psychostimulants and antidepressants, especially during states of heightened arousal or stress. Also, all three groups of drugs influence the activation of voltage-gated Ca(v)1.2 and Ca(v)1.3 L-type channels (LTCCs) in the brain, albeit in different ways. This article discusses evidence that points to disruption of these functional interactions between NK1R and LTCCs as a contributing factor in the cognitive and behavioural abnormalities that are prominent features of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Arising from this is the interesting possibility that the hyperactivity and impulsivity (as in ADHD) and psychomotor retardation (as in depression) reflect opposite poles of a behavioural continuum. A better understanding of this pharmacological network could help explain why psychostimulants augment motor behaviour during stress (e.g., in preclinical screens for antidepressants) and yet reduce locomotor activity and impulsivity in ADHD. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.

Balance disturbances in asthmatic patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate balance control in asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Thirty subjects with controlled persistent asthma were compared with 30 non-asthmatic subjects who were matched by age and sex. Individuals who had received psychiatric treatment, demonstrated chronic musculoskeletal pain, had limited joint movements, or showed vestibular or other equilibrium disorders were excluded from both the groups to avoid biomechanical bias in the dynamic posturography. Balance control was evaluated with the subject standing still on a force platform under four different sensory test conditions. These conditions combined the subject's eyes being opened or closed with a fixed or mobile force platform. A mobile platform provides a somatosensory perturbation, and when associated with the eyes closed condition, only vestibular information is available to moderate balance control. Sensory manipulation provides a more sensitive condition to differentiate postural control between populations or pathologies. Data were sampled at 100 Hz in three 20-second trials and four postural conditions were assessed. The center of pressure (CoP) displacement values were used to calculate area and velocity in the medial-lateral and forward-backward directions. A two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measurements was applied to the data.

RESULTS

In comparison to the control group, the asthma group demonstrated a greater area of CoP displacement in conditions using the mobile force platform (with eyes opened or closed) and a higher velocity in forward-backward direction on the mobile platform with the eyes closed.

CONCLUSION

Asthmatic individuals presented a greater area for the CoP displacement under somatosensory perturbations and a higher velocity in the forward-backward direction when vestibular information only was made available. Our data suggest that balance needs to be evaluated in asthmatic patients.

Activation of NK₁ receptors in the locus coeruleus induces analgesia through noradrenergic-mediated descending inhibition in a rat model of neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The locus coeruleus (LC) is a major source of noradrenergic projections to the dorsal spinal cord, and thereby plays an important role in the modulation of nociceptive information. The LC receives inputs from substance P (SP)-containing fibres from other regions, and expresses the NK(1) tachykinin receptor, a functional receptor for SP. In the present study, we investigated the roles of SP in the LC in neuropathic pain.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the left sciatic nerve was performed in rats to induce neuropathic pain. After development of neuropathic pain, SP was injected into the LC and the nocifensive behaviours were assessed. The involvement of noradrenergic descending inhibition in SP-induced analgesia was examined by i.t. administration of yohimbine, an α(2) -adrenoceptor antagonist. NK(1) receptor expression in the LC was examined by immunohistochemistry.

KEY RESULTS

In CCI rats, mechanical allodynia was alleviated by SP injection into the LC. These effects were abolished by prior injection of WIN 51708, an NK(1) receptor antagonist, into the LC or i.t. treatment with yohimbine. NK(1) receptor-like immunoreactivity was observed in noradrenergic neurons throughout the LC in intact rats, and remained unchanged after CCI.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

SP in the LC exerted analgesic effects on neuropathic pain through NK(1) receptor activation and resulted in facilitation of spinal noradrenergic transmission. Accordingly, manipulation of the SP/NK(1) receptor signalling pathway in the LC may be a promising strategy for effective treatment of neuropathic pain.

S41744, a dual neurokinin (NK)1 receptor antagonist and serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor with potential antidepressant properties: a comparison to aprepitant (MK869) and paroxetine

Though neurokinin(1) (NK(1)) receptors are implicated in depressed states and their treatment, selective antagonists have disappointed in clinical trials. Accordingly, we designed a novel ligand, S41744 (2-piperazin-1-yl-indan-2-carboxylic-acid-(3-chloro-5-fluoro-benzyl)-methyl-amide), which both blocks NK(1) receptors and interferes with serotonin (5-HT) reuptake. S41744 mimicked the selective antagonist aprepitant in binding human (h)NK(1) receptors and in antagonising Substance-P-mediated Extracellular-Regulated-Kinase phosphorylation (pK(B), 7.7). Further, it dose-dependently (0.63-40.0 mg/kg, i.p.) displaced ex vivo [(3)H]-[Sar(9),Met(O(2))(11)]-Substance P binding to gerbil striatum, attenuated formalin-induced hind-paw licking in gerbils, and antagonised locomotion induced by i.c.v. administration of the NK(1) agonist GR73632 to guinea pigs. Like paroxetine, S41744 recognised h5-HT transporters, reduced synaptosomal uptake of 5-HT (pK(B), 7.9), and dose-dependently (0.63-10.0 mg/kg) elevated dialysis levels of 5-HT in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of freely-moving guinea pigs. Further, S41744 increased extracellular levels of 5-HT in frontal cortex and hippocampus of rats to a greater extent than paroxetine, and its inhibitory influence upon serotonergic perikarya was blunted relative to its affinity for 5-HT transporters. S41744 more potently blocked stress-induced vocalizations in guinea pigs than aprepitant and paroxetine, and it was active in forced-swim and marble-burying procedures of putative antidepressant properties in mice. While aprepitant displayed anxiolytic actions in stress-induced foot-tapping and social interaction tests in gerbils, paroxetine was anxiogenic and S41744 "neutral", reflecting balanced NK(1) antagonism and suppression of 5-HT reuptake. Moreover, S41744 shared anxiolytic actions of aprepitant in the rat Vogel Conflict Test. In conclusion, S41744 is an innovative NK(1) antagonist/5-HT reuptake inhibitor justifying further evaluation for treatment of stress-related disorders.

Lithium chloride regulation of the substance P encoding preprotachykinin a, Tac1 gene in rat hippocampal primary cells

In rat hippocampal cultures, the preprotachykinin A (PPTA/Tac1) gene, which encodes the neuropeptide substance P, is regulated by the action of lithium. We used reporter gene and expression constructs to demonstrate that this mechanism of action of lithium is mediated via a previously characterised cis-regulatory Ebox element in the proximal promoter, which binds members of the basic Helix-Loop-Helix family of transcription factors. Consistent with this, in hippocampal cells, both the expression of the endogenous gene and the function of this promoter element are differentially regulated by the basic Helix-Loop-Helix factors, upstream stimulatory factor 1 and 2 (USF1/2). In addition, the genes for USF1 and USF2 are differentially regulated by lithium in these cells. Our data implicate USF1 as a major regulator of the action of lithium on the proximal PPTA promoter.

Neurokinin-1 receptors (NK1R:s), alcohol consumption, and alcohol reward in mice

RATIONALE

Reduced voluntary alcohol consumption was recently found in neurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R)-deficient (KO) mice. It remains unknown whether this reflects developmental effects or direct regulation of alcohol consumption by NK1R:s, and whether the reduced consumption reflects motivational effects.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to obtain an expanded preclinical validation of NK1R antagonism as a candidate therapeutic mechanism in alcohol use disorders.

METHODS

The NK1R antagonist L-703,606 and NK1R KO mice were used in models that assess alcohol-related behaviors.

RESULTS

L-703,606 (3-10 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently suppressed alcohol intake in WT C57BL/6 mice under two-bottle free choice conditions but was ineffective in NK1R KO:s, demonstrating the receptor specificity of the effect. Alcohol reward, measured as conditioned place preference for alcohol, was reduced by NK1R receptor deletion in a gene dose-dependent manner. In a model where escalation of intake is induced by repeated cycles of deprivation and access, escalation was seen in WT mice, but not in KO mice. Among behavioral phenotypes previously reported for NK1R mice on a mixed background, an analgesic-like phenotype was maintained on the C57BL/6 background used here, while KO:s and WT:s did not differ in anxiety- and depression-related behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute blockade of NK1R:s mimics the effects of NKR1 gene deletion on alcohol consumption, supporting a direct rather than developmental role of the receptor in regulation of alcohol intake. Inactivation of NK1R:s critically modulates alcohol reward and escalation, two key characteristics of addiction. These data provide critical support for NK1R antagonism as a candidate mechanism for treatment of alcoholism.

Neuronal pathways linking substance P to drug addiction and stress

Accumulating evidence suggests that the neuropeptide substance P (SP) and its principal receptor neurokinin 1 (NK1) play a specific role in the behavioral response to opioids and stress that may help to initiate and maintain addictive behavior. In animal models, the NK1 receptor is required for opioids to produce their rewarding and motivational effects. SP neurotransmission is also implicated in the behavioral response to stress and in the process of drug sensitization, potentially contributing to vulnerability to addiction or relapse. However, SP neurotransmission only plays a minor role in opioid-mediated antinociception and the development of opioid tolerance. Moreover, the effects of SP on addiction-related behavior are selective for opioids and evidence supporting a role in the response to cocaine or psychostimulants is less compelling. This review will summarize the effects of SP neurotransmission on opioid-dependent behaviors and correlate them with potential contributing neural pathways. Specifically, SP neurotransmission within components of the basal forebrain particularly the nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum as well as actions within the ascending serotonin system will be emphasized. In addition, cellular- or network-level interactions between opioids and SP signaling that may underlie the specificity of their relationship will be reviewed.