Design of clinical trials for therapeutic cancer vaccines development

Insights Into Dendritic Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy: From Bench to Clinical Applications

Dendritic cells (DCs) are efficient antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and potent activators of naïve T cells. Therefore, they act as a connective ring between innate and adaptive immunity. DC subsets are heterogeneous in their ontogeny and functions. They have proven to potentially take up and process tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). In this regard, researchers have developed strategies such as genetically engineered or TAA-pulsed DC vaccines; these manipulated DCs have shown significant outcomes in clinical and preclinical models. Here, we review DC classification and address how DCs are skewed into an immunosuppressive phenotype in cancer patients. Additionally, we present the advancements in DCs as a platform for cancer immunotherapy, emphasizing the technologies used for in vivo targeting of endogenous DCs, ex vivo generated vaccines from peripheral blood monocytes, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived DCs (iPSC-DCs) to boost antitumoral immunity.

Safety and Efficacy of Personalized Cancer Vaccines in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment

Cancer immunotherapy can induce sustained responses in patients with cancers in a broad range of tissues, however, these treatments require the optimized combined therapeutic strategies. Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have lasting clinical benefit, researchers are trying to combine them with other treatment modalities, and among them the combination with personalized cancer vaccines is attractive. Neoantigens, arising from mutations in cancer cells, can elicit strong immune response without central tolerance and out-target effects, which is a truly personalized method. Growing studies show that the combination can elevate the antitumor efficacy with acceptable safety and minimal additional toxicity compared with single agent vaccine or ICI. Herein, we have searched these preclinical and clinical trials and summarized safety and efficacy of personalized cancer vaccines combined with ICIs in several malignancies. Meanwhile, we discuss the rationale of the combination and future challenges.

Personalized Cancer Vaccines: Clinical Landscape, Challenges, and Opportunities

Tremendous innovation is underway among a rapidly expanding repertoire of promising personalized immune-based treatments. Therapeutic cancer vaccines (TCVs) are attractive systemic immunotherapies that activate and expand antigen-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Our review highlights key issues impacting TCVs in clinical practice and reports on progress in development. We review the mechanism of action, immune-monitoring, dosing strategies, combinations, obstacles, and regulation of cancer vaccines. Most trials of personalized TCVs are ongoing and represent diverse platforms with predominantly early investigations of mRNA, DNA, or peptide-based targeting strategies against neoantigens in solid tumors, with many in combination immunotherapies. Multiple delivery systems, routes of administration, and dosing strategies are used. Intravenous or intramuscular administration is common, including delivery by lipid nanoparticles. Absorption and biodistribution impact antigen uptake, expression, and presentation, affecting the strength, speed, and duration of immune response. The emerging trials illustrate the complexity of developing this class of innovative immunotherapies. Methodical testing of the multiple potential factors influencing immune responses, as well as refined quantitative methodologies to facilitate optimal dosing strategies, could help resolve uncertainty of therapeutic approaches. To increase the likelihood of success in bringing these medicines to patients, several unique development challenges must be overcome.

Tumorigenic and Immunogenic Properties of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: a Promising Cancer Vaccine

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are mainly characterized by their unlimited proliferation abilities and potential to develop into almost any cell type. The creation of this technology has been of great interest to many scientific fields, especially regenerative biology. However, concerns about the safety of iPSC application in transplantation have arisen due to the tumorigenic and immunogenic properties of iPSCs. This review will briefly introduce the developing history of somatic reprogramming and applications of iPSC technology in regenerative medicine. In addition, the review will highlight two challenges to the efficient usage of iPSCs and the underlying mechanisms of these challenges. Finally, the review will discuss the expanding application of iPSC technology in cancer immunotherapy as a potential cancer vaccine and its advantages in auxiliary treatment compared with oncofetal antigen-based and embryonic stem cell (ESC)-based vaccines.

Novel Genetic Melanoma Vaccines Based on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells or Melanosphere-Derived Stem-Like Cells Display High Efficacy in a Murine Tumor Rejection Model

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have elicited renewed interest due to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The role of these vaccines is to induce specific effector cells for killing cancer cells. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are responsible for tumor growth and progression. Accordingly, they are targets for various cancer therapies, including immunotherapy. Here, we demonstrate the effectiveness of melanoma vaccines composed of genetically modified tumor cells admixed with melanoma stem-like cells (MSC) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Two vaccines were constructed. The first vaccine contained cells derived from B16F10 melanospheres (SFs) with CSC characteristics. The second vaccine contained syngeneic murine induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs). iPSCs or SF cells were admixed with B16F10 cells, modified with the designer cytokine Hyper-IL6(H6) (B16/H6). Control mice received B16/H6 cells, B16F10 cells or PBS. Immunization with either vaccine significantly inhibited tumor growth and increased disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in C57BL/6 mice. Mice treated with the SF or iPSC vaccine demonstrated increased activation of the immune response in the vaccination site and tumor microenvironment compared to those treated with B16/H6, B16F10 or PBS. Higher infiltration of dendritic cells (DCs) monocytes, and natural killer (NK) cells; lower numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs); higher levels of the cytokines INFγ and IL-12 were observed with the novel vaccines than with the control treatments. In vitro restimulation of splenocytes derived from mice immunized with B16F10 cell, SF cell or miPSC lysates increased the proliferation of CD4+ T helper lymphocytes and secretion of cytokines. An increased serum titer of antibodies directed against B16F10 cells was found in mice immunized with the SF vaccine. The most effective DFS and OS extensions were reached with the miPSCs vaccine. The described results form the basis for a novel platform for the next generation of cancer vaccines composed of allogeneic cancer-specific cells modified with a molecular adjuvant gene and admixed with allogeneic miPSCs or SFs.

Re-induction using whole cell melanoma vaccine genetically modified to melanoma stem cells-like beyond recurrence extends long term survival of high risk resected patients - updated results

BACKGROUND

AGI-101H is an allogeneic gene modified whole cell therapeutic melanoma vaccine, evaluated in over 400 melanoma patients in the adjuvant and therapeutic settings. We present updated long-term survival results from two single-arm, phase II adjuvant trials (Trial 3 and Trial 5) with the focus on treatment beyond recurrence of the disease.

METHODS

Patients with resected high-risk melanoma (stage IIIB-IV) were enrolled to Trial 3 (n = 99) and Trial 5 (n = 97). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary was overall survival (OS). In the induction phase, the vaccine was administered every 2 weeks (eight times), followed by the maintenance phase every month until progression. At progression, maintenance was continued or re-induction was applied with or without surgery.

RESULTS

In Trial 3, the 10-year DFS was equal to 33.0% overall and to 52.4, 25.0, and 8.7% for stage IIIB, IIIC, and stage IV patients, respectively. In Trial 5, the overall 10-year DFS was equal to 24.2%, and to 37.5, 18.0, and 17.6% for stage IIIB, IIIC, and stage IV patients, respectively. In Trial 3, the 10-year OS was equal to 42.3% overall, and to 59.5, 37.5, and 17.4% for stage IIIB, IIIC, and stage IV patients, respectively. In Trial 5, the 10-year OS was equal to 34.3% overall and to 46.9, 28.0, and 29.4% for stage IIIB, IIIC, and stage IV patients, respectively. Among the 65 patients of Trial 3 who developed progression, 43 received re-induction with (n = 22) or without (n = 21) surgery. Two patients received surgery without re-induction. All the 22 progressing patients, who did not receive re-induction, died. Among the 75 patients of Trial 5 who experienced progression, 39 received re-induction with (n = 21) or without (n = 18) surgery. Among the 36 progressing patients who did not receive the re-induction, 35 died. Surgery and re-induction reduced (independently) the increase of mortality after progression in both trials, with the effect of re-induction reaching statistical significance in Trial 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination beyond recurrence of the disease with additional re-induction combined with surgery or alone increased long term survival of melanoma patients. However, further studies on larger patient cohorts are required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Central Evidence of Clinical Trials (EudraCT Number 2008-003373-40 ).

Whole cell melanoma vaccine genetically modified to stem cells like phenotype generates specific immune responses to ALDH1A1 and long-term survival in advanced melanoma patients

Allogeneic whole cell gene modified therapeutic melanoma vaccine (AGI-101H) comprising of two melanoma cell lines transduced with cDNA encoding fusion protein composed of IL-6 linked with the soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R), referred to as H6 was developed. H6 served as a molecular adjuvant, however, it has altered vaccine cells phenotype towards melanoma stem cells (MSC)-like with high activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase isoenzyme (ALDH1A1). AGI-101H was applied in advanced melanoma patients with non-resected and resected disease. In the adjuvant setting, it was combined with surgery in case of recurring metastases, which were surgically removed and vaccination continued. A significant fraction of AGI-101H treated melanoma patients is still alive (11–19 years). Out of 106 living patients, 39 were HLA-A2 positive and were the subject of the study. Immunization of melanoma patients resulted in the generation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells specific for ALDH1A1, which were detected in circulation by HLA-A0201 MHC dextramers loaded with ALDH1A1_88-96(LLYKLADLI) peptide. Phenotypically they were central memory CD8⁺ T cells. Re-stimulation with ALDH1A1_88-96ex vivo resulted in IFN-γ secretion and cells degranulation. Following each vaccine dose administration, the number of ALDH1A1-CD8⁺ T cells increased in circulation and returned to the previous level until next dose injection (one month). ALDH1A1-CD8⁺ T cells were also found, however in the lower number than in vaccinated patients, in the circulation of untreated melanoma with stage IV but were not found in stage II or III and healthy donors. Specific anti-ALDH1 antibodies were present in treated patients. Long-term survival suggests immuno-targeting of MSC in treated patients.

Intraperitoneal administration of a tumor-associated antigen SART3, CD40L, and GM-CSF gene-loaded polyplex micelle elicits a vaccine effect in mouse tumor models

Polyplex micelles have demonstrated biocompatibility and achieve efficient gene transfection in vivo. Here, we investigated a polyplex micelle encapsulating genes encoding the tumor-associated antigen squamous cell carcinoma antigen recognized by T cells-3 (SART3), adjuvant CD40L, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as a DNA vaccine platform in mouse tumor models with different types of major histocompatibility antigen complex (MHC). Intraperitoneally administrated polyplex micelles were predominantly found in the lymph nodes, spleen, and liver. Compared with mock controls, the triple gene vaccine significantly prolonged the survival of mice harboring peritoneal dissemination of CT26 colorectal cancer cells, of which long-term surviving mice showed complete rejection when re-challenged with CT26 tumors. Moreover, the DNA vaccine inhibited the growth and metastasis of subcutaneous CT26 and Lewis lung tumors in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, respectively, which represent different MHC haplotypes. The DNA vaccine highly stimulated both cytotoxic T lymphocyte and natural killer cell activities, and increased the infiltration of CD11c⁺ DCs and CD4⁺/CD8a⁺ T cells into tumors. Depletion of CD4⁺ or CD8a⁺ T cells by neutralizing antibodies deteriorated the anti-tumor efficacy of the DNA vaccine. In conclusion, a SART3/CD40L+GM-CSF gene-loaded polyplex micelle can be applied as a novel vaccine platform to elicit tumor rejection immunity regardless of the recipient MHC haplotype.

Recent progress in canine tumor vaccination: potential applications for human tumor vaccines

Tumor vaccination holds great promise for the treatment of cancer and research concerning tumor vaccination in dogs is of great interest for veterinary as well as human medicine. Indeed, cancer is the leading cause of death in adult dogs and companion animals are acknowledged as excellent preclinical models for human oncology. The license of the veterinary melanoma vaccine (Oncept™) and Provenge® for the treatment of prostate cancer in men established tumor vaccination as a valid treatment modality for cancer. Although the results with this and other vaccines are promising, there are still some hurdles to overcome. In this article, preclinical and clinical trials with tumor vaccines in dogs are discussed, as well as the surplus value of canine cancer patients for human medicine.

Therapeutic gene modified cell based cancer vaccines

History of cancer immunotherapy lasts for more than 120 years. In 1891 William B. Coley injected bacteria into inoperable cancer (bone sarcoma) and observed tumor shrinkage. He is recognized as the "'"Father of Immunotherapy"'". Cancer immunotherapy is based on the ability of the immune system to recognize cancer cells and to affect their growth and expansion. Beside the fact that, tumor cells are genetically distinct from their normal counterparts, and should be recognized and eliminated by immune system, the tumor associated antigens (TAAs) are often poorly immunogenic due to immunoediting. This process allows tumor to evolve during continuous interactions with the host immune system, and eventually escape from immune surveillance. Furthermore, tumor microenvironment consists of immunosuppressive cells that release immunosuppressive factors including IL-6, IL-10, IDO, TGFβ or VEGF. Interactions between cancer and stroma cells create network of immunosuppressive pathways, while activation of immune defense is inhibited. A key to successful immunotherapy is to overcome the local immunosuppression within tumor microenvironment and activate mechanisms that lead to tumor eradication. There are two clinical approaches of immunotherapy: active and passive. Active immunotherapy involves stimulation of immune response to tumor associated antigens (TAAs), either non-specifically via immunomodulating agents or specifically employing cancer vaccines. This review presents the progress and breakthroughs in design, development and clinical application of selected cell-based tumor vaccines achieved due to the generation and development of gene transfer technologies.