Selective histamine H₃ and H₄ receptor agonists exert opposite effects against the gastric lesions induced by HCl in the rat stomach

Chemical Probes for Histamine Receptor Subtypes

Ligands with different properties and different selectivity are highly needed for in vitro and in vivo studies on the (patho)physiological influence of the chemical mediator histamine and its receptor subtypes. A selection of well-described ligands for the different receptor subtypes and different studies is shown with a particular focus on affinity and selectivity. In addition, compounds with radioactive or fluorescence elements will be presented with their beneficial use for other species or different investigations.

Influence of the Novel Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist/Inverse Agonist M39 on Gastroprotection and PGE2 Production Induced by (R)-Alpha-Methylhistamine in C57BL/6 Mice

The role of histamine H3 receptors (H3Rs) in the regulation of gastroprotection and production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) as well as somatostatin remains contradictory. Therefore, the effects of the H3R antagonist/inverse agonist M39 on in vivo acidified ethanol-induced gastric ulcers and gastric acid secretion in the C57BL/6 mice were assessed. Results showed that acute systemic administration of H3R agonist (R)-α-methylhistamine (RAMH, 100 mg/kg, i.g.) significantly reduced the severity of ulcer index, increased gastric acid output, and increased mucosal PGE2 production without any alteration of somatostatin concentration in gastric juice. However, only acute systemic administration of the H2R agonist dimaprit (DIM, 10 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly decreased the level of somatostatin measured in gastric juice. Moreover, acute systemic administration of M39 (0.3 mg/kg, i.g.) abrogated the RAMH-induced increase of acid output as well as PGE2 production, but not the DIM (10 mg/kg, i.g.)-stimulated acid secretion, indicating that RAMH as well as M39 modulate the gastroprotective effects through interactions with histamine H3Rs. The present findings indicate that agonistic interaction with H3Rs is profoundly involved in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity by modulating PGE2 as well as gastric acid secretion, with no apparent role in the regulation of the inhibitory influence of somatostatin.

What We Know and What We Need to Know about Aromatic and Cationic Biogenic Amines in the Gastrointestinal Tract

Biogenic amines derived from basic and aromatic amino acids (B/A-BAs), polyamines, histamine, serotonin, and catecholamines are a group of molecules playing essential roles in many relevant physiological processes, including cell proliferation, immune response, nutrition and reproduction. All these physiological effects involve a variety of tissue-specific cellular receptors and signalling pathways, which conforms to a very complex network that is not yet well-characterized. Strong evidence has proved the importance of this group of molecules in the gastrointestinal context, also playing roles in several pathologies. This work is based on the hypothesis that integration of biomedical information helps to reach new translational actions. Thus, the major aim of this work is to combine scientific knowledge on biomolecules, metabolism and physiology of the main B/A-BAs involved in the pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal tract, in order to point out important gaps in information and other facts deserving further research efforts in order to connect molecular information with pathophysiological observations.

Immethridine, histamine H3-receptor (H3R) agonist, alleviated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis via inhibiting the function of dendritic cells

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease that is characterized by immune-mediated demyelination and degeneration of the central nervous system (CNS). Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is the preferential experimental rodent model for MS. Previous study demonstrated histamine H3 receptor (H3R) was an important factor in pathophysiology of EAE and immethridine was the most selective agonist of H3R. However, whether immethridine has therapeutic effect on EAE and its mechanism remained to be defined. Here we constructed EAE mouse model by immunization of MOG_35-55 peptides with complete Freund’s adjuvant, immethridine was used to treat EAE and its therapeutic effect was evaluated. The results showed that the treatment of immethridine could alleviate EAE. The percentage of Th1 and Th17 in the spleen from the treated EAE mice decreased and the surface molecules such as CD40, CD86 or MHCII on dendritic cells (DCs) were also down-regulated. To understand the effect of immethridine on DCs, bone marrow-derived DCs were prepared and the immunological functions were analyzed. The data demonstrated that immethridine could change the expression profiles of cytokines in DCs and inhibit the expression of the co-stimulatory molecules such as CD40 and CD86. Furthermore, immethridine also inhibited the antigen-presenting function of DCs and T cell differentiation induced by DCs. Signaling pathway analysis demonstrated that the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 but not ERK1/2 in DCs was inhibited after the treatment of immethridine. These data strongly suggested that immethridine could inhibit the function of DCs and indicated the therapeutic potential on EAE.

Anti-inflammatory effect of a new piperazine derivative: (4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)(1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methanone

AIMS

This study investigates the anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of new piperazine compound (LQFM182) as well as the toxicity acute in vitro.

MAIN METHODS

To evaluate the anti-nociceptive activity, the acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing test, tail flick test and formalin-induced pain test were used. The anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated using the models of paw oedema and pleurisy induced by carrageenan and some inflammatory parameters were evaluated, including cell migration, myeloperoxidase enzyme activity and the levels of TNF-α and IL-1β cytokines in pleural exudate. The acute oral systemic toxicity of LQFM182 in mice was evaluated through the neutral red uptake (nru) assay.

KEY FINDINGS

LQFM182 (50, 100 or 200 mg/kg, p.o.) decreased the number of writhings induced by acetic acid in a dose-dependent manner, and an intermediate dose (100 mg/kg, p.o.) reduced the paw licking time of animals in the second phase of the formalin test. Furthermore, LQFM182 (100 mg/kg, p.o.) reduced oedema formation at all hours of the paw oedema induced by carrageenan test and in pleurisy test reduced cell migration from the reduction of polymorphonuclear cells, myeloperoxidase enzyme activity and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α. Therefore, it was classified in GHS category 300 < LD₅₀ < 2000 mg/kg.

SIGNIFICANCE

Reduction of the TNF-α and IL-1β levels.

Further evidence for the role of histamine H3, but not H1, H2 or H4, receptors in immepip-induced inhibition of the rat cardioaccelerator sympathetic outflow

Since histamine H3 and H4 receptors are coupled to heterotrimeric Gi/o proteins, a signal transduction pathway associated with inhibition of neurotransmitter release, the present study has investigated the inhibition of the rat cardioaccelerator sympathetic outflow induced by the H3/H4 receptor agonist immepip by using antagonists for histamine H1 (ketotifen), H2 (ranitidine), H3 (thioperamide) and H4 (JNJ7777120) receptors. For this purpose, 102 male Wistar rats were pithed, artificially ventilated and prepared for either preganglionic spinal (C7-T1) stimulation of the cardioaccelerator sympathetic outflow (n=90) or i.v. bolus injections of noradrenaline (n=12). This approach resulted in frequency-dependent and dose-dependent tachycardic responses, respectively. I.v. continuous infusions of immepip (3 and 10 μg/kg min), but not of saline (0.02 ml/min), dose-dependently inhibited the sympathetically-induced tachycardic responses. Moreover, the cardiac sympatho-inhibition induced by 10 μg/kg min immepip (which failed to affect the tachycardic responses to i.v. noradrenaline) was: (i) unaltered after i.v. treatment with 1 ml/kg vehicle, 100 μg/kg ketotifen, 3000 μg/kg ranitidine, 30 μg/kg thioperamide or 300 μg/kg JNJ7777120; and (ii) abolished after 100 μg/kg thioperamide (i.v.). These doses of antagonists, which did not affect per se the sympathetically-induced tachycardic responses, were high enough to block their respective receptors. In conclusion, the cardiac sympatho-inhibition induced by 10 μg/kg.min immepip involves histamine H3 receptors, with further pharmacological evidence excluding the involvement of H1, H2 and H4 receptors.

Pharmacological evidence that histamine H3 receptors inhibit the vasodepressor responses by selective stimulation of the rat perivascular sensory CGRPergic outflow

This study has investigated whether pharmacological activation of Gi/o coupled histamine H3/H4 receptors inhibits the rat vasodepressor sensory outflow. For this purpose, 100 male Wistar rats were pithed, artificially ventilated and pretreated (i.v.) with: 25mg/kg gallamine, 2mg/kg/min hexamethonium and 20μg/kg/min methoxamine, followed by i.v. continuous infusions of physiological saline (0.02ml/min) or immepip (3.1, 10 or 31μg/kg/min; a histamine H3/H4 receptor agonist). Under these conditions, electrical stimulation (0.56-5.6Hz; 50V and 2ms) of the spinal cord (T9-T12) resulted in frequency-dependent vasodepressor responses, which were: (i) unchanged during the infusions of saline or immepip (3.1μg/kg/min); and (ii) significantly but, surprisingly, not dose-dependently inhibited by 10 and 31μg/kg/min immepip. Moreover, the sensory-inhibition by 10μg/kg/min immepip (which failed to inhibit the vasodepressor responses by i.v. bolus injections of α-CGRP; 0.1-1µg/kg) was: (i) essentially unaltered after i.v. administration of saline (1ml/kg) or blocking doses of the antagonists ketotifen (100μg/kg; H1), ranitidine (1000μg/kg; H2) or JNJ7777120 (310μg/kg; H4); and (ii) abolished after i.v. thioperamide (310µg/kg; H3). In conclusion, our results suggest that immepip-induced inhibition of the vasodepressor sensory outflow is mainly mediated by prejunctional activation of histamine H3 receptors.

Histamine H₄ receptors in the gastrointestinal tract

Histamine is a well-established mediator involved in a variety of physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms and exerts its effect through activation of four histamine receptors (H1-H₄). The histamine H₄ receptor is the newest member of this histamine receptor family, and is expressed throughout the gastrointestinal tract as well as in the liver, pancreas and bile ducts. Functional studies using a combination of selective and non-selective H₄ receptor ligands have rapidly increased our knowledge of H₄ receptor involvement in gastrointestinal processes both under physiological conditions and in models of disease. Strong evidence points towards a role for H₄ receptors in the modulation of immune-mediated responses in gut inflammation such as in colitis, ischaemia/reperfusion injury, radiation-induced enteropathy and allergic gut reactions. In addition, data have emerged implicating H₄ receptors in gastrointestinal cancerogenesis, sensory signalling, and visceral pain as well as in gastric ulceration. These studies highlight the potential of H₄ receptor targeted therapy in the treatment of various gastrointestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome and cancer.