Differential effects of sulfonylurea derivatives on vascular ATP-sensitive potassium channels

Are the cardiovascular properties of GLP-1 receptor agonists differentially modulated by sulfonylureas? Insights from post-hoc analysis of EXSCEL

AIMS

To examine whether the cardiovascular effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are attenuated by concurrent sulfonylurea (SU) therapy in a post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL).

METHODS

We investigated whether SUs, as a class or by specific type, modulated the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) on EXSCEL cardiovascular outcomes in intent-to-treat analyses of all trial participants, categorized as SU users or nonusers. Marginal structural models were used to evaluate whether there were differential EQW effects by SU category on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), depending on duration of SU use (6, 12, and 18 months). EQW-by-SU type interaction p-values and hazard ratios (95 % CIs) for EQW versus placebo for each baseline SU type (glibenclamide, gliclazide, glimepiride, other SUs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Neither SU use nor baseline SU type modified the effect of EQW on time to MACE (pinteraction = 0.88 and 0.78, respectively), nor did individual SU types, including glibenclamide (a systemically wide-acting SU).

CONCLUSIONS

SUs did not modulate the effect of EQW on cardiovascular outcomes, suggesting that SU treatment choices need not be altered to optimize the cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes.

Prostanoids contribute to regulation of inwardly rectifying K+ channels in intrarenal arterial smooth muscle cells

AIM

The inward rectifier K⁺ (Kir) channels and prostanoids are important factors in regulating vascular tone, but the relationship between them has not been well studied. We aimed to study the involvement of prostanoids in regulating Kir activity in the rat intrarenal arteries (RIRAs).

MAIN METHODS

The vascular tone of isolated RIRAs was recorded with a wire myograph. The intracellular Ca²⁺ concentrations ([Ca²⁺]_i) and Kir currents were measured with a Ca²⁺-sensitive fluorescence probe and patch clamp, respectively, in the arterial smooth muscle cell (ASMC) freshly isolated from RIRAs. Kir2.1 expression in RIRAs was assayed by Western blotting.

KEY FINDINGS

At 0.03-1.0 mM, BaCl₂ (a specific Kir blocker) concentration-dependently contracted RIRAs and elevated [Ca²⁺]_i levels. Mild stimulations with various vasoconstrictors at low concentrations significantly potentiated RIRA contraction induced by Kir closure with BaCl₂. In both the quiescent and the stimulated RIRAs, cyclooxygenase inhibition and thromboxane-prostanoid receptor (TPR) antagonism depressed BaCl₂-induced RIRA contraction, while nitric oxide (NO) synthetase inhibition and endothelium-denudation enhanced the contraction. Kir2.1 expression was significantly more abundant in smaller RIRAs. Ba²⁺-sensitive Kir currents were depressed by TPR agonist U46619 while increased by NO donor sodium nitroprusside.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present results reveal that vasoconstrictor stimulation augments RIRA contraction induced by Kir closure with Ba⁺ and indicate that prostanoid synthesis followed by TPR activation is involved in the modulation of the myocyte Kir activity. This study suggests that prostanoid synthesis and TPR may be potential targets for dysfunctions in renal blood circulation.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 acutely affects renal blood flow and urinary flow rate in spontaneously hypertensive rats despite significantly reduced renal expression of GLP-1 receptors

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) is an incretin hormone increasing postprandial insulin release. GLP‐1 also induces diuresis and natriuresis in humans and rodents. The GLP‐1 receptor is extensively expressed in the renal vascular tree in normotensive rats where acute GLP‐1 treatment leads to increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) and increased renal blood flow (RBF). In hypertensive animal models, GLP‐1 has been reported both to increase and decrease MAP. The aim of this study was to examine expression of renal GLP‐1 receptors in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and to assess the effect of acute intrarenal infusion of GLP‐1. We hypothesized that GLP‐1 would increase diuresis and natriuresis and reduce MAP in SHR. Immunohistochemical staining and in situ hybridization for the GLP‐1 receptor were used to localize GLP‐1 receptors in the kidney. Sevoflurane‐anesthetized normotensive Sprague–Dawley rats and SHR received a 20 min intrarenal infusion of GLP‐1 and changes in MAP, RBF, heart rate, dieresis, and natriuresis were measured. The vasodilatory effect of GLP‐1 was assessed in isolated interlobar arteries from normo‐ and hypertensive rats. We found no expression of GLP‐1 receptors in the kidney from SHR. However, acute intrarenal infusion of GLP‐1 increased MAP, RBF, dieresis, and natriuresis without affecting heart rate in both rat strains. These results suggest that the acute renal effects of GLP‐1 in SHR are caused either by extrarenal GLP‐1 receptors activating other mechanisms (e.g., insulin) to induce the renal changes observed or possibly by an alternative renal GLP‐1 receptor.

Gliclazide

Gliclazide is a second-generation oral hypoglycemic drug used for the treatment of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. It belongs to the sulfonylurea class that stimulates insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells by inhibiting ATP-dependent potassium channels. Gliclazide also possesses unique antioxidant properties and other beneficial hemobiological effects. This profile represents a comprehensive description of the physical properties, chemical synthesis, spectroscopic characterization (FTIR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, UV, and single-crystal X-ray), methods of analysis, pharmacological actions, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the title drug.

DPP-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Expectations, observations and perspectives

AIMS

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the greatest burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in terms of morbility, mortality and costs for individuals and societies. Therefore, its prevention is a major goal in diabetes care. Optimal treatment of hyperglycemia is certainly instrumental to CVD prevention. Optimal treatment means both establishing the most appropriate glycemic target for the given individual and selecting the medication(s) with the most favourable benefit/safety ratio. CVD safety, if not a clear CVD benefit, is certainly required for all antidiabetic agents. Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are among the classes of antidiabetic agents most recently made available for diabetes care. A major question to be addressed is the effect of these compounds on CVD. Expectations were high for their mechanism of action, which targets also post-prandial glucose and minimize hypoglycemia risk, thereby providing a sort of global glucose control, and for some potentially beneficial extra-glycemic effects. This article reviews the existing literature on this issue.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data published so far document that DPP-4 inhibitors have a wide spectrum of glycemic and extra-glycemic effects potentially reducing the risk of CVD as well as favourable effects on intermediate or surrogate CVD endpoints. These data heralded a better CVD outcome. Accordingly, pooling CVD safety data from phase 3 and 4 studies conducted with DPP-4 inhibitors suggested that their use might translate into a better CVD outcome. Data from three CVD outcome RCTs with alogliptin, saxagliptin and sitagliptin documented no harm but did not show any benefit on major CVD events. A modest but significant increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure was observed with saxagliptin and with alogliptin (only in subjects with no history of heart failure before randomization) but not with sitagliptin. A study currently in progress with linagliptin will provide further insights in the issue of CVD safety and benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

It should be considered that most alternative oral antidiabetic agents generally do not possess a better CVD risk profile than DPP-4 inhibitors and that some of them, indeed, should be used with caution because of potentially adverse effects on heart and vasculature. Overall, the selection of antidiabetic agent(s) with the most favourable CVD profile is mandatory but still challenging in diabetes care.