Galectins as potential pharmacological targets in renal injuries of diverse etiology

Modified Citrus Pectin (MCP) Confers a Renoprotective Effect on Early-Stage Nephropathy in Type-2 Diabetic Mice

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a significant global health concern with a high morbidity rate. Accumulating evidence reveals that Galectin-3 (Gal-3), a β-galactoside-binding lectin, is a biomarker in kidney diseases. Our study aimed to assess the advantageous impacts of modified citrus pectin (MCP) as an alternative therapeutic strategy for the initial and ongoing progression of DN in mice with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The animal model has been split into four groups: control group, T2DM group (mice received intraperitoneal injections of nicotinamide (NA) and streptozotocin (STZ), T2DM+MCP group (mice received 100 mg/kg/day MCP following T2DM induction), and MCP group (mice received 100 mg/kg/day). After 4 weeks, kidney weight, blood glucose level, serum kidney function tests, histopathological structure alterations, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and fibrosis parameters were determined in renal tissues. Our findings demonstrated that MCP treatment reduced blood glucose levels, renal histological damage, and restored kidney weight and kidney function tests. Additionally, MCP reduced malondialdehyde level and restored glutathione level, and catalase activity. MCP demonstrated a notable reduction in inflammatory and apoptosis mediators TNF-α, iNOS, TGF-βRII and caspase-3. Overall, MCP could alleviate renal injury in an experimental model of DN by suppressing renal oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, and apoptosis mediators.

A proteomic atlas of kidney amyloidosis provides insights into disease pathogenesis

The mechanisms of tissue damage in kidney amyloidosis are not well described. To investigate this further, we used laser microdissection-mass spectrometry to identify proteins deposited in amyloid plaques (expanded proteome) and proteins overexpressed in plaques compared to controls (plaque-specific proteome). This study encompassed 2650 cases of amyloidosis due to light chain (AL), heavy chain (AH), leukocyte chemotactic factor-2-type (ALECT2), secondary (AA), fibrinogen (AFib), apo AIV (AApoAIV), apo CII (AApoCII) and 14 normal/disease controls. We found that AFib, AA, and AApoCII have the most distinct proteomes predominantly driven by increased complement pathway proteins. Clustering of cases based on the expanded proteome identified two ALECT2 and seven AL subtypes. The main differences within the AL and ALECT2 subtypes were driven by complement proteins and, for AL only, 14-3-3 family proteins (a family of structurally similar phospho-binding proteins that regulate major cellular functions) widely implicated in kidney tissue dysfunction. The kidney AL plaque-specific proteome consisted of 24 proteins, including those implicated in kidney damage (α1 antitrypsin and heat shock protein β1). Hierarchical clustering of AL cases based on their plaque-specific proteome identified four clusters, of which one was associated with improved kidney survival and was characterized by higher overall proteomic content and 14-3-3 proteins but lower levels of light chains and most signature proteins. Thus, our results suggest that there is significant heterogeneity across and within amyloid types, driven predominantly by complement proteins, and that the plaque protein burden does not correlate with amyloid toxicity.

Unraveling How Tumor-Derived Galectins Contribute to Anti-Cancer Immunity Failure

Simple Summary

This review compiles our current knowledge of one of the main pathways activated by tumors to escape immune attack. Indeed, it integrates the current understanding of how tumor-derived circulating galectins affect the elicitation of effective anti-tumor immunity. It focuses on several relevant topics: which are the main galectins produced by tumors, how soluble galectins circulate throughout biological liquids (taking a body-settled gradient concentration into account), the conditions required for the galectins’ functions to be accomplished at the tumor and tumor-distant sites, and how the physicochemical properties of the microenvironment in each tissue determine their functions. These are no mere semantic definitions as they define which functions can be performed in said tissues instead. Finally, we discuss the promising future of galectins as targets in cancer immunotherapy and some outstanding questions in the field.

Abstract

Current data indicates that anti-tumor T cell-mediated immunity correlates with a better prognosis in cancer patients. However, it has widely been demonstrated that tumor cells negatively manage immune attack by activating several immune-suppressive mechanisms. It is, therefore, essential to fully understand how lymphocytes are activated in a tumor microenvironment and, above all, how to prevent these cells from becoming dysfunctional. Tumors produce galectins-1, -3, -7, -8, and -9 as one of the major molecular mechanisms to evade immune control of tumor development. These galectins impact different steps in the establishment of the anti-tumor immune responses. Here, we carry out a critical dissection on the mechanisms through which tumor-derived galectins can influence the production and the functionality of anti-tumor T lymphocytes. This knowledge may help us design more effective immunotherapies to treat human cancers.

Tissue-specific control of galectin-1-driven circuits during inflammatory responses

The relevance of glycan-binding protein in immune tolerance and inflammation has been well established, mainly by studies of C-type lectins, siglecs and galectins both in experimental models and patient samples. Galectins, a family of evolutionarily conserved lectins, are characterized by sequence homology in the carbohydrate-recognition domain (CRD), atypical secretion via an ER-Golgi-independent pathway and the ability to recognize β-galactoside-containing saccharides. Galectin-1 (Gal-1), a prototype member of this family displays mainly anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activities, although, similar to many cytokines and growth factors, it may also trigger paradoxical pro-inflammatory effects under certain circumstances. These dual effects could be associated to tissue-, time- or context-dependent regulation of galectin expression and function, including particular pathophysiologic settings and/or environmental conditions influencing the structure of this lectin, as well as the availability of glycosylated ligands in immune cells during the course of inflammatory responses. Here, we discuss the tissue-specific role of Gal-1 as a master regulator of inflammatory responses across different pathophysiologic settings, highlighting its potential role as a therapeutic target. Further studies designed at analyzing the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways that control Gal-1 expression and function in different tissue microenvironments may contribute to design tailored therapeutic strategies aimed at positively or negatively modulate this glycan-binding protein in pathologic inflammatory conditions.