M3 but not M4 muscarinic receptors in the rostromedial tegmental nucleus are involved in the acquisition of morphine-induced conditioned place preference

Differential effects of intra-RMTg infusions of pilocarpine or 4-DAMP on regulating depression- and anxiety-like behaviors

Depression and anxiety are associated with dysfunction of the mesolimbic dopamine system. The rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg) is predominantly composed of GABAergic neurons that exhibit dense projections and strongly inhibit mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons, proposed as a major "brake" for the system. Consequently, the RMTg may be a crucial brain region for regulating these emotions. The central cholinergic system, particularly the muscarinic receptors, plays an important regulatory role in depression and anxiety. M3 muscarinic receptors are distributed on GABAergic neurons in the RMTg, but their involvement in the regulation of depression and anxiety remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine the effects of RMTg M3 muscarinic receptors on regulating depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in adult male Wistar rats, as assessed through the forced swim, tail suspension, and elevated plus maze tests. The results showed that intra-RMTg injections of the M1/M3 muscarinic receptors agonist, pilocarpine (3, 10, and 30 μg/side), or the M3 muscarinic receptors antagonist, 4-DAMP (0.5, 1, and 2 μg/side), did not alter the immobility time in the forced swim and tail suspension tests. Additionally, pilocarpine (30 μg/side) decreased time spent in open arms and increased time in closed arms in the elevated plus maze; while 4-DAMP (1 and 2 μg/side) played the opposite role by increasing time spent in open arms and decreasing time in closed arms. These findings suggest that RMTg M3 muscarinic receptors have differential effects on regulating depression- and anxiety-like behaviors. Enhancing or inhibiting these receptors can produce anxiogenic or anxiolytic effects, but have no impact on depression-like behavior. Therefore, RMTg M3 muscarinic receptors are involved in regulating anxiety and may be a potential therapeutic target for anxiolytic drugs.

Ocular surface disease: a known yet overlooked side effect of topical glaucoma therapy

Ocular surface disease (OSD), a disorder affecting the lacrimal and meibomian glands and the corneal and conjunctival epithelium, is a well-known complication of topical glaucoma therapy. OSD can present as a new or pre-existing condition that virtually any anti-glaucoma formulation can exacerbate. As such, both glaucoma and OSD frequently coexist. Typical OSD symptoms include ocular discomfort, redness, burning, and dryness, whereas signs include periorbital and eyelid skin pigmentation, conjunctival scarring, and superficial punctate keratitis. Pressure-lowering eyedrops can cause toxic, allergic, and inflammatory reactions on the ocular surface. The latter can result from either preservatives or direct toxicity from the active molecule. Although usually mild, OSD can cause significant symptoms that lead to poor quality of life, decreased compliance to therapy, glaucoma progression, and worse visual outcomes. Given the chronic nature of glaucoma, lack of curative therapy, and subsequent lifelong treatment, addressing OSD is necessary. This manuscript aims to provide an up-to-date overview of OSD's signs, symptoms, and pathogenic mechanisms from glaucoma therapy toxicity.

Low Current Intensity Plus an Ineffective Dose of Morphine Affect Conditioning Place Preference Through Different Pathways in the Lateral Habenula

Background

The involvement of lateral habenula and the ineffective dose of morphine on reward-related learning and memory is less well-known. This study looked into the effects of electrical stimulation, GABAB receptor blockade, and a combination of both with morphine on conditioned place preference.

Materials and Methods

In this experiment, male rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (six rats in each group). A 5-day biased conditioned place preference paradigm was used for the behavioral test. The effects of electrical stimulation and phaclofen plus a low dose of morphine on the acquisition and expression phases were examined during conditioning sessions and before the test phase, respectively.

Results

The conditioning scores were reduced by antagonist injection during the acquisition phase. Interestingly, different intensities exhibited opposite effects on the acquisition phase. Conditioned place preference scores during the acquisition phase were significantly induced by 25 μA electrical stimulation, while conditioning scores were suppressed by electrical stimulation at 150 μA. Phaclofen (2 μg/rat) combined with high intensity induced aversion during the acquisition phase, while inhibiting expression. In contrast, high intensity with phaclofen (1 μg/rat) inhibited only the acquisition session. However, low intensity during the acquisition phase had an additive effect that was prevented by pretreatment with phaclofen (2 μg/rat), but this response was modified by the antagonist's low dose.

Conclusions

A behavioral technique called conditioned place preference is frequently used to evaluate learning that is related to rewards. Therefore, lateral habenula electrical stimulation and phaclofen plus morphine could affect place preference through the involvement of the reward system.

The role of NMDA glutamate receptors in the lateral habenula on morphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats

The lateral habenula (LHb) has received special attention due to its role in modulating motivated behavior, stress response, and rewarding and aversive stimuli through monoamine transmission. In the present study, the involvement of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors of the LHb in the expression and acquisition phases of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) was studied in male rats. Bilateral injections of agonist/antagonist (MK-801) of NMDA receptor were performed during the conditioning sessions of the acquisition phase. In other separate groups, drugs were also injected into the LHb before the test session during the expression phase of CPP. A 5-day CPP bias paradigm was used to study the effect of injections of NMDA and MK-801 into the LHb on morphine reward-related behavior. Different doses of NMDA plus morphine reduced the CPP score during the acquisition phase, whereas MK-801 significantly increased conditioning scores during the acquisition phase of CPP. The injection of agonists and antagonists of NMDA receptors in LHb had no significant effect on CPP scores and locomotion during the expression phase of CPP, whereas the motor activity in the acquisition phase was affected by the drugs. The reduction effect of NMDA on the CPP scores during the acquisition phase was blocked by pretreatment with MK-801. Our findings also suggest that NMDA receptors in the LHb may be involved in the acquisition phase of morphine-induced CPP.

Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists

Muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) are typical members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and exist in five subtypes from M1 to M5. Muscarinic receptor subtypes do not sufficiently differ in affinity to orthosteric antagonists or agonists; therefore, the analysis of receptor subtypes is complicated, and misinterpretations can occur. Usually, when researchers mainly specialized in CNS and peripheral functions aim to study mAChR involvement in behavior, learning, spinal locomotor networks, biological rhythms, cardiovascular physiology, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal tract functions, schizophrenia, and Parkinson's disease, they use orthosteric ligands and they do not use allosteric ligands. Moreover, they usually rely on manufacturers' claims that could be misleading. This review aimed to call the attention of researchers not deeply focused on mAChR pharmacology to this fact. Importantly, limited selective binding is not only a property of mAChRs but is a general attribute of most neurotransmitter receptors. In this review, we want to give an overview of the most common off-targets for established mAChR ligands. In this context, an important point is a mention the tremendous knowledge gap on off-targets for novel compounds compared to very well-established ligands. Therefore, we will summarize reported affinities and give an outline of strategies to investigate the subtype's function, thereby avoiding ambiguous results. Despite that, the multitargeting nature of drugs acting also on mAChR could be an advantage when treating such diseases as schizophrenia. Antipsychotics are a perfect example of a multitargeting advantage in treatment. A promising strategy is the use of allosteric ligands, although some of these ligands have also been shown to exhibit limited selectivity. Another new direction in the development of muscarinic selective ligands is functionally selective and biased agonists. The possible selective ligands, usually allosteric, will also be listed. To overcome the limited selectivity of orthosteric ligands, the recommended process is to carefully examine the presence of respective subtypes in specific tissues via knockout studies, carefully apply "specific" agonists/antagonists at appropriate concentrations and then calculate the probability of a specific subtype involvement in specific functions. This could help interested researchers aiming to study the central nervous system functions mediated by the muscarinic receptor.

Relationship between the role of muscarinic M3 receptors in morphine-induced conditioned place preference and the mesolimbic dopamine system

Opioid use disorder mainly results from functional defects in the brain reward loop, which includs the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc; consisting of shell and core, NAcS and NAcC). Reward effects contribute to opioid use disorder. RMTg M₃ receptors play a role in opioid reward by regulating the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neuron activity. Dopamine D₁ receptors expressed on GABA neurons regulate opioid reward by mediating the dopamine neuron activity in the VTA. Therefore, we investigated the effect of activating M₃ receptors by microinjecting pilocarpine into the RMTg along with activating D₁ receptors by microinjecting SKF38393 into the VTA on morphine-induced reward effect, using the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm (locomotion was also recorded). We also investigated whether the activation of M₃ receptors in the RMTg influenced dopamine release in the NAcS. The results showed that the inhibitory role of RMTg pilocarpine (60 μg/rat) infusions in morphine-induced CPP was reversed by VTA SKF38393 (4 μg/rat) infusions. Moreover, morphine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) increased dopamine release in the NAcS, which was blunted by microinjecting pilocarpine (60 μg/rat) into the RMTg. These results indicate that RMTg M₃ receptors mediate morphine-induced reward effect, which is probably related to the dopamine activity within the VTA and NAcS. The relationship between RMTg M₃ receptors and the mesolimbic dopamine system could be a potential direction for the treatment of opioid use disorder, but further verification through more comprehensive techniques is needed.

Activation of M3-AChR and IP3/Ca2+/PKC signaling pathways by pilocarpine increases glycine-induced currents in ventral horn neurons of the spinal cord

Our study aimed to determine the effects of pilocarpine and the mechanisms involving muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) on glycine receptors (GlyRs) in neurons of the spinal cord ventral horn. An enzymatic digestion combined with acute mechanical separation was applied to isolate neurons from the spinal cord ventral horn. Patch-clamp recording was then used to investigate the outcomes of pilocarpine. Our results indicate that pilocarpine increased the glycine currents in a concentration-dependent manner, which was blocked by the M₃-AChR selective antagonists 4-DAMP and J104129. Pilocarpine also enhanced the glycine currents in nominally Ca²⁺-free extracellular solution. Conversely, the enhancement of glycine currents by pilocarpine disappeared when intracellular Ca²⁺ was chelated by BAPTA. Heparin and Xe-C, which are IP₃ receptor antagonists, also totally abolished the pilocarpine effect. Furthermore, Bis-IV, a PKC inhibitor, eliminated the pilocarpine effect. Additionally, PMA, a PKC activator, mimicked the pilocarpine effect. These results indicate that pilocarpine may increase the glycine currents by activating the M₃-AChRs and IP₃/Ca²⁺/PKC pathways.