Receptor density influences ligand-induced dopamine D2L receptor homodimerization

The complex molecular pharmacology of the dopamine D2 receptor: Implications for pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine

With L-DOPA, dopamine agonists such as pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine constitute key therapeutic options for the management of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. These compounds exert their beneficial effect on motor behaviours by activating dopamine D₂-class receptors and thereby compensating for the declining dopaminergic transmission in the dorsal striatum. Despite a strong similarity in their mechanism of action, these three dopamine agonists present distinct clinical profiles, putatively underpinned by differences in their pharmacological properties. In this context, this review aims at contributing to close the gap between clinical observations and data from molecular neuropharmacology by exploring the properties of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine from both the clinical and molecular perspectives. Indeed, this review first summarizes and compares the clinical features of these three dopamine agonists, and then explores their binding profiles at the different dopamine receptor subtypes. Moreover, the signalling profiles of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine at the D₂ receptor are recapitulated, with a focus on biased signalling and the potential therapeutic implications. Overall, this review aims at providing a unifying framework of interpretation for both clinicians and fundamental pharmacologists interested in a deep understanding of the pharmacological properties of pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine.

Dopamine D2L receptor density influences the recruitment of β-arrestin2 and Gi1 induced by antiparkinsonian drugs

INTRODUCTION

Brain imaging studies have highlighted that the density of dopamine D₂ receptors markedly fluctuates across the stages of Parkinson's disease and in response to pharmacological treatment. Moreover, receptor density constitutes a molecular determinant for the signaling profile of D₂ receptor ligands. We therefore hypothesized that variations in receptor expression could influence D₂ receptor response to antiparkinsonian drugs, most notably with respect to the recruitment bias between G_i1 and β-arrestin2.

METHODS

The recruitment bias of dopamine, pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine was examined using a nanoluciferase-based biosensor for probing the interactions of the D_2L receptor with either G_i1 or β-arrestin2. The characterization of the functional selectivity of these D₂ receptor agonists was performed at two distinct D_2L receptor densities by taking advantage of a cell model carrying an inducible system that enables the overexpression of the D_2L receptor when exposed to doxycycline.

RESULTS

A high receptor density oriented the balanced signaling profile of dopamine towards a preferential recruitment of G_i1. It also moderated the marked G_i1 and β-arrestin2 biases of pramipexole and rotigotine, respectively. At variance, the G_i1 bias of ropinirole appeared as not being influenced by D_2L receptor density.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these observations highlight receptor density as a key driver of the signaling transducer recruitment triggered by antiparkinsonian agents. Moreover, given the putative beneficial properties of β-arrestin2 in promoting locomotion, this study provides molecular insights that position the arrestin-biased ligand rotigotine as a putatively more beneficial D₂ receptor agonist for the treatment of early and late Parkinson's disease.