Current developments in radiotherapy for paediatric brain tumours

Current status of proton therapy outcome for paediatric cancers of the central nervous system - Analysis of the published literature

INTRODUCTION

The most common solid tumours that develop in children are cancers of the central nervous system. Due to the increased rate of survival over the past decades, greater focus has been placed on the minimisation of long term side effects. In childhood cancer survivors, over 60% report one or more radiation-related late toxicities while half of these adverse events are graded as life-threatening or severe. Proton therapy enables high conformity with the planning target volume and a reduction in dose to areas beyond the target. Owing to the unique nature of dose delivery with proton therapy a reduction of low doses to normal tissues is achievable, and is believed to allow for a decrease in long-term treatment-related side effects. This paper aims to review the published literature around the effectiveness of proton therapy for the treatment of paediatric cancers of the central nervous system, with a focus on treatment outcomes and treatment-related toxicities.

METHODS

A search strategy utilising the Medline database was created with the intent of including all articles reporting on proton therapy, paediatric cancers, CNS tumours and treatment outcomes. The final search strategy included the following limitations: limited to humans, English, published from 2000 onwards. The final article count total was 74.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Proton therapy for the treatment of paediatric cancers of the central nervous system was found to provide survival and tumour control outcomes comparable to photon therapy. Reduced incidence of severe acute and late toxicities was also reported with the use of proton therapy. This includes reduced severity of endocrine, neurological, IQ and QoL deficits. Currently, extensive follow-up of proton patient populations still needs to be made to determine incidences of late-onset toxicities and secondary malignancies. Current evidence surrounding proton therapy use in paediatric patients supports its effectiveness and potential benefits in reducing the incidence of severe toxicities in later life.

Optimizing Craniospinal Radiotherapy Delivery in a Pediatric Patient Affected by Supratentorial PNET: A Case Report

New advances in radiation therapy for children allow increased conformability and reduced doses to non-target tissues. We report our experience in treating a 4-year-old child with craniospinal tomotherapy after surgery of the primary tumor, a supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor. The tomotherapy plan was compared with conventional craniospinal irradiation, 3D conformal radiation therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. The possible disadvantages of tomotherapy related to the radiation dose to organs at risk, treatment planning, and anesthesia should be carefully considered as the use of the technique is not suggested in a general manner, but selectively, in critical pediatric radiotherapy cases.

School performance of childhood cancer survivors: mind the teenagers!

OBJECTIVE

To assess school performance in an unselected group of childhood cancer survivors and study risk factors for impairment.

STUDY DESIGN

Rates of repeating a grade were compared for patients with cancer, their siblings, and the general population. Phone questionnaires were administered to patients about the school career of their child in remission and their siblings. Responses about cancer survivors were compared with those concerning their siblings and various registries provided by the national board of education. The primary outcome was the rate of repeating a grade.

RESULTS

A total of 148 children in remission with a mean age of 15 ± 5.3 years and a mean follow-up period since diagnosis of 6.3 ± 1.3 years were included. More patients than siblings repeated a grade (33% versus 21%; P = .02), with a mean delay since diagnosis of 2 years. Risk factors were an older age at diagnosis, attending a secondary school, low education level of parents, bone marrow transplantation, cerebral surgery, and physical sequelae. In multivariate analysis, risk for repeating was associated with low educational level of the father, attending secondary school at diagnosis, and requiring school-organized educational support on return to school.

CONCLUSION

After cancer, repeating a grade is not an exceptional occurrence, especially for teenagers; follow-up and supportive interventions before returning to school would be beneficial.