Pharmacokinetic interactions between rebamipide and selected nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rats

Canine Albumin Polymorphisms and Their Impact on Drug Plasma Protein Binding

Drug binding to plasma proteins is routinely determined during drug development. Albumin polymorphisms c.1075G>T (p.Ala359Ser) and c.1422A>T (p.Glu474Asp) were previously shown to alter plasma protein binding of a drug candidate (D01-4582, 4-[1-[3-chloro-4-[N′-(2-methylphenyl)ureido]phenylacetyl]-(4S)-fluoro-(2S)-pyrrolidine-2-yl]methoxybenzoic acid) in a colony of Beagles. Our study investigated the hypothesis that drug-protein binding in plasma from dogs with the albumin H1 (reference) allele would be greater than in plasma from dogs with the albumin H2 allele (c.1075G>T and c.1422A>T) (n = 6 per group). The plasma protein binding extent of four drugs (D01-4582, celecoxib, mycophenolic acid, and meloxicam) was evaluated using ultracentrifugation or equilibrium dialysis. Free and total drug concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. The albumin gene coding region was sequenced in 100 dogs to detect novel gene variants, and H1/H2 allele frequency was determined in a large and varied population (n = 1446 from 61 breeds and mixed-breed dogs). For meloxicam, H1 allele plasma had statistically significant higher free drug fractions (P = 0.041) than H2 allele plasma. No significant difference was identified for plasma protein binding of D01-4582, celecoxib, or mycophenolic acid. c.1075G>T and c.1422A>T were the most common single nucleotide polymorphisms in canine albumin, present concurrently in most study dogs and occasionally identified independently. Our findings suggest a potential influence of c.1075G>T and c.1422A>T on plasma protein binding. This influence should be confirmed in vivo and for additional drugs. Based on our results, albumin genotyping should be considered for canine research subjects to improve interpretation of pharmacokinetic data generated during the drug development process for humans and dogs.

Effect of IS01957, a para-coumaric acid derivative on pharmacokinetic modulation of diclofenac through oral route for augmented efficacy

Diclofenac is one of the world's largest selling nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The major concerns related to oral diclofenac therapy are gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effects for which explicitly emphasis has been given to use it at lowest effective dose for the shortest duration. On the other hand, IS01957 has been designed under the purview of anti-inflammatory drug and bioavailability enhancer. IS01957 have dual action on inflammation and nociception with acceptable safety profile. In the quest for a suitable combination with improved therapeutic efficacy and better tolerability, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction studies were performed for diclofenac with or without IS01957 in mice model. Results showed that IS01957 enhanced both anti-inflammatory effect and plasma concentration of diclofenac upon concomitant oral administration. These interesting results steered to enumerate the possible role of IS01957 towards diclofenac pharmacokinetics through a panel of mechanistic investigations: (a) BCRP dependent ATPase activity was markedly interfered by IS01957; (b) IS01957 increased the intestinal permeability of diclofenac in the single pass in-situ perfusion model; (c) IS01957 inhibited the CYP2C9 catalyzed diclofenac 4-hydroxylation in human liver microsomes. Immunoblotting results suggest that diclofenac action was improved significantly in the presence of IS01957 involving MAPK pathways. Finally acute gastric damage study showed that IS01957 in combination with diclofenac was better to improve the desired PGE₂ level as compare to alone. In nutshell, IS01957 have potential to augment the efficacy of diclofenac through pharmacokinetic modulation. Further investigations are required for dose reduction of diclofenac to combat its liabilities before going into clinical setting.

Modulation of Rat Hepatic CYP1A and 2C Activity by Honokiol and Magnolol: Differential Effects on Phenacetin and Diclofenac Pharmacokinetics In Vivo

Honokiol (2-(4-hydroxy-3-prop-2-enyl-phenyl)-4-prop-2-enyl-phenol) and magnolol (4-Allyl-2-(5-allyl-2-hydroxy-phenyl)phenol) are the major active polyphenol constituents of Magnolia officinalis (Magnoliaceae) bark, which has been widely used in traditional Chinese medicine (Houpu Tang) for the treatment of various diseases, including anxiety, stress, gastrointestinal disorders, infection, and asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the direct effects of honokiol and magnolol on hepatic CYP1A and 2C-mediated metabolism in vitro using rat liver microsomes and in vivo using the Sprague-Dawley rat model. Honokiol and magnolol inhibited in vitro CYP1A activity (probe substrate: phenacetin) more potently than CYP2C activity (probe substrate: diclofenac): The mean IC₅₀ values of honokiol for the metabolism of phenacetin and diclofenac were 8.59 μM and 44.7 μM, while those of magnolol were 19.0 μM and 47.3 μM, respectively. Notably, the systemic exposure (AUC and C_max) of phenacetin, but not of diclofenac, was markedly enhanced by the concurrent administration of intravenous honokiol or magnolol. The differential effects of the two phytochemicals on phenacetin and diclofenac in vivo pharmacokinetics could at least be partly attributed to their lower IC₅₀ values for the inhibition of phenacetin metabolism than for diclofenac metabolism. In addition, the systemic exposure, CL, and V_ss of honokiol and magnolol tended to be similar between the rat groups receiving phenacetin and diclofenac. These findings improve our understanding of CYP-mediated drug interactions with M. officinalis and its active constituents.

Histopathology and oxidative stress analysis of concomitant misoprostol and celecoxib administration

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), non-selective or selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX-1 and -2), reduce pain and inflammation associated with arthritic diseases. Celecoxib, a COX-2-selective inhibitor providing decreased gastric injury relative to non-selective NSAIDs, is commonly prescribed. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analog, supplements NSAID-inhibited prostaglandin levels. As concomitant celecoxib and misoprostol administration has been shown to intensify renal adverse effects, this article examined the influence of concomitant administration on hepatic histopathology, oxidative stress, and celecoxib concentration. On days 1 and 2, rat groups (n = 6) were gavaged twice daily (two groups with vehicle and two groups with 100 μg/kg misoprostol). From day 3 to day 9, one celecoxib dose (40 mg/kg) replaced a vehicle dose of one group and one group received celecoxib in addition to misoprostol. Livers were harvested on day 10. No hepatic abnormalities were observed denoting a lack of influence by either drug. Also no change in mean biomarker levels was detected. The changes in hepatic celecoxib concentration in the misoprostol-receiving group compared to control were not significant. Thus misoprostol does not influence hepatic celecoxib effects in terms of histopathology, oxidative stress, or celecoxib concentration level at the dosage and duration examined.

A simple high performance liquid chromatography method for determination of rebamipide in rat urine

Rebamipide is a mucoprotective agent commonly used to prevent nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointenstinal side effects [1]. Human plasma and urine analysis of rebamipide utilizing high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have been reported [2]. Recently, we reported on the plasma levels of rebamipide in presense or absence of celecoxib or diclofenac in rats [3] using a modified HPLC method of detection developed by Jeoung et al. [4]. To tailor the method towards use in urinary rebamipide extraction and analysis, the following modifications were made:•

To compensate for high concentrations of rebamipide found in urine, a new rebamipide stock solution was prepared with a final concentration of 50,000 ng/mL.

•

Rat urine calibration standards were obtained within the range of 50–1000 ng/mL and 1000–50,000 ng/mL.

•

Plasma samples were replaced with urine samples.