Species differences in the drug-drug interaction between atorvastatin and cyclosporine: In vivo study using a stable isotope-IV method in rats and dogs

Contribution analysis of metabolic tissues on systemic exposure of an active metabolite after oral administration of verapamil using a stable isotope-labeled compound

The present study illustrates the advantage of an isotope-IV study for the contribution analysis of metabolic tissues on systemic exposure of metabolites. A model parent drug, verapamil (VER), and its metabolite, norverapamil (Nor-VER), were used. This isotope-IV study used rats with and without the pre-treatment of the CYP inhibitor 1-aminobenzotriazole (ABT), was performed by the oral administration of VER (1 mg/kg) combined with the intravenous administration of stable isotope-labeled VER (VER-d6, 0.005 mg/kg). Plasma concentration profiles of both compounds and respective metabolites (Nor-VER, Nor-VER-d6) were then evaluated by LC-MSMS. VER oral availability was increased, and the systemic clearance decreased, in addition, the relative systemic exposure of Nor-VER and Nor-VER-d6 was increased by ABT pre-treatment. PK analyses revealed that, in ABT untreated rats, most Nor-VER in systemic circulation originated from the intestinal absorption process. ABT pre-treatment increased the contribution ratio to the systemic exposure of Nor-VER from the hepatic metabolism of systemically circulated VER, and decreased the contribution ratio of intestinal metabolism. These findings indicated that the isotope-IV study may be useful for considering the PK profile of metabolites.

Statins Increase the Bioavailability of Fixed-Dose Combination of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir by Inhibition of P-glycoprotein

BACKGROUND

Coadministration of statins and direct acting antiviral agents is frequently used. This study explored the effects of both atorvastatin and lovastatin on pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir "FDCSL".

METHODS

12 healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, three-phase crossover trial and were administered a single atorvastatin dose 80 mg plus tablet containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, a single lovastatin dose 40 mg plus tablet containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, or tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL alone. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to analyze plasma samples of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir metabolite "GS-331007" and their pharmacokinetic parameters were determined.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin caused a significant rise in sofosbuvir bioavailability as explained by increasing in AUC0-∞ and Cmax by 34.36% and 11.97%, respectively. In addition, AUC0-∞ and Cmax of GS-331007 were increased by 73.73% and 67.86%, respectively after atorvastatin intake. Similarly, co-administration of lovastatin with FDCSL increased the bioavailability of sofosbuvir, its metabolite (AUC0-∞ increase by 17.2%, 17.38%, respectively, and Cmax increase by 12.03%, 22.24%, respectively). However, neither atorvastatin nor lovastatin showed a change in ledipasvir bioavailability. Hepatic elimination was not affected after statin intake with FDCSL. Compared to lovastatin, atorvastatin showed significant increase in AUC0-∞ and Cmax of both sofosbuvir and its metabolite.

CONCLUSIONS

Both atorvastatin and lovastatin increased AUC of sofosbuvir and its metabolite after concurrent administration with FDCSL. Statins' P-glycoprotein inhibition is the attributed mechanism of interaction. The increase in sofosbuvir bioavailability was more pronounced after atorvastatin intake. Close monitoring is needed after co-administration of atorvastatin and FDCSL.

Liposomal Formulation for Oral Delivery of Cyclosporine A: Usefulness as a Semisolid-Dispersion System

PURPOSE

This study aims to understand the process and mechanism of oral drug absorption from liposomes and to verify the usefulness of liposomal formulation for poorly soluble drugs.

METHODS

Cyclosporine A (CsA) was used as a model drug and entrapped into Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC) liposomes. Molecular state of CsA in the liposomes was analyzed using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and polarized light microscopy (PLM). Release profiles of CsA from liposomes were observed in fasted state simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF). Oral absorption of CsA from liposomal formulations were investigated in rats.

RESULTS

PXRD and PLM analyses suggested that CsA exists in the lipid layer of liposomes as a molecular dispersed state. Although both liposomes retained CsA stably in the simple buffer, DPPC liposomes quickly released CsA within 10 min in FaSSIF due to the interaction with bile acid. In contrast, effect of bile acid was negligible in DSPC, indicating a high resistivity to membrane perturbation. Oral bioavailability of CsA from liposomal formulations were almost comparable with that from a marketed product (Neoral). However, the absorption profiles were clearly different. CsA was absorbed quickly from DPPC liposomes and Neoral, while sustained absorption profile was observed from DSPC liposomes. Further study in which ritonavir was co-entrapped in the liposomes with CsA showed the higher efficacy of ritonavir to increase oral bioavailability of CsA.

CONCLUSION

Liposomes allows the appropriate formulation design for oral delivery of poorly soluble drugs, not only to increase the extent but also to control the rate of absorption.

Immunosuppressive Drugs

Immunosuppressant is a class of medicines that inhibit or decrease the intensity of the immune response in the body. Most of these medications are used to allow the body less likely to resist a transplanted organ. In solid organ transplantation, immunosuppressive agents are needed for the activation of early-stage immunosuppression, the management of late-stage immunosuppression or for the maintenance of organ rejection. The emergence of novel agents and improvements in immunosuppression regimens after transplantation are significant factors leading to this progress. However, these drugs also increase the risk of infection, cancers and specific adverse side effects specific to each agent in patients particularly in pregnant women and fertility issues. Corona virus disease being hot topic of debate is has given positive outcome to immunosuppressive drugs however need more attention in future. Transplant centers across the world utilize multiple immunosuppression protocols; nevertheless, each patient can require an individually formulated immunosuppression regimen to manage the advantages and possible damage of treatment thus eliminating the likelihood of their primary disease recurrence.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in healthy male Egyptian volunteers

PURPOSE

Comorbid conditions of heart and liver disorders added to HCV-induced hepatic steatosis make co-administration of statins, and direct-acting antivirals is common in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction of atorvastatin and fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir "FDCSL" with rationalization to the underlying mechanism.

METHODS

A randomized, three-phase crossover study that involves 12 healthy volunteers was performed. Participants received a single-dose of atorvastatin 80 mg alone, atorvastatin 80-mg plus tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, or tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL alone. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for atorvastatin, sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and sofosbuvir metabolite "GS-331007," and their pharmacokinetics parameters were determined.

RESULTS

Compared to atorvastatin alone, the administration of FDCSL caused a significant increase in both areas under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_0-∞) and maximum plasma concentration (C_max) of atorvastatin by 65.5% and 156.0%, respectively. Also, atorvastatin caused a significant increase in the AUC_0-∞ and C_max of sofosbuvir by 32.0% and 11.0%, respectively. Similarly, AUC_0-∞ and C_max of sofosbuvir metabolite significantly increased by 84.0% and 74.0%, respectively. However, ledipasvir AUC_0-∞ showed no significant change after atorvastatin intake. The elimination rate in all drugs revealed no significant changes.

CONCLUSION

After concurrent administration of FDCSL with atorvastatin, the AUC_0-∞ of both atorvastatin and sofosbuvir were increased. Caution should be taken with close monitoring for possible side effects after co-administration of atorvastatin and FDCSL in clinical practice.